Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Questions and Answers
Reload this Page >

Radio problem, interference, or what?

Community
Search
Notices
Questions and Answers If you have general RC questions or answers discuss it here.

Radio problem, interference, or what?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2014, 08:20 PM
  #26  
dirtybird
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Tan Valley, AZ
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes it is possible but that ignition would have to be throwing out enough RF on 2.4 to wipe out the entire 2.4 band.
Frankly I dont believe it. That ignition can't be that crappy.I suspect you had a bad receiver.
Old 07-14-2014, 08:31 PM
  #27  
Charlie P.
 
Charlie P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Crane, NY
Posts: 5,117
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

You are transmitting induction directly to the receiver by hooking it to the ignition circuit. An ignition spark is wide-band.

Do what you like but I run a seperate ignition battery and keep all servos 10" from the plug. Haven't had a glitch to date.
Old 07-14-2014, 08:51 PM
  #28  
2walla
My Feedback: (10)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: walla walla, WA
Posts: 732
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you have a defective ignition you can get interference on 2.4. Seen it. Also have have seen a defective cap that wouldnt seat properly cause glitching. The broadband high voltage spike of the spark can screw up a lot of things.
Old 07-15-2014, 03:33 AM
  #29  
sensei
 
sensei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SAN ANTONIO, TX
Posts: 2,826
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Yes I agree a defective ignition module with enough spiking, a loose cap on the plug, chaffed wires or whatever could probably cause enough noise to be a problem with just about any receiver, and if it was causing a problem 6' away then that could most likely cause a crash anyway, even if everything was setup in line together or not. All anyone can do is perform their own homework, troubleshoot their own problems, setups and programming issues and maybe even purchase and try a new ignition module in this case if all other remedy attempts fail. Anyway I do hope your find your problem.

Bob

Last edited by sensei; 07-16-2014 at 02:28 AM.
Old 07-15-2014, 04:16 AM
  #30  
flyinwalenda
My Feedback: (5)
 
flyinwalenda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Northeast, PA
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by aframe2
Thanks guys for all of the advice, going to work on it today, will let you know the results. Aframe2
What have you determined so far ?
Old 07-15-2014, 04:53 AM
  #31  
dirtybird
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Tan Valley, AZ
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charlie P.
You are transmitting induction directly to the receiver by hooking it to the ignition circuit. An ignition spark is wide-band.

Do what you like but I run a seperate ignition battery and keep all servos 10" from the plug. Haven't had a glitch to date.
Yes a spark is wide band but the high frequencies are very easy to filter out.
The capacitive reactance is inversely proportional to the frequency. The capacitance of just two wires close together is enough to be a short at the frequency of 2.4GHZ. In order to transfer frequency that high you need a waveguide. A coax will work for a short distance but not very far. A twinlead, which a servo connection is, would not work.
Remember, interference from an ignition does not have the code so the receiver will reject it. A reflected signal does have the code.
As an experiment I drove an ignition system with a function generator so it was producing a continuous spark. with the spark plug installed and held next to the receiver ov an operating 2.4 system I did not even get a glitch. The plug was out of the engine and completely exposed.

Last edited by dirtybird; 07-15-2014 at 05:27 AM.
Old 07-15-2014, 05:03 AM
  #32  
dirtybird
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Tan Valley, AZ
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

double post

Last edited by dirtybird; 07-15-2014 at 05:28 AM.
Old 07-15-2014, 06:21 AM
  #33  
Rodney
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 7,769
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I have also witnessed where a 2.4GHz system was interfered with by an electronic ignition system. While 2.4 is more tolerant of RF interference than the old 72, 75 and 6 meter frequencies, it is not immune.
Old 07-15-2014, 06:54 AM
  #34  
dirtybird
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Tan Valley, AZ
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rodney
I have also witnessed where a 2.4GHz system was interfered with by an electronic ignition system. While 2.4 is more tolerant of RF interference thahn the old 72, 75 and 6 meter frequencies, it is not immune.
If 2.4 receiver is interfered with it will quit and go into failsafe with the band wiped out. Is that what you saw?
What you could have seen was direct interference thru pick up on the servo leads The servo leads are not shielded and the servo pulse is quite suseptable to low frequency interference

Last edited by dirtybird; 07-15-2014 at 06:56 AM.
Old 07-15-2014, 08:38 AM
  #35  
Charlie P.
 
