Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Questions and Answers
Reload this Page >

Evo .61 vs. OS 55

Community
Search
Notices
Questions and Answers If you have general RC questions or answers discuss it here.

Evo .61 vs. OS 55

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2010, 05:02 PM
  #1  
ckombo
Junior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Evo .61 vs. OS 55

Hi,

I have an Extra 300 that i am putting together and need to select an engine for it. I want supreme power for speed and aerobatics and an engine that i can put in an airplane designed for speed later on.

Would you all suggest the Evo .61 or the OS (.55 or .61)? What engine is better designed for speed and fit decently well within a 40-50 size airplane?


Old 10-17-2010, 07:19 PM
  #2  
jetmech05
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 4,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Evo .61 vs. OS 55

you asked my opinion so here goes....I wouldn't buy an Evo....based on the problems I have seen trying to tune an Evo 46...although I have not seen the problems with the bigger Evo's...I like OS...
Old 10-17-2010, 07:50 PM
  #3  
ChuckW
Senior Member
 
ChuckW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Evo .61 vs. OS 55

Between the two, I personally would go straight for the OS as well. The .55 is hard to beat.
Old 10-17-2010, 08:15 PM
  #4  
Hemikiller
My Feedback: (125)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Killingworth, CT
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Evo .61 vs. OS 55

My two cents:

If this is a 40-size aircraft, the 55AX is a no-brainer. Listing on Tower at $159, take the $20 off $139 coupon code (011H4) and the 55AX is less than the 60NX.

IMHO, Horizon is making the EVO engines up to be way more than what they are, which is just another Chinese engine dolled up in a funky casting. I don't think the pre-running is worth the premium they are charging for them over a like displacement Magnum. This is not to say they are a poor engine at all, I had an EVO46NT that was a great engine. I just wouldn't spend that kind of money on a house-brand engine.
Old 10-19-2010, 07:17 AM
  #5  
TimBle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Evo .61 vs. OS 55

If this is for a 40 size bird then opt for a .55 OS AX, Or a J'En 57. Both are based on 46 size crankcases and produce loads of power for their weight. If the plane requires a .60size engine then rather opt for a .75 OS AX since it uses a similar sized crank case.

.60 size engines are rather portly for the power they produce.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.