Easiest to fly RC Scale Military Jets
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (11)
Easiest to fly RC Scale Military Jets
Note: Not counting BAE Hawk
I know that the brand and configuration of a jet can make a big difference, but if we assume reasonable wing loagings and a good brand, what are the easiest RC scale military jets to fly?
Based on what I have seen and heard, here is what I are the easiest ones in order from easy to hard.
My criteria:
-No snap on stall
-No special landing requirements like holding lots of power or high alpha
-Wide gear stance to prevent tipping
-In two cases below the jets are designed for a twin setup but when run on a single make them even lighter and easier to fly.
-New: No wierd flying tendencies like dutch role.
f-22 single
f-15 single
Mirage
I dont consider F-16 as it is tippy on the ground and requires high alpha but the one I had and sold was heavy.
I am looking for something easy to fly that doesnt require so much skill or concentration all the time (relatively speaking to harder to fly jets). I hear the yellow f-22 and f-15 are good choices for this?
I know that the brand and configuration of a jet can make a big difference, but if we assume reasonable wing loagings and a good brand, what are the easiest RC scale military jets to fly?
Based on what I have seen and heard, here is what I are the easiest ones in order from easy to hard.
My criteria:
-No snap on stall
-No special landing requirements like holding lots of power or high alpha
-Wide gear stance to prevent tipping
-In two cases below the jets are designed for a twin setup but when run on a single make them even lighter and easier to fly.
-New: No wierd flying tendencies like dutch role.
f-22 single
f-15 single
Mirage
I dont consider F-16 as it is tippy on the ground and requires high alpha but the one I had and sold was heavy.
I am looking for something easy to fly that doesnt require so much skill or concentration all the time (relatively speaking to harder to fly jets). I hear the yellow f-22 and f-15 are good choices for this?
Last edited by essyou35; 05-27-2014 at 07:39 AM. Reason: Added another criteria.
#4
My Feedback: (24)
Well, you've already got the F-15, and that, from what I've seen, is one of the best. Its almost impossible to stall and the landings are very straight forward. Some of the models have narrow (non-scale) gear spacing that does make them prone to tipping over though.
The F-22 might be better in that regard because the gear are more widely spaced, but I have not flown one to be able to comment on that.
Other than needing special care to maintain speed and carry power on the approach, the wide gear stance and somewhat of a "delta" planform make the F-4 not that difficult to land either, actually.
Bob
The F-22 might be better in that regard because the gear are more widely spaced, but I have not flown one to be able to comment on that.
Other than needing special care to maintain speed and carry power on the approach, the wide gear stance and somewhat of a "delta" planform make the F-4 not that difficult to land either, actually.
Bob
#11
My Feedback: (23)
The airplane is really easy and stress free to fly, landing just takes some finess and precision to be accurate with them every time. Once you learn it though, you can really have fun with it and get the landing roll outs to less than 200'.
#12
My Feedback: (57)
Well, you've already got the F-15, and that, from what I've seen, is one of the best. Its almost impossible to stall and the landings are very straight forward. Some of the models have narrow (non-scale) gear spacing that does make them prone to tipping over though.
The F-22 might be better in that regard because the gear are more widely spaced, but I have not flown one to be able to comment on that.
Other than needing special care to maintain speed and carry power on the approach, the wide gear stance and somewhat of a "delta" planform make the F-4 not that difficult to land either, actually.
Bob
The F-22 might be better in that regard because the gear are more widely spaced, but I have not flown one to be able to comment on that.
Other than needing special care to maintain speed and carry power on the approach, the wide gear stance and somewhat of a "delta" planform make the F-4 not that difficult to land either, actually.
Bob
#18
My Feedback: (34)
Im still new to turbines only been flying as of end of summer last year.
I currently have a Byron F16 at 21 pounds and it is very enjoyeable to fly, and I have yet to tip and hit a wing, but I fly off grass, and I was always told to stop then turn for turn around.
But My Carf Eursport Navy is a great war bird, and flys great!, The huge wings, and wide landing gear stance and the fact you can set it up so all 3 landing gear have Pro link type struts really take the punishment of a bad landing.
Yes there is some wing rock on take off, and slow fly buys but you don't notice it after a few flights, it fly as slow and smooth as you can want, Im event thinking I could use it later this year to compet in our local NASA (scale flying contest) as I can do really nice horzontal figure 8's and other scale manuvers with out much stress vs the F16 that scares the crap out of me to fly it that slow.
Carf even sells a really nice weapons kit for it, and once I have a spar $500 I'll order it.
I wish there was a scale jet like the falcon 120 / Navy Cat as it flys so dang well you almsot forget its Turbine..
I currently have a Byron F16 at 21 pounds and it is very enjoyeable to fly, and I have yet to tip and hit a wing, but I fly off grass, and I was always told to stop then turn for turn around.
But My Carf Eursport Navy is a great war bird, and flys great!, The huge wings, and wide landing gear stance and the fact you can set it up so all 3 landing gear have Pro link type struts really take the punishment of a bad landing.
Yes there is some wing rock on take off, and slow fly buys but you don't notice it after a few flights, it fly as slow and smooth as you can want, Im event thinking I could use it later this year to compet in our local NASA (scale flying contest) as I can do really nice horzontal figure 8's and other scale manuvers with out much stress vs the F16 that scares the crap out of me to fly it that slow.
Carf even sells a really nice weapons kit for it, and once I have a spar $500 I'll order it.
I wish there was a scale jet like the falcon 120 / Navy Cat as it flys so dang well you almsot forget its Turbine..
#22
My Feedback: (29)
I am liking the yellow f-15. Sounds like it flies like a trainer. I've glassed enough wings that I think I can build it ok.
Only problem is I will use spray paint or enamel through my airbrush to paint it.
Only problem is I will use spray paint or enamel through my airbrush to paint it.
Last edited by grbaker; 05-27-2014 at 04:12 PM.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , NV
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Want an easy Arf Military jet?/ Try the Hobby People U-2.. 66 inch span, hand launch. It is basically a jet powered glider AND has a great rate of climb. Looks great in the air too. Been flying one for several years. Just 3 channel ( Elev, Ail and Motor. Don m
#24
My Feedback: (287)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: dracut,
MA
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
F-22 hands down. ... I have a yellow with K170... It's a real sweetheart. On the ground the with the low wide track gear it handles like a race car. In the air it has zero bad habits and is rock stable on landing approach! Once on the ground no tendency to "bunny hop" also for some reason the outline is easy to follow in the air!
#25
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rocklin,
CA
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to throw my 2 cents in...I have had the same Phillip Avonds F-15 for 13 years now. His model does not have the stability issues that other f-15's do. His F-16 is great too. Check out my web page on RCU to see my F-15 up close. It's an easy build but can be as scale as you like. His web page is www.avonds.com