RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz    Gallery
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
    Search This Thread  
 
Printable Version

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Warbirds and Warplanes >> RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz
Page: <<   < prev  268 269 [270] 271 272 273 274 275 276 277   next >   >>  

Tower Hobbies Get Coupon Codes Brands  
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/6/2012 2:41 PM   
perttime



Posts: 1286
Score: 125
Joined: 12/30/2005
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Tampere, FINLAND
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnnyS

Messerschmitt Bf 109.
You got it, JohnnyS. Your turn.

I thought I might get in a few more quotes from Messerschmitt 109 - myths, facts and the view from the cockpit.


Hide Signatures

(in reply to JohnnyS)
       Post #: 6726

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/6/2012 5:43 PM   
Mein Duff



Posts: 875
Score: 105
Joined: 5/22/2009
Last Login: 5/17/2013
From: Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Status: offline
Hurricane ?

_____________________________

Fleet Brotherhood #5
Half A Wing, Three Engines and A Prayer

Hide Signatures

(in reply to JohnnyS)
       Post #: 6727

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/6/2012 9:02 PM   
JohnnyS


 

Posts: 220
Score: 100
Joined: 2/12/2006
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Status: offline


New aircraft:

1. It used a radial engine in a pusher configuration, with a 6 bladed propeller.

2. It was the only aircraft of its specific configuration to be ordered in quantity production anywhere in the world during WWII.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to perttime)
       Post #: 6728

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/7/2012 9:16 PM   
Ernie P.


 

Posts: 2156
Score: 100
Joined: 9/29/2007
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Bealeton, VA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mein Duff

I should have been more specific about the time frame... WWII..
Mobyal ..You Got It !!
Saburo Sakai it was...on the last day of WWII he and another pilot shared credit for the last B-29 Brought down..
I wasn't aware of the Black Widow story...

Mobyal it's your turn.. Please post us a Question.




Mein Duff;

Since we're in a waiting mode, I'd like to respectfully disagree with your last answer. I knew what answer you wanted, but disagreed at the time. I finally had the time to chase down some cooborating data. Yes, Sakai did shoot down a B-29 the day before the Japanese Emperor announced the Japanese surrender on August 15th. However, the war did not officially end until September 2nd, when the actual surrender documents were signed. And other B-29s were shot down between the two dates. And I believe the last B-29 to be shot down was the "Hog Wild". It was shot down by Russian pilots, over North Korea. It is an interesting story. Thanks; Ernie P.


The Japanese Instrument of Surrender was the written agreement that enabled the Surrender of Japan, marking the end of World War II. It was signed by representatives from the Empire of Japan, the United States of America, the Republic of China, the United Kingdom, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the Commonwealth of Australia, the Dominion of Canada, the Provisional Government of the French Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, and the Dominion of New Zealand on the deck of the USS Missouri in Tokyo Bay on September 2, 1945.

The date is sometimes known as Victory over Japan Day, although that designation is more frequently used to refer to the date of Emperor Hirohito's Gyokuon-hōsō (Imperial Rescript of Surrender), the radio broadcast announcement of the acceptance of the terms of the Potsdam Declaration at noon Japan standard time on August 15.


-background data
My dad, Eugene Harwood, was the navigator of the other B-29 Hog Wild (Z-28, 44-70136) out of Saipan which had been shot down at the end of WWII (during Armistice) not by the Japanese but by the Russians while on a mercy mission to drop supplies at a POW camp in North Korea. The Hog Wild was the last B-29 shot down during WWII and the first B-29 shot down during the Cold War. The crew did not know if they would live or die. It caused an international incident in which General MacArthur had to intervene to get the crew released from the POW camp where they were delivering the supplies to. My dad is now deceased but we have coauthored a book of his life and specifically this incident in a book from his words entitled “Honorable Heart” by Eugene Harwood and Barb Harwood Hartwig. It details his duties as a navigator on the B-29 and uses a lot of his personal photos from the War (two are enclosed) including photos of the POW camp and some of the POW prisoners. It is available on www.amazon.com and www.barnesandnoble.com The copilot’s son, Terry Rainey, has also written an article in the Cold War Times, November 2009, about the Hog Wild (online at http://www.coldwar.org/text_files/ColdwartimesNov2009.pdf (page 28, the Hog Wild story). A friend, Dwight Rider, is now writing an extensively researched and more detailed book about the downing of the Hog Wild.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Mein Duff)
       Post #: 6729

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/7/2012 10:06 PM   
JohnnyS


 

Posts: 220
Score: 100
Joined: 2/12/2006
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Status: offline
Ernie P.,

That's a really fascinating story: Thanks very much!!

