JimBrown

My Feedback: (2)

Fortunately, before V1.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PS1YAX70edc

...jim

sideshow

My Feedback: (11)

See how fast the pilot fed in rudder? Awesome.....

sysiek

My Feedback: (176)

Cortex gyro

ticketec

My Feedback: (2)

Close, ADIRU's air data inertial reference units. there are 3 of them onboard.

It was the flight management computers that fed the rudder in that quick. It's designed so that if there is an engine out senario the pilots to not have to correct for the lost engine, but rather manage the situation.


Thanks

dave

hofer

Hi,
Puhh, no rumors here, ticketec,
It was the PILOT to react with the rudder here - NO automatic yaw compensation from ANY of the 3 IRS`s is available during T/O roll on the Airbuses !!!
Engine failure in T/O is a scenario trained every 6 month in the SIM !
So, in this case, the pilot exercised his skills and justified the money he earns to the managers !
see you
Hans

mort78

My Feedback: (1)

As Hofer says, there is no automatic rudder input for the A330.
I think you might be thinking of the 777. The 777 is fitted with a TAC (Thrust Asymmetry Compensation).
That applies rudder in the event of an engine failure. Watching that video, that pilot was extremely quick to get the rudder sorted. Great job.

j.duncker

My Feedback: (2)

The reverse thrust thingies seem to be deployed in about 1 second.

If the pilot/copilot did this great reactions.

Square Nozzle

My Feedback: (1)

Sorry folks but that was a compressor stall, the engine did not "explode".

2walla

My Feedback: (10)

Engine chucked a blade due to fatigue failure.. Happens all the time.

Dreddi

My Feedback: (3)

No it doesnt. A shed blade is a catastrophic failure and would constitute a design change to prevent future occurrences.

JimBrown

My Feedback: (2)

From the AAIB accident report:

At approximately 105 kt on a takeoff roll on Runway 23R at Manchester, the right engine failed, emitting a flash and smoke from the exhaust. The crew quickly established that there was a loss of power and aborted the takeoff, brought the aircraft to an emergency stop on the runway and taxied clear using the unaffected left engine. Inspection of the right engine revealed there had been a failure of a single HP turbine blade which had detached, resulting in a high power engine surge and further secondary damage to the IP and LP turbines and nozzles. The blade failure was caused by high cycle fatigue (HCF) crack propagation with crack initiation resulting from ‘Type 2 sulphidation’ corrosion.

...jim

RCJetBazz

Compressor stall my *****!

gsmarino2000

My Feedback: (2)

I believe the correct term is a "contained failure" meaning that nothing was thrown out the side of the engine. The shed blade and any other parts either stayed inside or exited through the exhaust nozzle. The pilot(s) absolutely acted correctly and quickly as everyone points out. One nice thing in a full scale aircraft - you feel the yaw.

Square Nozzle

My Feedback: (1)

Compressor stall, compressor surge. It's the same thing. The blade failure resulted in reverse flow in the engine ---- Compressor stall.

gsmarino2000

My Feedback: (2)

This really had nothing do with the compressor. Corrosion initiated a crack in a HP turbine blade, which propagated due to high cycle fatigue until the blade separated at the crack. The blade then damaged the only remaining downstream components - the IP and LP nozzles and IP and LP blading. The event caused the engine to surge, but that was a tertiary event caused by damage and disruption in the turbine section which disrupted airflow through the engine.

bevar

My Feedback: (27)

Allow me to simplify as they would say in NASCAR: It done blowd up!

What they did was pretty much a non event. An engine shells at 105 knots and you abort. You chop the throttles, RTO kicks in automatically and then depending on the operator either go straight into reverse, which automatically deploys the ground spoilers for you...or bang the throttles closed, manually deploy the ground spoilers and then reverse the engines. Now keep in mind I'm speaking Boeing so the Bus might act a little different. Either way a 105 knot abort is no big deal...just another day at the funny farm.

Beave

Quikturn

My Feedback: (12)

The flight crew did a great job on that abort! Looked like a textbook procedure.

I fly fly a Hawker 800XP that has a rudder bias system that compensates for a failed engine. Bleed air from both engines are routed to the opposite end of a piston/actuator unit that's connected to the rudder. With both engines running, bleed air is equal and no rudder deflection. When an engine fails, bleed air is lost on one side of the actuator driving the rudder to compensate for the asymmetrical condition. Pretty simple system and makes V1 cuts much easier.

bevar

My Feedback: (27)

Yep...I agree. It's a simple reflection of the training they went through...so when a rejected takeoff occurs...it's a non event.

After a couple of hundred aborts in the sim...when it happens for real it you just react and get the job done.

Nicely done boys...

Beave

ticketec

My Feedback: (2)

There is thrust asymmetry compensation on the A330, but it may be gated to above 100kts, not sure, so hofer may be right. I'll pull out my course notes when i get a chance and see what they say. T/R deply, 100% from the front office, and nice job, but as hofer stated they train for RTO's all the time.

Thanks

dave

hofer

Hi ticketec,
Well, in fact, Airbuses do NOT have automatic yaw compensation during ALL phases of flight if the Autopilot is not engaged - you have to step on that rudder firsthand in any case, then trim manually around 10 Units ( with TOGA thrust ) before you can engage the AP !
I have to know - just passed my latest A330 SIM-check 3 days ago !
see you
Hans

mort78

My Feedback: (1)

Dave,
When you dig out your info, I think you'll find it DOES NOT have any compensation of any kind on the A330.
I've been flying the A330 for the last 5 years, so if it does, it's news to me

What it does do automatically is engage max braking (RTO) once the thrust levers are brought back to idle and provided the speed is greater than 72kts.
The spoilers are also auto in this situation.
Cheers and beers,
Mort

NickC5FE

My Feedback: (31)

Square Nozzle, "The blade failure resulted in a reverse flow through the engine"........No...

Compressor stall occurs due to compressor discharge pressure exceeding compressor inlet pressure, usually because the first stages of compression cant handle the amount of air coming through the inlet, thus pressure drops in front and the built up pressure in the rear stages of compression flow forward. Most modern day (and even our old TF-39's on the C-5) have variable stator vanes on the first few stages of compression that adjust blade angle for the amount of air being brought in and throttle lever position to help squash stalls. Many times, in older low bypass turbo fans, the compressor stall would CAUSE blade failure.

cactusflyer

My Feedback: (4)

No....it was the CEREBRAL cortex!! Basically, when the windshield trends from all pavement in view to pavement/grass, you push on the pedal that makes for more pavement! The auto brakes went to RTO mode....rejected takeoff....the brakes were activated and the Bus started decelerating on a deceleration schedule. The reversers were applied by the pilot which allowed for less braking. At 80 kts, reverse thrust was reduced to idle and then stowed by the pilot. 105kts. to 80kts. doesn't take long. Hence, the quick deployment and stowage.

Tailwinds,


John

FalconWings

My Feedback: (57)

i want to emphasize that yes it happened before V1, but had it been after Vr you just get airborne. There's no decision.......just hope your Fuel, Payload and CG calculations were correct so the V's are accurate.

FalconWings

My Feedback: (57)

Hey Airbus guys, is the T/R actuation hooked up to the primary hydraulic system or is it self contained to the engine?