Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Page 42 of 55 FirstFirst ... 32404142434452 ... LastLast
Results 1,026 to 1,050 of 1354

  1. #1026
    rjbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Anchorage, AK
    Posts
    1,245
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth

    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641


    ORIGINAL: rjbob

    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641


    ORIGINAL: cfircav8r

    Again you are referencing the ground. If you used exactly the same inputs the aircraft would react the same, no closer to stall, only the turn would be elongated in the direction of the wind.
    So if I understand you correctly, in my example below, if I used the same inputs for turn two, the bottom senario is roughly *what the turn should look like?

    You're kind of getting the idea...but the 2nd illustration would take the shape of a parallelogram. All the airspeeds in the 2nd illustration, however, would match the airspeeds in the 1st illustration.

    In order to make the ground track in the 2nd illustration match the first, the 2nd illustration would include 2 turns of more than 90 degrees and 2 turns of less than 90 degrees...which could easily be accomplished with the same bank angles and airspeeds.
    Ok, lets look at one turn at a time. If I*gave the inputs needed to*force the ground track in the bottom example*to be the same as the top example for turn two, what would happen to my airspeed?
    No wind situation...heading 360 degrees/course 360 degrees...left turn/30 degrees of bank...hold bank until course is 270 degrees and level out Since there is wind, the heading is the same as the course. During the turn, the airspeed drops, maybe 2 knots due to the slightly higher wing loading. Again...this is in NO WIND.

    Now let's take a headwind...Again the heading and the course starts at 360 degrees and the airspeed is the same as in the no wind situation. A Left turn/30 degrees of bank. The bank angle is again held to 30 degrees until the COURSE is 270 degrees then level out. The heading is now, say, 285 degrees but the course and all airspeeds and ground track are identical. as in the no wind situation. And the control inputs are also identical. The pilot is responsible for stopping the turn when the desired course is attained.
    Alaska Bob - "Can I fly one of your jets? I crashed all of mine."

  2. #1027
    cfircav8r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Hampton, IA
    Posts
    1,197
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth


    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641


    ORIGINAL: rjbob


    ORIGINAL: flythesky


    ORIGINAL: Top_Gunn


    ORIGINAL: flythesky

    A plane will lose airspeed in a turn because of the increased drag from the deflected control surfaces.* It will lose more in a downwind turn than an upwind turn because of the increased deflection of the control surfaces associated with downwind turns.
    Am I right in thinking that by ''downwind turn'' you mean the turn from the downwind leg to the base leg (or to final, if you make a 180 degree turn)? If so, it's true, but this thread seems to be mostly about people thinking that turning toward downwind loses you more speed than other turns, even if the control inputs are the same. That one's the myth.
    You are correct.* One problem with the thread was that there was never a definition of what a downwind turn was.* A 90deg turn or a 180 deg turn or where in the circuit it was.

    The bottom line, though, is that no matter what one's definition of a downwind turn (upwind to downwind or downwind to upwind), it is a still myth. Either way, the plane flies the same.

    Ok, for clarification, what I and most people I know refer to as a downwind turn is represented by turn two in my example. Now, with that defined, what would happen to my airspeed in turn two*if I forced the aircraft in the bottom example to have the same ground track as the*top*example?*
    If you look at my example in post 1020 you will see turn two requires a greater than 90 degree turn. This can be done one of two ways.
    1. you can do a standard turn and hold it longer
    2. you can increase bank angle to keep the time the same, this will cause you to loose even more airspeed due to the higher wing loading not the wind or inertia or any other erroneous reason.
    The three most useless things to a pilot, the sky above you, the runway behind you, and the fuel on the ground.

  3. #1028
    hugger-4641's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    McKenzie, TN
    Posts
    1,836
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth


    ORIGINAL: cfircav8r

    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641


    ORIGINAL: cfircav8r

    Again you are referencing the ground. If you used exactly the same inputs the aircraft would react the same, no closer to stall, only the turn would be elongated in the direction of the wind.
    So if I understand you correctly, in my example below, if I used the same inputs for turn two, the bottom senario is roughly what the turn should look like?