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Ernie P.)
       Post #: 6730

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/7/2012 11:05 PM   
Mein Duff



Posts: 875
Score: 105
Joined: 5/22/2009
Last Login: 5/17/2013
From: Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Status: offline
Thanks for the clarification Ernie...My appologies for the misleading quiz answer.

_____________________________

Fleet Brotherhood #5
Half A Wing, Three Engines and A Prayer

Hide Signatures

(in reply to JohnnyS)
       Post #: 6731

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/8/2012 12:17 AM   
Ernie P.


 

Posts: 2156
Score: 100
Joined: 9/29/2007
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Bealeton, VA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mein Duff

Thanks for the clarification Ernie...My appologies for the misleading quiz answer.


Not a problem, Mein Duff. It isn't as though I've never gotten it wrong. Sometimes, we can all learn from the questions. And somewhere back in the recesses of my overloaded brain, I remember something about some rogue Japanese pilots who shot up (I don't think they actually shot any down) some US aircraft after August 15th. They were simply upset at seeing US aircraft fly over Japan without being challenged. There was nearly a resumption of active bombing activities. Eventually, all Japanese aircraft had the props removed to prevent the pilots from going at it on their own. Thanks; Ernie P.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Mein Duff)
       Post #: 6732

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/8/2012 12:21 AM   
Ernie P.


 

Posts: 2156
Score: 100
Joined: 9/29/2007
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Bealeton, VA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnnyS



New aircraft:

1. It used a radial engine in a pusher configuration, with a 6 bladed propeller.

2. It was the only aircraft of its specific configuration to be ordered in quantity production anywhere in the world during WWII.


Well, let's get the Shinden out of the way. Thanks; Ernie P.


The Kyūshū J7W1 Shinden (震電, "Magnificent Lightning") fighter was a World War II Japanese propeller-driven aircraft prototype that was built in a canard design. The wings were attached to the tail section and stabilizers were on the front. The propeller was also in the rear, in a pusher configuration.

Developed by the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) as a short-range, land-based interceptor, the J7W was a response to B-29 Superfortress raids on the Japanese home islands. For interception missions, the J7W was to be armed with four forward-firing 30 mm cannons in the nose.

The Shinden was expected to be a highly maneuverable interceptor, but only two prototypes were finished before the end of war. Plans were also drawn up for a jet-powered version (J7W2 Shinden-Kai),[2] but this never left the drawing board.

The "J-" designation referred to land-based fighters of the IJN and the "-W-" to Watanabe Tekkōjo, the company that oversaw the initial design; Watanabe changed its name in 1943 to Kyūshū Hikōki K.K.[3][4]

The idea of a canard-based design originated with Lieutenant Commander Masayoshi Tsuruno, of the technical staff of the IJN in early 1943. Tsuruno believed the design could easily be retrofitted with a turbojet, when suitable engines became available.[5][6] His ideas were worked out by the First Naval Air Technical Arsenal (Dai-Ichi Kaigun Koku Gijitsusho), which designed three gliders designated Yokosuka MXY6, featuring canards.[5][7] These were built by Chigasaki Seizo K. K. and one was later fitted with a 22 hp Semi 11 (Ha-90) 4-cylinder air-cooled engine.[8]

The feasibility of the canard design was proven by both the powered and unpowered versions of the MYX6 by the end of 1943,[8] and the Navy were so impressed by the flight testing, they instructed the Kyushu Aircraft Company to design a canard interceptor around Tsuruno's concept. Kyushu was chosen because both its design team and production facilities were relatively unburdened,[8] and Tsuruno was chosen to lead a team from Dai-Ichi Kaigun Koku Gijitsusho to aid Kyushu's design works.[5]

The construction of the first two prototypes started in earnest by June 1944, stress calculations were finished by January 1945,[9] and the first prototype was completed in April 1945. The 2,130 hp Mitsubishi MK9D (Ha-43) radial engine and its supercharger were installed behind the cockpit and drove a six-bladed propeller via an extension shaft. Engine cooling was to be provided by long, narrow, obliquely mounted intakes on the side of the fuselage.[10] It was this configuration that caused cooling problems while running the engine while it was still on the ground. This, together with the unavailability of some equipment parts postponed the first flight of the Shinden.

