65" Mojo close to 67" Fusion?
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (9)
65" Mojo close to 67" Fusion?
Can anybody compare these two? I am on my second 67" Fusion and have no complaints. But once it's gone there are no replacements. Has anyone flown both? Reading the specs on the Mojo 65 it says it has a longer tail moment compared to the Mojo 60. The Fusion will do precision and 3D and that's what I will be looking for when the time comes.
david
david
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (57)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Greenwood,
IN
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 65
The Fusion leans more toward pattern and the MoJo65 is a little more 3D.
It would be a good practice pattern bird though as the stick movements are little more noticeable on the MoJo65.
As for competing in pattern, I'd look elsewhere.
It would be a good practice pattern bird though as the stick movements are little more noticeable on the MoJo65.
As for competing in pattern, I'd look elsewhere.
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (57)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Greenwood,
IN
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 65
The Fusion leans more toward pattern and the MoJo65 is a little more 3D.
It would be a good practice pattern bird though as the stick movements are little more noticeable on the MoJo65.
As for competing in pattern, I'd look elsewhere.
It would be a good practice pattern bird though as the stick movements are little more noticeable on the MoJo65.
As for competing in pattern, I'd look elsewhere.
#4
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (9)
RE: 65
Not interested in competing. I just like the way the Fusion flys. I have never flown a Mojo, but many of the profiles I have flown are more like a napkin blowing in the wind. I guess I was hoping the Mojo 65 was more of a hybrid type flyer. Something that excelled at both.
Thanks for the response Thumb, David
Thanks for the response Thumb, David
#7
My Feedback: (2)
RE: 65
I've had this same thought. Rookie 3D, too old to ever be any good at it, but like trying. I have a DLE20/67" Fusion. Picked it over others because of the longer tail moment. Like it because it seems like it might be a little tamer than others similar to it, as well as the fact that I can fly it wide open (6" pitch prop), without a lot of concern regarding blowing the control surfaces off it?
I have gas powered scale hot rods as well, but like the profile for slowing WAY DOWN, knife edge, random outrageous behavior, etc.
I would have picked the Mojo 65 as a replacement as well - because of it's longer tail moment? So wondering what is there about this airframe that might make it "a little more 3D"?
Thanks for any insight! -Al
I have gas powered scale hot rods as well, but like the profile for slowing WAY DOWN, knife edge, random outrageous behavior, etc.
I would have picked the Mojo 65 as a replacement as well - because of it's longer tail moment? So wondering what is there about this airframe that might make it "a little more 3D"?
Thanks for any insight! -Al
#9
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: alamogordo,
NM
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 65
I have both. Love both. The Fusion does pinwheels better, hovers better. The Mojo65 spins a touch better and does rolling circles a bit better and slightly better KE. I take the Mojo off and go straight into a ke the length of the runway and hold it a foot off without even thinking about it. Very stable. The Fusion does do the IMAC stuff better and if you want a little of both - get it. The Mojo is better (only slightly) on the 3D side. One place the Mojo excedls at however is strength. I've landed upside down, bottomed out on a loop hard into the ground, cartwheeled it, and did other very abusive things and its still going strong! THe FUsion has requierd 2 new fuselages and 2 wing replacements in its lifespan. Plus I hear the Fusion is being replaced by an improved version (and I hope to be 1st in line! ) real soon.I've also had a Aeroworks Pro x260 60-90 size and either of these fly way better than it can.
#10
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (9)
RE: 65
Thanks dave ( and all) you have the insight I was looking for. Although it's hard to believe anything would KE better than Fusion. I only have a dozen or so flights on my kit built Fusion. I flew the ARF for several hundred flights. The kit built is a stronger unit so unless i do a dumb thumb i wont have to make this decision today. I like to look forward and be ready when the time comes. i had the Fushion kit for two years before I finished it. I have flown the Pro Yak BTW. It was not my set up or plane so it's hard to say what it's limits are. But i did not really care for it. I have not looked at the Velox or Primo. The Mojo seams to be the plane most often recommended so i was leaning that way.
Thanks again guys. Hopefully I have some time before making this decision, but you never know. My ARF Fusion was flying great until i blew the stab loose on it.
david
Thanks again guys. Hopefully I have some time before making this decision, but you never know. My ARF Fusion was flying great until i blew the stab loose on it.
david
#11
My Feedback: (13)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Center of the Flyover States,
Posts: 2,166
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
RE: 65
Look at pictures of the Mojo and compare to the Primo. The Primo has a thinner airfoil and pattern lines. The Mojo is supposed to be a more "soft" handling 3D model (due to fat airfoil) and therefore more forgiving. If you like pattern then the Primo is probably more to your liking.