    If you make a normal 90 deg turn using the same bank angle and throttle settings and maintain altitude you will not stall but you will have a pattern that looks like this. While it looks like more than a 90 deg turn on the up wind turns and less than 90 on the down wind this is just your ground track, the actual headings will be true right angles.
    Ok, for clarification of my question, ground track is all that an Rc pilot is concerned with. So I still don't have an answer. I'll ask again: If I force the ground track to look identical in my two examples below, what will happen to my airspeed in turn two of the bottom example as compared to the top?


    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Mk25535.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	61.8 KB 
ID:	1629896  
    Jerry
    AMA -922698 Nomal people scare me, but not as much as I scare them...

  4. #1029
    rjbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Anchorage, AK
    Posts
    1,245
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth


    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641


    ORIGINAL: cfircav8r

    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641


    ORIGINAL: cfircav8r

    Again you are referencing the ground. If you used exactly the same inputs the aircraft would react the same, no closer to stall, only the turn would be elongated in the direction of the wind.
    So if I understand you correctly, in my example below, if I used the same inputs for turn two, the bottom senario is roughly *what the turn should look like?

    If you make a normal 90 deg turn using the same bank angle and throttle settings and maintain altitude you will not stall but you will have a pattern that looks like this. While it looks like more than a 90 deg turn on the up wind turns and less than 90 on the down wind this is just your ground track, the actual headings will be true right angles.
    Ok,* for clarification of my question, ground track is all that an Rc pilot is concerned with. So I still don't have an answer. I'll ask again: If I force the ground track to look identical in my two examples below, what will happen to my airspeed in turn two of the bottom example as compared to the top?


    Again...you can use the EXACT SAME BANK ANGLES and the airpeeds will be identical. You merely hold the turn for a longer or a shorter time to maintain the ground track you desire.

    Can't wait for dinner.
    Alaska Bob - "Can I fly one of your jets? I crashed all of mine."

  5. #1030
    hugger-4641's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    McKenzie, TN
    Posts
    1,836
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth


    ORIGINAL: cfircav8r


    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641


    ORIGINAL: rjbob


    ORIGINAL: flythesky


    ORIGINAL: Top_Gunn


    ORIGINAL: flythesky

    A plane will lose airspeed in a turn because of the increased drag from the deflected control surfaces. It will lose more in a downwind turn than an upwind turn because of the increased deflection of the control surfaces associated with downwind turns.
    Am I right in thinking that by ''downwind turn'' you mean the turn from the downwind leg to the base leg (or to final, if you make a 180 degree turn)? If so, it's true, but this thread seems to be mostly about people thinking that turning toward downwind loses you more speed than other turns, even if the control inputs are the same. That one's the myth.
    You are correct. One problem with the thread was that there was never a definition of what a downwind turn was. A 90deg turn or a 180 deg turn or where in the circuit it was.

    The bottom line, though, is that no matter what one's definition of a downwind turn (upwind to downwind or downwind to upwind), it is a still myth. Either way, the plane flies the same.

    Ok, for clarification, what I and most people I know refer to as a downwind turn is represented by turn two in my example. Now, with that defined, what would happen to my airspeed in turn twoif I forced the aircraft in the bottom example to have the same ground track as thetopexample?
    If you look at my example in post 1020 you will see turn two requires a greater than 90 degree turn. This can be done one of two ways.
    1. you can do a standard turn and hold it longer
    2. you can increase bank angle to keep the time the same, this will cause you to loose even more airspeed due to the higher wing loading not the wind or inertia or any other erroneous reason.
    Bingo! this is what I am saying happens to an Rc pilot when he makes a turn downwind, this is what I am saying is not a "myth".
    Jerry
    AMA -922698 Nomal people scare me, but not as much as I scare them...

