Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Questions and Answers
Reload this Page >

Great Planes Big Stik 40 ARF

Community
Search
Notices
Questions and Answers If you have general RC questions or answers discuss it here.

Great Planes Big Stik 40 ARF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2006, 04:26 PM
  #1  
P47 Jug - Al
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Rocky River, OH
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Great Planes Big Stik 40 ARF

Hi,

[link]http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXBMM9&P=ML[/link]

I am setting up a GP’s Big Stik 40 with a super tiger 45. GP’s suggests placing the engine towards the front end of the engine mount. However with the Super Tiger, the plane is very nose heavy. If I move the engine back (I could easily move the engine back an inch or a little more) to help the CG, will I disturb the aerodynamics of the plane in a negative way? The only other option is to add weight to the tail. How much, I am not sure. But if I can play with the engine position, that would save weight in the tail.

Any ideas?

Thanks
Al
Old 06-14-2006, 04:56 PM
  #2  
redfox435cat
Senior Member
 
redfox435cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lompoc , CA
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Great Planes Big Stik 40 ARF

thats the best way to balace it. it isn't going to affect the model in any noticable way. Just do it. Also you can get an extension and put the battery toward the tail.
Old 06-15-2006, 07:27 AM
  #3  
P47 Jug - Al
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Rocky River, OH
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Great Planes Big Stik 40 ARF

Thanks for your feedback!
Old 06-15-2006, 07:47 PM
  #4  
Jstanzak
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Haltom City, TX
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Great Planes Big Stik 40 ARF

I have a GP Bigstick 40 with the engine shoved all the way back in the mount without a problem. But then again I am running a hundertiger pro61.
Old 06-15-2006, 07:56 PM
  #5  
Ed_Moorman
My Feedback: (1)
 
Ed_Moorman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Shalimar, FL
Posts: 4,059
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Great Planes Big Stik 40 ARF

I have a Big Stick 40 that I use to break in mid-sized engines. It does come out nose heavy. If the plane doesn't have a cowl, I normally put the engine as far back as it can go unless I know before hand that it builds tail heavy. In my case it has had 2 GMS .47s, 2 OS .46AXs, a Saito .56, Magnum .70 4-stroke and an OS .50. It flew well with all of these engines.

In the case of the Big Stick 40, I also moved the rudder servo to the rear. It might better with both the elevator and rudder servos in the rear.

If you are planning to do knife edge, you want to at least turn the dihedral brace over for some anhedral. It really needs more than this. The usual figure is 3 degrees on each side. Pretend it's a low wing plane flying inverted. The white/tan strip in the center of the wing is balsa gap filler from adding the anhedral.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Tr49926.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	44.1 KB
ID:	478199   Click image for larger version

Name:	Hc94130.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	112.0 KB
ID:	478200   Click image for larger version

Name:	Yw68736.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	60.1 KB
ID:	478201  
Old 12-31-2006, 08:25 AM
  #6  
top242
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: , SPAIN
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Great Planes Big Stik 40 ARF

Hi!, for more aerobatics ist better 0º dihedral? i am an expert pilot. And.... the landing gear, ist better bicycle? . The engine, os46ax , asp524T , or os 50sx? Thanzs!
Old 01-11-2007, 09:35 PM
  #7  
Joseph Ryan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ocean, NJ
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Great Planes Big Stik 40 ARF

I have just finished balancing my Big Stik with a Super Tiger .61 on the front, it required 7.25 oz at the very rear in front and under the vertical stabilizer(inside the fuse). In addition I moved the battery pack behind the servo tray. I also put 1/2 oz weight at the outer left wing (opposite the engine muffler) for lateral balance. It is now completely balanced I can't wait to fly it.
Old 01-11-2007, 09:38 PM
  #8  
P47 Jug - Al
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Rocky River, OH
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Great Planes Big Stik 40 ARF

A Super Tirgre 61, WOW, that thing will tear Let us know how it flys! I have a ST 45 and it flys well with it. I also added a couple of ounces on the tail too. Have fun!

Al
Old 01-12-2007, 04:17 PM
  #9  
Ed_Moorman
My Feedback: (1)
 
Ed_Moorman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Shalimar, FL
Posts: 4,059
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Great Planes Big Stik 40 ARF

Top242: 0 degrees is better than dihedral on a high wing plane, but it really needs anhedral. A high wing location on the fuselage is the equivalent of 3 degrees of dihedral so you need 3 dgerees of anhedral to get back to neutral. If you stay with 0 degrees, the plane will roll with rudder in point rolls and knife edge. If the wing is already built, you can add downward end plates about 3/4" below the wing. These act like anhedral and will also compensate for the high wing location.

Take any low wing plane with dihedral and turn it over and what do you have? A high wing plane with anhedral. This is what you are looking for.

By the way, if you build a low wing plane with 0 degrees dihedral, it will roll opposite to the rudder and want to roll over on its back in knife edge. That's the reason low wing RC planes have dihedral, not for stability. We want neutral or 0 roll stability for acro planes so we don't have to counter control for the stabilizing effect. The plane should stay where we put it, not roll out.

Joseph Ryan: A heavy engine is the reason I have the rudder and elevator servos in the tail of my Ultra Stick and the battery behind the wing. I hate to add lead-it just increases the wing loading and decreases performance.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Jh17261.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	146.7 KB
ID:	596359   Click image for larger version

Name:	Hd94638.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	80.7 KB
ID:	596360   Click image for larger version

Name:	Uz68830.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	53.7 KB
ID:	596361  
Old 01-13-2007, 03:45 PM
  #10  
Joseph Ryan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ocean, NJ
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Great Planes Big Stik 40 ARF

Thanks Ed I agree with you about the lead weight being nothing but parasitic load, I wish I had visited here before I built it, I probably would have done what you did. Why did you add the wire to the tail?
Old 01-13-2007, 04:20 PM
  #11  
Ed_Moorman
My Feedback: (1)
 
Ed_Moorman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Shalimar, FL
Posts: 4,059
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Great Planes Big Stik 40 ARF

One of the other guys bumped his tail and cracked it loose. It isn't in a slot, only surface glued to the fuselage sides. I added the bracing wires just in case. I normally use something lighter, like weedeater line, but since a little more tail weight wouldn't hurt, I went with heavier wire.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.