Poor Transmitter Antenna Positioning may Cause Lockouts
#76
Gonzola38,
What I take from your attachment, is the weakest signal is radiated from the tip of the antenna no matter what direction it is pointed, and the strongest signal is radiated from the sides of the antenna.
So if you have the antenna positioned in a 90 degree direction to your right, the weakest signal is radiated to the right and strongest will be straight to the front of you.
What I take from your attachment, is the weakest signal is radiated from the tip of the antenna no matter what direction it is pointed, and the strongest signal is radiated from the sides of the antenna.
So if you have the antenna positioned in a 90 degree direction to your right, the weakest signal is radiated to the right and strongest will be straight to the front of you.
Next weekend I will do a test with the antenna in different positions to see which one gives me a the stronger signal.
Maybe pointing the antenna up is the way to go.
#78
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Crestview, FL
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gonzalo38,
Straight from the Futaba manual from the 7C on page 18.
18
Transmitter Antenna
1. The transmitter antenna is adjustable so please make sure that the antenna is never pointed directly
at the model when flying as this creates a weak signal for the receiver.
2. Keep the antenna perpendicular to the transmitter's face to create a better RF condition for the
receiver. Of course this depends on how you hold the transmitter, but in most cases, adjusting the
transmitter antenna so that it is perpendicular to the face will give the best results. Please adjust the
transmitter antenna to the way you hold the transmitter.
The tip is the weakest signal, so having the antenna pointing up 90 degrees from the face of the transmitter will give you the best signal. I have personally lost a plane while having the antenna laying on it's side. The antenna would not stay up by itself, and I didn't notice it had fell over. Lost the plane at the far end of the field to my right. Right where the antenna was pointed. Sent it in to Futaba and they corrected the problem with the antenna. It shipped from the factory that way. Learned to always check my antenna orientation.
Straight from the Futaba manual from the 7C on page 18.
18
Transmitter Antenna
1. The transmitter antenna is adjustable so please make sure that the antenna is never pointed directly
at the model when flying as this creates a weak signal for the receiver.
2. Keep the antenna perpendicular to the transmitter's face to create a better RF condition for the
receiver. Of course this depends on how you hold the transmitter, but in most cases, adjusting the
transmitter antenna so that it is perpendicular to the face will give the best results. Please adjust the
transmitter antenna to the way you hold the transmitter.
The tip is the weakest signal, so having the antenna pointing up 90 degrees from the face of the transmitter will give you the best signal. I have personally lost a plane while having the antenna laying on it's side. The antenna would not stay up by itself, and I didn't notice it had fell over. Lost the plane at the far end of the field to my right. Right where the antenna was pointed. Sent it in to Futaba and they corrected the problem with the antenna. It shipped from the factory that way. Learned to always check my antenna orientation.
#79
You have to sort the crap from the clay!
From 4 pages of sniping, bagging other brands, personal attacks, name calling & conspiracy
theories what do we have?
Antenna orientation?
Frame losses from telemetry systems?
Metal control cables?
Heat issues on early receivers?
Anyone else have anything USEFUL to add?
Thanks for the original post Andy.
John.
From 4 pages of sniping, bagging other brands, personal attacks, name calling & conspiracy
theories what do we have?
Antenna orientation?
Frame losses from telemetry systems?
Metal control cables?
Heat issues on early receivers?
Anyone else have anything USEFUL to add?
Thanks for the original post Andy.
John.
#80
My Feedback: (55)
The way I understand it is to picture the wave from the tx antenna as a donut, with the antenna in the hole and perpendicular to body of the donut. Then, with the antenna positioned vertically, tip either pointed up overhead or down to the deck, the signal "donut" is then propagated out from you (and around you). As was mentioned by Craig B, the weak part of the signal (i.e. the hole) is then oriented overhead or down to the ground...neither place of which your jet should normally be.
#83
My Feedback: (24)
Here are some pictures of the radiation pattern (in 2D and 3D) of a dipole antenna. The "nulls," or points of low power are at the 2 ends of the antenna.
BTW, I think its best to orient your antenna towards the ground, but not directly straight down (or straight up). The maximum power is radiated out at 90 degrees from the axis of the antenna so you you want the antenna to be perpendicular to your line-of-sight to the model. Since you are usually looking up at an angle of 20-40 degrees plus towards your airplane, you want the antenna to be at an angle of 90 degrees to this, and that is easier to do with the antenna pointed down, not up.
Bob
BTW, I think its best to orient your antenna towards the ground, but not directly straight down (or straight up). The maximum power is radiated out at 90 degrees from the axis of the antenna so you you want the antenna to be perpendicular to your line-of-sight to the model. Since you are usually looking up at an angle of 20-40 degrees plus towards your airplane, you want the antenna to be at an angle of 90 degrees to this, and that is easier to do with the antenna pointed down, not up.
