why no space shuttle rc ?
#3
My Feedback: (5)
RE: why no space shuttle rc ?
I've seen some plans and construction articles in one of the magazines. Radio Controlled Models (RCM) I think. Also saw one flying on the first 'Oops' video (from Propwash Video- shows various R/C crashes). As you might guess, it crashed. Seemed to be REALLY unstable in pitch and roll. Guess that's why...[:@][8D]
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: why no space shuttle rc ?
Luther Hux did one for Model Aviation, lessee, about 1988 or thereabouts? Piggybacked up and dropped like the first STS test flights.
#5
Senior Member
RE: why no space shuttle rc ?
The proportions are very poor. Hard to build one light enough so that the scale wing area will support it. The only one I've seen that actually flew (it was carried aloft piggy back on another model) had about a 45 degree glide angle and difficult to flair at landing.
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: why no space shuttle rc ?
Yup been done. It was designed by parker Leung and the plans are available from RCM. Powered by a ST .40, futaba Super 8 radio and yes it flew like a pattern plane. I built this one back in '95 and was a fun project, all hand cut graphics.
#8
Senior Member
RE: why no space shuttle rc ?
Shuttle proportions may not be very suitable for RC application........but......they are ideal for a "FIELD BOX" and gets lots of attention and is very functional
#9
Senior Member
RE: why no space shuttle rc ?
When I attended the first landing of Columbia at EAFB, I got the impression the thing was just a big tool box, being dropped from a very high altitude, based on the time elapsed between sighting it passing overhead and the touchdown after a short 180 degree pattern.
Tom's field box is probably an accurate dynamic replica!
And would fly the same.
And a brilliant idea!!
Tom's field box is probably an accurate dynamic replica!
And would fly the same.
And a brilliant idea!!
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Philadelphia,
PA
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: why no space shuttle rc ?
An aircraft with the flight characteristics of a road grader doesn't make a hopeful candidate for a smooth flying model. (G)
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Vancouver,
BC, CANADA
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: why no space shuttle rc ?
I think there was an article in MAN or RCM a year or so ago about someone who had built a model of the Russian version of the shuttle, complete with a ducted fan launch aircraft(AN-225?) to carry it up. One guy flew the mother ship and one guy flew the shuttle (Buran?) once it was released.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: why no space shuttle rc ?
ORIGINAL: Dsegal
An aircraft with the flight characteristics of a road grader doesn't make a hopeful candidate for a smooth flying model. (G)
An aircraft with the flight characteristics of a road grader doesn't make a hopeful candidate for a smooth flying model. (G)
IMO, the shuttle orbiter makes a questionable choice for a "scale" glider...
Cheers!
Jim
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Vancouver,
BC, CANADA
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: why no space shuttle rc ?
True enough... I saw a movie(The Dream is Alive?) at the IMAX in Seattle several years ago. There was one sequence filmed out the cockpit windows on landing. Having been involved in "full scale" aviation, I have an idea of what a normal approach looks like. The view on approach through the windows of the shuttle is downright scary. When watching the approach, I kept thinking to myself that they were going to overfly the runway, do a 180 and then land.... but no...they just stuffed the nose down and kept going.
#17
RE: why no space shuttle rc ?
ORIGINAL: Jimmbbo
In a former life, I was offered a chance to aly a Space Shuttle simulator at NASA... when I was on final at 12000 feet 5 miles from the airport, at 300 kts on a glideslope 6 times steeper than normal, I got the idea this was not my father's glider... Crashed the sim twice before I finally managed to get it on the runway...
IMO, the shuttle orbiter makes a questionable choice for a "scale" glider...
Cheers!
Jim
ORIGINAL: Dsegal
An aircraft with the flight characteristics of a road grader doesn't make a hopeful candidate for a smooth flying model. (G)
An aircraft with the flight characteristics of a road grader doesn't make a hopeful candidate for a smooth flying model. (G)
IMO, the shuttle orbiter makes a questionable choice for a "scale" glider...
Cheers!
Jim
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sun City,
AZ
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: why no space shuttle rc ?
That just goes to show you that landing the shuttle simulator (or an RC model for that matter) would be no big deal. Since we're on the subject, thought you might be interested in the attachment which is part of my notes about the Space Shuttle approach and landing.