Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Results 1 to 24 of 24

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    mia, FL
    Posts
    2,255
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Fullsize F-18C doing Cobra ?

    @ 9:00 look's to me like a COBRA MANEUVER ?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbR4BCLmUA8
    It's a hobby - keep it simple

    www.332ndredtail.com

  2. #2
    FalconWings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    Posts
    5,530
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    I thik the real cobra ends we a final pull after leveling from th negative g manouver. On this video the Hornet quickly tries to recover by banking left after the negative push.
    Buying Jet Legend? Read here: http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_11372496/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    mia, FL
    Posts
    2,255
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by FalconWings View Post
    I thik the real cobra ends we a final pull after leveling from th negative g manouver. On this video the Hornet quickly tries to recover by banking left after the negative push.
    I saw that too.. but it was a good effort lol.
    It's a hobby - keep it simple

    www.332ndredtail.com

  4. #4
    FalconWings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    Posts
    5,530
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by basimpsn View Post
    I saw that too.. but it was a good effort lol.
    Word is there is a new Horny coming out. Stealthier and deadlier.
    Buying Jet Legend? Read here: http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_11372496/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm

  5. #5
    perttime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Tampere, FINLAND
    Posts
    1,393
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    I'm not sure what a Cobra is supposed to look like exactly, or if there is an official definition...

    Can't tell exactly because of the editing but it could be the same program that I've seen at some shows. I really like the look of the sharp high AoA corners and what people have called loaded rolls (like corkscrew with high AoA, and possibly flares going off at the same time).

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    mia, FL
    Posts
    2,255
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by FalconWings View Post
    Word is there is a new Horny coming out. Stealthier and deadlier.
    F-22 ? just kidding lol
    It's a hobby - keep it simple

    www.332ndredtail.com

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    mia, FL
    Posts
    2,255
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    "I'm not sure what a Cobra is supposed to look like exactly, or if there is an official definition"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsyMUAfh6fg
    It's a hobby - keep it simple

    www.332ndredtail.com

  8. #8
    DrScoles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Sammamish, WA,
    Posts
    1,192
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    May be a naive question, but why would finland buy f-18's that have folding wings and arrestor hook? Seems like they wouldn't have checked that box on the option sheet. Seems like added weight and maintenance that they won't use. I googled looking to see if they have carriers, looks like they don't. Why would a country buy a plane designed for carrier use in the first place when they don't have a carrier?

    Here is a list of carriers by nation. Interesting that we have to have 5 times more than second place and 10 times more than every other.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen shot 2013-08-30 at 8.07.09 AM.png 
Views:	97 
Size:	57.4 KB 
ID:	1914780

  9. #9
    perttime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Tampere, FINLAND
    Posts
    1,393
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by basimpsn View Post
    Yep.
    ... but if you do a maneuver that is a bit like a Cobra - where is the line between Cobra and "not-a-Cobra?
    Last edited by perttime; 08-30-2013 at 09:24 AM.

  10. #10
    perttime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Tampere, FINLAND
    Posts
    1,393
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by DrScoles View Post
    May be a naive question, but why would finland buy f-18's that have folding wings and arrestor hook?
    Folding wings are handy for storage. A hook and sturdy landing gear are handy for using short and rough runways, such as straight pieces of road. Finland still stays prepared to use roads for air bases, as there is no realistic way to keep a "major enemy" from breaking the peace time air bases.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNtFc0Z44m8

    They don't use the hook routinely but practice its use at land bases.

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    gloucester, UNITED KINGDOM
    Posts
    524
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    I could always ask if you want, got his email here as we been chatting reference photo's i got of him from this years display
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurie-hughes/

  12. #12
    FalconWings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    Posts
    5,530
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by DrScoles View Post
    May be a naive question, but why would finland buy f-18's that have folding wings and arrestor hook? Seems like they wouldn't have checked that box on the option sheet. Seems like added weight and maintenance that they won't use. I googled looking to see if they have carriers, looks like they don't. Why would a country buy a plane designed for carrier use in the first place when they don't have a carrier?

    Here is a list of carriers by nation. Interesting that we have to have 5 times more than second place and 10 times more than every other.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen shot 2013-08-30 at 8.07.09 AM.png 
Views:	97 
Size:	57.4 KB 
ID:	1914780
    Simple: it costs more. The baseline F-18 was designed for NAVY, therefore floding wings and arresting hook were requirements. Changing these requirements or changing the baseline design costs a lot o money and would have been billed directly to the customer. So, the customer has to ask the question can I live with folding wings and an arresting hook. Some manufacturers dont even provide an option of redesign/reconfiguring baseline design.

    Spain, Switzerland, Canada, USA all share the same configuration. On a side note, eliminating the folding wings, removing the tail hook, adding a smaller landing gear would yield a much lighter airframe with improved performance. Not sure the NAVY would like that for an export version Horny.

