Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

Glue joint resistance comparative test.

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Glue joint resistance comparative test.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-2014, 11:12 AM
  #76  
Zor
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario, ON, CANADA
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default My understanding and experience

Originally Posted by olnico

Great idea, but I really don't have the time to implement it. So I'll keep digging holes in the workshop floor .
Hi All,

I do not understand why the gluing ( cementing ) of this item was chosen while areas needing much stronger joints are required.

I think that most regular wood glues and epoxies are much harder then the materials they bind.

The binding strength to hold under stress ( impact peak forces ) seems to me to be the purpose of selecting a binding agent. The ability of the binding agent to hold depends on the penetration to some extend and the material being cemented may give ( break ) just beyond the penetration.

Many bondings have little or no penetration such as gluing to glass or metal surfaces.
The binding in such cases is more molecular than porous penetration. In such cases the area of binding is more important. This also apply of course to penetrated bindings.

I have developped the habit of filleting all gluing to increase the binding areas.
I have been rewarded with much less damages in the multitude of crashes over the years.

There are also methods of helping the bound structure to resist the breakage of the glued joint. Glued joints rarely break under compression. They break under tension, shearing, twisting or tangential forces.

Zor

Last edited by Zor; 09-11-2014 at 11:18 AM.
Old 11-25-2014, 02:34 PM
  #77  
olnico
Thread Starter
 
olnico's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston, Texas.
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Shear test of the USB with E-20NS.
That was a big surprise. I was expecting the glue joint to be slightly weaker than with E-20HP. In fact this was not the case at all.
The bracket did hold till 62.5 kgs of load!
That is a mighty 125 kgs for a pair of brackets and 170 PSI shear strength.

Here is a picture of the test at 62.5 kgs, just before it broke.



Last edited by olnico; 11-25-2014 at 02:51 PM.
Old 11-25-2014, 03:15 PM
  #78  
dbsonic
My Feedback: (3)
 
dbsonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: san jose, CA
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very interesting. Compared to epoxy, the Hysols are far superior. Looking fwd to your next test.
Old 12-05-2014, 12:52 AM
  #79  
olnico
Thread Starter
 
olnico's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston, Texas.
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Gemtlemen, here is the winner, so far. Hysol 9462!

Test at 50 kgs/ 110 lbs:



60 kgs/ 132 lbs:



65 kgs/ 143 lbs:



The glue joint sheared after a few seconds at this weight in an impressive explosion.

The shear strength of the glue joint in these conditions is 65kgs for 5.165 cm2 or 12.58 kgs/ cm2 or 179 PSI.

Here is the picture of the bracket after failure:



This is interesting because part of the glue joint failed on the wood interface and part of the bracket failed on the PYCABS interface. This is a good validation of the shear strength of the material in real conditions.

BTW this also validates the resistance of the Ultimate Servo Brackets at a mighty 130 kgs/ 286 lbs per servo. This bracket will hold 1700 oz.in of torque without failing!

Last edited by olnico; 12-05-2014 at 12:55 AM.
Old 12-05-2014, 01:06 AM
  #80  
marc s
 
marc s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: farnborough, , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Oli are you able to test 9464, from what I understand it very similar to 9462, comparatively less money than 9462 and is a grey colour and thixo too, I've used it and find it god but would like to see how it stands up if you have time/options to test it.

Being grey it blends nicely with any carbon faced formers/plates etc too and your PYCABS black products...

marcs
Old 12-05-2014, 03:05 AM
  #81  
olnico
Thread Starter
 
olnico's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston, Texas.
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marc s
Oli are you able to test 9464, from what I understand it very similar to 9462, comparatively less money than 9462 and is a grey colour and thixo too, I've used it and find it god but would like to see how it stands up if you have time/options to test it.

Being grey it blends nicely with any carbon faced formers/plates etc too and your PYCABS black products...

marcs
Hi Marc,.
I just checked with Loctite USA. They do not have 9464 on the dealer's catalogue.
Old 12-05-2014, 03:16 AM
  #82  
marc s
 
marc s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: farnborough, , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

How strange - CAT No 36692

marcs
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1654.JPG
Views:	178
Size:	2.80 MB
ID:	2052337  
Old 12-05-2014, 03:22 AM
  #83  
olnico
Thread Starter
 
olnico's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston, Texas.
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marc s
How strange - CAT No 36692

marcs
That's a Euro only reference. I will check if I can get a sample from Loctite USA.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.