RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon   
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
    Search This Thread  
 
Printable Version

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Flight Simulator Software >> RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/14/2009 6:16 AM   
r1derbike



Posts: 600
Score: 100
Joined: 10/5/2004
Last Login: 11/25/2009
From: Bella Vista, AR, USA
Status: offline
rc_sportpilot, I feel your pain. I got the new G3 and the interlink was broken on arrival. Fixed it myself so I wouldn't be without it for weeks. That was quite some time ago!

I don't know if you've contacted GP/RealFlight support yet, so that might be an option. If you have, and no resolution, you might give Jim a PM on the KE site.

Maybe he has the inside track on your question about when a fix might be forthcoming. It sounds like you fell through the cracks, unfortunately.

Charles

_____________________________

"Sometimes, I run out of altitude and airspeed...at the same time!"

Hide Signatures

(in reply to rc_sportpilot)
       Post #: 126

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/14/2009 2:12 PM   
N1EDM



Posts: 2356
Score: 116
Joined: 7/19/2002
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Brockton, MA, USA
Status: offline
Hi da Rock,

I just wrote a note asking how to get these files into RealFLight... then I found it under Files>Import>RFX.

Thanks anyway,

Bob


_____________________________

AMA 4307 Club Saito Member #61
An expert is someone who has been doing it for 15 minutes longer than you.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to da Rock)
       Post #: 127

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/14/2009 3:24 PM   
johndou


 

Posts: 206
Score: 100
Joined: 6/19/2006
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Vallejo, CA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: opjose
As you noted above, the ''minimum'' requirements are a 3D card with 32mb of ram for G3.5 AND Directx9 compliance.

In a way this is a misnomer as DIRECTX9 specifies much more than 32MB of dedicated video ram.

The original poster's video card only has 32MB of RAM, making it a MINIMUM spec card for G3, let alone G4 or G5, and his card is NOT DX9 compliant, though it does feature shader 2.0 support.

So his video configuration does not even hit the mid point between minimal to optimal configurations, making it LESS than a ''median'' setup.



If you dial everything up, yes.

However you can reduce the eye candy quite a bit and get respectable performance.

Point of fact: G5 starts out with greatly reduced video settings for those people who cannot seem to figure out how to do so.




Only in an extreme situation, such as if a user has a seriously antiquated configuration.

The exceptions ( ironically ) are those who own the processors that have turned up to have problems running the setup.exe file.



Okay, I’ll admit it ... I’m not a "computer gamer". My "general" use computer is not configured as a gaming computer. But, then according to RealFlight I don’t require a gaming computer to run their software.

Generally when I buy a piece of software and my computer meets the "minimum systems requirements" I’m able to run that software as advertised. I’m not able to do that with RealFlight.

RealFlight’s ads tell me that I have features like "depth of field, real rendering, reactive 3D objects, sensory environmental elements, backgrounds that are anything but static", or "ambient sound". I get "Simulated shadows ... Reflecting surfaces ... and colors with breathtaking accuracy." Yet, I don’t have all of these features with a minimum requirements computer.

The only other experience I have in "gaming" is with MicroSoft's Flight Simulator. With that game I'm able to run the software "as advertised" with the minimum requirements. Like I said, I’m not a gamer. But, is that the norm for computer games? Am I not able to use the game "as advertised" with the minimum requirements? With other types of software I am.


quote:

ORIGINAL: opjose
The exceptions ( ironically ) are those who own the processors that have turned up to have problems running the setup.exe file.




Do you have a reference to that? Where could someone verify that information if they wanted to and find out just which processors are in question?

Hide Signatures

(in reply to opjose)
       Post #: 128

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/14/2009 6:24 PM   
opjose



Posts: 8987
Score: 197
Joined: 11/26/2005
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Poolesville, MD, USA
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: johndou

Okay, I’ll admit it ... I’m not a ''computer gamer''. My ''general'' use computer is not configured as a gaming computer. But, then according to RealFlight I don’t require a gaming computer to run their software.



That is correct.

You do not need a computer with high end "gaming" specifications to run their software.

However you DO need DirectX9 compliance, as with ALL 3D programs and games.


quote:

ORIGINAL: johndou

Generally when I buy a piece of software and my computer meets the ''minimum systems requirements'' I’m able to run that software as advertised. I’m not able to do that with RealFlight.