    David
    Buying Jet Legend? Read here: http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_11372496/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm

  13. #13
    Turbulence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Sahuarita , AZ
    Posts
    1,189
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    WOW, I don't ever recall a take off with the Speed Brake out. That was a first for me.


    Quote Originally Posted by perttime View Post
    Folding wings are handy for storage. A hook and sturdy landing gear are handy for using short and rough runways, such as straight pieces of road. Finland still stays prepared to use roads for air bases, as there is no realistic way to keep a "major enemy" from breaking the peace time air bases.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNtFc0Z44m8

    They don't use the hook routinely but practice its use at land bases.

  14. #14
    perttime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Tampere, FINLAND
    Posts
    1,393
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by Turbulence View Post
    WOW, I don't ever recall a take off with the Speed Brake out. That was a first for me.
    I've wondered about that one too. On purpose, selected by computer, or Pilot Error? I know that Hornets use the rudders for increased elevator authority. Looks like it didn't slow it down much.

  15. #15
    mtnflyer14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    517
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    I only had one flight in the Hornet, and I don't remember the interlocks, but in the Tomcat the speedbrakes automatically retracted at the military power stop on either throttle. I would assume the F-18 is the same, so I don't understand how he could (and why would he?) take off with speed brake extended like that. It did retract as soon as he went weight off wheels. Strange.
    Regards,
    Gus
    AW Extra 260/ZDZ Super 80; Elan/K-100; GJC Viperjet/K-80; YA F-15C/K-140

  16. #16

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    stony point, NY
    Posts
    289
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    the 18 has to use the rudders because it does not have enough elavator to rotate. the fix was to feed a bunch of rudder in and then they can rotate for take off. heck, the a 6 had to use skids under the front tires for land take off. the tires would blow if not for the skid plantes. it was never designed for land use. the f 14 could do a true cobra. it is a simple full up manuver to the point that the aircraft just pancakes into the air at a 90 degree angle of attack.

  17. #17

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    stony point, NY
    Posts
    289
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    i should say that this was told to me by my brother-in-law, Bill Stiles who was chife engineer for stablity and controll for the f-14. he was the man who designed the f-14 and worked on it form the first piece of paper right to the day it was retired. Bill told me that he had a new "baby" tom cat designed that would totally out preform the 18 but the navy wanted the far inferior 18. like he said,,some one in the navy was bought out big time. the 18 is like going back to prop power whaen comparwd to the f-14.

  18. #18

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    stony point, NY
    Posts
    289
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    i watched it two times and saw no cbra ,,,nothing even close.

  19. #19
    Wagon1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Pensacola, FL
    Posts
    175
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by perttime View Post
    Folding wings are handy for storage. A hook and sturdy landing gear are handy for using short and rough runways, such as straight pieces of road. Finland still stays prepared to use roads for air bases, as there is no realistic way to keep a "major enemy" from breaking the peace time air bases.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNtFc0Z44m8

    They don't use the hook routinely but practice its use at land bases.
    They built an F18 without all that mess. It was the YF-17.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	YF-17_01.jpg 
Views:	46 
Size:	97.4 KB 
ID:	1914897


    (....itty bitty girly landing gear)
    \"Leave the gun, take the cannolis\"

  20. #20
    FalconWings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    Posts
    5,530
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Yeap. Northrop was in deep on the lightweight fighter competition. They had a great concept, which was later sold to McDonnell Douglas.
    Buying Jet Legend? Read here: http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_11372496/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm

  21. #21
    bevar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Lake Worth, FL
    Posts
    3,341
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Most fighters have tailhooks. The F-15 and F-16 do too even though they are land based, non carrier aircraft.

    Beave
    Jetcat USA and the SPT-10 Rule!
    Allied Scale Squadron

  22. #22
    impulse09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    310
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by FalconWings View Post
    Word is there is a new Horny coming out. Stealthier and deadlier.
    Maybe they'll fix the pylons on this one???
    Don S

  23. #23

    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    GCQueensland, AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    8
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    The hook can be used in case the brakes fail, they can hook a cable across the runway and use the hook to catch it. There is a great video of the hornet during trials where they test it for rough carrier landings, the fa-18 catches the hook while still above the runway and it pulls the aircraft to the ground, amazing it doesn't rip the whole tail end off. Its a back up so to speak.

  24. #24
    perttime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Tampere, FINLAND
    Posts
    1,393
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by fred985 View Post
    the 18 has to use the rudders because it does not have enough elavator to rotate.
    The only reason to do the airbrake take-off on purpose, that I can think of, is that it would also add a pitch-up moment like the in-rudder.

    Quote Originally Posted by Wagon1 View Post
    They built an F18 without all that mess. It was the YF-17.
    (....itty bitty girly landing gear)
    But the F-17 never went into production. Neither did F-18L.

    If SAAB Gripen had already been in service in Sweden, at the time when Finland was looking to replace the Draken and MiG-21, I think there was a good chance of it being selected instead of F-18. They wanted a fighter that didn't have too many teething problems remaining, though. The Gripen was certainly designed with road bases in mind.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:36 PM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.