Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Profile and Fun Flying Planes
Reload this Page >

O.S. 91FX or Saito's Fa 100 Mojo 60

Community
Search
Notices
Profile and Fun Flying Planes If you're a profile fan or into fun flyers than this is the forum to discuss those topics.

O.S. 91FX or Saito's Fa 100 Mojo 60

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2008, 10:26 AM
  #26  
flyboy138
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
flyboy138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: east moline, IL
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 91FX or Saito's Fa 100 Mojo 60

Nice job Craig.Thats cool I like that design.A o.s 110 I wonder if its going to be a good power to weight ratio?
Old 12-22-2008, 04:56 PM
  #27  
asmund
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Floroe, NORWAY
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: O.S. 91FX or Saito's Fa 100 Mojo 60

If you`re going for 110 displacement, then you might just go for the YS and be reassured that the power to weight will not be a problem. I flew my Katana 70 (very similar to the Mojo 60) with the YS 110 and it was great, now I have mounted the 91 FX to compare and finally decide on which engine to keep using
Old 12-24-2008, 05:59 PM
  #28  
TimChurch
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 91FX or Saito's Fa 100 Mojo 60

I have a MoAss 60 with a YS110 the wieght was very noticable, I'm going to be pulling it off and putting one of my 100s on it, I curently have three Mojo 60s and I wanted to try it with the Ys, Power is good but the extra wieght is too much.
Old 12-24-2008, 07:44 PM
  #29  
craigteffe
Senior Member
My Feedback: (24)
 
craigteffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 91FX or Saito's Fa 100 Mojo 60

The 115 is 2.6 Oz heavier than the 100 and has a smaller case and from what i hear less vibration. I used to have a 91 thunder tiger on my other mojo and it was just as heavy as the 115.
Old 01-28-2009, 10:58 PM
  #30  
Blade-breaker
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, MN
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 91FX or Saito's Fa 100 Mojo 60


ORIGINAL: Deathbunny_SG

For your saito haters the new os 110FS-a should be a good fit for a mojo 60, pricey though.

Ya a little high. The weight is good though 21.5oz with muffler. I wonder how the power is compared to say the Saito 115 ??
Old 02-01-2009, 02:04 PM
  #31  
davids24beer
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 91FX or Saito's Fa 100 Mojo 60

I have a mojo 60 with a saito 100, runs great. The mojo is a nice flying plane. I also have a ucando 60 with a os 91fx, also a great combo. Each engine is a good choice, just depends perosnal choice.
Old 02-01-2009, 04:57 PM
  #32  
flyboy138
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
flyboy138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: east moline, IL
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 91FX or Saito's Fa 100 Mojo 60

ORIGINAL: davids24beer

I have a mojo 60 with a saito 100, runs great. The mojo is a nice flying plane. I also have a ucando 60 with a os 91fx, also a great combo. Each engine is a good choice, just depends perosnal choice.
Which one do you like better the mojo or the ucando?
Old 02-05-2009, 02:20 PM
  #33  
Goinstraightup
Senior Member
My Feedback: (26)
 
Goinstraightup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Baraboo , WI
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 91FX or Saito's Fa 100 Mojo 60

Cool Scheme Craigteffe

I fly my moass 60 with a Saito 100 and it is the perfect combo. Full power only used for uplines.
Old 02-05-2009, 06:13 PM
  #34  
davids24beer
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 91FX or Saito's Fa 100 Mojo 60

Both fly good, the mojo has some advantages over the ucando. One its a profile, the engine is in the open, not closed up in a cowl. Second I think it's a stronger plane, I've seen a lot of the ucando's lose their landing gear. I'm not a good 3d pilot, but the mojo is easerir to hover for me. And with the mojo, you can say you built it.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.