Jim_McIntyre
Posts: 2078
Joined: 4/5/2002 From: Claremont,
ON, CANADA Status: offline
|
IMHO, I am not elitist or hostile. I do not treat a student who shows up with an ARF any different than one who shows up with a kit-built, scratch-built, SPAD what have you. It's the personality of the person, not the type of aircraft. The 'instant gratification types' gravitate to the least work entry and pay little attention to anything you have to say. They just want their ticket to burn some holes in the sky. What's worse, not their fault but, the LHS and some local builders now cater to them. Here's some money, I want this ready to fly for the weekend. Are all kits safe? No. But, at least there's a chance the person will consult with someone before proceeding to risk the effort they invested. There will always be the inept who don't care regardless of the route they choose. With many ARFs you get a hot glued shelf paper covered aboniation slapped together to a tight timeframe (piecework) by someone who's probably never seen one fly. It's not their fault, it's their job. And 'Tall Paul', it's not about maturity, nor is it just about flying, it's about modelling. You only have half the picture and in your 'maturity' fail to comprehend the other half while condemning those who do.... Who was it who said "The point of a journey, is not to arrive". For me, ARFs eliminate the journey.... Why is it some people cannot distinguish between the mass market product and the consumer (themselves).... can it be they identify with their ARF? Maybe building is a right of passage. Maybe it should be? I don't know, I'm just voicing one persons opinion, based on experience, I think it should. So go ahead and call me elitist or immature for not voicing the popular opinion. :
< Message edited by Jim_McIntyre -- Jul 18 2003 5:18PM >
_____________________________
http://scalebuilder.org
|