RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ?

Reply
Old 10-24-2012, 12:47 AM
  #101
David Gladwin
 
David Gladwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: CookhamBerkshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 3,252
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ?

Goose, doesn't really surprise me that the F16 has so many power supplies, FBW+ no power= no control and I guess some of those backups are designed to cope with battle damage and still get you home, or even stay in the fight !
Sid, entirely agree but I could go further and say even small GT models should have dual batteries. My little Savex L39 with a Wren 44 is so light I can lift it with one finger, but it, too, has twin Rx batteries !Weight gain is insignificant. Its a bit of a tester too, one battery is a Duralite Lithium Ion the other is a Lipo, both seem to discharge at about the same rate. Both feed the Weatronics 8 channel Smart receiver via Mini Hobby Turbo regulators and JR HD switches, and the log shows DEAD stable voltage, 5.4v, on the rx bus.

Just as interest my larger models are all fitted with Weatronics 12-22 receivers for probably the ultimate in secure power supplies:

1. Twin batteries, one main, one standby.
2. Automatic load test of BOTH batteries on EVERY switch on (7amps for .5 second) An audio visual warning is triggered if the volttage drop exceeds the value YOU set, dependant on battery health and capability, on the software.
3. 8 Regulators distributed ober the servo outputs, all rated at 5 amps continuous, very large heatsink.
4. Battery connection is an electronically "latched contactor" so that switch failure/disconnection leaves power connected.
5. Real time audio/visual alert of battery voltage drop/changeover via the telemetry downlink.

Difficult to know how that could be improved on in any significant way. But, never say never, well hardly ever ..... !

Morning coffee finished , back to my SG Hawk.

Regards, (and thank you for your supportive comments , guys, nice to know I am not just a lone voice in the wilderness)

David.
David Gladwin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 03:19 AM
  #102
BaldEagel
 
BaldEagel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kent, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 9,635
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ?

Yeah thanks for your support everyone its nice to know that everyone has followed my lead and are using twin A123's

Mike
BaldEagel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 11:35 AM
  #103
gooseF22
 
gooseF22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 2,368
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ?

Ok,... Im out of popcorn...
gooseF22 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 01:25 PM
  #104
BaldEagel
 
BaldEagel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kent, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 9,635
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ?

BaldEagel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 09:56 AM
  #105
abelard
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 170
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ?

Quote:
I have been using A123's since they first came out
Possibly not much longer...

http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2012/1...ngle_page=true
abelard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 10:03 AM
  #106
BarracudaHockey
Community Moderators
 
BarracudaHockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 21,562
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ?

Nothing to do with our hobby batteries
BarracudaHockey is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 02:12 PM
  #107
BlueBus320
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rockville Centre
Posts: 1,550
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ?


Quote:
ORIGINAL: David Gladwin

Goose, doesn't really surprise me that the F16 has so many power supplies, FBW+ no power= no control and I guess some of those backups are designed to cope with battle damage and still get you home, or even stay in the fight !
Sid, entirely agree but I could go further and say even small GT models should have dual batteries. My little Savex L39 with a Wren 44 is so light I can lift it with one finger, but it, too, has twin Rx batteries !Weight gain is insignificant. Its a bit of a tester too, one battery is a Duralite Lithium Ion the other is a Lipo, both seem to discharge at about the same rate. Both feed the Weatronics 8 channel Smart receiver via Mini Hobby Turbo regulators and JR HD switches, and the log shows DEAD stable voltage, 5.4v, on the rx bus.

Just as interest my larger models are all fitted with Weatronics 12-22 receivers for probably the ultimate in secure power supplies:

1. Twin batteries, one main, one standby.
2. Automatic load test of BOTH batteries on EVERY switch on (7amps for .5 second) An audio visual warning is triggered if the volttage drop exceeds the value YOU set, dependant on battery health and capability, on the software.
3. 8 Regulators distributed ober the servo outputs, all rated at 5 amps continuous, very large heatsink.
4. Battery connection is an electronically ''latched contactor'' so that switch failure/disconnection leaves power connected.
5. Real time audio/visual alert of battery voltage drop/changeover via the telemetry downlink.

Difficult to know how that could be improved on in any significant way. But, never say never, well hardly ever ..... !

Morning coffee finished , back to my SG Hawk.

Regards, (and thank you for your supportive comments , guys, nice to know I am not just a lone voice in the wilderness)

David.
How did you set up an auto load test on every switch? I'm doing a setup now & would like to set this up. Also, the dual swithch guys with chargeports. Are you charging your batteries inside your models through the charge ports?
thanks
BlueBus320 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 05:12 PM
  #108
roger.alli
 
roger.alli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney NSW , AUSTRALIA
Posts: 939
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ?

Quote:
ORIGINAL: BlueBus320


Quote:
ORIGINAL: David Gladwin

Goose, doesn't really surprise me that the F16 has so many power supplies, FBW+ no power= no control and I guess some of those backups are designed to cope with battle damage and still get you home, or even stay in the fight !
Sid, entirely agree but I could go further and say even small GT models should have dual batteries. My little Savex L39 with a Wren 44 is so light I can lift it with one finger, but it, too, has twin Rx batteries !Weight gain is insignificant. Its a bit of a tester too, one battery is a Duralite Lithium Ion the other is a Lipo, both seem to discharge at about the same rate. Both feed the Weatronics 8 channel Smart receiver via Mini Hobby Turbo regulators and JR HD switches, and the log shows DEAD stable voltage, 5.4v, on the rx bus.

Just as interest my larger models are all fitted with Weatronics 12-22 receivers for probably the ultimate in secure power supplies:

1. Twin batteries, one main, one standby.
2. Automatic load test of BOTH batteries on EVERY switch on (7amps for .5 second) An audio visual warning is triggered if the volttage drop exceeds the value YOU set, dependant on battery health and capability, on the software.
3. 8 Regulators distributed ober the servo outputs, all rated at 5 amps continuous, very large heatsink.
4. Battery connection is an electronically ''latched contactor'' so that switch failure/disconnection leaves power connected.
5. Real time audio/visual alert of battery voltage drop/changeover via the telemetry downlink.

Difficult to know how that could be improved on in any significant way. But, never say never, well hardly ever ..... !

Morning coffee finished , back to my SG Hawk.

Regards, (and thank you for your supportive comments , guys, nice to know I am not just a lone voice in the wilderness)

David.
How did you set up an auto load test on every switch? I'm doing a setup now & would like to set this up. Also, the dual swithch guys with chargeports. Are you charging your batteries inside your models through the charge ports?
thanks
What David is referring to here (point 2). Every time the receiver is switched on, the Weatronics 12xx receivers do an automatic load test of the batteries. This is a pre programmed function of these receivers.



Roger
roger.alli is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 06:02 PM
  #109
BlueBus320
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rockville Centre
Posts: 1,550
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ?

oh, ok thanks
BlueBus320 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:07 AM.