Even before the first prototype took to the air the Navy had already ordered the J7W1 into production,[10] with quotas of 30 Shinden a month given to Kyushu's Zasshonokuma factory and 120 from Nakajima's Handa plant.[10] It was estimated some 1,086 Shinden could be produced between April 1946 and March 1947.[9]

On 3 August 1945, the prototype first took off, with Tsuruno at the controls, from Itazuke Air Base.[5][11] Two more short flights were made, a total of 45 minutes airborne, by war's end. Flights were successful, but showed a marked torque pull to starboard (due to the powerful engine), some flutter of the propeller blades, and vibration in the extended drive shaft.[11]



Hide Signatures

(in reply to JohnnyS)
       Post #: 6733

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/8/2012 2:03 PM   
JohnnyS


 

Posts: 220
Score: 100
Joined: 2/12/2006
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Status: offline
Ernie,

You got it!

Your turn...



Hide Signatures

(in reply to Ernie P.)
       Post #: 6734

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/8/2012 4:20 PM   
Ernie P.


 

Posts: 2156
Score: 100
Joined: 9/29/2007
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Bealeton, VA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnnyS

Ernie,

You got it!

Your turn...





This is not a difficult question, but it does highlight a point that I feel deserves to be made about WWII combat in the air. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What United States fighter do I describe?

Clues:

(1) Credited with the most enemy aircraft shot down in combat?



Hide Signatures

(in reply to JohnnyS)
       Post #: 6735

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/8/2012 8:38 PM   
zippome


 

Posts: 211
Score: 100
Joined: 12/1/2008
Last Login: 5/16/2013
From: Akron, OH, USA
Status: offline
B-17?

Zip


Hide Signatures

(in reply to Ernie P.)
       Post #: 6736

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/8/2012 11:22 PM   
lbrande


 

Posts: 285
Score: 100
Joined: 4/1/2003
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Alta Loma, CA, USA
Status: offline
F6F Hellcat?

Hide Signatures

(in reply to zippome)
       Post #: 6737

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/8/2012 11:35 PM   
Ernie P.


 

Posts: 2156
Score: 100
Joined: 9/29/2007
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Bealeton, VA, USA
Status: offline
No correct answers thus far. Which, quite frankly, surprises me. I thought this was a giveaway question which would only serve to highlight a sometimes overlooked point about the true effectiveness of fighter aircraft. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What United States fighter do I describe?

Clues:

(1) Credited with the most enemy aircraft shot down in combat?

(2) Considered to be the most successful mass produced aircraft (fixed wing) produced by its manufacturer.


Hide Signatures

(in reply to lbrande)
       Post #: 6738

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/9/2012 1:46 AM   
uncljoe



Posts: 4641
Score: 160
Joined: 9/8/2003
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Status: offline
 F 86

_____________________________

Look towards the Horizon......your death awaits you there

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Ernie P.)
       Post #: 6739

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/9/2012 2:27 AM   
Ernie P.


 

Posts: 2156
Score: 100
Joined: 9/29/2007
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Bealeton, VA, USA
Status: offline
No correct answers thus far (although some very interesting ones). Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What United States fighter do I describe?

Clues:

(1) Credited with the most enemy aircraft shot down in combat?

(2) Considered to be the most successful mass produced aircraft (fixed wing) produced by its manufacturer.

(3) Low wing design.


