CoosBayLumber
Posts: 3047
Joined: 1/20/2002 From: San Bernardino Calif Status: offline
|
Oh, what was mentioned..... The stretch factor is done before the file is written to a disk. On large format scanning, there is a stretch factor present in the direction that the page is run through the rolls. The stretch factor is not present on "flatbed" scanners. The firms around here have three different brands of scanners/printers. The OCE' seems to be the least problemmatic. It has an anti-stretch software factor in it. The Xerox style that is used by our Kinkos does not. The stretch factor in feeding a 36 inch wide sheet through is about 1/8" per foot on Xerox. On the OCE' the software cuts this back to near zero. Thus if you have a 1/4 inch slot for a spar on a rib shown, if inserted into a Xerox machine one direction it becomes taller, the other it becomes wider. It must be some combination if the rib is shown diagonally. Much of this has to do with diameter of the rolls, direction which the image faces when inserted, and I don't know what else. You should be able to estimate the factor by measuring the distance on a marked line. Is always dangerous assuming that scanned images are correct. You may be one of the cautious ones, and check things first, as once bitten you always remember. Has been a lot of nasty things mentioned about kit cutting firms past year in forums. The machine is stupid, and only runs from coordinate to coordinate. Much of the poor fit should have been taken care of by the CAD file operator. A friend showed me his rubber powered new laser cut kit, and the parts did not match the plans by a 1/16th here and there. All ribs were too short to match the chord. There are laser cut parts, and laser cut parts that fit. Wm.
|