Only if you've overlooked something, that made you believe your system meets the minimums.

DirectX9 compliance, enough memory and a suitable processor and you're good to go.

The problem is with the first item.


Video card vendors often pull a fast one on the consumer so to speak.

Most people walk into a store and declare "I don't play games".... without thinking.

So the video card manufacturers cater to this.

They take their older chipsets, dress them up a bit, and sell them to this crowd.

Along comes a 3D product that requires DirectX compliancy, and the user BELIEVES their machine is compliant because DirectX is installed.

However that may NOT be the case.

In the example given which started your quiery, the person is using a video system that was developed for DX7, and later enhanced for DX8. When DX9 came along, the manufacturer took their older chips and sold them to new buyers as a low end/low cost device.

So if he runs older software, or normal work related programs he may never notice or care about this difference...

Along comes a 3D game, etc... and the buyer is complaining about the software developer, when in point of fact, they were unfortunately not given all the details about their purchase.

I've been in stores and seen this happen over and over again. I've even seen the salespeople try very hard to explain this to a laptop or desktop computer purchaser. Ultimately the purchaser tries to cut corners, and refuses to pay the extra 40-70.00 dollars needed to get something better suited to their computers.

They go home, never realizing that they've introduced a BIG bottleneck on their own computer. But it is ultimately their OWN mistake. On laptops, it's a BIG mistake since it cannot be corrected later.

quote:

ORIGINAL: johndou

RealFlight’s ads tell me that I have features like ''depth of field, real rendering, reactive 3D objects, sensory environmental elements, backgrounds that are anything but static'', or ''ambient sound''. I get ''Simulated shadows ... Reflecting surfaces ... and colors with breathtaking accuracy.'' Yet, I don’t have all of these features with a minimum requirements computer.



Why would you expect to?

If you don't have the hardware to support something, there is nothing the software can do about it.

If the software attempts to do all of these things WITHOUT hardware, the program would turn into a slide show....

This is true of ANY and ALL 3D software.

Some of those features you listed, which are not dependant upon your video hardware, do work even on minimum spec machines. You just will not see them in the same numbers.

For example on a high end machine, the computer can instruct the video card to render tens of thousands of trees, dissappearing into the distance.

If your video card is not up to it, you may only see a few trees close by.

This is all done to maintain that "backward compatibility" that people scream about.


quote:

ORIGINAL: johndou

The only other experience I have in ''gaming'' is with MicroSoft's Flight Simulator. With that game I'm able to run the software ''as advertised'' with the minimum requirements.



Actually, sorry to say, but that is COMPLETELY untrue.

Try loading up Flightsim 9 or Flightsim X, and all of those features which you named above, that Flightsim9 and Flightsim X also uses, WILL BE DISABLED.

This in order to get the sim to run.

What is happening, is that you've missed that this is the case.

As you said you are not a "gamer", which is why you are unfamiliar with all of this.


quote:

ORIGINAL: johndou

But, is that the norm for computer games?



No you are mistaken, the "norm" is DIRECTX compliance.

Next time you are in a store, pick up any "GAME" box and look at the requirements.

DirectX 9 ( and in some cases DirectX 10 ) compliance is MANDATORY for all 3D games written in the last four years.

There are a few exceptions that may also cite Opengl 2.x or above compliancy as well which ads another complicating wrinkle.


quote:

ORIGINAL: johndou

Am I not able to use the game ''as advertised'' with the minimum requirements?


Sure you are, you just will not get all of the stuff you would see with the PROPER hardware.

quote:

ORIGINAL: johndou

With other types of software I am.



Not true. That is a misconception. Other 3D software does exactly the same thing.

Nor can you include 2D software and games into this mix, as flight sims are not 2D programs.

BTW: Aerofly Deluxe now has requirements that exceed those of Realflight. Go figure.

quote:

ORIGINAL: johndou

Do you have a reference to that? Where could someone verify that information if they wanted to and find out just which processors are in question?


Sure, it's a sticky on the Knifeedge site.

Look at the posting at the top of the G5 subforum which talks about the installation issue.



