Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
#51
My Feedback: (69)
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
ORIGINAL: Andy Sheldon
Dave
I personally have 2 of the Jetjoe Juniors in foam models.
My original engine is now about 18 months old.
The only changes I have made is to open the tail cone a little to reduce the temp slightly as suggested in another thread on this forum.
The very early Juniors suffered with loss of pre load due to the wavy washer but Joe is very helpful and if you return the turbine to him he replaces the washer free of charge and tests the engine.
I did have a combustion chamber burn out after about 6 months of hard use and again it was returned to Joe who replaced it with an improved design free of charge. Joe really is very helpfull.
I read these Jet Joe bashing threads and really can not believe some of the posts.
I know some of the posters and know that they have very little turbine experience and have never personally owned a Jet Joe.
The Jet Joe is not plug and play like a JetCat but if you know what you are doing its not a problem.
Heres another flight
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNyMQumSGF4
Thanks
Andy
Dave
I personally have 2 of the Jetjoe Juniors in foam models.
My original engine is now about 18 months old.
The only changes I have made is to open the tail cone a little to reduce the temp slightly as suggested in another thread on this forum.
The very early Juniors suffered with loss of pre load due to the wavy washer but Joe is very helpful and if you return the turbine to him he replaces the washer free of charge and tests the engine.
I did have a combustion chamber burn out after about 6 months of hard use and again it was returned to Joe who replaced it with an improved design free of charge. Joe really is very helpfull.
I read these Jet Joe bashing threads and really can not believe some of the posts.
I know some of the posters and know that they have very little turbine experience and have never personally owned a Jet Joe.
The Jet Joe is not plug and play like a JetCat but if you know what you are doing its not a problem.
Heres another flight
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNyMQumSGF4
Thanks
Andy
Great reply...How many hours exactly on EACH? Only item needing service was a CC between both engines? No bearings, flame sticks, etc? Other than maybe some ECU adjustments nothing else?
Lastly, These came direct from JJ in China and no other party "tweaked" them before or after you got 'em?
I'm still a disbeliever.... Sorry.
Dave
#53
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
I know some of the posters and know that they have very little turbine experience and have never personally owned a Jet Joe.
I almost did though, a friend bought one before me. After seeing all the joy it brought him I was left thinking.........
Whew....close call! - John.
#55
My Feedback: (927)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Inverness, FL
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
Mike,
Most of these comments are from onlookers. Many have never owned a JJ. I have a JJ1400, Got it from JJUS, used.
It has been a fine running turbine. Starts every time, haven't had a flame out and keeps running even after some of my less than perfect landings. I really can't complain at all.
Pushes my jet around smartly, and uses about 6 to 7 oz of fuel per minite.
I heard all the stories and have owned Jet Cat's and PST's. Couldn't pass this one up at the price I paid, and figured I knew enough about them to play with it. Haven't had any problems so I just fly it and it has proven to be a dependable unit.
And I do buy lotto tickets, but never win anything!
Just my 2 cents from someone who actually ownes one.
Most of these comments are from onlookers. Many have never owned a JJ. I have a JJ1400, Got it from JJUS, used.
It has been a fine running turbine. Starts every time, haven't had a flame out and keeps running even after some of my less than perfect landings. I really can't complain at all.
Pushes my jet around smartly, and uses about 6 to 7 oz of fuel per minite.
I heard all the stories and have owned Jet Cat's and PST's. Couldn't pass this one up at the price I paid, and figured I knew enough about them to play with it. Haven't had any problems so I just fly it and it has proven to be a dependable unit.
And I do buy lotto tickets, but never win anything!
Just my 2 cents from someone who actually ownes one.
#56
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Co. Donegal, IRELAND
Posts: 2,760
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
To try and answer the actual question of the thread, I believe it is still a build/balance issue at the factory which is probably a normal Chinese assembly line and not actually going through the hands of an expert like mike at wren before it goes out the door.
However anyone who has any knowledge about turbines will get one to run fine as the components themselves now are all ok.
Anyone that has stripped or worked on turbines will know there is nothing much to them and really not that difficult to get right, but you do need to have certain things right like all the fuel needles working, correct preload and the turbine well balanced, which seem to be the major issues.
But as said above, they are not a Plug & Play like a Jetcat, and are better bought either in parts or stripped and rebuilt, snag here is because they are cheap they attract the new, on a budget, jet flyer who dos'nt know anything about turbines, and the guy that does, probably can afford to buy a Jetcat anyway so wont want to be bothered.
Jetjoe is still selling them and parts are very easy to obtain so I don't think much will change on that front.
However anyone who has any knowledge about turbines will get one to run fine as the components themselves now are all ok.
Anyone that has stripped or worked on turbines will know there is nothing much to them and really not that difficult to get right, but you do need to have certain things right like all the fuel needles working, correct preload and the turbine well balanced, which seem to be the major issues.