Hide Signatures

(in reply to uncljoe)
       Post #: 6740

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/9/2012 2:33 AM   
zippome


 

Posts: 211
Score: 100
Joined: 12/1/2008
Last Login: 5/16/2013
From: Akron, OH, USA
Status: offline
I missed that all important word "fighter" when I first read the question. Now you mention (fixed wing) in a clue. A red herring perhaps? Well I'm gonna guess not, and since the russians had considerable success with it, I'm gonna guess the Bell P-39?
Zip


Hide Signatures

(in reply to uncljoe)
       Post #: 6741

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/9/2012 3:26 AM   
cfircav8r



Posts: 1156
Score: 218
Joined: 7/17/2004
Last Login: 5/17/2013
From: Hampton, IA, USA
Status: offline
built and operated by the US, or just US designed aircraft?

_____________________________

The three most useless things to a pilot, the sky above you, the runway behind you, and the fuel on the ground.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to zippome)
       Post #: 6742

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/9/2012 7:19 AM   
lbrande


 

Posts: 285
Score: 100
Joined: 4/1/2003
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Alta Loma, CA, USA
Status: offline
P-51 type.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to cfircav8r)
       Post #: 6743

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/9/2012 8:26 AM   
Ernie P.


 

Posts: 2156
Score: 100
Joined: 9/29/2007
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Bealeton, VA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: zippome

I missed that all important word ''fighter'' when I first read the question. Now you mention (fixed wing) in a clue. A red herring perhaps? Well I'm gonna guess not, and since the russians had considerable success with it, I'm gonna guess the Bell P-39?
Zip



A red herring? Me? Would I do that? Yes zippome, the Bell P-39 is the right answer; and you are up, Sir. We await your question. Thanks; Ernie P.

Look at the production numbers below. Of the main US WWII fighter types, the P-38, P-39, P-40, P-47, P-51, F4F, F4U and F6F, only the F4F Wildcat was produced in smaller numbers than the P-39. And the P-39, in Russian hands, scored more air to air victories than any other US type of aircraft. Yet somehow, the P-39 is considered to be a near failure; because it was only effective at low altitude. My point? Well, two points actually. When considering the effectiveness of any aircraft; you must consider one primary point: How did it fare IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH IT FOUGHT, and against the enemy opposition AT THE TIME? Also, this should highlight the fact that the struggle between Germany and Russia was the main thrust of the war. All else was secondary. It was in Russia that Germany put her main effort; and it was in Russia that she lost the war.


Question: What United States fighter do I describe?

Clues:

(1) Credited with the most enemy aircraft shot down in combat?

(2) Considered to be the most successful mass produced aircraft (fixed wing) produced by its manufacturer.

(3) Low wing design.

(4) All metal.

(5) Single engine.

(6) Tricycle landing gear.

Answer: The Bell P-39

Production Numbers


P-38: 10,037
P-39: 9,584
P-40: 13,738
P-47: 15,686
P-51: 15,000
F4F: 7,885
F4U: 12,571
F6F: 12,275

The Bell P-39 Airacobra was one of the principal American fighter aircraft in service at the start of World War II. Although its mid-engine placement was innovative, the P-39 design was handicapped by the lack of an efficient turbo-supercharger, limiting it to low-altitude work, although the type was used with great success by the Soviet Air Force. In the P-39, Soviet pilots scored the highest number of individual kills attributed to any U.S. fighter type. Together with the derivative P-63 Kingcobra, these aircraft would be the most successful mass-produced, fixed-wing aircraft manufactured by Bell.
The P-39 was an all-metal, low-wing, single-engine fighter, with tricycle undercarriage incorporating a very streamlined and aerodynamically efficient design.

The Airacobra was conceived as a "weapons system" design with the T9 cannon in mind. This weapon fired a 1.3 lb. (610 g) projectile capable of piercing .8" (2 cm) of armor at 500 yards (450 m) with armor piercing rounds. The complete armament fit as designed consisted of the T9 with a pair of Browning M2 .50" (12.7 mm) machineguns mounted in the nose. This would change to two .50s and two .30s in the XP-39B (P-39C, Model 13, the first 20 delivered) and 2x0.50 and 4x0.30 (all four in the wings) in the P-39D (Model 15), which also introduced self-sealing tanks and shackles (and piping) for a 500 lb. (227 kg) bomb or drop tank. The engine was placed behind the cockpit, so pilots often referred to this as "Allison armor." A long transmission tunnel passed through the fuselage, under the cockpit, and was linked to the three-bladed propeller. The radiator was located in the fuselage.