Charlie P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Crane, NY
Posts: 5,117
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dirtybird
A reflected signal does have the code. As an experiment I drove an ignition system with a function generator so it was producing a continuous spark. with the spark plug installed and held next to the receiver of an operating 2.4 system I did not even get a glitch. The plug was out of the engine and completely exposed.
But the original poster stated that he wired the ignition and the receiver to the same battery. It's not a question of induction. It's direct pulses being fired throughout the circuit via mechanical connectivity. Ain't no coax gonna shield that.
Old 07-15-2014, 09:51 AM
  #36  
dirtybird
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Tan Valley, AZ
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charlie P.
But the original poster stated that he wired the ignition and the receiver to the same battery. It's not a question of induction. It's direct pulses being fired throughout the circuit via mechanical connectivity. Ain't no coax gonna shield that.
If you reread the initial post I think post #9 nailed it.
BTW coax is not a shield, its a transmission line.
Old 07-15-2014, 10:27 AM
  #37  
raptureboy
 
raptureboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kempton PA
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

O.k this horse has been beat to death before. OP what if any were the results of your investigation/troubleshooting? My money is on a incorrectly connected wire.
Old 07-15-2014, 02:24 PM
  #38  
aframe2
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Walton, KY
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Charlie P, I'm going to try your advice next. I moved the opto kill switch away from the receiver and I'm still getting interference. Tomorrow I will introduce a
second battery to the system. Aframe2
Old 07-15-2014, 04:58 PM
  #39  
hawkerone
My Feedback: (11)
 
hawkerone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Beverly Hills, FL
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Consensus is that you need to be on a two battery arrangement. One for aircraft systems (receiver & servos) and one for ignition. Only common line for the two systems should be the Optical Cut-off switch to the receiver. I whole heartedly agree with this and have used this arrangement for years without the first hiccup. I use a 6v NiMH for the system battery and a 4.8v NiMH for the ignition.
Old 07-15-2014, 05:46 PM
  #40  
flyinwalenda
My Feedback: (5)
 
flyinwalenda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Northeast, PA
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by flyinwalenda
Maybe you have a mix enabled in the transmitter, a bad servo, too small of a battery or regulator.?

First : remove the opto kill switch from between the mechanical switch and the ignition box and then try it again and see if it works OK. If so then something is activating the opto switch as you move the ailerons . You would need to look for a mix turned on in the transmitter.

If the problem is still there then

Second: disconnect the aileron servos , start the engine , move the aileron stick and see if the engine still quits. If it runs OK then either one of the servos is bad and pulling down the battery or regulator and/or the battery regulator is maxed out and can't provide the current to the ignition box. Check the servos ;if OK then plug in a separate battery to the ignition and try again.
Originally Posted by aframe2
Charlie P, I'm going to try your advice next. I moved the opto kill switch away from the receiver and I'm still getting interference. Tomorrow I will introduce a
second battery to the system. Aframe2
Did you perform any of the troubleshooting procedures from post #4 above ?
Old 07-16-2014, 01:05 AM
  #41  
Larry882
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had the same problem years ago with my Sig 1/4 Scale cub. It was the Genuine JR high dollar Y cord going to the Ailerons. They put a choke or something in there that goes bad. I was lucky because I caught it on the ground. I made a new one that doesn't have any extra parts and the problem went away. Another club member had the same problem with a 1/3 Scale cub but it happened in the air. He was not so lucky.
Old 07-16-2014, 03:18 AM
  #42  
sensei
 
sensei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SAN ANTONIO, TX
Posts: 2,826
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aframe2
Charlie P, I'm going to try your advice next. I moved the opto kill switch away from the receiver and I'm still getting interference. Tomorrow I will introduce a
second battery to the system. Aframe2
Your first post stated you had a problem with aileron input from your transmitter killing the engine, now you state you are still getting interference, so which one is it? The problem you were/are having is not an interference problem at all if you input the aileron stick and kill the engine, it is most likely a programming/mixing issue, interference usually causes one or more servos to jump around, intermittently go hard over and so on, I saw a servo extension go bad that caused a very twichy aileron in 2walla's airplane maybe about 15 years ago or so, but I have never witnessed or heard of flight control input killing the engine unless there was an improper mix turned on, what you have explained sounds more like you have somehow slaved the kill with aileron input from the transmitter. If you really wish to troubleshoot this problem, start by unplugging the opti kill and see if the aileron input kills the engine, if not, isolate and correct the mix problem.

