BVM F86 80" help! Jack Diaz's please help!
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
BVM F86 80" help! Jack Diaz's please help!
Hi guys,
I remember Jack Diaz and dad posting ideal throws (especially mild up trim on aileron for washout effect) but I cannot find the thread anywhere. Can anybody point me to that posting or would Jack Diaz Sr or Jr post it again please! I of course have the manual and realize there are throws included in there but I was hoping for he "experts"!!!!!
P.S. I have the fowler flaps
Thanks in advance!
Shaz
I remember Jack Diaz and dad posting ideal throws (especially mild up trim on aileron for washout effect) but I cannot find the thread anywhere. Can anybody point me to that posting or would Jack Diaz Sr or Jr post it again please! I of course have the manual and realize there are throws included in there but I was hoping for he "experts"!!!!!
P.S. I have the fowler flaps
Thanks in advance!
Shaz
#3
My Feedback: (6)
RE: BVM F86 80
Hey Shaz,
The ailerons need to have an 1/8" of up in them for the washout. We just test flew mine about a month ago and i don't remember the throws that we set up. The other thing that Jack Diaz Sr said is to make sure to balance it for the C.G with the wings off and everything else in the fuse with the U.A.T full. It should balance right on the main spar slot.
The ailerons need to have an 1/8" of up in them for the washout. We just test flew mine about a month ago and i don't remember the throws that we set up. The other thing that Jack Diaz Sr said is to make sure to balance it for the C.G with the wings off and everything else in the fuse with the U.A.T full. It should balance right on the main spar slot.
#5
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Caracas, VENEZUELA
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: BVM F86 80
Hey Shaz, I am here
The CG, with the airplane RTF and no wings, should be under the main carbon spar slot at the fuselage.
These are the throws that I use:
Elevators: 1" up and down
Ailerons: 1.25" up and 1" down (measured at the flap edge).
Rudder: 1.5" each side.
Carefully check the "neutral" position of the ailerons (using a straight edge, and viewing from the side). Once satisfied, raise them 1/8".
Note that this could end up being more than 1/8" with respect to the flaps. What happens is that most times the fouler flap mechanism doesn't allow the flap to go fully up (it doesn't matter ... and helps!).
So, if you adjust the ailerons using the flaps as reference, you could end up without the necessary washout. This is Very important.
Without the proper washout (again: 1/8" more than the built in one), the Sabre could be tricky sometimes.
Let me know if you need any other info.
Jack
The CG, with the airplane RTF and no wings, should be under the main carbon spar slot at the fuselage.
These are the throws that I use:
Elevators: 1" up and down
Ailerons: 1.25" up and 1" down (measured at the flap edge).
Rudder: 1.5" each side.
Carefully check the "neutral" position of the ailerons (using a straight edge, and viewing from the side). Once satisfied, raise them 1/8".
Note that this could end up being more than 1/8" with respect to the flaps. What happens is that most times the fouler flap mechanism doesn't allow the flap to go fully up (it doesn't matter ... and helps!).
So, if you adjust the ailerons using the flaps as reference, you could end up without the necessary washout. This is Very important.
Without the proper washout (again: 1/8" more than the built in one), the Sabre could be tricky sometimes.
Let me know if you need any other info.
Jack
#8
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Caracas, VENEZUELA
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: BVM F86 80
Shaz, 1/8" measured at the inboard end.
I also fly at 5000+ feet (density altitude).
There is no problem with take off, and I find landings easier than at lower altitudes (better sink rate). Nose up, full flaps, speed brakes and power
The tendency to stall is another story. Be gentle with the elevator; and in your location, the extra washout is a must !!!
Advise: during maneuvers like loops or reverse cuban 8's, never reduce the power until the nose is pointing down (say 2 o'clock position). It bites if you reduce the power prematurely at your altitude.
You will be reminded if you forget this
Not the subject, but since I mentioned Density Altitude, here is a good D. A. Calculator. Useful also to calculate the power loss due to ambient conditions.
http://wahiduddin.net/calc/calc_da.htm
http://wahiduddin.net/calc/calc_hp_dp.htm
Jack
I also fly at 5000+ feet (density altitude).
There is no problem with take off, and I find landings easier than at lower altitudes (better sink rate). Nose up, full flaps, speed brakes and power
The tendency to stall is another story. Be gentle with the elevator; and in your location, the extra washout is a must !!!