In September 1940, Britain ordered 386 P-39Ds (Model 14), with a 20 mm Hispano-Suiza HS.404 and six .303 (7.7 mm), instead of a 37 mm and six 0.30 calibers. The RAF eventually ordered a total of 675 P-39s. However, after the first Airacobras arrived at 601 Squadron RAF in September 1941, they were promptly recognized as having an inadequate rate of climb and performance at altitude for Western European conditions. Only 80 were adopted, all of them with 601 Squadron. Britain transferred about 200 P-39s to the Soviet Union.

Another 200 examples intended for the RAF were taken up by the USAAF after the attack on Pearl Harbor as the P-400, and were sent to the Fifth Air Force in Australia, for service in the South West Pacific Theatre.
Because of the unconventional layout, there was no space in the fuselage to place a fuel tank. Although drop tanks were implemented to extend its range, the standard fuel load was carried in the wings, with the result that the P-39 was limited to short range tactical strikes.

United Kingdom
In 1940, the British Direct Purchase Commission in the US was looking for combat aircraft; they ordered 675 of the export version Bell Model 14 as the "Caribou" on the strength of the company's representations on 13 April 1940. The performance of the Bell P-39 prototype and 13 test aircraft which were able to achieve a speed of 390 mph (630 km/h) at altitude was due to the installation of turbo-supercharging. The British armament was 0.50-inch machine guns in the fuselage, and four 0.30-inch machine guns in the wings, the 37 mm gun was replaced by a 20 mm Hispano-Suiza.

The British export models were renamed "Airacobra" in 1941. A further 150 were specified for delivery under Lend-lease in 1941 but these were not supplied. The Royal Air Force (RAF) took delivery in mid 1941 and found that actual performance of the non-turbo-supercharged production aircraft differed markedly from what they were expecting.
In some areas, the Airacobra was inferior to existing aircraft such as the Hawker Hurricane and Supermarine Spitfire and its performance at altitude suffered drastically. On the other hand it was considered effective for low level fighter and ground attack work. Problems with gun and exhaust flash suppression and compass were fixable.
No. 601 Squadron RAF was the only British unit to use the Airacobra operationally, receiving their first two examples on 6 August 1941. On 9 October, four Airacobras attacked enemy barges near Dunkirk, in the type's only operational action with the RAF. The squadron continued to train with the Airacobra during the winter, but in March 1942, it re-equipped with Spitfires.

The Airacobras already in the UK, along with the remainder of the first batch being built in the US, were sent to the Soviet Air force, the sole exception being AH574, which was passed to the Royal Navy and used for experimental work, including the first carrier landing by a tricycle undercarriage aircraft on HMS Pretoria Castle, until it was scrapped on the recommendation of a visiting Bell test pilot in March 1946.

General characteristics
Crew: One
Length: 30 ft 2 in (9.2 m)
Wingspan: 34 ft 0 in (10.4 m)
Height: 12 ft 5 in (3.8 m)
Wing area: 213 sq ft (19.8 m²)
Empty weight: 5,347 lb (2,425 kg)
Loaded weight: 7,379 lb (3,347 kg)
Max takeoff weight: 8,400 lb (3,800 kg)
Powerplant: 1× Allison V-1710-85 liquid-cooled V-12, 1,200 hp (895 kW)
Performance
Maximum speed: 376 mph; (605 km/h; Redline dive speed=525 mph.)
Range: 1,098 miles (1,770 km)
Service ceiling 35,000 ft (10,700 m)
Rate of climb: 3,750 ft/min (19 m/s; 15,000'/ 4.5 min at 160 mph (260 km/h).)
Wing loading: 34.6 lb/sq ft (169 kg/m²)
Power/mass: 0.16 hp/lb (0.27 kW/kg)
Armament
1x 37 mm M4 cannon firing through the propeller hub at the rate of 140 rpm with 30 rounds of HE ammo.
4 x .50 cal (12.7 mm) machine guns. Rate of fire was 750 rpm x 1 gun in each wing, only 300 rpm each x 2 guns synchronized in the cowl. Ammo: 200 rounds per nose-gun, 300 per wing-pod.
Up to 500 lb (230 kg) of bombs externally