Bob
#84
My Feedback: (10)
A troll is an anonymous person posting things just to get a rise from people and causing mayhem. Andy is NOT anonymous, many here know him, respect him and consider him a friend. Given that, he is going to get more than the benefit of the doubt when it comes to information he may have. All clear on that?
If its not the radio, something causes models to go down....lets keep this on point and maybe we can all learn something that may save a model.
If its not the radio, something causes models to go down....lets keep this on point and maybe we can all learn something that may save a model.
Whatever, bud. I don't know Andy from Adam, and my statement still stands. If you're going to make a statement about failures, then you need to come back with hard evidence of such, not vague innuendo ... or you're just blowing smoke. You can defend your buddy all you want, but that's exactly what was done.
#85
My Feedback: (3)
Agreed, I have flown Kraft, Airtronics, JR, Spektrum and now Hitec. I have not noted any system being more failure prone then the others during the respective time period. IMO most issues are installation related mostly unknowingly. The manufacturers could be doing a better job at educating us as to what can cause signal degradation.
Craig, I work for Randtron Antenna Systems, your comments on TX antenna orientation are spot on.
Craig, I work for Randtron Antenna Systems, your comments on TX antenna orientation are spot on.
Cractus, common sense isn't and RCU is not unworldly enough to change that.
VF84sluggo that is a great description of signal propagation with this equipment - accurate, clear, and concise.
rhklenke, I would not point the antenna towards the ground because that is where the 'ground plane' is. While there is not physical connection to our equipment, why complicate matters and allow or encourage a secondary propagation from hidden debris (a buried fence line got me once)
#86
My Feedback: (17)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Oviedo,
FL
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is another diagram of the radiation pattern on linear antennas.
The two circles are the cross section of the "doughnut" mentioned earlier. The punchline is that you want your antenna perpendicular to your aircraft.
Left or right, horizontal with the ground, isn't too bad as long as you keep your radio towards your aircraft.
Better yet is what someone mentioned, 45% or so down toward the ground or folded 45% back, past vertical - dependent upon how you hold your transmitter. (Like rhklenke said)
The worst thing you can do is to point the tip of the antenna towards the plane.
Some companies are now using multiple antennas to minimize antenna positioning issues. You will also see multiple antennas on WiFi access points and routers for the same reason.
Keep in mind that the protocols used in our radios are designed to be very fault tolerant; unless you utilize a means of monitoring the quality of the data link it is pretty much impossible to distinguish between a system (transmitter, antennas, and receivers) that is operating marginally and one that is operating well. If your installation is marginal it is just a matter of time until you have a problem.
Paul
The two circles are the cross section of the "doughnut" mentioned earlier. The punchline is that you want your antenna perpendicular to your aircraft.
Left or right, horizontal with the ground, isn't too bad as long as you keep your radio towards your aircraft.
Better yet is what someone mentioned, 45% or so down toward the ground or folded 45% back, past vertical - dependent upon how you hold your transmitter. (Like rhklenke said)
The worst thing you can do is to point the tip of the antenna towards the plane.
Some companies are now using multiple antennas to minimize antenna positioning issues. You will also see multiple antennas on WiFi access points and routers for the same reason.
Keep in mind that the protocols used in our radios are designed to be very fault tolerant; unless you utilize a means of monitoring the quality of the data link it is pretty much impossible to distinguish between a system (transmitter, antennas, and receivers) that is operating marginally and one that is operating well. If your installation is marginal it is just a matter of time until you have a problem.
Paul
Last edited by SkidMan; 04-20-2014 at 04:32 PM.
#87
My Feedback: (17)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Oviedo,
FL
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jim Branaum - Pointing one end of the antenna toward the ground not any different than pointing it towards the sky. The power radiated off of each end of the antenna is essentially the same (the far end, or the end fastened at your transmitter). The real radiated power is perpendicular to the antenna axis, not the end of the antenna.
Last edited by SkidMan; 04-20-2014 at 04:32 PM.
#89
Here are some pictures of the radiation pattern (in 2D and 3D) of a dipole antenna. The "nulls," or points of low power are at the 2 ends of the antenna.
BTW, I think its best to orient your antenna towards the ground, but not directly straight down (or straight up). The maximum power is radiated out at 90 degrees from the axis of the antenna so you you want the antenna to be perpendicular to your line-of-sight to the model. Since you are usually looking up at an angle of 20-40 degrees plus towards your airplane, you want the antenna to be at an angle of 90 degrees to this, and that is easier to do with the antenna pointed down, not up.
Bob
BTW, I think its best to orient your antenna towards the ground, but not directly straight down (or straight up). The maximum power is radiated out at 90 degrees from the axis of the antenna so you you want the antenna to be perpendicular to your line-of-sight to the model. Since you are usually looking up at an angle of 20-40 degrees plus towards your airplane, you want the antenna to be at an angle of 90 degrees to this, and that is easier to do with the antenna pointed down, not up.
