Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

Ripmax Xcalibur Sports jet

Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Ripmax Xcalibur Sports jet

Old 10-27-2015, 05:28 PM
  #1651  
Vettster
 
Vettster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Beeton, Ontario, CANADA
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pylonboy
Hey Vettster............are you going to replace your broken Boomer with an Xcaliber?

I'm just starting the build of mine now. Going to squeeze my old P70 in it somehow. Should be a good addition to the Sprint for small fields!!

Maybe we can fly formation next year like we did at Forest with our Sprints. LOL!!
Hey How are you! Sorry forget your name. I think you will see a lot more of the xcaliber next year. My buddy is getting one too.

The formation flying was fun! But we need more practice lol

Trevor

BTW.. I'll be sqeezing my P-80se in her as she pushed that old draggy Sprint jet over 200mph Hint guys..diesel=Power
Old 10-30-2015, 05:37 AM
  #1652  
Fly Mower
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Anybody using Aileron differential..?

My rolls aren't as axial as I'd like - might be due to the fact my CoG is little a forward than most (that said, I'm not really sure how CoG effects the accuracy of rolls...)

Any views..?
Old 10-31-2015, 10:08 AM
  #1653  
Dave Wilshere
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,092
Received 732 Likes on 528 Posts
Default

Differential is needed with a twin boomer, fractional have you first measured yours move the same? I see more where mechanical set ups or servo miss match gives different movement on each wing.
If perfect then have 1mm more up than down aileron.
Always check going vertical, either up or down!

More Xcalibur activity today at PMFC. Roland and Bugz were at it with their P-100Rx examples

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0526.JPG
Views:	961
Size:	481.5 KB
ID:	2128531   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0527.JPG
Views:	1008
Size:	504.2 KB
ID:	2128532   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0578.JPG
Views:	858
Size:	493.6 KB
ID:	2128533   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0580.JPG
Views:	872
Size:	507.0 KB
ID:	2128534  
Old 10-31-2015, 10:21 AM
  #1654  
i3dm
My Feedback: (51)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Reut,Israel
Posts: 4,346
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Flying the Xcalibur with Jetcat P-80 yesterday:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9enwUarMU0w I love this jet / turbine combo!
Old 10-31-2015, 11:01 AM
  #1655  
Dave Wilshere
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,092
Received 732 Likes on 528 Posts
Default

Just imagine, lighter and more power :-)
Old 10-31-2015, 11:14 AM
  #1656  
i3dm
My Feedback: (51)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Reut,Israel
Posts: 4,346
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Wilshere
Just imagine, lighter and more power :-)
Mine in the air feels as light and as powerful as any 100 powered X.
Old 11-01-2015, 11:36 AM
  #1657  
Dave Bugz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dave, don't think the "Formation Cup" has much to worry about just yet, with a few more YEARS practice we might get there. Great jet, great day only spoilt by the fact I had to take the good lady shopping later that afternoon.
Old 11-04-2015, 05:17 AM
  #1658  
pylonboy
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cayuga, ON,
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vettster
Hey How are you! Sorry forget your name. I think you will see a lot more of the xcaliber next year. My buddy is getting one too.

The formation flying was fun! But we need more practice lol

Trevor

BTW.. I'll be sqeezing my P-80se in her as she pushed that old draggy Sprint jet over 200mph Hint guys..diesel=Power
Brent H.

"Squeezing" will be a good term for installing the P80SE!! My old P70 just fits in without too much carving. Yours will definitely have enough power though..............love my P80SE, but it is a brick compared to the new turbines. I was out with "the other Trevor" yesterday and he was flying a new Sprint with a Rabbit in it and you can see it is lighter and more agile than my P80SE Sprint . It had great vertical too!

If I were doing a new build with a new turbine it would either be a VT 80, P100RX, Rabbit or Merlin 100. Obviously the 100's get a nod for the vertical power.

As Dave W. pointed out above...........there is no comparison between heavy and light setups with the same power. It's simply a matter of fact that lighter planes react quicker, fly faster and land lighter. That being said, you gotta have fun with what you have!! Mine is a budget build and the P70 was just laying around anyway, so...............that equates to cheap fun!

