Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> AMA Discussions >> Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP
Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP - 7/28/2003 1:46:42 AM   
SAPropbuster



Posts: 206
Joined: 3/7/2002
From: San Antonio, TX, USA
Status: offline
After much deliberation and consultation, Jim Branaum has agreed to run as a write-in candidate for the District VIII AMA VP.
I know he will have a good campaign statement following.
He (as well as I) believes in having a MODELER and the hobby/sport run AMA, NOT the AMA running the modeler.

Speak up, Jim. Let's all hear your platform....

_____________________________

Bob Severance
       Post #: 1

Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP - 7/28/2003 1:53:58 AM   
SAPropbuster



Posts: 206
Joined: 3/7/2002
From: San Antonio, TX, USA
Status: offline
When you get your ballot, you need to make SURE the name is spelled correctly: Jim Branaum and his AMA # is on the ballto as well: 1428.

We cannot give the AMA ANY reason to toss your ballot!!

Remember:
Jim Branaum AMA# 1428

_____________________________

Bob Severance

(in reply to SAPropbuster)
       Post #: 2

Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP - 7/28/2003 2:13:32 AM   
J_R


 

Posts: 4446
Joined: 1/4/2002
From: Corona, CA,
Status: offline
Well, get him out here. Is he going to hide too? What are his visions and why does he think he is a better alternative than the others.

JR

(in reply to SAPropbuster)
       Post #: 3

Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP - 7/28/2003 3:10:42 AM   
Jim Branaum


 

Posts: 1669
Joined: 10/22/2002
From: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX, USA
Status: offline
Me hide? Surely you jest!




I have owned my own company and now am a semi retired Systems Analyst in my mid 50's with growing children of school age. Previously I tried on a limited scale some free flight, rubber, and control line but was very dissatisfied with my results. I guess that is what happens when there are not enough interested hobby folks around. Changing that is one of my goals since it is clear that if we don't reach out effectively enough, we loose our impact and flying sites nationwide.

I have been in the hobby (this time) for over 20 years. I fly indoor electric, S.M.A.L.L., .40 sized stuff and giant scale birds. I tried helicopters but got bored with them as they encouraged private flying rather than the social events I frequent. Some of the folks in Texas, Louisiana, and New Mexico have seen me fly and crash airplanes at their events for over 18 years as part of my pursuit of that goal. In short, I travel to interesting events or places whenever the opportunity is presented and it matches up with my interests and sometimes with my flying skills.

When I joined my first club (I now belong to three) , the San Antonio Propbusters, the membership was running around 40 or 50. Shortly after I got involved I served a couple terms as Club Secretary and started some of the changes done to do encourage the club to survive. Today I have been treasurer for 7 years and the membership is well over 150 adults and growing. We have two temporary flying sites and an active search for a new site.

I have been watching, as others, and have concluded we need some changes. We need to change the approach used within our own organization so that it serves the hobby rather than the hobby serves it. Currently we seem to have an insurance problem because as a group we have failed to install accident prevention activities as a priority. Note that does not mean new rules because rules do not prevent accidents, the membership does. As AMA members we have seen dues go up significantly due to the increase in insurance costs but not seen any recommendations from the AMA as to moves we could take to prevent future cost increases.

The AMA was founded to foster competition and yet today, as a group, most modelers do not compete. Since the goals of the membership have changed, it is clear we need to adjust the goals and directions of the AMA. Some changes in the goals and possibly the by-laws of the organization are being discussed now and we need effective representation to help the hobby grow with the AMA. District VIII represents enough modelers that we should be part of that process and yet it seems to be behind closed doors to most of us. To my way of thinking and doing business that means we need to have improved two way communications between the membership and the elected leaders rather than strictly leader driven communications. Good ideas are not the property of a few, but grow when there is free and open communication between respected parties. As a club officer, I have learned to listen respectfully to all the members because even those I have disagreements with have good ideas from time to time. I have used the ideas of a competitor when they were good, but I generally make sure that the individual was recognized for the contribution. We need to use this method in the AMA and in District VIII.

Some have suggested to me that a 2 term limit should be place on the District Vice Presidency, and I think that should be discussed and some limit set as too many get too far away from the average membership after too much more than six years.

_____________________________

Jim Branaum AMA 1428

(in reply to SAPropbuster)
       Post #: 4

Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP - 7/28/2003 4:17:31 AM   
mongo


 

Posts: 1224
Joined: 12/5/2001
From: Midland, Republic of TEXAS, TX, USA
Status: offline
jim, my own idea is, 2 terms max in any one elected position and a maximum of 3 terms total in a lifetime. that allows for folks that might want to hold more than one office.

