|
dolanosa -> Buil a mini F3A / practice machine. Need input from scratch builders. (10/13/2009 8:24 PM)
|
Hello everyone, As winter is coming upon us early this year (Chicago is freezing right now), I'm thinking of building my own Mini F3A pattern plane to build along with my full on pattern aircraft. I have scratch built airplanes a long time ago and I'm planning to get back into the hobby. There are several planes out there right noe that meet the criteria for mini-F3A but I want to build my own for several reasons. I currently have the plane in 3D CAD format, the way I want it to look as well as the technical, aerodynamic aspects. Unfortunately, the end product actually looks like a smaller version of the new F3A designs out there, wide body, deep fuselage, thick trailing edges, etc. I'll post some pictures later as I go. So let's say the actual fuse, wings, stabs, etc are all planned out. I want to build it out of wood as light as possible and possibly getting the second "kit" laser cut once the first one is flight tested and deemed neutral in all aspects of flight. Here is my dilema and I have to balance weight, strength (not meant to survive a crash but able to withstand snaps), and budget. As you guys well know, there are several ways to make built up planes. There is the 'normal' pattern plane method of building a box and gluing formers where needed, then sheeting the plane with 1/16" balsa. I have built planes this way before and it has served me. I believe this is an evolution to the old pattern 'slab' method where 1/4" slabs of balsa were used to make the sides and carved blocks to make the irregular shapes such as the nose or the leading edges of the vertical stab. There is also the tried and true stringer and former (bulkhead) method that is an older technique but make make for a heavier plane. I think that this may be cheaper too since I don't have to buy a ton of thin balsa sheets but thicker sheets that I can make stringers. Now, as you guys also know, with the advent of 3D (flying) design, many things have changed. I have seen several models that have a very open box structure without sheeting. I was looking at my buddy's 40% and it was very open barely any sheeting except to make the upper deck shape. Other than that and the part in front of the cockpit, no sheeting. I have also seen examples of this in the smaller 3D aircraft. This looks promising as it will help by having less weight, I guess. Ok. This is where you guys can help me a lot as many of you are avid builders. What are the pros and cons for each design? Please note that this plane will not be designed for 3D or very high G maneuvers like blenders and such. It's meant to perform its best in pattern maneuvers so lighter will be better and will help in downline maneuvers as well. - I want to keep the weight as light as possible to maximize the available engine power.
- I also want to embrace the latest building techniques to advance my knowledge.
- Most of all, I want to save money since that's the resource that's very limited right now.
- What about built up wing vs foam with balsa sheet?
- What about a 1 or 2 piece wing?
Here are some design specs: Screen shots by tonight. Motor to use: Non-piped Rossi 40 Span: 56" Length: 58" Width: 4 - 4.5" Total height: 12" (canopy height is around 8") Weight: As low as I can get. Thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate this. butch
|
|
|
|