Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 29

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Chatham, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    118
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Flash Power thoughts

    I am looking to get into a new jet and have been doing some reading and it seems to point to a Flash as the best option for what I want. I have been looking at either a used C Flash or U Flash new or used but I have been pondering power choices.

    At this point it will be either a 100 or 140 and I was leaning to a 100 to keep it light and would like to try and get the fuel usage down for longer flight times and keep residual thrust down for landings.

    Is there options for additional fuel over that of the wing tank?

    I have also heard that the 100 is marginal for that bird as I don't want an under powered jet either. Operation will be off of grass fields.

    Any thoughts?


  2. #2
    AFTERBURNER1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Anaheim Hills, CA
    Posts
    4,364
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    JETCAT p140 fully bypassed is a great combo..
    Horizon Hobby

  3. #3
    PaulD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    CoquitlamBC, CANADA
    Posts
    1,307
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    Check out what Peter Ayache has done with his UF. He put a BF100 in his which is more comact than a P120 but puts out similar thrust @ 27 lbs. I also think he sells the engine for about 2500 so a pretty good value. I have seen/flown Dean W's fly with a P100 JetCat and it has really good performance. The UF is a lot slipperier than the Classic.

    I flew my Classic Flash with a Merlin 160 and it was ballistic but was a real handfull and was really tough to land until I put crow set-up in with the flaps. (Too much residual thrust)

    Carf sells a sadlle tank kit in place of the wing tank that adds lots of capacity:

    http://carf-models.com/public_carf/p...ory&proId=2772

    Cheers,

    PaulD
    If it\'\'s too LOUD - You\'\'re too OLD

    Www.wircsrc.com
    MAAC Jet Committee

  4. #4
    RCISFUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Erie, PA
    Posts
    5,191
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    I a have a Classic Flash and originally I had a Jet Central Rabbit rated at 19 Lbs, it flew great with that Turbine, when it came time to send in the motor for its 25 hour service interval I decided to bolt in my Jet Central Cheetah, all I can say is WOW, at 31 Lbs this thing is a rocket ship. I usually fly around at less than half throttle. The landing characteristics changed also because of the residual thrust.

    I would not hesitate to put the Rabbit back in when I need the Cheetah for another project.

    So what I am trying to say is pick a turbine that you feel will fit your long term flying goals, a larger thrust motor that is compact will not be a disadvantage as far as weight and fuel consumption because you probably would not be flying around at full throttle. Then is is good if you need it for a larger airframe, if you have no plans to go bigger then the New Rabbit 100 would be perfect at 22 Lbs of thrust.


    Good luck, no matter what you get you will like the Flash!
    Rich
    The New Jet Central Rhino SP, Cheetah, Rabbit & Super Eagle owner

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Bakersfield, CA
    Posts
    321
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    P 100 RX will push it past 200 mph

  6. #6
    luv2flyrc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Mississauga, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    1,423
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts


    ORIGINAL: RCISFUN

    I a have a Classic Flash and originally I had a Jet Central Rabbit rated at 19 Lbs, it flew great with that Turbine, when it came time to send in the motor for its 25 hour service interval I decided to bolt in my Jet Central Cheetah, all I can say is WOW, at 31 Lbs this thing is a rocket ship. I usually fly around at less than half throttle. The landing characteristics changed also because of the residual thrust.

    I would not hesitate to put the Rabbit back in when I need the Cheetah for another project.

    So what I am trying to say is pick a turbine that you feel will fit your long term flying goals, a larger thrust motor that is compact will not be a disadvantage as far as weight and fuel consumption because you probably would not be flying around at full throttle. Then is is good if you need it for a larger airframe, if you have no plans to go bigger then the New Rabbit 100 would be perfect at 22 Lbs of thrust.


    Good luck, no matter what you get you will like the Flash!
    Yep, I agree. I have a Classic that originally had my Rabbit 100 in it, flew great, nice and light, easy to land, actually had to drag it in with some power on. Put my Cheetah in it to use the Rabbit elsewhere. Gained 11oz's overall in weight with the additional 2oz's upfront to balance, about 70km/hr faster...mind you the Rabbit 100/ flash would still do 290KM/hr but, feels heavier, more of a straightline speed plane now if that's what you're looking for.

    I actually prefer it with the Rabbit 100 and may put it back in over the winter. It's lighter, more agile has lots of speed. It still has unlimited vertical if you go into it with some speed. The only thing it won't do is go unlimited vertical, fully loaded from takeoff. So, for the way I like to fly it, 22lbs is perfect.

    Mike


  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Chatham, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    118
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    Currently I have Rookie 1 with a super eagle and I am going to keep it around. With the Eagle it can be a pain to land in our short field as well I get 7 min flights.

    I was hoping to get into a flash with either motor but want to try to get 10 min, should require about 4L and want it tame on the landings hence the 100 statement.

    Just looking at options so I do it once.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Chatham, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    118
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    Don't want a brand X war but I had a look at the B100F mentioned above which is impressive with a 120N thrust and low weight.

