DarZeelon
Posts: 7083
Joined: 4/9/2003 From: Rosh-Ha'Ayin, ISRAEL Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: whodeany99 The engine has been run in as per the manual's run in procedure with 4 tanks before attempting to fly. Hoodini, That's exactly the point! Please read Bax's input here, in addition to the procedure I outlined. Bax says you must never break-in your engine at a four-cycle rich setting, as I do in my procedure... The manual, on the other hand, specifically tells you, on page 23, to run one full tank through the engine, with the needle set 180º rich from optimal flight setting... That is about ¾ of a turn rich from peak RPM! This will produce a rich, four-cycle running, which both Bax and I tell you NOT to do... This manual is wrong and quite possibly, promotes much more initial wear into the engine, than would a correct break-in. quote:
It now has around 30 tanks through it, soon it will need a rebuild . Don't make me laugh! I am totally serious here! This is one of the more unwise statements I have read in these pages... An ABC engine should last 400 hours, following a correct break-in procedure (that's 2,400 10 minute tanks!). Engines with a somewhat less durable ABN setup should theoretically not endure that long, but the Thunder Tiger .46 Pro and the Webra .50 GT engines; both ABN, do reach that 400 hour benchmark, as observed by Dr Nitro, a tester for one of the model fuel manufacturers. If your engine need a rebuild after just 1% of this projected life expectancy, you are doing something terribly wrong!
_____________________________
Dar Zeelon - ISRAEL - ddzeelon@gmail.com MVVS - Jett - Nelson - Bolly - Mejzlik
|