I guess I should start posting some build pics.............I'm about 70-80% complete. Not sure exactly because I bought mine from another member that started the build and didn't get too far. Just going over everything again for piece of mind because he had never built a turbine jet before. So far I prefer the overall construction and layout of the Xcaliber as compared to the Boomerang Sprint.
Old 11-04-2015, 06:02 PM
  #1659  
Vettster
 
Vettster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Beeton, Ontario, CANADA
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I hear ya Brent.. I have two engines in for service right now. The K100G and the P-80se. The 100 might end up in the Xcaliber after all and P-80 in the F-104 or the WetJet that im building.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	006.jpg
Views:	185
Size:	1.80 MB
ID:	2129086  
Old 11-12-2015, 10:25 PM
  #1660  
dmattmul
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is everyone using 76 mm wheel for the main? I was just sent 66 mm and concerend avout grass departures. Any advise wouls be appreciated.

Thanks
Old 11-12-2015, 11:39 PM
  #1661  
Dave Wilshere
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,092
Received 732 Likes on 528 Posts
Default

Yes, 3" (75mm) is right and probably what you want.

D
Old 11-13-2015, 06:27 AM
  #1662  
dmattmul
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks, Dave.
Old 11-15-2015, 03:01 PM
  #1663  
dmattmul
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My supplier thinks the 76 mm mains are going to be to tight. They are close so I understand what he is seeing. They are Pro-Link electrics and use Intairco wheels. Is anyone using Intairco wheels? Could these be slightly larger than the ones JSM supplies? I know the web site for Ripmax shows 76 mm and the picture of the wheel has 3 on it so I am pretty sure this is correct. If I stay with the smaller ones (66 mm) I can maiden the airframe this week. If I need to replace will not be back in the states till January. Any advise?
Old 11-15-2015, 11:35 PM
  #1664  
Dave Wilshere
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,092
Received 732 Likes on 528 Posts
Default

Clearance is fine sounds to me more like they want you to keep what you have ;-)
At the end of the day it will fly from grass with the smaller wheel, but it will work the gear and legs harder.
I would wait for the right ones but it's your call
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpg
Views:	142
Size:	1.24 MB
ID:	2130872  
Old 11-16-2015, 08:46 AM
  #1665  
dmattmul
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks, Dave. Yes probably easier for them but also quicker for me. They have said they will take the one back no issues. The supplier is a great supplier with good customer service. I think since it is tight he did not want to sell me something that might jam which is the safe thing to do. The smallest wheels I have used so far with jets is 3 inch and wanted to stay with that size. Again thanks for the help !!!
Old 11-17-2015, 08:09 AM
  #1666  
Scottbh
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So my Xcalibur is almost finished apart from checking the C of G. I have set the control surface, ailerons 23mm up and down with 8mm CROW mixed in with full landing flap, elevator is set to maximum possible without binding on the rudder which is also set to maximum, flap is 20mm for takeoff and max for landing, also have brakes mixed in with down elevator but only when full flap is deployed. 20% expo on ailerons and elevator. As this is my first time setting up a jet I would appreciate your comments/thoughts please gentleman.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpeg
Views:	899
Size:	1.45 MB
ID:	2131068  
Old 11-17-2015, 09:06 AM
  #1667  
Dave Wilshere
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,092
Received 732 Likes on 528 Posts
Default

Too much CROW! I think it lands much better without, depends on your turbine (residual thrust varies massively) If you want it to sit slightly nose high have 4mm CROW

There is no right or wrong, everyone's brain/fingers work differently, but you will always get it down with a soft control set up...where you can get into trouble quickly with too sharp/much control power.
You know your comfort zone, if you like positive feel around the centre then stick with low Expo figures, but maybe reduce full throw a little. If you like it softer you can just increase the expo another 10% on each.
Calm and smooth you will have nothing to worry about

Dave
Old 11-17-2015, 09:17 AM
  #1668  
Scottbh
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Dave, I'll reduce the CROW to 4mm and try it out, it's a p100 turbine by the way. Thanks for the quick reply and positive encouragement

Scott
Old 11-17-2015, 12:02 PM
  #1669  
Dave Wilshere
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,092
Received 732 Likes on 528 Posts
Default

Cool, P-100 you don't actually need any CROW as idle thrust is nice and low. But at 4mm it won't dump much lift and you can chose.