    Also saw the Merlin 140 which looked impressive with regards to weight, pricing seems decent as well.

    Even more confusion.

  9. #9
    Edgar Perez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Gurabo, PUERTO RICO (USA)
    Posts
    1,976
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    Cheetah due to thrust and weight
    Edgar Perez
    Puerto Rico

  10. #10
    RCISFUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Erie, PA
    Posts
    5,191
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts


    ORIGINAL: Edgar Perez

    Cheetah due to thrust and weight
    +1

    Merlin 140 is basically the same as the Cheetah; however the Cheetah has the lifetime warranty

    Both are excellent Turbines, you would be happy with either.

    http://dreamworksrc.com/catalog/jetc...ah-p-1911.html

    http://dreamworksrc.com/catalog/merlin-m140-p-1929.html
    Rich
    The New Jet Central Rhino SP, Cheetah, Rabbit & Super Eagle owner

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    HarrowMiddlesex, UNITED KINGDOM
    Posts
    204
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    I have a J-Munts Merlin 140 in my Ultra Flash and it suits it just fine.With 31.5 lbs of trust it will do 250mph as wedo not have any speed limit here in the UK.

    But thats not the mainreason for using the M-140.This turbine is very well constructed and is smaller in diameter and weighs less than a JC 140. I have no nose weight to get the balance correct.It is also very economical and 8-9 minutes is easy with variable throttle use and the using the main and wing tank. Gaspar is also a very helpfull guy and gives excellent service.

    Phil.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Wu60492.jpg 
Views:	3 
Size:	413.1 KB 
ID:	1810515   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Rn39360.jpg 
Views:	3 
Size:	420.8 KB 
ID:	1810516  

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Niles, OH
    Posts
    1,204
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts


    ORIGINAL: carcraze

    I am looking to get into a new jet and have been doing some reading and it seems to point to a Flash as the best option for what I want. I have been looking at either a used C Flash or U Flash new or used but I have been pondering power choices.

    At this point it will be either a 100 or 140 and I was leaning to a 100 to keep it light and would like to try and get the fuel usage down for longer flight times and keep residual thrust down for landings.

    Is there options for additional fuel over that of the wing tank?

    I have also heard that the 100 is marginal for that bird as I don't want an under powered jet either. Operation will be off of grass fields.

    Any thoughts?

    Don't forget to look at the Kingtech K-100 and K-140. I own a K-80 and a K-140 and both engines are putting out more thrust then advertised. I love these engines very reliable and if you were to actually need service, Barry and Dirk from www.kingtechusa.com are located in California.

    Joe Lewis
    Kingtech
    K-80 and K-140
    Owner

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Chatham, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    118
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    I was actually looking at the 100g and the 140 which is what promoted the original post.

    I have really thinking about weight though as well and there seems to be a lot of units in the 120 140 area now with much smaller cans, I must say though the Kingtech price seems attractive.

    Trying to sort it out before I make a very much thinner wallet [:@]

    Any idea now the blue angels scheme shows up in the sky as I am getting old these days?

  14. #14
    PaulD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    CoquitlamBC, CANADA
    Posts
    1,307
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    The Merlin 140 definitely wins in in the mid size power to weight ratio IMO. The Kingtech 140 is a tank^2 - it puts it strong thrust but is the same size as a 160 turbine. It will fit but it's too heavy....

    It's ok to get old as long as you don't complain it's too loud!

    PaulD
    If it\'\'s too LOUD - You\'\'re too OLD

    Www.wircsrc.com
    MAAC Jet Committee

  15. #15
    Ramz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Petitcodiac, NB, CANADA
    Posts
    264
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    Sounds like a good 100 would be the proper choice. If landing, fuel consumption and lightweight are of concern, any modern 100 would be perfect. I have a K170F in mine. GPS'd at 276 mph. For me, it is perfect but most people would be perfectly happy with a 120 or 140. I definately notice the residual thrust on landing but it is still a ***** cat to land. Just takes a bit more time to slow down.

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
    Posts
    7,678
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    I built one last year with a P-80SE just to prove to the powerheads it would work well. Think there is a video on the UF thread somewhere. Enough for a rolling loop....
    Partner Claire's UF will have a P90RXi in it and that will have a little more go than the P80SE.
    I've flown UF's with P100RX, P-80SE, my 2 year old UF loads with a P-120SX. Friends with EvoJet 90, P-140RX, Hawk 100R. Great model what ever you power it with. Flights from grass with most of those too.