  6. #1031
    rjbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Anchorage, AK
    Posts
    1,245
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth


    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641


    ORIGINAL: cfircav8r


    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641


    ORIGINAL: rjbob


    ORIGINAL: flythesky


    ORIGINAL: Top_Gunn


    ORIGINAL: flythesky

    A plane will lose airspeed in a turn because of the increased drag from the deflected control surfaces.* It will lose more in a downwind turn than an upwind turn because of the increased deflection of the control surfaces associated with downwind turns.
    Am I right in thinking that by ''downwind turn'' you mean the turn from the downwind leg to the base leg (or to final, if you make a 180 degree turn)? If so, it's true, but this thread seems to be mostly about people thinking that turning toward downwind loses you more speed than other turns, even if the control inputs are the same. That one's the myth.
    You are correct.* One problem with the thread was that there was never a definition of what a downwind turn was.* A 90deg turn or a 180 deg turn or where in the circuit it was.

    The bottom line, though, is that no matter what one's definition of a downwind turn (upwind to downwind or downwind to upwind), it is a still myth. Either way, the plane flies the same.

    Ok, for clarification, what I and most people I know refer to as a downwind turn is represented by turn two in my example. Now, with that defined, what would happen to my airspeed in turn two*if I forced the aircraft in the bottom example to have the same ground track as the*top*example?*
    If you look at my example in post 1020 you will see turn two requires a greater than 90 degree turn. This can be done one of two ways.
    1. you can do a standard turn and hold it longer
    2. you can increase bank angle to keep the time the same, this will cause you to loose even more airspeed due to the higher wing loading not the wind or inertia or any other erroneous reason.
    Bingo! this is what I am saying happens to an Rc pilot when he makes a turn downwind, this is what I am saying is not a ''myth''.
    Did you not read the part about holding the turn longer? You're maintaining that you can't accomplish your objective with the same control inputs. When someone tells you how to do it, you ignore it.
    Alaska Bob - "Can I fly one of your jets? I crashed all of mine."

  7. #1032
    cfircav8r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Hampton, IA
    Posts
    1,197
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth

    Again the myth is that the wind is pushing you not that pilots have trouble. Many pilots believe they are having trouble because the wind is "pushing on the plane." That is the argument. Many phases of flight confuse R/C pilots. When you are flying towards yourself the rudder and ailerons appear to act in reverse and you need to know the reason why when you move the stick right it rolls left. This argument would be akin to saying the actual controls reverse, not just our perception of it.
    The three most useless things to a pilot, the sky above you, the runway behind you, and the fuel on the ground.

  8. #1033
    hugger-4641's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    McKenzie, TN
    Posts
    1,836
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth

    Did you not read the part about holding the turn longer? You're maintaining that you can't accomplish your objective with the same control inputs. When someone tells you how to do it, you ignore it.
    cfircav8r
    _____________________________

    I didn't ignore anything, but yes, this is what I am saying. However, I think we are still not talking about the same objective. I can't hold the turn longer and maintain the EXACT same ground track, I have to complete the turn in the exact radius and ground track as I did in the "no wind" example. If you explained how todo this without losing airspeed or without adjusting control inputs, thenI definitely missed it.
    Jerry
    AMA -922698 Nomal people scare me, but not as much as I scare them...

  9. #1034
    rjbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Anchorage, AK
    Posts
    1,245
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth


    ORIGINAL: cfircav8r

    Again the myth is that the wind is pushing you not that pilots have trouble. Many pilots believe they are having trouble because the wind is ''pushing on the plane.'' That is the argumant. Many phases of flight confuse R/C pilots. When you are flying towards yourself the rudder and ailerons appear to act in reverse and you need to know the reason why when you move the stick right it rolls left. This argument would be akin to saying the actual controls reverse, not just our perception of it.
    These guys have a misconception. Instead of following through with the reasoning, they get to a certain point in the thought process and STOP.

    And then they make up falsehoods in order to substantiate their mistaken views such as, "An experienced pilot will...etc, etc, etc."

    Exasperating,
    Alaska Bob - "Can I fly one of your jets? I crashed all of mine."