_____________________________

- Nitroplanes forum host. -

Hide Signatures

(in reply to johndou)
       Post #: 129

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/14/2009 9:55 PM   
dbcisco



Posts: 310
Score: 101
Joined: 9/23/2007
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Lansdale, PA, USA
Status: offline
Lots of people having problems with realflight G4.5 and I have little hope that G5 will be a better product.
Any interested person can go to the KE forums and see that there are a quite a lot of computers and video cards that meet the advertised minimum requirements that have problems running or not running at all.
Despite the two or three people who claim that everybody is lying about their problems with realflight or are morons who can't read Realflight has a lot more issues than the average computer. I have rarely had a computer game in the last 30 years that didn't work on the listed minimum requirements.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to opjose)
       Post #: 130

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/14/2009 10:04 PM   
opjose



Posts: 8987
Score: 197
Joined: 11/26/2005
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Poolesville, MD, USA
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: dbcisco

go to the KE forums and see that there are a quite a lot of computers and video cards that meet the advertised minimum requirements that have problems running or not running at all.



If anyone goes to the G5 threads, they will see that most of the discussions are about setting up routers and modems.

Citing sporatic posts on the KE forums is also disingenuous, as there is no point of reference.

Even here, you can find a myriad of posts about problems with other sims, put up by people that may be having problems not directly related to those sims as well.

Using the same logic, were we to go by the sheer volume of posts here for other sims, it may appear to someone that Aerofly Deluxe is a highly problematic program, or FSOne, etc. using the same touchstone.

Yet both work fine as well.



quote:

ORIGINAL: dbcisco

I have rarely had a computer game in the last 30 years that didn't work on the listed minimum requirements.



Though that has no bearing on a product you self-admittedly don't even own yet, as the original topic was G5.

And btw it works just fine on the minimums.





_____________________________

- Nitroplanes forum host. -

Hide Signatures

(in reply to dbcisco)
       Post #: 131

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/14/2009 10:07 PM   
erik58


 

Posts: 136
Score: 100
Joined: 1/11/2003
Last Login: 3/9/2010
From: easthaven, CT, USA
Status: offline
hello- I just found out about the g5 will it work on the early g3? thanks Erik

_____________________________

erik58

Hide Signatures

(in reply to opjose)
       Post #: 132

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/14/2009 10:11 PM   
opjose



Posts: 8987
Score: 197
Joined: 11/26/2005
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Poolesville, MD, USA
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: erik58

hello- I just found out about the g5 will it work on the early g3? thanks Erik


Yes if you own G3, you can purchase the upgrade to G5.

Please refer to the Realflight web page for more details on the upgrade options.



_____________________________

- Nitroplanes forum host. -

Hide Signatures

(in reply to erik58)
       Post #: 133

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/14/2009 10:57 PM   
Raycamaro



Posts: 123
Score: 100
Joined: 8/13/2007
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Evansville, IN, USA
Status: offline
Is there anywhere besides Knifedge where I can go to download some of Horizon Hobby planes and helis?

Hide Signatures

(in reply to opjose)
       Post #: 134

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 12:15 AM   
jzrf6c


 

Posts: 329
Score: 100
Joined: 6/23/2005
Last Login: 3/10/2010
From: Shelby Township, MI, USA
Status: offline
Say what you want about the ramblings in this thread but I saved the cost of a useless update. I learn, here in this thread, that the G5 wont run on most older AMD cpus.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Raycamaro)
       Post #: 135

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 12:58 AM   
dbcisco



Posts: 310
Score: 101
Joined: 9/23/2007
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Lansdale, PA, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: opjose
And btw it works just fine on the minimums.


It does not run on some older CPUs THAT MEET THE MIN. REQ.

< Message edited by dbcisco -- 11/15/2009 11:23 PM >


Hide Signatures

(in reply to opjose)
       Post #: 136

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 1:03 AM   
opjose



Posts: 8987
Score: 197
Joined: 11/26/2005
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Poolesville, MD, USA
Status: online
An interesting response from someone that doesn't even own the software.... to someone who has tested it on many difference machines ( me ), that include laptops and minimum requirement computers.

The veracity of the comment is self evident.



