OS manual _vs_ break-in
05-21-2003, 05:18 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Jasper,
AL
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OS manual _vs_ break-in
In another thread, the OS rep was quoted as saying:
Why does the factory manual evidently give an incorrect break-in procedure for the FX engines? If you followed the procedure in the manual could this be a warranty issue?
I have two SX engines (15 and 61), both broken-in per the manual, and an FT 120 Twin, not yet broken-in. Are there known break-in (or other) errors in the manuals included with these engines?
If you purchased an OS ring-less engine and followed the manual, alternating between four-cycle and two-cycle, you may have harmed your engine.
Bill Baxter said so himself:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/showthrea...452&forumid=152
Bill Baxter said so himself:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/showthrea...452&forumid=152
I have two SX engines (15 and 61), both broken-in per the manual, and an FT 120 Twin, not yet broken-in. Are there known break-in (or other) errors in the manuals included with these engines?
