A123 and Futaba
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Displaced Canadian in Central Texas TX
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A123 and Futaba
Do I need to use a regulator to drop the Voltage when using A123's with Futaba Receivers? I have read that Futaba has not committed to saying that this is OK or NOT; I know I have to run a regulator to drop the Voltage for my Ignition, but what about the receiver?
Thanks.
Thanks.
#3
My Feedback: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: A123 and Futaba
The 6.6V in the new A123s are Rx and servo friendly as I understand.. I know several guys running them unregulated with NO issues.. I have read that all major brand products handle the 6.6 with ease. If I were running them to an ignition module I would certainly regulate.. but thats a completely different issue..
#5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 4,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: A123 and Futaba
what is your receiver worth? Since no one has offically said...run a regulator....we know that 6.0 V won't hurt and we know that 6.6V might hurt after a while....
I run regulators
I run regulators
#6
My Feedback: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: A123 and Futaba
ORIGINAL: dasintex
I thought A123 were 7.2 volts?
I thought A123 were 7.2 volts?
http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0093p?&C=MCD
and the fellas I play with have called the manufacturers and asked if the 6.6 from the A123s will hurt.. none said yes. You can still regulate if you choose..
#7
Moderator
RE: A123 and Futaba
A 6 volt NiCd is 7.2 volts hot off the charger, while an A123/LiFe is 7.4. Under load the difference is a bit more because it takes more to draw down an LiFe, but those are the max voltages that the manufacturers have to design for. So the real issue is whether or not the receiver and servos can tolerate an extra .2 volts. Given that they can still work at less than 4 volts, it seems to me that this equipment is not so voltage sensitive that another .2 volts at the high end is going to make a difference.
#8
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Displaced Canadian in Central Texas TX
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: A123 and Futaba
ORIGINAL: dasintex
I thought A123 were 7.2 volts?
I thought A123 were 7.2 volts?
Anyone else out there using A123 with Futaba, any problems?
Thanks.
#9
My Feedback: (14)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Noblesville,
IN
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: A123 and Futaba
I have been using 5 cell Nicd and Nimh for the past 20 years with Futaba, JR, Hitec and Airtronics. The only issue I ever had was with some older JR servos that twitched until the initial charge was burned off. My flying buddy has been using A123 for the past 5 years, straight up, with all Futaba gear, and has never had an issue. This is with both 72 and now 2.4. My next battery purchase will be A123 and I will not be using any regulator. FWIW.
#10
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Anytown
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: A123 and Futaba
A123s are 7.2V right off the charger and fall to their rated 6.6v fairly quickly. Futaba equipment is well able to use the a123s without regs and DA has approved unregulated A123s on their ignitions. I don't think that holds true for the others though.
#11
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Displaced Canadian in Central Texas TX
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: A123 and Futaba
7.2 or 7.4; the question was can you run A123 with Futaba, but thanks for the clarification; so it appears that you can run A123.
#12
RE: A123 and Futaba
Futaba has the stance that if it does not have the Futaba name on it then your not suppose to do it. Reality is it is done all the time. I think it is a standard in pattern now.
#14
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Displaced Canadian in Central Texas TX
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: A123 and Futaba
ORIGINAL: TFF
Futaba has the stance that if it does not have the Futaba name on it then your not suppose to do it. Reality is it is done all the time. I think it is a standard in pattern now.
Futaba has the stance that if it does not have the Futaba name on it then your not suppose to do it. Reality is it is done all the time. I think it is a standard in pattern now.
BarracudaHockey; that is interesting that Hobbico sells LeFe, but do not warn against Futaba use, again, more crap; thats what makes RCU a valuable tool when you can't get accurate and honest infomation from the manufacturers.
I find it also interesting, that I read that JR has told consumers that A123 use is not a problem with their equipment; they don't seem to be bothered by people not using JR Branded batteries; these manufactures have to know that a lot of people interchange brands within their use ie: Futaba Radios and Receivers and Hitec Servos; or when 72 was the only frequecy in town, how many people used Hitec Receivers with Futaba, etc, etc. so it would make sense that the voltage requirements and limits are fairly universal so people could remain Brand Loyal; can you imagine what would happen if Futaba or JR Radios would only operate their brand of servos, ESC, etc.