But as said above, they are not a Plug & Play like a Jetcat, and are better bought either in parts or stripped and rebuilt, snag here is because they are cheap they attract the new, on a budget, jet flyer who dos'nt know anything about turbines, and the guy that does, probably can afford to buy a Jetcat anyway so wont want to be bothered.
Jetjoe is still selling them and parts are very easy to obtain so I don't think much will change on that front.
#57
My Feedback: (6)
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
I have never owned a JetJoe. But as someone here (Dave, I think???) put it so eloquently, I don't have to eat feces to know it tastes like sh_t!
I have been flying turbines for almost 12 years now. I have seen oh so many reports on JJ. The guys that claim to be flying them successfully can be counted on less than one hand.
Is a JetJoe really to be considered a quality product????
I have been flying turbines for almost 12 years now. I have seen oh so many reports on JJ. The guys that claim to be flying them successfully can be counted on less than one hand.
Is a JetJoe really to be considered a quality product????
#59
My Feedback: (5)
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
ORIGINAL: hapyjac2
Mike,
Most of these comments are from onlookers. Many have never owned a JJ. I have a JJ1400, Got it from JJUS, used.
It has been a fine running turbine. Starts every time, haven't had a flame out and keeps running even after some of my less than perfect landings. I really can't complain at all.
Pushes my jet around smartly, and uses about 6 to 7 oz of fuel per minite.
I heard all the stories and have owned Jet Cat's and PST's. Couldn't pass this one up at the price I paid, and figured I knew enough about them to play with it. Haven't had any problems so I just fly it and it has proven to be a dependable unit.
And I do buy lotto tickets, but never win anything!
Just my 2 cents from someone who actually ownes one.
Mike,
Most of these comments are from onlookers. Many have never owned a JJ. I have a JJ1400, Got it from JJUS, used.
It has been a fine running turbine. Starts every time, haven't had a flame out and keeps running even after some of my less than perfect landings. I really can't complain at all.
Pushes my jet around smartly, and uses about 6 to 7 oz of fuel per minite.
I heard all the stories and have owned Jet Cat's and PST's. Couldn't pass this one up at the price I paid, and figured I knew enough about them to play with it. Haven't had any problems so I just fly it and it has proven to be a dependable unit.
And I do buy lotto tickets, but never win anything!
Just my 2 cents from someone who actually ownes one.
What are you doing with a JetJoe what happen to you RAM?
Basil
#60
My Feedback: (69)
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
ORIGINAL: Woketman
I have never owned a JetJoe. But as someone here (Dave, I think???) put it so eloquently, I don't have to eat feces to know it tastes like sh_t!
I have been flying turbines for almost 12 years now. I have seen oh so many reports on JJ. The guys that claim to be flying them successfully can be counted on less than one hand.
Is a JetJoe really to be considered a quality product????
I have never owned a JetJoe. But as someone here (Dave, I think???) put it so eloquently, I don't have to eat feces to know it tastes like sh_t!
I have been flying turbines for almost 12 years now. I have seen oh so many reports on JJ. The guys that claim to be flying them successfully can be counted on less than one hand.
Is a JetJoe really to be considered a quality product????
Thanks for the credit!
Now can we get back on topic of poor quality turbines from Jet Joe? :-))
"So much time, so little quality"
Dave Rigotti
#61
My Feedback: (28)
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
Too many double standards.
If any of the "approved by the turbine snobs" beloved companies went to crap they would be the first ones stepping up to try to fix the problem, not just bashing them and doing everything possible to hold them down.
Many people just don't understand free market economics.
No wonder unemployment is 9.8%
I bet if a new company came out with a product as good, if not better quality then the "approved" companies they'll get the same bashing as JJ.
If any of the "approved by the turbine snobs" beloved companies went to crap they would be the first ones stepping up to try to fix the problem, not just bashing them and doing everything possible to hold them down.
Many people just don't understand free market economics.
No wonder unemployment is 9.8%
I bet if a new company came out with a product as good, if not better quality then the "approved" companies they'll get the same bashing as JJ.
#62
My Feedback: (48)
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
I bet if a new company came out with a product as good, if not better quality then the "approved" companies they'll get the same bashing as JJ.
Read the threads, for every JJ owner that reports good results (and that's usually after rebuild & tinkering) there are 10 who report major problems. There's no snob conspiracy here. Most experienced turbine fliers recognise JJ for what it is and are trying to keep naive newbees from wasting their money and time.
Joe
#63
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mercersburg, PA
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
I wish I would have listen to the voice of reason before buying my JJ1800 but I was a newbee and could smell the kero.
I could of had two good turbines by now.
Newbees Take Notes!!
I could of had two good turbines by now.
Newbees Take Notes!!
#64
My Feedback: (69)
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
ORIGINAL: Mike06659
I wish I would have listen to the voice of reason before buying my JJ1800 but I was a newbee and could smell the kero.
I could of had two good turbines by now.
Newbees Take Notes!!