You have down mixed with flap? tiny bit more should be added with the CROW.

Last thing to check is elevator Neutral, make sure you start with it level flaps clean

Dave
Old 12-09-2015, 06:21 PM
  #1670  
emilsanto
My Feedback: (39)
 
emilsanto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: warren, OH
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hello
can anyone tell me if the kingtec 100 or the jetsmunt 100 will fit in this plane without issues/mods.?
also has anyone flow the xcaliber and the boomerangs sprint . how did the compare
thanks
Old 12-09-2015, 06:47 PM
  #1671  
avionics
My Feedback: (3)
 
avionics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I put BF100 and its over power. At idle the plane runs too fast i the runway and landing with difficulties. I sent back my turbine to BF turbines and requested them to reduce the idle to 35000 since then i havent had a chance to test as i moved. But i would say 100 is over power and landing is too fast.
Old 12-09-2015, 08:58 PM
  #1672  
dbottaz
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Carefree, AZ
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by emilsanto
Hello
can anyone tell me if the kingtec 100 or the jetsmunt 100 will fit in this plane without issues/mods.?
also has anyone flow the xcaliber and the boomerangs sprint . how did the compare
thanks
Yes, I have a Kingtech 100 in my X Caliber, fits and flys great. You don't need the extra power but you can throttle it back. To land you must get it dirty and cut power early enough on final and you are good. We have a 700 ft runway and use it all safely.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	XCaliber landing.JPG
Views:	866
Size:	95.8 KB
ID:	2135137   Click image for larger version

Name:	XCaliber gear pass.JPG
Views:	800
Size:	36.8 KB
ID:	2135138   Click image for larger version

Name:	XCaliber KT 100.JPG
Views:	875
Size:	538.3 KB
ID:	2135139  
Old 12-10-2015, 12:19 AM
  #1673  
Dave Wilshere
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,092
Received 732 Likes on 528 Posts
Default

Its nothing to do with 100N its the idle thrust. We all fly with JetCat P-100Rx turbines and 270' strip no problem, people only look at the top end power and not where the real development goes...low idle thrust and reliable running.

Turbines with higher static thrust do need more drag, I set one up with a JetsMunt 100 and it needed 85 degrees landing flap and I also split the rudders with full flap, so they open 1" (25mm) each side. No pitch change just drag. The Xcalibur is free running on the ground, so set the nose wheel with a section of silicon tube over the axle trapped between the leg fork and wheel hub, this makes enough friction to stop it free rolling on the ground.

To answer the original question, the Sprint is a great flying aeroplane, its simple and fun to fly, but it does not hold much energy so people who learn on one and go onto a normal sports jet or scale model can struggle, as shutting the throttle does not naturally slow the craft. I'm bias, but the Xcalibur is a much better learning machine if you want to move on to other jets. The Xcalibur is an easy to fly sports jet, no stress and being a glass fuselage it does not suffer with fuel on the film like the Sprint.
My Xcalibur is coming up 3 years old and still looks great.

Dave

BF 100 is more than 100N
dbottaz, looks like you can add some more flap, it makes a big difference.

Last edited by Dave Wilshere; 12-10-2015 at 12:21 AM.
Old 12-10-2015, 02:50 AM
  #1674  
Si_B
 
Si_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: , , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My Xcalibur is fitted with a jetmunt 100. Fits perfect, loads of grunt and perfectly happy getting her into a tight grass strip with no run off. I do use crow to help but no other issues.

Flew my Sprint for a year or so before getting the Xcalibur. Both great planes but the Xcalibur does fly better. Landing wise, I'd say the Sprint was easier as it was more draggy.

Simon
Old 12-10-2015, 08:17 AM
  #1675  
izzy
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: REHOVOT, ISRAEL
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Mine has the k100 and sits much more forward than the picture that dbottaz posted a few posts back
Lands perfectly and can land on a 50 m strip
Take offs are great with the extra power
Best fun jet

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.