Bob
It is a pity that more emphasis is not placed on this by the radio manufacturers in the manuals. If you point those nulls at a model just after takeoff or on approach for landing on an install that may be less than optimal for some reason, you are playing Rc Russian roulette. Time for a new poll.....
#90
Agreed, I have flown Kraft, Airtronics, JR, Spektrum and now Hitec. I have not noted any system being more failure prone then the others during the respective time period. IMO most issues are installation related mostly unknowingly. The manufacturers could be doing a better job at educating us as to what can cause signal degradation.
Craig, I work for Randtron Antenna Systems, your comments on TX antenna orientation are spot on.
Craig, I work for Randtron Antenna Systems, your comments on TX antenna orientation are spot on.
#92
My Feedback: (22)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: palm harbor,
FL
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I never saw a warranty that read bullet proof. So its possible there was a lockout but I know unlike another brand I once had that was a frequent occurrence.so if it did happen I think the guys flying that particular futaba radio should be informed and no be evasive and I nunedo.spell itand have a real conversation.opening up a post titled whats wrong with futaba is not a good intro.
#93
My Feedback: (2)
A troll is an anonymous person posting things just to get a rise from people and causing mayhem. Andy is NOT anonymous, many here know him, respect him and consider him a friend. Given that, he is going to get more than the benefit of the doubt when it comes to information he may have. All clear on that?
If its not the radio, something causes models to go down....lets keep this on point and maybe we can all learn something that may save a model.
If its not the radio, something causes models to go down....lets keep this on point and maybe we can all learn something that may save a model.
Andy how do you feel about being a half-troll, part Gnome/part-human wizard or paladin but with lots of hit points and melee attack? Maybe an elf?
Shaz
#94
My Feedback: (22)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: palm harbor,
FL
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thee post is titled whats up with futaba.then it says there were some lockouts but the information is somehow secret.that tends toraise eyebrows.if more information is shared then we can discuss it intellegently without brand bashing.i have had a radio warranty that says this radio is bullet proofing
#95
My Feedback: (18)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New City, NY
Posts: 3,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Same with mine. Right after reading that I checked. it only rotates 45 degrees from parallel to the face to straight up although when I first had the radio for just a few weeks I thought I had closed the case after test running an engine in my backyard and when lifting the case by the handle the radio fell out and the antenna had popped out. I snapped it right back in but now I wonder if I had snapped it in the wrong position. I do remember always pointing the antenna on my 12 FG down but the 18 I point up.
#96
My Feedback: (76)
Tony's accident happened at my home field and I also fly Futaba. I don't fly as fast or as far so Tony, but I would be more than happy test any combos you want in some of my lower priced planes. Now, the only other difference between the speed and range is I do NOT use PowerBox for anything, if someone wants to volunteer one, I can certainly test that too. Now, We know Tony was using one, and I am under the impression that the accident in PHX also had one, can we confirm if it was the same model/type? I have 2 10C and a 14MZ I can use to test with. Can we also look into finding out the TX's used when the planes went in? Also what RX and was there any of the new a-bus or telemetry? (I don't have or use that either). Let's first see if we can get details about the actual set up used.
Ralph
Ralph
#97
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: san jose,
CA
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are 2 things crucial with Futaba 2.4Ghz.
1. the rx antennas need to be fixed at 90 degrees.
2. the tx antenna orientation must be set such that the side lobes cover the flying area.
Short of this is likely non-optimal with possible failsafe consequences. Since most typical Futaba setups don't have frame loss counters you just have to follow the above and trust it works correctly. Personally I like the idea of having frame loss counters since there are these variables...
1. the rx antennas need to be fixed at 90 degrees.
2. the tx antenna orientation must be set such that the side lobes cover the flying area.
Short of this is likely non-optimal with possible failsafe consequences. Since most typical Futaba setups don't have frame loss counters you just have to follow the above and trust it works correctly. Personally I like the idea of having frame loss counters since there are these variables...
#99
My Feedback: (24)
Most important from this thread is that we should take this opportunity to perhaps come up with different troll-like synonyms that differentiate actual trolls, with pretend-trolls, and then wannabe trolls (peer pressure). Maybe we can do some sub-categories like Gnomes, Goblins, Elves, Dwarves, Sprites, maybe a billy goat or two?
Andy how do you feel about being a half-troll, part Gnome/part-human wizard or paladin but with lots of hit points and melee attack? Maybe an elf?
Shaz
Andy how do you feel about being a half-troll, part Gnome/part-human wizard or paladin but with lots of hit points and melee attack? Maybe an elf?
Shaz
Bob
#100
My Feedback: (24)
Same with mine. Right after reading that I checked. it only rotates 45 degrees from parallel to the face to straight up although when I first had the radio for just a few weeks I thought I had closed the case after test running an engine in my backyard and when lifting the case by the handle the radio fell out and the antenna had popped out. I snapped it right back in but now I wonder if I had snapped it in the wrong position. I do remember always pointing the antenna on my 12 FG down but the 18 I point up.
Bob