Several of the Red Air Force's ranking aces flew the P-39 for a major portion of their combat sorties. The top ace in the P-39 and number four overall was Guards Major Gregoriy Rechkalov, who shot down 50 of his total 56 kills while flying a P-39. Guards Colonel Aleksandr Pokryshkin, who finished the war as the number two Soviet ace with 59 individual and 6 shared kills, reportedly flew the P-39 for 48 of his kills. Another high scorer in the P-39 was Guards Major Dmitriy Glinka, who destroyed 20 German aircraft in 40 aerial engagements in the summer of 1943, and finished the war with an even 50 kills, 41 of them while flying the P-39. Third-ranked Soviet ace Guards Major Nikolay Gulaev transitioned to the P-39 in early August 1943 with 16 individual and 2 shared kills. He flew his last combat sortie on 14 August 1944 (ordered to attend higher military schooling), leaving the battlefield with an additional 41 individual victories and 1 shared kill after just over one year in his P-39.


Hide Signatures

(in reply to zippome)
       Post #: 6744

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/9/2012 1:46 PM   
zippome


 

Posts: 211
Score: 100
Joined: 12/1/2008
Last Login: 5/16/2013
From: Akron, OH, USA
Status: offline
Ok guys, here goes...
This fighter aircraft was developed from, and showed a strong resemblance to one of the best fighters of its previous generation. This one however proved to be itself mediocre. It was then developed and used as a basis for another aircraft that was again considered to be one of the best of it's time.
It was first ordered in 1944 and was allready being phased out of service by 1949.
Thanks
Zip


< Message edited by zippome -- 4/9/2012 11:29 PM >


Hide Signatures

(in reply to Ernie P.)
       Post #: 6745

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/10/2012 4:43 AM   
zippome


 

Posts: 211
Score: 100
Joined: 12/1/2008
Last Login: 5/16/2013
From: Akron, OH, USA
Status: offline
This fighter aircraft was developed from, and showed a strong resemblance to one of the best fighters of its previous generation. This one however proved to be itself mediocre. It was then developed and used as a basis for another aircraft that was again considered to be one of the best of it's time.
It was first ordered in 1944 and was allready being phased out of service by 1949.
The Canopy, the wing and the tail were very similar to the succesful fighter that proceeded it.
That wing again was very similar to yet another design that was used from 1959 to 2008. (a different aircraft than the previously mentioned succesful development)
Of these 2 design developments 1 line was a fighter aircraft. 1 was a trainer aircraft.

Zip



Hide Signatures

(in reply to zippome)
       Post #: 6746

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/10/2012 4:53 AM   
JohnnyS


 

Posts: 220
Score: 100
Joined: 2/12/2006
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Status: offline
FJ-1 Fury?

Hide Signatures

(in reply to zippome)
       Post #: 6747

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/10/2012 1:47 PM   
zippome


 

Posts: 211
Score: 100
Joined: 12/1/2008
Last Login: 5/16/2013
From: Akron, OH, USA
Status: offline
Thats what I was looking for,JohnnyS! Your turn!
thanks!
Zip

Hide Signatures

(in reply to JohnnyS)
       Post #: 6748

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/10/2012 1:58 PM   
zippome


 

Posts: 211
Score: 100
Joined: 12/1/2008
Last Login: 5/16/2013
From: Akron, OH, USA
Status: offline

Sorry this line of questions were kind of disjointed guys. I kinda did this one on the fly (so to speak).

This fighter aircraft was developed from, and showed a strong resemblance to one of the best fighters of its previous generation. This one however proved to be itself mediocre. It was then developed and used as a basis for another aircraft that was again considered to be one of the best of it's time.
It was first ordered in 1944 and was allready being phased out of service by 1949.
The Canopy, the wing and the tail were very similar to the succesful fighter that proceeded it.
That wing again was very similar to yet another design that was used from 1959 to 2008. (a different aircraft than the previously mentioned succesful development)
Of these 2 design developments 1 line was a fighter aircraft. 1 was a trainer aircraft.

Ordered in late 1944 as the XFJ-1 in competition with proposals from Douglas and Vought, the Fury began as a straight-wing, tricycle gear fighter with a single turbojet passing through the fuselage. The wing, empennage and canopy strongly resembled that of the piston-engined P-51 Mustang, North American Aviation's highly successful World War II fighter.

