Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

2.6m F-117 NightHawk, Twin SimJet 2300 - Build form scratch.

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

2.6m F-117 NightHawk, Twin SimJet 2300 - Build form scratch.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2015, 04:16 PM
  #26  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hello

First, I've to correct something that I didn't mention from the beginning.
This project is a joined efforts and funds between me and my best friend Bob. I'm sorry mate that I didn't mention your name from the first post.
So all the work done is a result of a lot of brain storming between both of us.

Last weekend we started on the fuselage. We are using dupron foam to create all the templates of the internal structure and the outside skin then we will transfer it to the building material.

The original plan was to use beech plywood for all the internal structure but I think we will use a compsit material instead.
We will trial with enforced fiberglass with laminated balsa core sheets. It will be much less wight and strong enough.

Our target wight is 17-18kg dry, all the equipment (engines, electronics, batteries, retracts, wheels, etc...) are around 10kg, so I need to get the model empty to 7kg.
Each wing is 1kg so the fuselage can't be more than 5kg painted.

any thoughts about a material that will help with target?

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0055.JPG
Views:	1085
Size:	206.9 KB
ID:	2069874   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0058.JPG
Views:	1086
Size:	149.6 KB
ID:	2069875  
Old 02-02-2015, 05:11 PM
  #27  
sidgates
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Migf117
Hello

First, I've to correct something that I didn't mention from the beginning.
This project is a joined efforts and funds between me and my best friend Bob. I'm sorry mate that I didn't mention your name from the first post.
So all the work done is a result of a lot of brain storming between both of us.


Last weekend we started on the fuselage. We are using dupron foam to create all the templates of the internal structure and the outside skin then we will transfer it to the building material.

The original plan was to use beech plywood for all the internal structure but I think we will use a compsit material instead.
We will trial with enforced fiberglass with laminated balsa core sheets. It will be much less wight and strong enough.

Our target wight is 17-18kg dry, all the equipment (engines, electronics, batteries, retracts, wheels, etc...) are around 10kg, so I need to get the model empty to 7kg.
Each wing is 1kg so the fuselage can't be more than 5kg painted.

any thoughts about a material that will help with target?

================================================== ==================
Mig,
You might consider bulkheads is am using in my scratch built F-94C. I cut the bulkhead out of 1/4" thick blue foam and fit it to the inside of the fuse. Next I cut out the center leaving approx. 5/8" to 3/4" thick on outside edge. This thickness is for 6-8" dia. bulkheads. Next I round the edge of the inside dia. Now I glass the foam with approx. 2-3" long strips of 3oz glass cloth and epoxy resin. I wrap the cloth around the foam from the inside leaving the outside dia. bare foam. applying 3-4 layers.

To glue the bulkhead in I coat the outside bare foam edge with a thin coat of gorilla glue. If I want the area even stiffer I then wet a thin strip of carbon tow and tamp in it the joint between the bulkhead and the inside of the fuse.

You can see my project at http://sidgates.us
Old 02-03-2015, 01:08 AM
  #28  
Jgwright
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Norfolk , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have made a number of turbine powered flying wing designs and am in the process of making another at the moment. I reckon you will come out at over 20 Kg with 2 110mm case size turbines with that size of airframe. The plane just has to be built so lightly to get under 20 Kg. There are just so many parts to be added that you will not have thought of and all planes mysteriously get heavier as you work on them! I have carbon faced balsa core formers in my Boulton Paul P111 and that has one engine 2.11M wingspan and the weight came out at 23Kg dry. My Horten had 2 MW44 engines and just managed to get under the weight limit, but the structure was light with ribs being from poplar ply except for the root ribs and the areas around the retracts and engines, where I used birch ply. Unexpected things like 1Kg nose weight can throw the calculations off. I see your weight limit is 25 KG and I am not sure if it is with fuel or not.

comparative weights of poplar and lite ply and birch ply.

http://www.slecuk.com/PBCPPlayer.asp?ID=1501565


On my current build I am concerned that it may come out heavy. It is 2.2m wingspan and will be sheeted in Proskin, but most ribs are Poplar. Unfortunately the centre section is difficult to maintain structural integrity without adding quite a lot of birch ply ribs. Because of this I decided to register the model as a possible Large Model and have it inspected. If it is completely finished and comes out over the weight limit inspection of the inside would be impossible and I would not relish having to remove areas of Proskin. You may like to consider your options.