  10. #1035
    rjbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Anchorage, AK
    Posts
    1,245
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth

    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641

    Did you not read the part about holding the turn longer? You're maintaining that you can't accomplish your objective with the same control inputs. When someone tells you how to do it, you ignore it.
    cfircav8r
    _____________________________

    I didn't ignore anything, but yes, this is what I am saying. However, I think we are still not talking about the same objective. I can't hold the turn longer and maintain the EXACT same ground track, I have to complete the turn in the exact radius and ground track as I did in the ''no wind'' example. If you explained how to*do this without losing airspeed or without adjusting control inputs, then*I definitely missed it.
    You hold the turn longer or shorter in order to maintain the same radius.

    I can do it and you can, too.

    Because you are unable to visualize it doesn't mean others can't.
    Alaska Bob - "Can I fly one of your jets? I crashed all of mine."

  11. #1036
    hugger-4641's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    McKenzie, TN
    Posts
    1,836
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth


    ORIGINAL: rjbob

    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641

    Did you not read the part about holding the turn longer? You're maintaining that you can't accomplish your objective with the same control inputs. When someone tells you how to do it, you ignore it.
    cfircav8r
    _____________________________

    I didn't ignore anything, but yes, this is what I am saying. However, I think we are still not talking about the same objective. I can't hold the turn longer and maintain the EXACT same ground track, I have to complete the turn in the exact radius and ground track as I did in the ''no wind'' example. If you explained how todo this without losing airspeed or without adjusting control inputs, thenI definitely missed it.
    You hold the turn longer or shorter in order to maintain the same radius.

    I can do it and you can, too.

    Because you are unable to visualize it doesn't mean others can't.
    Then I must be confused about what you mean by "holding the turn longer" . I am assuming you mean either starting the turn sooner, or maintaining it for a longer time. If so then you are correct, I can not visualizehow you can do this and still follow the same ground track, orwithout affecting airspeed.
    Jerry
    AMA -922698 Nomal people scare me, but not as much as I scare them...

  12. #1037
    cfircav8r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Hampton, IA
    Posts
    1,197
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth

    You are right to make it look the same YOU will loose airspeed due to the higher G load. It is not the wind causing it it is your desire to MAKE the turn look a certain way. Part of being a good pilot is knowing your planes, and your own, limitations. If, in your desire to make your ground track look perfect, you stall/crash you have nothing and no one to blame but yourself. Not the wind, not inertia, not gremlins.
    The three most useless things to a pilot, the sky above you, the runway behind you, and the fuel on the ground.

  13. #1038
    acerc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Lithia, Fl
    Posts
    6,604
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth

    Just read this thread out of boredom and all I can add is           OMG-really.
    Robert
    Cub Brotherhood #3\\ Ryan STA Brotherhood #4
    Corsair Brotherhood #56\\ Waco Brotherhood #184

  14. #1039
    hugger-4641's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    McKenzie, TN
    Posts
    1,836
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth


    ORIGINAL: cfircav8r

    You are right to make it look the same YOU will loose airspeed due to the higher G load. It is not the wind causing it it is your desire to MAKE the turn look a certain way. Part of being a good pilot is knowing your planes, and your own, limitations. If, in your desire to make your ground track look perfect, you stall/crash you have nothing and no one to blame but yourself. Not the wind, not inertia, not gremlins.
    Finally, we get all theposturing andcondecention out of the way and get down to the point! Different perceptions of the same facts! Yes, I totaly understand that for a pilot who does not care about his ground track, a turn down wind is no different than any other. But, for a pilot who is concerned with nothing else but his ground track, crashing in a down wind turn is not a myth!

    Thanks for helping me articulate whatI have been struggling with. If this does notclear it up for everyone else who has berated and belittled those who didn't percieve the argument the same way, then my Cub is waiting and theoffer for dinner still stands.cfircav8r,should you ever make it down my way, your dinner is waiting for having patience with me thru this discussion instead of trying to bully me into submission !
    Jerry
    AMA -922698 Nomal people scare me, but not as much as I scare them...

  15. #1040

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    151
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth


    ORIGINAL: cactusflyer


    ORIGINAL: flythesky

    A plane will lose airspeed in a turn because of the increased drag from the deflected control surfaces. It will lose more in a downwind turn than an upwind turn because of the increased deflection of the control surfaces associated with downwind turns.
    WRONG!

