MY FIRST Q500 MACHINE
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: guadalajara, MEXICO
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MY FIRST Q500 MACHINE
I WILL BOUGT MY FIRST MACHINE FOR TO RACE
WHAT IS IT THE BEST MACHINE LS JETT Q500, OR LS NELSON Q500
AND WHY
THANKS
ATT: CHRISTOPER
WHAT IS IT THE BEST MACHINE LS JETT Q500, OR LS NELSON Q500
AND WHY
THANKS
ATT: CHRISTOPER
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: queensland, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: MY FIRST Q500 MACHINE
both of these engines are hot race engines and with the side exhaust models the power output is very close between the two. there is also another top engine made by MB [ PROFI ] which is also as quick but even cheaper. what you should take into account is ; how good are you with race engines ? do you have money to re build them as they do where out alot quicker than the lower reving glow engines. also have you thought of racing Q-500 in the lower class that uses engines like O.S. and Thunder Tiger 46 sizes ?
the costs of replacing these 2 engines is cheaper than what you will pay for a Nelson etc crankcase. big doolars
the costs of replacing these 2 engines is cheaper than what you will pay for a Nelson etc crankcase. big doolars
#4
My Feedback: (10)
RE: MY FIRST Q500 MACHINE
I agree with Freeair on looking at the TT engines as an entry to Q500.
If the racers in your area are only looking at what we call in the states 428 racing you will be looking at the high dollar engines but if they are also running what we call 424 you would save a bunch of money and possible fustration by going with the TT.40. They are all good engines though.
If the racers in your area are only looking at what we call in the states 428 racing you will be looking at the high dollar engines but if they are also running what we call 424 you would save a bunch of money and possible fustration by going with the TT.40. They are all good engines though.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: char, NC
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: MY FIRST Q500 MACHINE
ORIGINAL: vicman
I agree with Freeair on looking at the TT engines as an entry to Q500.
If the racers in your area are only looking at what we call in the states 428 racing you will be looking at the high dollar engines but if they are also running what we call 424 you would save a bunch of money and possible fustration by going with the TT.40. They are all good engines though.
I agree with Freeair on looking at the TT engines as an entry to Q500.
If the racers in your area are only looking at what we call in the states 428 racing you will be looking at the high dollar engines but if they are also running what we call 424 you would save a bunch of money and possible fustration by going with the TT.40. They are all good engines though.
john g.
#6
My Feedback: (10)
RE: MY FIRST Q500 MACHINE
Play nice Johnny
I had my T-6 taken out by Mr. Nagy's Q 25 Predator Sunday. Word is he is putting kill marks on the plane for the next race seeing as he is 3-0 for mid-airs with that thing now.
The engine was using the same mount as you guys...and I still have it.
I had my T-6 taken out by Mr. Nagy's Q 25 Predator Sunday. Word is he is putting kill marks on the plane for the next race seeing as he is 3-0 for mid-airs with that thing now.
The engine was using the same mount as you guys...and I still have it.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: char, NC
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: MY FIRST Q500 MACHINE
Vic,
l had 9,674 e-mails when l got home from the shop............everybody but Santa and The Easter Bunny!
oh wait .......l heard a "bing" oh well..........them to............what have we started?!?!?!?
jmg
l had 9,674 e-mails when l got home from the shop............everybody but Santa and The Easter Bunny!
oh wait .......l heard a "bing" oh well..........them to............what have we started?!?!?!?
jmg