< Message edited by opjose -- 11/15/2009 1:29 AM >


_____________________________

- Nitroplanes forum host. -

Hide Signatures

(in reply to dbcisco)
       Post #: 137

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 1:05 AM   
opjose



Posts: 8987
Score: 197
Joined: 11/26/2005
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Poolesville, MD, USA
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: jzrf6c

Say what you want about the ramblings in this thread but I saved the cost of a useless update. I learn, here in this thread, that the G5 wont run on most older AMD cpus.


The software will run on older CPU's that are somewhat beyond the minimum recommended specifications.

The problem lies with the installer software.

However as pointed out by dbcisco, the affected CPU's are quite old.



_____________________________

- Nitroplanes forum host. -

Hide Signatures

(in reply to jzrf6c)
       Post #: 138

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 1:31 AM   
opjose



Posts: 8987
Score: 197
Joined: 11/26/2005
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Poolesville, MD, USA
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raycamaro

Is there anywhere besides Knifedge where I can go to download some of Horizon Hobby planes and helis?


There are a couple of sites that host a few planes, but for the most part most user created planes are available at the KnifeEdge site.

Normally if you cannot find it there, no one has made it yet.


_____________________________

- Nitroplanes forum host. -

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Raycamaro)
       Post #: 139

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 2:05 AM   
bob21


 

Posts: 57
Score: 100
Joined: 2/2/2003
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: lansing, MI, USA
Status: offline
as stated the problems lie in port forwarding, wich is not hard to do at all but i have done everything to the tee and tried other things too and still no multi player and this is the main reason for the game shooting each other in the sky what a idea. but i sent mine back after weeks of trying to configure port forwarding and got my money back thank you tower. so buyer beware g3.5 i have no issues in multi player g5 major sucks if i had 10 bucks a hour for the time i put inot trying to get multi player to work i would have about two hundred dollars no exageration either...

Hide Signatures

(in reply to opjose)
       Post #: 140

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 2:12 AM   
opjose



Posts: 8987
Score: 197
Joined: 11/26/2005
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Poolesville, MD, USA
Status: online
Check out the KE threads.

We've been able to help out most people with port forwarding issues. Almost batting a thousand on this...

e.g. Kmot's thread, where he was battling with this.

He was in the same boat as you.


It turned out that while he had EVERYTHING correctly set up, a simple undocumented check mark in his router's configuration page prevented MP from connecting. Once ticked everything worked.


There is even a sticky up now showing how to configure your router/modem for many different brands.

Port forwarding is normaly trivial to set up, but small differences from the myriad of router manufacturers complicates things for a few people.


_____________________________

- Nitroplanes forum host. -

Hide Signatures

(in reply to bob21)
       Post #: 141

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 3:16 AM   
bob21


 

Posts: 57
Score: 100
Joined: 2/2/2003
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: lansing, MI, USA
Status: offline
you do not read to well,,, i sent it back i folled those forum also and posted question there too

Hide Signatures

(in reply to opjose)
       Post #: 142

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 6:46 AM   
opjose



Posts: 8987
Score: 197
Joined: 11/26/2005
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Poolesville, MD, USA
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: bob21

you do not read to well,,, i sent it back i folled those forum also and posted question there too


Actually I read and write well and somewhat legibly, thank you, and yes I know you returned it.

If you had a problem with Multiplayer it was most likely an issue with your router or it's configuration.

Unfortunately all of these devices are fairly different, so in some cases it is difficult for people to get help via a forum, in setting up port forwarding. However that said, once the router is set up MP works well, and if you know your router, setting up MP is almost trivial.

I saw your posts, and again I'd refer you to Kmot's identical predicament on the KE forums.

A simple check mark on his router's configuration page made all the difference, and no one could figure it out, because it was not documented anywhere in the router manual or config page.

He too "tried everything", and in point of fact he had everything right!... except one small mark.

In your case there was probably something similiar at work.



_____________________________

- Nitroplanes forum host. -

Hide Signatures

(in reply to bob21)
       Post #: 143

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 6:51 AM   
r1derbike



Posts: 600
Score: 100
Joined: 10/5/2004
Last Login: 11/25/2009
From: Bella Vista, AR, USA
Status: offline
5 machines. 1 netbook, 1 notebook, 3 desktops, 2 Intel processors and 3 AMD processors. 3 video cards and 2 integrated video processors.

