Wondering about something
#1
Thread Starter
Wondering about something
I was pondering my f-15 today and I noticed these two setups. The half bipass they are using comes with the jet and they have connected it to the bell mouth on one and the other is straight to the pipe. The bypass is just fiberglass, will this not degrade from the heat and eventually crumble from the extreme heat? Just wondering for when I install mine. Thanks
http://flyeaglejet.com/f15e/1aa11%20%283%29.jpg
http://flyeaglejet.com/f15e/IMG_3324.JPG
http://flyeaglejet.com/f15e/1aa11%20%283%29.jpg
http://flyeaglejet.com/f15e/IMG_3324.JPG
#3
Thread Starter
RE: Wondering about something
yeah I thought about that as well, but didn't know if that would last for long periods of time in such close contact with such high heat.
#4
My Feedback: (6)
RE: Wondering about something
The bypasses should be carbon fibre if they are black like that. There just not as good of quality as you would find in a BVM Product. But as David has said you should paint the last three to four inches of the back end with at least three coats of the BVM heat shield and they should be just fine. Make sure you sand the inside real good and wipe them out with isopropyl alcohol before you apply the Heat shield.
#7
RE: Wondering about something
ORIGINAL: wojtek
the bellmouths in the 2nd photo are unnecessary, and don't serve much of a function ( amusing the carbon lip fits into the pipe as it looks it does )
~V~
the bellmouths in the 2nd photo are unnecessary, and don't serve much of a function ( amusing the carbon lip fits into the pipe as it looks it does )
~V~
#9
My Feedback: (24)
RE: Wondering about something
ORIGINAL: FenderBean
k thanks for the info, yeah I wouldn't use the bellmouth. Just for info, the fact its not a full bypass matter?
k thanks for the info, yeah I wouldn't use the bellmouth. Just for info, the fact its not a full bypass matter?
This thing is basically just a large bell mouth. The bell mouth serves two purposes. The first is to smooth the airflow from inside the airframe into the pipe. Without the bell mouth, the air passing around the sharp leading edge of the pipe would be very turbulent, which would severely restrict the amount of air that gets into the pipe - robbing thrust and increasing airframe drag (from ram air backing up into the inlets). The second purpose is to support the front end of the pipe. The bell mouth greatly increases the rigidity of the front of the pipe and also reduces the vibration from the turbulence, which can damage or collapse the pipe.
You have to have either a full bypass, or a bell mouth. Which one each model has is a choice of the aircraft designer and/or builder...
Bob
#10
Thread Starter
RE: Wondering about something
Okay so this type of setup is just a fancy bell mouth, so would you still use the recommended distance from turbine cone to the start of bell mouth?
#11
My Feedback: (24)
RE: Wondering about something
ORIGINAL: FenderBean
Okay so this type of setup is just a fancy bell mouth, so would you still use the recommended distance from turbine cone to the start of bell mouth?
Okay so this type of setup is just a fancy bell mouth, so would you still use the recommended distance from turbine cone to the start of bell mouth?
BTW, my Skymaster F-4 came with a "big bell mouth" that is close to the size of the carbon ones in your pictures, but this one is actually made of spin aluminum. I use the same placement method as with the carbon bell mouths.
Bob
#14
My Feedback: (24)
RE: Wondering about something
ORIGINAL: ron Sweeney
Take a look at the Wren pipes, hardly any bell mouth, just the end turned out slightly, makes you wonder??? Ron.
Take a look at the Wren pipes, hardly any bell mouth, just the end turned out slightly, makes you wonder??? Ron.
I've not seen a Wren pipe first-hand, I'd also be curious to see if they use thicker material in their pipes.
Bob
#15
Thread Starter
RE: Wondering about something
so maybe adding the bell mouth like the one picture is still a good idea?
ORIGINAL: rhklenke
I'd be willing to bet that the ''turned out slightly'' end is much stiffer than an end that is not turned out at all. I'd be really worried about a pipe that did not have *something* to stiffen the end near the turbine...
Bob
ORIGINAL: ron Sweeney
Take a look at the Wren pipes, hardly any bell mouth, just the end turned out slightly, makes you wonder??? Ron.
Take a look at the Wren pipes, hardly any bell mouth, just the end turned out slightly, makes you wonder??? Ron.
Bob
#16
My Feedback: (24)
RE: Wondering about something
ORIGINAL: FenderBean
so maybe adding the bell mouth like the one picture is still a good idea?
so maybe adding the bell mouth like the one picture is still a good idea?
Bob
#20
My Feedback: (86)
RE: Wondering about something
ORIGINAL: rhklenke
No, in this setup, I use the distance (the typical 3/4'' to 1'') from the end of the engine tail pipe to the start of the pipe itself - not the bell mouth. With this ''big bell mouth'' the tail cone of the engine will actually be partly inside the bell mouth - as your pictures show.
BTW, my Skymaster F-4 came with a ''big bell mouth'' that is close to the size of the carbon ones in your pictures, but this one is actually made of spin aluminum. I use the same placement method as with the carbon bell mouths.
Bob
ORIGINAL: FenderBean
Okay so this type of setup is just a fancy bell mouth, so would you still use the recommended distance from turbine cone to the start of bell mouth?
Okay so this type of setup is just a fancy bell mouth, so would you still use the recommended distance from turbine cone to the start of bell mouth?
BTW, my Skymaster F-4 came with a ''big bell mouth'' that is close to the size of the carbon ones in your pictures, but this one is actually made of spin aluminum. I use the same placement method as with the carbon bell mouths.
Bob