    Tailwinds,

    John
    Such a reasoned and well thought out response.

    Larry

  16. #1041

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Hamburg, NY
    Posts
    41
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth

    RJBob,
    I apologize for my poorly worded post. I did not mean to imply anything about anyone's flying ability. I was simply trying to convey my thoughts.

    Regards,
    Dave S.


  17. #1042

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    151
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth


    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641


    ORIGINAL: flythesky


    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641


    ORIGINAL: cfircav8r

    Again you are referencing the ground. If you used exactly the same inputs the aircraft would react the same, no closer to stall, only the turn would be elongated in the direction of the wind.
    So if I understand you correctly, in my example below, if I used the same inputs for turn two, the bottom senario is roughly what the turn should look like?

    No. All turn would look alike but the control movements would be different for each turn.


    You didn't read my question thoroughly, I said if I used the same inputs, meaningI usethe exact same stick movement which would equate to exact same elevator, rudder, and aileron deflection. If I do this ,the bottom track in my example should resemble what would happen in turn two.
    Sorry. Turns one and two would be similar. in shape. Turns three and four would be elongated (streched) in the direction of the wind.

    Larry

  18. #1043
    rjbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Anchorage, AK
    Posts
    1,245
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth


    ORIGINAL: Cosmicwind

    RJBob,
    I apologize for my poorly worded post. I did not mean to imply anything about anyone's flying ability. I was simply trying to convey my thoughts.

    Regards,
    Dave S.

    What is really difficult is the fact that we're in a forum setting. It's impossible to take you up in a plane or demonstrate something at the flying field...or even wave my hands to simulate a flying plane over a cup of coffee.

    There would be no arguments whatsoever in re this topic if the myth believers went for a ride with a professional pilot or watched and listened while a competent R/C pilot demonstrated some good old fashioned myth-busting.

    Again...Happy flying!

    Bob
    Alaska Bob - "Can I fly one of your jets? I crashed all of mine."

  19. #1044

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Boulder City, NV
    Posts
    60
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth

    Thanks Highhorse for teaching me something very valuable. What is the next lesson? Thanks again Highhorse!

  20. #1045

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Madbury, NH
    Posts
    64
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth

    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641


    ORIGINAL: cfircav8r

    You are right to make it look the same YOU will loose airspeed due to the higher G load. It is not the wind causing it it is your desire to MAKE the turn look a certain way. Part of being a good pilot is knowing your planes, and your own, limitations. If, in your desire to make your ground track look perfect, you stall/crash you have nothing and no one to blame but yourself. Not the wind, not inertia, not gremlins.
    Finally, we get all the*posturing and*condecention out of the way and get down to the point!* Different perceptions of the same facts!* *Yes, I totaly understand that for a pilot who does not care about his ground track, a turn down wind is no different than any other. But, for a pilot who is concerned with nothing else but his ground track, crashing in a down wind turn is not a myth!

    Thanks for helping me articulate what*I have been struggling with. *If this does not*clear it up for everyone else who has berated and belittled those who didn't percieve the argument the same way*, then my Cub is waiting and the*offer for dinner still stands.***cfircav8r,*should you ever make it down my way, your dinner is waiting for having patience with me thru this discussion instead of trying to bully me into submission ![img][/img]
    Did anyone ever say "crashing in a downwind turn is a myth"??? NO, THATS NOT THE MYTH. The "myth" refers to the ERRONEOUS REASONS people posit for their downwind crashes. It's important because the myth IS a myth, and leads people to make the wrong (or at least not the best) compensation for the very real problem of downwind crashes.

    Is ANYONE really that concerned with ground track being exactly the same as in dead calm? Even in competition/pattern flying, when you have to maintain ground track by crabbing into the wind, do the judges really take points off for having a longer radius on the downwind turns? I've never flown patterns, but that seems awfully hard to see or judge anyway. Furthermore, in your original dinner challenge, did you specify that the ground track and turn radii remain the same as in dead calm? I don't think so. You are now re-framing your challenge and your argument because you now know your original concept was somewhat in error. You might benefit from accepting that, and I'm calling you on it (not belittling you).