The first flight of the prototype XFJ-1 took place on 11 September 1946, with the first of 30 deliveries beginning in October 1947. Flown by Navy squadron VF-5A, the FJ-1 made the USN's first operational aircraft carrier landing with a jet fighter at sea[N 1] on 10 March 1948 aboard USS Boxer, pioneering jet-powered carrier operations and underscoring the need for catapult-equipped carriers. The Fury was capable of launching without catapult assistance, but on a crowded flight deck the capability was of small practicality. In reality, taking off without a catapult launch, pitched the FJ-1 into a perilous, slow climb that was considered too risky for normal operations.[2]

As straight wings were seen at the time as the only way to ensure the low speed and stability needed for carrier landings, the FJ-1 used a straight wing. No provision for wing-folding had been made as dive brakes mounted in the wings made that option unfeasible. In order to conserve carrier deck space, a unique "kneeling" nose undercarriage along with a swivelling "jockey wheel" allowed the FJ-1 to be stacked tail-high, close to another FJ-1.[3]

Although ordered into production, the initial order for 100 units was trimmed to only 30 aircraft which were mainly used in testing at NAS North Island, California. VF-5A, soon redesignated as VF-51, operated the type in service beginning in August 1948. Although VF-51 went to sea on Boxer by May 1949, the FJ-1s were phased out in favor of the new F9F-2 Panther.[4]

Ending its service career in U.S. Naval Reserve units, the FJ-1 eventually was retired in 1953. The one highlight in its short service life was VF-51's win in the Bendix Trophy Race for jets in September 1948. The unit entered seven FJ-1s, flying from Long Beach, California to Cleveland, Ohio, with VF-51 aircraft taking the first four places, ahead of two California Air National Guard Lockheed F-80 Shooting Stars.[1]
As for the trainer..

The first version of the aircraft entered service in 1959 as the T2J-1. It was re-designated the T-2A in 1962 under the joint aircraft designation system. The two-seat trainer was powered by one Westinghouse J34-WE-46/48 turbojet. The aircraft was subsequently redesigned, and the single engine was replaced with two Pratt & Whitney J60-P-6 turbojets in the T-2B. The T-2C was fitted with two much more powerful 2,950 lbf (13,100 N) thrust General Electric J85-GE-4 turbojets. The T-2D was an export version which was sold to the Venezuelan air force, while the T-2E was sold to the Greek Air Force. The T-2 Buckeye (along with the TF-9J) replaced the T2V-1/T-1A Seastar, though the T-1 would continue in some uses into the 1970s.

T-2C being parked at Naval Air Station Pensacola, FL on August 30, 2005.

The Buckeye was designed as a low-cost multi-stage trainer. Its straight wing is similar to that used in the original North American FJ-1 Fury. Its cockpit controls are similar to the T-28C trainer. The T-2's performance is between that of the Air Force's T-37 Tweet, and the TA-4J Skyhawk. While it has no built-in armament, the T-2 has two underwing hardpoints for .50 in gun pods, 100 lb (45 kg) practice bombs or 2.75 in rockets.

All T-2 Buckeyes were manufactured by North American at Air Force Plant 85, located just south of Port Columbus Airport in Columbus, Ohio. 273 aircraft were built during its production run. The name Buckeye refers to the state tree of Ohio, as well as the mascot of the Ohio State University

Thanks  Zip
 



Hide Signatures

(in reply to zippome)
       Post #: 6749

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz - 4/10/2012 2:08 PM   
zippome


 

Posts: 211
Score: 100
Joined: 12/1/2008
Last Login: 5/16/2013
From: Akron, OH, USA
Status: offline
OOps, forgot something.... You can guess which fighter it was developed into.....


Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


Hide Signatures

(in reply to zippome)
       Post #: 6750

Page:   <<   < prev  268 269 [270] 271 272 273 274 275 276 277   next >   >>  
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Warbirds and Warplanes >> RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz
Page: <<   < prev  268 269 [270] 271 272 273 274 275 276 277   next >   >>  





Jump to:


 
Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

RC Universe is a service of Internet Brands, Inc. Copyright © 2001-2013.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America


1.797RCU1