Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Scale Aircraft >> Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite
Page: [1]

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite - 5/10/2008 9:40:41 PM   
David Eichstedt


 

Posts: 11
Joined: 5/5/2008
From: Champaign, IL, USA
Status: offline
We're showing a new airplane at a couple of events just to get customers' reactions, and I thought I'd post some photos here to see what some of the RCU crowd thinks.

Horizon is looking at doing a Twin Otter. The prototype wingspan is about 84" to 86," it weighs 10 1/4 to 10 1/2 pounds, and it's powered by two E-flite Power 25s driven by two 3S, 3200 mAh Li-Pos. We flew it at SEFF last weekend, and we'll be showing it at Joe Nall next weekend.

We're still deciding if we want to go the purely electric route (E-flite brand) or offer a glow power option and make it a Hangar 9. Your input would be appreciated.

The cost does appear to be fairly high. Will customers pay between $400 and $550 for one of these? We're still not sure...

Personally, I hope you guys like it because it looks great in the air!

Thanks,

David Eichstedt
Director of Aircraft Development
Horizon Hobby

DISCLAIMER - All the photos I've posted have been pulled from other posts in other forums. I don't know who took the photos, but thanks for making them available!

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


< Message edited by David Eichstedt -- 5/10/2008 9:41:47 PM >


_____________________________

David Eichstedt, Horizon Hobby
Director of Aircraft Development - Hangar 9, E-flite, ParkZone, HobbyZone, etc.
       Post #: 1

RE: Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite - 5/11/2008 2:25:20 AM   
pdansalvish



Posts: 328
Joined: 4/10/2002
From: Lusby, MD, USA
Status: offline
Dave,

If you offer the plane I would go with the Hanger 9 route similar to the B-25. With options of either glow or Electric. Looks great.....

(in reply to David Eichstedt)
       Post #: 2

RE: Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite - 5/11/2008 3:56:57 AM   
Wayne22



Posts: 4197
Joined: 4/10/2002
From: Edmonton, AB, CANADA
Status: offline
That looks really well done. To me electric would make a lot more sense (even though I burn dinosaurs) because of it being a twin, and the relatively small nacelles, however, You would probably cover a wider market if buyers had a choice which way to go....


Now the important question: Floats???


_____________________________

All I ask is for a chance to prove that money can't make me happy......

(in reply to pdansalvish)
       Post #: 3

RE: Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite - 5/11/2008 3:07:01 PM   
rogue-RCU


 

Posts: 95
Joined: 3/31/2002
From: Broadway, VA, USA
Status: offline
Go the hanger Nine route and offer it as both. Not all of us fly electrics.

_____________________________

Robert Cline
Rockingham Area Fliers

(in reply to Wayne22)
       Post #: 4

RE: Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite - 5/11/2008 6:58:54 PM   
Kmot



Posts: 7451
Joined: 6/11/2003
From: Northridge, CA, USA
Status: offline
As unbelievable as it may seem to some, the whole world IS NOT switching to electrics!

As suggested, a glow/electric capable would be a good choice. I like this twin because it does not require the extra cost and complexity of retracts and the gear hanging down is still 'scale'.

_____________________________

Ahhh......screw it!

(in reply to rogue-RCU)
       Post #: 5

RE: Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite - 5/11/2008 7:39:32 PM   
Solstice


 

Posts: 92
Joined: 10/18/2004
From: Corvallis, OR, USA
Status: offline
I guess the answer glow vs elec/glow depends on whether the airframe gains weight when you make it capable of glow. I like glow, but I think this could be the case where an electric option is ideal. Narrow cowls mean the electric will work well.

If electric I would like to see:

Good access for battery and big enough for a variety of battery options.
Reasonable fidelity to scale
Quality in the landing gear. Tempered aluminum with fairings that don't crack when the gear flexes. Strut nose gear option (Robart).
Optional floats that are reasonably scale AND so are the attachments.
Optional 3 bladed props that are well matched for the motors (are you thinking Power32?)
Offer a relatively generic base color scheme for the model but include a high quality set of Ultracote plus graphics. You could then sell alternate schemes such as you have in your prototype.