Bob

Last edited by sensei; 08-14-2014 at 02:40 AM.
Old 07-16-2014, 09:09 AM
  #43  
aframe2
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Walton, KY
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks, Sensei, will try that also. Aframe2
Old 07-16-2014, 01:40 PM
  #44  
aframe2
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Walton, KY
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I will check back in in a few days to let you know how the troubleshooting is going. I had a minor setback today. I was getting ready to
put in the second battery and I dropped the plane from about 3 feet high and broke the horizontal stab. I now have some repair work
to do before preceding with the trouble shooting. I do appreciate all of your help. It is invaluable. Thanks, Aframe2
Old 07-16-2014, 02:23 PM
  #45  
CafeenMan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 4,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Horizontal stabilizers are over-rated.
Old 07-29-2014, 03:37 PM
  #46  
aframe2
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Walton, KY
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well guys, I have repaired my tail on the Pitts, good as new, maybe better. While the plane was down I changed
about 4 things. I replaced and moved the rcxel kill switch. I bought the one on V View website for 19.95. I was using
the one that cost 34.95 with bed for a 6v battery,(may have been my problem). I installed a battery for the ignition, 4.8v.
So now I am running a separate battery for ignition and receiver. I changed a single switch I was using for a dual switch.
I put everything back together and fired it up a few hours ago and to my surprise it ran like a dream. No glitching from
any source. I can now deflect the ailerons and no interference to the engine. I just can't say what the problem was before
because I did all of those changes at the same time. I want to thank you guys for the constructive criticism you gave, it
guided me in the right direction. Thanks again, Aframe2
Old 08-07-2014, 03:44 AM
  #47  
lopflyers
Senior Member
My Feedback: (12)
 
lopflyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Another happy ending for RC Universe
Old 08-12-2014, 10:37 AM
  #48  
aframe2
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Walton, KY
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, sorry to say I'm back with half of the same problem. I took my plane to the
flying field today to run it up and down the runway to make sure I was ready for
the maiden. Everything was running and operating just as it is suppose to operate.
I took the plane back to the pits to refuel, thought it was out of gas after all of the
taxiing. I started the plane up and the gremlin that caused all of that engine cutout
was back, only this time only when I deflect the aileron control to the right. When
the aileron control is deflected to the left all is well. I'm glad this happened on the
ground. When I have the engine running at full throttle and deflect the aileron to the
right the engine sputters and spurts but continues to run. If I have it at half throttle
or less the engine will just quit. Don't know if this is a noise problem or what. I bought
a JR Matchbox and have decided to run all of my aileron servos through it. I will let
you know the outcome once this is done. Aframe2
Old 09-07-2014, 08:49 AM
  #49  
Mcast27
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Dcup

Aframe. I am having the exact same problem with my dle 35. I have a metal throttle linkage that I'm going to change and I just ordered a dcup from fromeco.org it's a capacitor but better than the other ones on the forum. I haven't switched to two batteries yet but I might have to also. I talked with Tim at valleyview rc in wa, since I'm from boise. He had the same problem and led me to fromeco. They are dle distributors and he is their repairman/owner. I hope it works, I'll give you an update when I get it.
Old 09-08-2014, 07:54 AM
  #50  
aframe2
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Walton, KY
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mcast27, since my last post I have added another battery, moved my ignition switch as far away from
the receiver switch that I can manage to get it. I moved the kill switch away from the receiver and
have moved the throttle receiver away from the ignition module and changed the throttle linkage
to a non conductive pushrod. I'm also going to test the aileron servo to make sure that is not the problem.
I had to send my transmitter in for repair so I haven't been able to test the changes. When I get the
transmitter back I will let you know the results. Aframe2


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.