    Dw
    Motors & Rotors. JetCat, Powerbox, Intairco, Behotec, Graupner. CARF-models Rep. JR Propo for ever!, Jet 1A, MAP, Evojet, BVM

  17. #17
    Jamie C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Somerset, UNITED KINGDOM
    Posts
    1,210
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7DaBv8474A[/youtube]

  18. #18

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    mia, FL
    Posts
    2,286
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts


    ORIGINAL: Ramz

    Sounds like a good 100 would be the proper choice. If landing, fuel consumption and lightweight are of concern, any modern 100 would be perfect. I have a K170F in mine. GPS'd at 276 mph. For me, it is perfect but most people would be perfectly happy with a 120 or 140. I definately notice the residual thrust on landing but it is still a ***** cat to land. Just takes a bit more time to slow down.
    Mine flys very well with the k170, At Hamburg jet rally everybody thought I have a P-120 because I was just cruisin around the skies, I wasn't pushing it too much. I also had the best landing
    It's a hobby - keep it simple

    www.332ndredtail.com

  19. #19
    Ramz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Petitcodiac, NB, CANADA
    Posts
    264
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts


    ORIGINAL: basimpsn


    ORIGINAL: Ramz

    Sounds like a good 100 would be the proper choice. If landing, fuel consumption and lightweight are of concern, any modern 100 would be perfect. I have a K170F in mine. GPS'd at 276 mph. For me, it is perfect but most people would be perfectly happy with a 120 or 140. I definately notice the residual thrust on landing but it is still a ***** cat to land. Just takes a bit more time to slow down.
    Mine flys very well with the k170, At Hamburg jet rally everybody thought I have a P-120 because I was just cruisin around the skies, I wasn't pushing it too much. I also had the best landing
    Yeah I hear ya. It is always fun to do a low, slow dirty pass, pour on the coals and accelerate vertically. A buddy of mine has a UF on order and he is going with a K140F. We probably won't be able to tell much difference straight and level. A truly great airframe.

  20. #20
    Wayne22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Strathcona county, AB, CANADA
    Posts
    5,389
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    watch this video....and look what power they used (at the end of the video..) You have lots of options...[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aJsU42W6Rw[/youtube]
    All I ask is for a chance to prove that money can\'t make me happy......

  21. #21

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    East Yorkshire, UNITED KINGDOM
    Posts
    163
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    I think your definitely on the right track with either the 100 / 120 / 140 size turbines, I wouldnt be tempted to fit anything larger than this, we have a Merlin 140 in our UF and it feels so well balanced compared to my 160 powered Classic Flash, I had a Wren SS in mine originally and while it was nice to fly it always felt like it was cruising round with no option to go any quicker, now Ive fitted the 160, while its absolutely balistic and fun when its flat out, its hard to find a point on the Throttle position where its not at least 50 - 60mph faster than it used to be, I know some guys will say they are sure Idle would cure this but flying an aerobatic routine with the throttle set at partial settings I find a little awkward.

    I had a flight with two 140 powered UF's last weekend and just thought they seemed alot nicer to fly, maybe its just me, I dont know, they just felt alot smoother and easier to fly due to the slightly lower top speed and what seemed like a more linear throttle curve.

    Theres also been a few of the our club members that have dealt with Gaspar and couldnt speak highly enough of him.

  22. #22
    PaulD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    CoquitlamBC, CANADA
    Posts
    1,307
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    The other thing to consider with the big blocks is unless you have the will and airspace to be flying around at 200 mph all the time, you will spend most of your flights in the lower end of the throttle curve - right where most turbines have crappy throttle response.

    PaulD
    If it\'\'s too LOUD - You\'\'re too OLD

    Www.wircsrc.com
    MAAC Jet Committee

  23. #23

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
    Posts
    7,678
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts


    ORIGINAL: Jamie C

    [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7DaBv8474A[/youtube]

    Jamie

    Yep! That was the one I thought about. P-80SE...plenty

    Dave
    Motors & Rotors. JetCat, Powerbox, Intairco, Behotec, Graupner. CARF-models Rep. JR Propo for ever!, Jet 1A, MAP, Evojet, BVM

  24. #24
    VF84sluggo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Gulf Breeze, FL
    Posts
    2,218
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    ORIGINAL: PaulD

    The other thing to consider with the big blocks is...you will spend most of your flights in the lower end of the throttle curve - right where most turbines have crappy throttle response.

    PaulD
    Excellent point!!

    This is exactly my concern over putting a pre-SE/SX P-120 in an Elan I'm getting. Sure, I'll have a great punch into the vertical, but the rest of the time I'd in this rpm range. And then on landing, with this older -120 with the slow spool-up time (but fast compared to my P-70) , I'll for sure be back in this rpm range.

    Sluggo

  25. #25

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Levittown, PA
    Posts
    340
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Flash Power thoughts

    I had a Classic Flash with a Jet Cental Falcon 23lbs thrust flew great. I built an Ultra this year with a Jet Central Cheetah (31 lbs thrust) it was way over powered for my flying field. Unfortunately I lost it last week due to a radio issue. Most of the fields I fly at and the jet meets I attend monitor speed with a radar gun. If i were to build another Ultra I definately would put my Rabbit 100 (22.5 lbs thrust ) in it. Plenty fast , longer flight times, lighter wieght, and less residual thrust for landing. Hope to try this combo out someday when i can fund another jet.
    Jack George


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:51 AM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.