My battery thoughts are to offer an A123 type battery option and charger. This would allow folks to purchase one battery and do a fast charge. This might reduce the final cost and overcome buyers concerns for the cost of multiple large battery packs.

I would consider offering a electric install kit that would be carefully selected to install with little fuss. Two speed controllers, two Power32 motors, props (3 bladed), separate BEC for receiver and servos.

For glow:
Same, but I would think this would require widening the nacelles to handle fuel tanks and throttle servo. I'm not sure I would like this, but it would broaden the appeal.

(in reply to Kmot)
       Post #: 6

RE: Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite - 5/11/2008 7:58:43 PM   
David Eichstedt


 

Posts: 11
Joined: 5/5/2008
From: Champaign, IL, USA
Status: offline
I just got these photos from a fellow named Jeff over on RC Groups. There are some better up-close details in these shots.

There's plenty of room in the nacelle for about an 8 ounce tank if you wanted to go the glow route.

David

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


_____________________________

David Eichstedt, Horizon Hobby
Director of Aircraft Development - Hangar 9, E-flite, ParkZone, HobbyZone, etc.

(in reply to Solstice)
       Post #: 7

RE: Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite - 5/12/2008 1:25:58 AM   
Kmot



Posts: 7451
Joined: 6/11/2003
From: Northridge, CA, USA
Status: offline
quote:

There's plenty of room in the nacelle for about an 8 ounce tank if you wanted to go the glow route.


Bingo! A pair of Saito 30's would be sweet!

_____________________________

Ahhh......screw it!

(in reply to David Eichstedt)
       Post #: 8

RE: Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite - 5/16/2008 4:10:13 AM   
David Eichstedt


 

Posts: 11
Joined: 5/5/2008
From: Champaign, IL, USA
Status: offline
This one was taken at Joe Nall today.

Thanks to www.riversiderc.com for the photo!

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


_____________________________

David Eichstedt, Horizon Hobby
Director of Aircraft Development - Hangar 9, E-flite, ParkZone, HobbyZone, etc.

(in reply to Kmot)
       Post #: 9

RE: Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite - 5/16/2008 4:33:52 PM   
N215PB



Posts: 168
Joined: 4/26/2006
From: PA, PA, USA
Status: offline
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE in HANGAR 9 GLOW..........the rc world cries out for civilain twins............how about a nice large PIPER AZTEC C, A Beech 18......a KING AIR.............. a early Cessna 310............the Twin OTTER would be great..........offer it in a all white version so it can be painted in a commuter livery!!

_____________________________

"My wife says if I buy one more airplane she's gonna leave me, Gee I'm gonna miss her"

(in reply to David Eichstedt)
       Post #: 10

RE: Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite - 5/23/2008 2:06:54 AM   
blitzskiff


 

Posts: 199
Joined: 2/7/2008
From: Annapolis , MD, USA
Status: offline
whens this coming out? also what the mrsp? I like it.

(in reply to N215PB)
       Post #: 11

RE: Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite - 6/9/2008 2:18:12 PM   
TJR1



Posts: 238
Joined: 3/20/2007
From: Mobile, AL, USA
Status: online
Just found this thread. My vote is for glow power. (I know you don't do it, but a kit would be my first preference )

_____________________________

Check your six... I might be on it!
AMA#: 741093 Member: Azalea City Model Aeronautics

(in reply to blitzskiff)
       Post #: 12

RE: Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite - 6/9/2008 8:13:53 PM   
racer-RCU


 

Posts: 477
Joined: 12/3/2002
From: charlotte, NC, USA
Status: offline
another vote for the hanger 9 version, I like the way that horizon is coming out with all of these aircraft that you hardly see modeled.

(in reply to TJR1)
       Post #: 13

RE: Twin Otter by Hangar 9 or E-flite - 6/10/2008 1:49:15 PM   
ccrebidoux