    The problem is not so much that pilots try to maintain a "perfect" rectangular ground track, but that they try to maintain steady ground SPEED. If you try to keep your visually apparent speed (ground speed) looking the same as on a calm day, then yes, you will definitely lose airspeed on the "downwind" turn and gain airspeed going upwind. That is bad and that's no myth.

    If you expect and allow the plane to have different ground speeds upwind vs. downwind, then you usually stay out of trouble. If you allow for this different visual ground speed appearance in the different directions of flight, then even if you DO try to maintain ground track by constantly crabbing into the wind, I doubt the loss in airspeed caused by the longer (greater than 90 degree) turn would be very significant. The point of this thread is that you should not attempt to do this at the same radius as upwind anyway. THAT IS THE LESSON, not "add throttle". If you keep your stick movements gradual and similar to what you do on a calm day, and let the downwind turn "elongate" and let the plane appear to accelerate in the down wind direction, YOU WILL NOT LOSE AIRSPEED ANY MORE THAN YOU DO ON YOUR UPWIND TURNS... and you will not crash. No throttle needed.

    You may consider this a trivial or semantic point, but it's important. Most airspeed loss from turning downwind is NOT due to the trivial fact that such turns may be more than 90 degrees. Most of the airspeed loss is due to the pilot MAKING the plane lose airspeed by being unaware of the invisible wind speed, underestimating wind affect on ground track and ground speed, and by FORCING the plane to make turns that look the same downwind as upwind. In short, pilot mistakes ground speed for airspeed. Pilot error, NOT AERODYNAMICS. "Add throttle" is not the correct cure for this error.

  21. #1046
    rjbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Anchorage, AK
    Posts
    1,245
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth


    ORIGINAL: RZielin

    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641


    ORIGINAL: cfircav8r

    You are right to make it look the same YOU will loose airspeed due to the higher G load. It is not the wind causing it it is your desire to MAKE the turn look a certain way. Part of being a good pilot is knowing your planes, and your own, limitations. If, in your desire to make your ground track look perfect, you stall/crash you have nothing and no one to blame but yourself. Not the wind, not inertia, not gremlins.
    Finally, we get all the*posturing and*condecention out of the way and get down to the point!* Different perceptions of the same facts!* *Yes, I totaly understand that for a pilot who does not care about his ground track, a turn down wind is no different than any other. But, for a pilot who is concerned with nothing else but his ground track, crashing in a down wind turn is not a myth!

    Thanks for helping me articulate what*I have been struggling with. *If this does not*clear it up for everyone else who has berated and belittled those who didn't percieve the argument the same way*, then my Cub is waiting and the*offer for dinner still stands.***cfircav8r,*should you ever make it down my way, your dinner is waiting for having patience with me thru this discussion instead of trying to bully me into submission ![img][/img]
    Did anyone ever say ''crashing in a downwind turn is a myth''??? NO, THATS NOT THE MYTH. The ''myth'' refers to the ERRONEOUS REASONS people posit for their downwind crashes. It's important because the myth IS a myth, and leads people to make the wrong (or at least not the best) compensation for the very real problem of downwind crashes.

    Is ANYONE really that concerned with ground track being exactly the same as in dead calm? Even in competition/pattern flying, when you have to maintain ground track by crabbing into the wind, do the judges really take points off for having a longer radius on the downwind turns? I've never flown patterns, but that seems awfully hard to see or judge anyway. Furthermore, in your original dinner challenge, did you specify that the ground track and turn radii remain the same as in dead calm? I don't think so. You are now re-framing your challenge and your argument because you now know your original concept was somewhat in error. You might benefit from accepting that, and I'm calling you on it (not belittling you).

    The problem is not so much that pilots try to maintain a ''perfect'' rectangular ground track, but that they try to maintain steady ground SPEED. If you try to keep your visually apparent speed (ground speed) looking the same as on a calm day, then yes, you will definitely lose airspeed on the ''downwind'' turn and gain airspeed going upwind. That is bad and that's no myth.