_____________________________

for muroc1, frank, none of the above is intended to be either bullying or insulting, it is just the way i communicate.

(in reply to SAPropbuster)
       Post #: 5

Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP - 7/28/2003 4:45:57 AM   
J_R


 

Posts: 4446
Joined: 1/4/2002
From: Corona, CA,
Status: offline
Jim

You mention competition and then changes. What does that mean, specifically? Do you want to get rid of the national flying site? Abandon FAI? Delete Rule book events, altogether?

Are you aiming at making the AMA an insurance company only?

How would you fill offices that have no candidates? Many VP's run unopposed now. If you drive them out of office with term limits, and not one wants to run, what then? What makes you think that term limits are a good idea?

JR

(in reply to SAPropbuster)
       Post #: 6

Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP - 7/28/2003 5:01:26 AM   
mongo


 

Posts: 1224
Joined: 12/5/2001
From: Midland, Republic of TEXAS, TX, USA
Status: offline
jr:
the term limits thing, might be the catalyst needed to get things like the requirements for office holding changed, so that more members would be eligible to run for office. i for one, have never understood what importance leader member status had to do with a members desire or ability to run for or execute the dutys of office. 30-40 years ago, leader members were icons of the hobby, now, it is just a designation on yer ama card.

_____________________________

for muroc1, frank, none of the above is intended to be either bullying or insulting, it is just the way i communicate.

(in reply to SAPropbuster)
       Post #: 7

Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP - 7/28/2003 5:25:38 AM   
J_R


 

Posts: 4446
Joined: 1/4/2002
From: Corona, CA,
Status: offline
mongo

Either Branaum is spouting rhetoric or he has a reasoned approach to change. If this is just more "I'm for motherhood, apple pie and Chevrolet" he is just another wannabe. The questions I asked call for answers. Either he has them or he doesn't.

Making changes, without careful consideration, leads to unintended consequences. In the case of term limits, "might" is a totally unacceptable possibility. You "might" wind up with no leaders at all.

JR

(in reply to SAPropbuster)
       Post #: 8

Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP - 7/28/2003 5:47:17 AM   
Jim Branaum


 

Posts: 1669
Joined: 10/22/2002
From: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX, USA
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by J_R
Jim

You mention competition and then changes. What does that mean, specifically? Do you want to get rid of the national flying site? Abandon FAI? Delete Rule book events, altogether?

Are you aiming at making the AMA an insurance company only?

How would you fill offices that have no candidates? Many VP's run unopposed now. If you drive them out of office with term limits, and not one wants to run, what then? What makes you think that term limits are a good idea?

JR
[/QUOTE]

Jr,
Lets take them one at a time.

Lets all agree to be clear in that competition, rulebook or FAI, and the national flying site are here to stay. We have already spent a ton of $ on improvements that are of no use to anyone else but us. The only way to recover our investment is to use it as much as possible.

However, we probably need to put further improvements into the ballpark of the various SIGS. They use the facilities and if they want specific changes, they should be willing to fund them. There was some noise many years ago about putting in RV hookups for folks at the Nats and I thought that might be a good idea then but I am not sure today.

Muncie needs to become to model aviation's what Oshkosh is to the EAA. The hard part is figuring out the best way to get there and I think discussion should be open and in public rather than short term and in committee meetings no one has time to share with the membership. Frequently even the DVP's don't have the time to deal with all the 'stuff' and they miss important things in the rush. An exciting example might be finding out how many people in District VIII have a clue as to what PADCOMM stands for.

No, I have no intention of making the AMA an insurance company. I went to a fly in yesterday (and ate a 30% Cap - darn it) and one of the things I heard was that if it were not for insurance, the club probably would not be an AMA Chartered Club. As that is a similar feeling I have heard all over, there is a clear message there. The message is that the single service most members can see that the AMA provides is insurance. We should take every possible step to make that a good thing in the future without taking away from the fun of flying.

I was talking to Dave Brown a week or two ago and we were discussing the nomination process. We agreed that what the AMA is currently using invites abuse that may well be within the rules but still stands as a taint. Fresh examples of that have driven home the need to change the process. Getting the correct change in place may take a while and will almost certainly involve lots of other changes.

I mentioned the process Bill Lee previously fielded and Dave told me it was actually someone else's. He also pointed out the flaw in it which was control by the DVP. He mentioned a Nomination committe based on that districts club presidents, which I think is a reasonable place to start. I would rather make it on ALL club officers in the district to get the nomination process closer to the membership. That very process could be use dot decide on a "replacement" DVP if it were necessary. Those types could be validated by membership vote in the next election. I also think we need to remove any indication of incumbency from the ballot.

