|
aeajr -> RE: QUESTION - Flying near an AMA field? (5/19/2008 10:17:45 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RTice Hello. I sent an email to the president of one of the clubs, but I haven't received a response back...and this weekend looks to be a beauty. While I will wait for a response from the president to avoid causing problems, I do want to get your feedback regarding flying near an AMA field. I posted my original email question below. Thank you for your assistance. Hi Mark: I hope you don't mind me emailing you to ask you a question or two. I got your name/email from the bc flyers website. Adjoining Fields - I am a beginner in r/c airplanes, so forgive me if this is a ridiculous question. Would I be allowed to fly a "parkflyer" plane in any of the other fields in Bush Park? Specifically, I am talking about the Hobbico Skyfly and Parkzone Slo-v. They both operate on 27mHz. I attached a map with some of the areas circled. Best Regards, Rob [IMG]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e180/RTice/scobee.jpg[/IMG] You have shown a tremendous level of responsibility by your note to the club. As a fellow flyer, I thank you for thinking of others. As many have stated, neither the AMA nor the local club can give you permission to fly anywhere. The local club, not AMA, may have some level of control as to whom can fly at their club field. But that authority comes from the landowner, not the AMA. AMA does have guidelines for the location of club fields. There is a 3 mile minimum separation. The purpose of this rule is to avoid frequency conflict between flyers on those fields. Of course if you or anyone else is flying within 3 miles of those fields, you have the potential of receiving interference from these fields and naturally you create the potential of interference. If you were flying between a couple of fields, then you can be shot down by either field. Our AMA field welcomes 27 MHz planes, so if you were flying within 1/2 mile of our field you would possibly cause the crash of one of our planes and we would possibly cause your plane to crash and neither would know the cause. Things would just start dropping out of the sky. Personally, I have several 27 MHz planes and have never had a problem, but it can happen. Likewise people buy 72 MHz systems and fly "off field". Here we have the same situation, only these 72 MHz systems have longer range capability. So now you could be flying 1-2 miles from that AMA field. You have your favorite plane in the air and someone on the AMA field turns on with a radio on your channel and down you go, and you have no idea why. And the reverse is also true. None of this has anything to do with the AMA. They just try to provide guidance as to what distances are safe. Fortunately today we have 2.4 GHz, as has been stated. So, when you decide to upgrade to a hobby grade radio system, whether you plan to fly on or off an AMA field, I would highly recommend getting a 2.4 GHz radio. I have two systems. One on 72 MHz and one on 2.4 GHz. Planes that I fly off field, such as my slope gliders, are being moved over to 2.4 GHz. As it turns out one of my slope soaring sites is a park that is about 1 mile from an AMA field. I did not know that until a few months ago. At that point I started moving over to 2.4 GHz. Over time, more and more of my planes will move over to 2.4 GHz to eliminate this frequency conflict concern.
|
|
|
|