SManMTB
Posts: 4834
Joined: 4/28/2005 From: Charlottesville,
VA, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dragoonpvw quote:
ORIGINAL: SManMTB Well the problem here is that Futaba never stated the safe temperature range. At least this is true for the FASST system used for the 3PK and 3PM. If they did PLEASE point me to it because I really like to see it. edit: spelled FASST wrong Page 10 3pk manual Receiver Vibration and Waterproofing The receiver contains precision electronic parts. Be sure to avoid vibration, shock, and temperature extremes. By the way, if you don't know what temperature extremes are then you would have to call and find out. That of course is a user responsibility. good luck Paul Thank you but, there is no definition of 'temperature extremes' and it's certainly NOT the users responsibility to find out what Futaba specifies as a safe temperature range. Have you EVER seen any consumer electronics that doesn't come with this info clearly printed in the manual!? (Except RC related products). If these 'issues' were to happen in any car of a certain brand there would be a major recall and possibly class action lawsuits LOL. Do you think Ford/GM/Toyota or whoever would get away this easy if their engine ECU over heated and failed and there were no written specs about safe operating temperatures? Not in a million years. Seriously, why is there such a reluctant attitude from Futaba with this, and why are the fanboys coming in and defending. I mean there is an issue but it would have been a non-issue if it was clearly stated that we are not supposed to run the Rx at more than xxx F. Besides this the early batch of FASST receivers (for cars) didn't have this issue.
< Message edited by SManMTB -- 7/15/2008 2:38:42 AM >
|