FALCON OR TURBINATOR
#8
My Feedback: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Latrobe,
PA
Posts: 2,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: FALCON OR TURBINATOR
ORIGINAL: RAPPTOR
THANKS EVERY BODY.. ANY FALCON SET UP TRICKS.. I HAVE ONE .. CROW? C/G? THROWS?/ TURBINSTOR ON ORDER .. THANKS
THANKS EVERY BODY.. ANY FALCON SET UP TRICKS.. I HAVE ONE .. CROW? C/G? THROWS?/ TURBINSTOR ON ORDER .. THANKS
There's a lot of good info on the falcon thread. Basically... if you set it up per the manual... it will fly great. The only hard thing is getting the elevator set. But... if you set it in line with the top surface... it's a good starting point. (it will look "up" from the underside)
#10
My Feedback: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: reisterstown, MD
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: FALCON OR TURBINATOR
I can't speak on the Falcon but can tell you that the Turbinator is a great honest plane that will just about walk at landing speed with 60 degrees of flap and a little crow. Anyone who has seen mine fly always asks do you even use the brakes? My answer is usually no, unless we are on pavement to taxi. I never use the brakes on grass fields which is where I fly the most. A P-80 -100 for power would be just about right. My std one has a P-120 and it will go like stink unless you watch the power on level passes. I have been working on a 125% enlarged one for about a year with taking the summer and most of this fall off due to work.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Southport, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: FALCON OR TURBINATOR
#15
My Feedback: (15)
RE: FALCON OR TURBINATOR
Tim is dead on Great first or just fun to fly jet Mine was only reinforced glue joints with carpenters glue and stuffed a dowel in the tube My last flight i did a blender with it and the canopy exploded and it flung off one of the main wheels still landed with no problems Ive just been too lazy to do the repairs on it and ive got probably 15 hrs on the airframe