RE: Class II airplanes  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       



All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Pattern Flying >> Classic Pattern Flying >> RE: Class II airplanes
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Class II airplanes - 7/9/2008 3:58:08 PM   
mightyhorn


 

Posts: 48
Joined: 8/12/2002
From: Caldwell, ID, USA
Status: offline

I know that there are plans out there for Dale Root's Ascender. I contacted the company and they said for a fee, they would kit it for me.
mightyhorn

(in reply to jeide)
       Post #: 26

RE: Class II airplanes - 7/9/2008 5:15:13 PM   
RFJ



Posts: 454
Joined: 4/20/2005
From: Belfast, IRELAND
Status: offline
A very poor picture I know, but this is Dale Root's Ascender. Babcock tone filter radio and K&B Torp 35.

Plan/article published in August 1957 issue of AAM.

Ray

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to mightyhorn)
       Post #: 27

RE: Class II airplanes - 7/9/2008 6:57:03 PM   
Ed Cregger



Posts: 7736
Joined: 1/31/2002
From: Ringgold, GA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jeide

Hi Ray.Thanks. I will build it light. My Daddy Rabbit built from the original plans is 5.2 LBS ready to fly. Jim



-


That thing must really have a great power-to-weight ratio with an OS .55AX up front. At least I'm assuming it has the .55. Come to think of it, the way my Enya .45CX handles my 6.1 lb. Hail Razor, your AX, even if a .46, must really haul the mail with your model.

I've always wanted a Royal Coachman, by Sterling.


Ed Cregger


_____________________________

Artisan

"Flying models since the Fifties - I'll get the hang of this yet!!!"

(in reply to jeide)
       Post #: 28

RE: Class II airplanes - 7/9/2008 7:30:11 PM   
rainedave



Posts: 5174
Joined: 7/21/2005
From: Greensboro, NC, USA
Status: online
Well, Ed, you're welcome to a copy of the plans. PM me your email address and I'll send the file.

David

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to Ed Cregger)
       Post #: 29

RE: Class II airplanes - 7/10/2008 8:30:35 AM   
RFJ



Posts: 454
Joined: 4/20/2005
From: Belfast, IRELAND
Status: offline
quote:

My Daddy Rabbit built from the original plans is 5.2 LBS ready to fly


That's nice and light so you should have no problem with the II Perfection. Actually the point I was trying to make was to keep the wing light not so much the complete model. The increased inertia of a heavy, constant chord wing really messes up the rudder response - no ailerons on these things of course. The wing is huge ( 840 square inches) so the wing loading will be low even if you end up slightly heavy. Bill's original was 7llbs 4ozs with a Veco 61.

To try to promote the somewhat neglected Class II designs here is another - the Oily Bird.

Ray



Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to rainedave)
       Post #: 30

RE: Class II airplanes - 7/10/2008 7:48:30 PM   
UStik


 

Posts: 146
Joined: 10/28/2006
From: Augsburg, GERMANY
Status: offline
Amazing, lil' Ugly Stik. I didn't know this fuselage and tail design was not unique.

I had a rudder-and-throttle model with a similar wing/tail layout but a not such simple fuselage. By the way, it flew slowly and - as a taildragger - did decent landings all by itself.

And by the way, why had some of these Class II models fully sheeted wings? A small D-tube would be torsion proof enough, I think.

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to rainedave)
       Post #: 31

RE: Class II airplanes - 7/10/2008 8:00:58 PM   
WEDJ



Posts: 999
Joined: 2/21/2007
From: East Haddam, CT, USA
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: UStik

Amazing, lil' Ugly Stik. And by the way, why had some of these Class II models fully sheeted wings? A small D-tube would be torsion proof enough, I think.


Remember, back then it also had to be a little crash-proof.


_____________________________

Pilot dog FTW!

(in reply to UStik)
       Post #: 32

RE: Class II airplanes - 7/10/2008 8:35:48 PM   
UStik


 

Posts: 146
Joined: 10/28/2006
From: Augsburg, GERMANY
Status: offline
Didn't remember that, thanks for the hint! I only remembered crash-proof was due to the wing (and tail) attachment with rubber bands because I tested this intensely back then. It worked most times except once when the model landed through a garden door.

(in reply to WEDJ)
       Post #: 33

Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Pattern Flying >> Classic Pattern Flying >> RE: Class II airplanes
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]





Jump to:


Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Member Video Posts | RCU Video Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

© 2001 - 2007 24-7 RC, LLC, all rights reserved.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America

Kaango.com Classifieds


0.594RCU1