Replacing The .25FX with .25AX WHY?
07-14-2009, 08:30 PM
#1
Replacing The .25FX with .25AX WHY?
I just want to know why OS is replacing the OS .25FX with the .25AX. Lets think like OS management would think....
Let's charge more for it $139.98 (.25AX) versus $94.99 (.25FX)
Let's make it weigh more .25AX 12.6 oz versus .25FX 10.8 oz
Let's make it less powerful .25AX .8BHP @ 15,000 RPM .25FX .84 HP @ 18,000 RPM
Lets make it slower .25AX Practical RPM 2,500-15,000 versus .25FX 2,500-19,000 RPM
Let's take the most popular .25 engine made and put forth maximum effort to reduce its sales!!!!
OK guys what am I missing here?
OK OS guys chime in and let us know. BTW.... did your last employer have GMC in their name discription!!!
Bob Harris
Let's charge more for it $139.98 (.25AX) versus $94.99 (.25FX)
Let's make it weigh more .25AX 12.6 oz versus .25FX 10.8 oz
Let's make it less powerful .25AX .8BHP @ 15,000 RPM .25FX .84 HP @ 18,000 RPM
Lets make it slower .25AX Practical RPM 2,500-15,000 versus .25FX 2,500-19,000 RPM
Let's take the most popular .25 engine made and put forth maximum effort to reduce its sales!!!!
OK guys what am I missing here?
OK OS guys chime in and let us know. BTW.... did your last employer have GMC in their name discription!!!
Bob Harris