Advise: during maneuvers like loops or reverse cuban 8's, never reduce the power until the nose is pointing down (say 2 o'clock position). It bites if you reduce the power prematurely at your altitude.
You will be reminded if you forget this
Not the subject, but since I mentioned Density Altitude, here is a good D. A. Calculator. Useful also to calculate the power loss due to ambient conditions.
http://wahiduddin.net/calc/calc_da.htm
http://wahiduddin.net/calc/calc_hp_dp.htm
Jack
#9
My Feedback: (67)
RE: BVM F86 80
Jack,
This is great input. I'm scribbling down anything I can get my hands on regarding this model as I too am building one currently. Thanks for sharing your experience! The build is going pretty smooth and everything seems to be fitting...and there is a lot to get in there.
Btw, I fly at around 400'.
This is great input. I'm scribbling down anything I can get my hands on regarding this model as I too am building one currently. Thanks for sharing your experience! The build is going pretty smooth and everything seems to be fitting...and there is a lot to get in there.
Btw, I fly at around 400'.
#10
My Feedback: (24)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Fond du Lac,
WI
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: BVM F86 80
Hi Shaz:
Like Jack says, be careful with slow airspeed, hi-G maneuvers like loop, reverse Cuban, and Split-S.......
I personally never do this with my Sabre, since I have never seen Bob Hoover or Snod do these in their show routines.....just beautiful rolls and some 1/2 loops with roll out to straight and level at the top......if you do get into a low or high speed stall in a Sabre with the swept wing and relatively low rudder authority,especially at low speed, a grave yard spiral or spin is waiting to bite you....
Here is the old classic video of Bob H. just finessing that Sabre like no one else.....I try my best to emulate him, but seldom look as smooth as he does.....
I am thinking about putting a 180RX in mine so I can do those super cool rolls on take-off......my Titan is a little wimpy....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRt6UnNzR6I
TA
Like Jack says, be careful with slow airspeed, hi-G maneuvers like loop, reverse Cuban, and Split-S.......
I personally never do this with my Sabre, since I have never seen Bob Hoover or Snod do these in their show routines.....just beautiful rolls and some 1/2 loops with roll out to straight and level at the top......if you do get into a low or high speed stall in a Sabre with the swept wing and relatively low rudder authority,especially at low speed, a grave yard spiral or spin is waiting to bite you....
Here is the old classic video of Bob H. just finessing that Sabre like no one else.....I try my best to emulate him, but seldom look as smooth as he does.....
I am thinking about putting a 180RX in mine so I can do those super cool rolls on take-off......my Titan is a little wimpy....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRt6UnNzR6I
TA
#11
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Caracas, VENEZUELA
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: BVM F86 80
Hi Tom, good post, but 180RX ????? Be careful. A wimpy Titan is way more than needed !!
When you mentioned the low rudder authority, I remembered another hint:
The "rudder to aileron mix" on the Sabre for knife edges or slow rolls, is opposite to all other airplanes that I have programmed.
I mean: if you apply left rudder during knife edge, the airplane will roll right [X(]. So, the mix has to reduce the aileron deflection (during rolls).
I don't know why this happens, but when you look at how high the rudder is with respect to the wing, it makes sense !!! Rudder applies a torque.
But then, why other airplanes with tall rudders don't do it ?
Expert opinions are welcome
jack
When you mentioned the low rudder authority, I remembered another hint:
The "rudder to aileron mix" on the Sabre for knife edges or slow rolls, is opposite to all other airplanes that I have programmed.
I mean: if you apply left rudder during knife edge, the airplane will roll right [X(]. So, the mix has to reduce the aileron deflection (during rolls).
I don't know why this happens, but when you look at how high the rudder is with respect to the wing, it makes sense !!! Rudder applies a torque.
But then, why other airplanes with tall rudders don't do it ?
Expert opinions are welcome
jack
#12
My Feedback: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: reisterstown, MD
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: BVM F86 80
Jack it must have the same aero properties as the old TopFlite Contender. I just got a mini one for playing around with and it does the same thing left rudder gives right rolls, and vice verse. I am so looking forward to building my 80" Sabre.
#13
My Feedback: (24)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Fond du Lac,
WI
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: BVM F86 80
ORIGINAL: Jack Diaz
Hi Tom, good post, but 180RX ????? Be careful. A wimpy Titan is way more than needed !!
Hi Tom, good post, but 180RX ????? Be careful. A wimpy Titan is way more than needed !!
Tom