I would hope that term limits would keep the EC membership more member oriented. However I am also aware that there may be an unintended consequence there so more research needs to be done before we set it in concrete. There may be other changes we need to make before that get to the top of the list.

If you, or anyone else, have any other questions I will try to answer them. However, please write exactly what you want answered so I don't fall into the stupid trap of trying to read your mind. I failed that course in college.

_____________________________

Jim Branaum AMA 1428

(in reply to SAPropbuster)
       Post #: 9

Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP - 7/28/2003 5:54:36 AM   
Jim Branaum


 

Posts: 1669
Joined: 10/22/2002
From: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX, USA
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by mongo
jr:
the term limits thing, might be the catalyst needed to get things like the requirements for office holding changed, so that more members would be eligible to run for office. i for one, have never understood what importance leader member status had to do with a members desire or ability to run for or execute the dutys of office. 30-40 years ago, leader members were icons of the hobby, now, it is just a designation on yer ama card.
[/QUOTE]

Oddly enough that is exactly the same line of conversation many of my friends have had in the recent past. The Leader Member currently is AMA's prehensile tail.

I have been given the impression that the LM status thing was used as a marker to indicate your commitment to the AMA and the hobby rather than just your local bunch. That was the 'picture' Johnny Clemens painted when he made me a Leader Member over 15 years ago. At the same luncheon he told several of us the tale of the 'dynasty' approach to AMA politics. Oddly enough some of the areas discussed are the same. Stranger still some antics are mirrored in recent actions. Strangest of all is that some of the names are the same!

_____________________________

Jim Branaum AMA 1428

(in reply to SAPropbuster)
       Post #: 10

Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP - 7/28/2003 7:00:18 AM   
J_R


 

Posts: 4446
Joined: 1/4/2002
From: Corona, CA,
Status: offline
Jim

You must have at least one friend in D8. You do, don't you? Why didn't you have him nominate you (assuming your answer is yes, if not it's self explainatory)?

Why are you messing with the process and running a write-in campaign instead? Is this a whim... something your doing just for sport to bug Sandy Frank and/or Bill Lee? What can you do so differently than Dr. Frank, that it qualifies you to replace him? Think your better than Horrace Cain? Why? Mike Moss?

JR

(in reply to SAPropbuster)
       Post #: 11

Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP - 7/28/2003 7:06:35 AM   
ArchB


 

Posts: 15
Joined: 7/26/2003
From: GreaterBoston, Mass
Status: offline
That's some of the most articulate, well thought, well focussed stuff I have heard. Certainly this guy isn't runnig for D-8 VP

I will be watching this with the utmost of interest.

So far, so good.

Good luck D-8.

-Arch

(in reply to SAPropbuster)
       Post #: 12

Write in Jim Branaum 1428LM for D8-VP - 7/28/2003 8:08:36 AM   
mongo


 

Posts: 1224
Joined: 12/5/2001
From: Midland, Republic of TEXAS, TX, USA
Status: offline
jr,
when yer driving down the highway, and yer tire goes flat, do you:
get out and change the tire so you can get on down the road to a safe spot, or do you examine the tie rod ends for to find the reason the tire went flat?
excessive term accumulation is the flat tire of the AMA right now. we need to get it changed and get moving again. if that shows us that there is another problem causing the "flats" then we focus on fixing that problem.

and with the quality of leaders we have now, no leaders would be a good thing.

_____________________________

for muroc1, frank, none of the above is intended to be either bullying or insulting, it is just the way i communicate.

(in reply to SAPropbuster)
       Post #: 13

We need a Debate at SWAC. - 7/28/2003 8:25:45 AM   
Hossfly



Posts: 3850
Joined: 12/3/2001
From: New Caney, TX, USA
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jim Branaum
Jr,
Lets take them one at a time.

Lets all agree to be clear in that competition, rulebook or FAI, and the national flying site are here to stay. We have already spent a ton of $ on improvements that are of no use to anyone else but us. The only way to recover our investment is to use it as much as possible.

However, we probably need to put further improvements into the ballpark of the various SIGS. They use the facilities and if they want specific changes, they should be willing to fund them. There was some noise many years ago about putting in RV hookups for folks at the Nats and I thought that might be a good idea then but I am not sure today.

Muncie needs to become to model aviation's what Oshkosh is to the EAA.
//SNIP//
. Frequently even the DVP's don't have the time to deal with all the 'stuff' and they miss important things in the rush. An exciting example might be finding out how many people in District VIII have a clue as t