    If you expect and allow the plane to have different ground speeds upwind vs. downwind, then you usually stay out of trouble. If you allow for this different visual ground speed appearance in the different directions of flight, then even if you DO try to maintain ground track by constantly crabbing into the wind, I doubt the loss in airspeed caused by the longer (greater than 90 degree) turn would be very significant. The point of this thread is that you should not attempt to do this at the same radius as upwind anyway. THAT IS THE LESSON, not ''add throttle''. If you keep your stick movements gradual and similar to what you do on a calm day, and let the downwind turn ''elongate'' and let the plane appear to accelerate in the down wind direction, YOU WILL NOT LOSE AIRSPEED ANY MORE THAN YOU DO ON YOUR UPWIND TURNS... and you will not crash. No throttle needed.

    You may consider this a trivial or semantic point, but it's important. Most airspeed loss from turning downwind is NOT due to the trivial fact that such turns may be more than 90 degrees. Most of the airspeed loss is due to the pilot MAKING the plane lose airspeed by being unaware of the invisible wind direction, underestimating wind affect on ground track and ground speed, and by FORCING the plane to make turns that look the same downwind as upwind. In short, pilot mistakes ground speed for airspeed. Pilot error, NOT AERODYNAMICS. ''Add throttle'' is not the correct cure for this error.
    There ya go!
    Alaska Bob - "Can I fly one of your jets? I crashed all of mine."

  22. #1047

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    , NAMIBIA
    Posts
    302
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth


    ORIGINAL: hugger-4641


    ORIGINAL: cfircav8r

    You are right to make it look the same YOU will loose airspeed due to the higher G load. It is not the wind causing it it is your desire to MAKE the turn look a certain way. Part of being a good pilot is knowing your planes, and your own, limitations. If, in your desire to make your ground track look perfect, you stall/crash you have nothing and no one to blame but yourself. Not the wind, not inertia, not gremlins.
    Finally, we get all the*posturing and*condecention out of the way and get down to the point!* Different perceptions of the same facts!* *Yes, I totaly understand that for a pilot who does not care about his ground track, a turn down wind is no different than any other. But, for a pilot who is concerned with nothing else but his ground track, crashing in a down wind turn is not a myth!

    Thanks for helping me articulate what*I have been struggling with. *If this does not*clear it up for everyone else who has berated and belittled those who didn't percieve the argument the same way*, then my Cub is waiting and the*offer for dinner still stands.***cfircav8r,*should you ever make it down my way, your dinner is waiting for having patience with me thru this discussion instead of trying to bully me into submission ![img][/img]
    Yes you are right from that point of view, but the argument is about something else. The pilot obsessed with a ground track for whatever reason (aerobatic pattern being judged for example) would have to do a lot more work to maintain track. Many years ago when flying F3A and you were judged on wing level and ground track we did horrible turns with constant bank angle but with rudder co-ordinated to maintain the illusion of wind not affecting you. If you did not watch airspeed the downwind turn WOULD get you for sure (or loop whatever). many pilots managed this well without understanding the physics/aerodynamics involved hence the myth is born "the wind pushed the plane".
    Wind does not affect airplanes ONLY pilots.
    Hope we all agree now.

  23. #1048

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Longview, TX
    Posts
    34

    RE: Downwind turn Myth

    If any of you are still struggling with this concept, perhaps a visit to the PROBRO site will help clear up any questions. Just ask and ye will receive.

  24. #1049
    Airplanes400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,631
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth

    OMG ... this thread is a myth!
    We in the Federal Government have no sense of humor that we are aware of.

  25. #1050
    Airplanes400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,631
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Downwind turn Myth

    Good job people ... over 1,000 posts about absolutely nothing. I'm going to get the last 10 minutes of my life back and do something more productive ... like watch Jerry Springer, or watch the show with 5 women sitting around a table talking nonsense about nonsense, or see what Kate Middleton is wearing while on tour in Canada with Prince William...
    We in the Federal Government have no sense of humor that we are aware of.


Page 42 of 55 FirstFirst ... 32404142434452 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:19 PM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.