G5 runs on all of them.

I thought a success story might be in order, as nobody usually posts when things are going smoothly.

Charles

_____________________________

"Sometimes, I run out of altitude and airspeed...at the same time!"

Hide Signatures

(in reply to bob21)
       Post #: 144

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 4:24 PM   
RACE 66


 

Posts: 96
Score: 110
Joined: 6/12/2005
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: BELLINGHAM, WA, USA
Status: offline
Well I took the "hook" on the G5 series. As I am an "old schooler" I purchased my first flight sim from Dave Brown in 91' and still have it, "floppy" and all. Always wanted to upgrade, and no I have NOT been flyin' the DB series all these years.
Last year with the purchase of a new computer, I took the specs (at that time) for Real Flight believe it was 4.5 and upgraded the computer to those spec's (video card?) anyway, it was about 70 or 80 bucks. So, as I await the G5 series and see what comes about.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to r1derbike)
       Post #: 145

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 5:03 PM   
jzrf6c


 

Posts: 329
Score: 100
Joined: 6/23/2005
Last Login: 3/10/2010
From: Shelby Township, MI, USA
Status: offline
Just for the record....below is from NE.

We have just discovered a compatibility issue between G5 and older CPU models. It manifests as a crash in setup.exe (not setup2.exe/Installer2) as soon as the G5 disk is inserted into the drive. Note that it appears similar to the DEP-related issue where Installer2 crashes immediately after inserting the G5 disk, but it is a completely different problem.

We are working on a fix. In the meantime there is no workaround except installing on a different computer.

The following CPUs are affected:
Intel Pentium III or older
AMD Athlon (650 MHz – 1400 MHz)
AMD Athlon XP (1500+ – 3200+)
AMD Duron (600 MHz – 1800 MHz)
AMD Sempron (2000+ – 3300+)
AMD Athlon MP (1000 MHz – 3000+)
AMD Geode NX (667 MHz – 2200 MHz)

I don't know to many people that change CPUs like underware. "older CPUs" is in the mind of the beholder.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to RACE 66)
       Post #: 146

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 5:32 PM   
johndou


 

Posts: 206
Score: 100
Joined: 6/19/2006
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Vallejo, CA, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: opjose
quote:

ORIGINAL: johndou

RealFlight’s ads tell me that I have features like ''depth of field, real rendering, reactive 3D objects, sensory environmental elements, backgrounds that are anything but static'', or ''ambient sound''. I get ''Simulated shadows ... Reflecting surfaces ... and colors with breathtaking accuracy.'' Yet, I don’t have all of these features with a minimum requirements computer.



Why would you expect to?



Yes, of course, why would I expect to have all of the advertised features with a minimum requirements machine? Maybe because I have a minimum requirements machine and these are the features that are listed to run - with a minimum requirements machine. No where in any of the literature, advertisements, packaging, etc. does it state that these feature require anything more then the minimum requirements. Yet, according to you they do?




quote:

ORIGINAL: opjose
quote:

ORIGINAL: johndou

The only other experience I have in ''gaming'' is with MicroSoft's Flight Simulator. With that game I'm able to run the software ''as advertised'' with the minimum requirements.



Actually, sorry to say, but that is COMPLETELY untrue.

Try loading up Flightsim 9 or Flightsim X, and all of those features which you named above, that Flightsim9 and Flightsim X also uses, WILL BE DISABLED.

This in order to get the sim to run.

What is happening, is that you've missed that this is the case.

As you said you are not a ''gamer'', which is why you are unfamiliar with all of this.



Actually, sorry to say, I believe you’re COMPLETELY wrong.

I have - essentially - a minimum requirements machine with FSX loaded on it and none of the advertised features of that game ARE DISABLED.

Yet, as you’ve pointed out, several of the advertised features are DISABLED on the same machine running RealFlight.

quote:

ORIGINAL: opjose
quote:

ORIGINAL: johndou

But, is that the norm for computer games?



No you are mistaken, the ''norm'' is DIRECTX compliance.

Next time you are in a store, pick up any ''GAME'' box and look at the requirements.