I wish I would have listen to the voice of reason before buying my JJ1800 but I was a newbee and could smell the kero.
I could of had two good turbines by now.
Newbees Take Notes!!
Dave Rigotti
#65
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: gwent, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
Hi
I just thought I would post my view, I have owned a jetcat P80 that was great! Also I have built my own engines from scratch, usually using donor parts from car turbos ie the compressor, shaft and turbine (the parts the need to be perfectly made lol), the engines here always run pretty good.
Anyway I think for a person that knows how the engines work and what is critical for them to run reliably, the JJ engines are a pretty good bargin, for example the 1200 is available in a kit, and I have found that the designs are good but the tolerances and finishes on some of the part are not so good.
For example I managed to tighten up the compressor tolerance using a very thin alloy shim washer on the shaft which would of improve the compression ratio and lowered internal engine temperatures.
Another point is the fuel burner ring, sometimes these are not soldered too well and sometime partially blocked with solder, resulting in and unbalanced combustion chamber and hotspots.
I suppose if you spent a little time when assembling the engines testing and checking each components then you will have a decent engine at a good price.
I know only the 1200 engines are available in kit form but if I were to buy a ready built engine from jj, I would strip it first and check everything as mentioned above.
Hope this helps some people
Antony
I just thought I would post my view, I have owned a jetcat P80 that was great! Also I have built my own engines from scratch, usually using donor parts from car turbos ie the compressor, shaft and turbine (the parts the need to be perfectly made lol), the engines here always run pretty good.
Anyway I think for a person that knows how the engines work and what is critical for them to run reliably, the JJ engines are a pretty good bargin, for example the 1200 is available in a kit, and I have found that the designs are good but the tolerances and finishes on some of the part are not so good.
For example I managed to tighten up the compressor tolerance using a very thin alloy shim washer on the shaft which would of improve the compression ratio and lowered internal engine temperatures.
Another point is the fuel burner ring, sometimes these are not soldered too well and sometime partially blocked with solder, resulting in and unbalanced combustion chamber and hotspots.
I suppose if you spent a little time when assembling the engines testing and checking each components then you will have a decent engine at a good price.
I know only the 1200 engines are available in kit form but if I were to buy a ready built engine from jj, I would strip it first and check everything as mentioned above.
Hope this helps some people
Antony
#66
My Feedback: (6)
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
ORIGINAL: joeflyer
Not true! That hasn't happened with Kingtech or Black Mamba. Both companies came out with lower cost turbines than the established brands. The difference between them and Jetjoe is that they start and run out of the box, and now that they have been on the market for 1 - 2 years they are establishing a reputation as reliable products.
Read the threads, for every JJ owner that reports good results (and that's usually after rebuild & tinkering) there are 10 who report major problems. There's no snob conspiracy here. Most experienced turbine fliers recognise JJ for what it is and are trying to keep naive newbees from wasting their money and time.
Joe
I bet if a new company came out with a product as good, if not better quality then the ''approved'' companies they'll get the same bashing as JJ.
Read the threads, for every JJ owner that reports good results (and that's usually after rebuild & tinkering) there are 10 who report major problems. There's no snob conspiracy here. Most experienced turbine fliers recognise JJ for what it is and are trying to keep naive newbees from wasting their money and time.
Joe
Hey joe, your first name ain't "Jet", is it????
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NA,
NJ
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
Why haven't JJ improved? They don't need to. The price is low enough.
Doesn't matter that they are crap. Doesn't matter that the turbine is not made of Inconel, the tolerances are horrible, the workmanship is awful and the balancing method criminal. Doesn't matter that they need "tinkering" (rebuilding) to work. Doesn't matter that they are inherently unsafe.
They are cheap. Cheap sells.
Kingtech tried very very hard and made some very ingenious modifications to reduce the price of the engine without compromising reliability and safety. That's the big difference. Kingtech's engines are inexpensive. JJ are cheap!
Doesn't matter that they are crap. Doesn't matter that the turbine is not made of Inconel, the tolerances are horrible, the workmanship is awful and the balancing method criminal. Doesn't matter that they need "tinkering" (rebuilding) to work. Doesn't matter that they are inherently unsafe.
They are cheap. Cheap sells.
Kingtech tried very very hard and made some very ingenious modifications to reduce the price of the engine without compromising reliability and safety. That's the big difference. Kingtech's engines are inexpensive. JJ are cheap!
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NA,
NJ
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Why haven't JetJoe Turbines Improved??
No, but it isn't Inconel 713c or 718. Probably a lower grade, perhaps some kind of fortified stainless.
Since they have no documentation and you can't tell where and how they were forged it's anybody's guess. Since real Inconel turbines need to be vacuum cast and x-rayed (=expensive) you can understand why they're secretive.
Since they have no documentation and you can't tell where and how they were forged it's anybody's guess. Since real Inconel turbines need to be vacuum cast and x-rayed (=expensive) you can understand why they're secretive.