Riddles
#51
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Riddles
Ok It's not a riddle but I found It quite funny.
A man camped in a national park, and noticed Mr. Snake and Mrs. Snake slithering by. "Where are all the little snakes?" he asked.
Mr. Snake replied, "We are adders, so we cannot multiply."
The following year, the man returned to the same camping spot.
This time there were a whole batch of little snakes.
"I thought you said you could not multiply," he said to Mr. Snake. "Well, the park ranger came by and built a log table, so now we can multiply by adding!"
Paul.
A man camped in a national park, and noticed Mr. Snake and Mrs. Snake slithering by. "Where are all the little snakes?" he asked.
Mr. Snake replied, "We are adders, so we cannot multiply."
The following year, the man returned to the same camping spot.
This time there were a whole batch of little snakes.
"I thought you said you could not multiply," he said to Mr. Snake. "Well, the park ranger came by and built a log table, so now we can multiply by adding!"
Paul.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Newbury, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
RE: Riddles
Nope
it was....
... an Egg!
"i am a vessel without hinges, lock or lid" (the shell is the container without hinges, a lock or a lid)
"yet within my walls, a golden treasure is hid" (the yolk)
HAHA!
it was....
... an Egg!
"i am a vessel without hinges, lock or lid" (the shell is the container without hinges, a lock or a lid)
"yet within my walls, a golden treasure is hid" (the yolk)
HAHA!
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: , HONG KONG
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Riddles
ORIGINAL: CapUSA
I never am, but always will be, I carry nothing, but may hold much for some people. What am I?
I never am, but always will be, I carry nothing, but may hold much for some people. What am I?
Clement
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Riddles
ORIGINAL: CapUSA
tomorrow is correct. Here's a riddle some of you might get, if you know the reference.
"what do I have in my pocket?"
tomorrow is correct. Here's a riddle some of you might get, if you know the reference.
"what do I have in my pocket?"
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: , HONG KONG
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Riddles
ok... here's the answer to mine:
..--o-o-o
...\...../|
....o..o.o
......X...|
....o..o.o
.../.....\|
ignore the periods. they're there to fill up space otherwise the system messes up the alignment.
Clement
..--o-o-o
...\...../|
....o..o.o
......X...|
....o..o.o
.../.....\|
ignore the periods. they're there to fill up space otherwise the system messes up the alignment.
Clement
#59
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Riddles
ORIGINAL: jongscx
...my precioussssss...
...my precioussssss...
Alive without breath, as cold as death; never thirsty, ever drinking, clad in mail but never clinking......
What has roots as nobody sees, is taller than trees, up, up it goes, but never grows?
30 white horses on a red hill. First they champ, then they stamp, then they stand still.
What are the answers?
NO FAIR, Tolkien fans, let the unread answer
#60
RE: Riddles
ORIGINAL: Jose R.
I got one for you guys-
If a bottle and a cork cost $1.05 and the bottle cost $1.00 more than the cork, What would be the cost of the cork?
I got one for you guys-
If a bottle and a cork cost $1.05 and the bottle cost $1.00 more than the cork, What would be the cost of the cork?
#61
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Riddles
ORIGINAL: -EXTRA-
i still dont see how the answer is 25C please explain im going crazy here....
ORIGINAL: Jose R.
I got one for you guys-
If a bottle and a cork cost $1.05 and the bottle cost $1.00 more than the cork, What would be the cost of the cork?
I got one for you guys-
If a bottle and a cork cost $1.05 and the bottle cost $1.00 more than the cork, What would be the cost of the cork?
$0.025 + ($0.025+$1.00) = $1.05
.05 dive by 2, u get 0.025 ( 0.025+0.025=0.05 ) 0.05 + 1.00 = 1.05
The answer is 2.5 cents "A" cork.
To dumb it down, "If a bottle and a cork cost $1.05" bottle is $1 right? "What would be the cost of the cork?" 0.025, They never said how many corks. They said "If a bottle and a cork cost $1.05 and the bottle cost $1.00 more than the cork, What would be the cost of the cork" 2.5cents "A" Cork!
He said 0.25 wen it should of read 2.5C
#63
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina, SK, CANADA
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Riddles
okay, its just algebra
let the cost of the cork be x
so the cork costs x
the bottle costs x+$1.00 (a dollar more than the cork)
the total cost is $1.05
so: cork + bottle = total cost
or: (x) + (x+$1.00) = $1.05
--> x + x + $1.00 = $1.05
--> 2x + $1.00 = $1.05
--> 2x = $0.05
--> x = $0.025
or 2.5 cents
I have no idea why pythonfan emphasizes "'A' cork", and that it was never specified how many corks there are. It was specified; there is one cork.
let the cost of the cork be x
so the cork costs x
the bottle costs x+$1.00 (a dollar more than the cork)
the total cost is $1.05
so: cork + bottle = total cost
or: (x) + (x+$1.00) = $1.05
--> x + x + $1.00 = $1.05
--> 2x + $1.00 = $1.05
--> 2x = $0.05
--> x = $0.025
or 2.5 cents
I have no idea why pythonfan emphasizes "'A' cork", and that it was never specified how many corks there are. It was specified; there is one cork.
#64
RE: Riddles
you have to think of it backwards: the bottle costs a dollar and 2.5 cents beacuse half of five is 2.5 and the bootle costed $1.00 more than the cork. I know it gets confusing.
I have another one:
How can a person with one eye see more than a person with two?
I have another one:
How can a person with one eye see more than a person with two?
#66
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Athens,
GA
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Riddles
An indian taxi driver was being asked questions by a prospective employer to see if he knew english well enough to communicate with passengers.
He asks him: "If I cut out your tongue, what will happen?"
the indian answers "Then I cannot speak."
He asks a "If I gouge out your eyes, what will happen?" he answers: "then I cannot see."
Finally, the employer asks: "And if I cut off your ears, what will happen?"
The indian then answers: "Then I cannot see, or at least have a little trouble in doing so..."
What was his logic?
He asks him: "If I cut out your tongue, what will happen?"
the indian answers "Then I cannot speak."
He asks a "If I gouge out your eyes, what will happen?" he answers: "then I cannot see."
Finally, the employer asks: "And if I cut off your ears, what will happen?"
The indian then answers: "Then I cannot see, or at least have a little trouble in doing so..."
What was his logic?
#71
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Greentown, IN
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Riddles
if a cork is .025c then you would have to have two corks. to find the total of one cork you would have to minus 1.00$ from 1.05$ aand you would get 5c a cork. why in the world would you divide it by two.
#72
RE: Riddles
Beacuse the bottle cost $1.00 more than the cork. The cork cant cost 5 cents beacuse the bottle would now cost less than a dollar. the bottle is $1.00 more than the cork beacuse 2.5-2.5=0
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mayking,
KY
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Riddles
It doesn't say the bottle is $1.00, but that it is $1.00 MORE than the cork. So it has to inlcude the price of the cork to determine the price of a cork alone. If the cork was 5 cents, that is saying the bottle is a dollar more ($1.05) totalling to $1.10. But if the cork is .025 cents, then .025 plus a dollar more than the cork ($1.025) totals to $1.05. Any better?
#75
RE: Riddles
by getting in front of him?
Clement
Clement
Heres the answer:
A person with two eyes sees only one eye while the person with one see two eyes so he sees more.
Oh and thanks r2champion for explaning it clearly