DirectX 9 ( and in some cases DirectX 10 ) compliance is MANDATORY for all 3D games written in the last four years.

There are a few exceptions that may also cite Opengl 2.x or above compliancy as well which ads another complicating wrinkle.


Okay, I get it, DIRECTX is the “norm” for computer 3D games. But, of course that wasn’t the question I asked. I asked if it was the norm for computer games to be advertised with features that are, as you say, disabled, for users with minimum requirements machines?

RealFlight is the only game where I’ve seen anything other then minimum requirements listed. All of the computer games I’m aware of only list minimum requirements, there’s no mention of “optimal” requirements on their packaging or advertisements. And the games run as advertised on those minimums.

quote:

ORIGINAL: opjose
quote:

ORIGINAL: johndou

Am I not able to use the game ''as advertised'' with the minimum requirements?


Sure you are, you just will not get all of the stuff you would see with the PROPER hardware.


Well, you’ve got me again ... I thought I’d asked about minimum requirements and how that translates to getting the “game” as advertised. Now you’re telling me that not only do I have to have the “minimum” hardware requirements but I also have to have the “PROPER” hardware. Is that listed somewhere? What is the “PROPER” hardware to have? Do I have to have an HP instead of a Dell? Or do I need an Nvidia card instead of a GeForce? Or do I need to make sure that my high end card is overclocked and choose anti-aliasing settings”.

Based on comments I’ve read on the KE site I need a “high end video card” - “particularly if I intend to enable ‘Depth of Field’ ...” That seems to contradict the advertised features and the minimum requirements of the game. But then you said earlier that I actually need a “median” requirements machine - something inbetween optimal and minimum. Didn’t you?

All of this is just so confusing. Maybe I’ll just be better off with Aerofly? At least they tell what I really need to run their software.









Hide Signatures

(in reply to opjose)
       Post #: 147

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 5:48 PM   
bob21


 

Posts: 57
Score: 100
Joined: 2/2/2003
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: lansing, MI, USA
Status: offline
i wish it was that simple i have looked at every mark and nothing changed like i said i spent about 20 hours on this and nothing i have numerous games for the cp and they have noissues in multi player. i looked in knife edge forums for help also. point is WE SHOULD NOT HAVE TO WORK THIS HARD TO GET INTO MULTI PLAYER.. i have a common lynks router new last year...

Hide Signatures

(in reply to opjose)
       Post #: 148

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 5:58 PM   
dbcisco



Posts: 310
Score: 101
Joined: 9/23/2007
Last Login: 3/12/2010
From: Lansdale, PA, USA
Status: offline
This is not off topic. It points to the validity of any opinions posted here. A decision to buy any product is begun with a quest for information. That is impossible when the info is filtered based on vendor pressure. Is anyone here a "shill"? It doesn't matter. What matters is that anyone posting negative comments or experience is attacked, deleted and threatened with "actions". Meanwhile, fanatics of RF are allowed to bash, slander and insult those bringing negative comments. With such biased information, a wise decision is impossible. My bet is that this post will be deleted too.

opjose posted the following on KE forums.
"dbcisco is at it again attempting to defame KE and G5 over at RCU.

I would ask that anyone who is running G5 after an upgrade and is also a member there, post your experience with the product on that board in the Simulator and Beginners forum threads about G5.

He is trying very hard to make it seem that the software is bug filled and problematic, in an attempt to dissuade purchasers and potential buyers.

Every thread where someone asks a question about Realflight, he finds and jumps into to attempt to cast a bad light."

The owner of KE (C.McVey) resopnded with this:
"I will make sure the proper people see this. I just went and read the thread."

Now I know why certain people can post nasty stuff and others get deleted, banned etc.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to johndou)
       Post #: 149

RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon - 11/15/2009 6:50 PM   
bob21


 

Posts: 57
Score: 100
Joined: 2/2/2003
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: lansing, MI, USA
Status: offline
well its true it is a problem

Hide Signatures

(in reply to dbcisco)
       Post #: 150

Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9   next >   >>  
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Flight Simulator Software >> RE: Realflight G5Coming Soon
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9   next >   >>  





Jump to:


 
Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

© 2001 - 2007 24-7 RC, LLC, all rights reserved.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America


1.563RCU1