The Germans are the masters of building huge planes very lightly but strongly. They mostly use lots of cnc or laser cut formers close together that are well fretted out cut from poplar and sheeted with balsa, covered in iron on film or fibreglass and painted. In your case you could consider using iron on film to save weight. As your fuselage is all angles I guess you could even look at Depron foam as the outer skin. There is a guy in Australia who has made a number of large light deltas that have flown successfully. It would need reinforcing around the retract and engine mounts and the exhausts would need some careful treatment.

John
Old 02-22-2015, 05:25 PM
  #29  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi Guys

Thank you all for your feedback and ideas about the material.

We have done a some testing with different options and the best combination of wight and strength was for Balsa and fiberglass.
So sheets of balsa (3mm and 6mm) with 100gsm fiberglass on both sides came out very strong and light.

As you can see in the pictures, we glued sheets of 6mm hard balsa to make the spine (the center former) then all sanded flat and keyed up using the Woodpicker tool - great tool, it makes a big enhancement to strength of the sheeting - then on a big 16mm melamine MDF sheets which have been waxed we put epoxy resin then the fiberglass cloth then more resin, then the balsa, more resin, then fiberglass and one more layer of resin then the top melamine MDF sheet then a lot of wight on top of the whole thing.

After 24 hours, the result was very strong and light sheet of fiberglased balsa. We cut out the spine from it and we were surprised the weight.

The spine is 2.2m long and 300mm at the highest point and 6mm thick, the weight is 530g only... so happy with that.

Next we will make more 6mm sheets for the rest of the formers and 3mm for the mezzanine (the horizontal sheets which will attach to each side of the spine and where everything will attached to) and 1.5mm sheets for all the outside skin which will be laid on glass sheets to - hopefully - get very smooth surface ready for painting with minimal preparation (we will start testing on that next weekend).

With this material I think we'll be able to achieve the weight we want.

Talk to you soon guys.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0067.JPG
Views:	945
Size:	162.5 KB
ID:	2075539   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0068.JPG
Views:	907
Size:	153.7 KB
ID:	2075540   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0069.JPG
Views:	928
Size:	216.4 KB
ID:	2075541   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0070.JPG
Views:	911
Size:	127.3 KB
ID:	2075542   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0072.JPG
Views:	885
Size:	230.7 KB
ID:	2075543   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0075.JPG
Views:	904
Size:	212.2 KB
ID:	2075544   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0076.JPG
Views:	886
Size:	212.5 KB
ID:	2075545   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0077.JPG
Views:	922
Size:	202.6 KB
ID:	2075546  

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0078.JPG
Views:	905
Size:	199.4 KB
ID:	2075547  
Old 04-11-2015, 04:57 AM
  #30  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi all

It have been a while since our last post, but we did quite a bit of progress on the project.

We are a more ahead of what in the attached pics, but I didn't take pictures of our final progress yet. (may be tomorrow).

I don't think I need to talk much, the pictures will say more.




Looking forward for your feedback guys.

Cheers
Moatasem
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0112.JPG
Views:	926
Size:	225.3 KB
ID:	2088017   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0114.JPG
Views:	919
Size:	214.9 KB
ID:	2088018   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0116.JPG
Views:	925
Size:	222.3 KB
ID:	2088019   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0117.JPG
Views:	951
Size:	228.0 KB
ID:	2088020   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0119.JPG
Views:	919
Size:	216.8 KB
ID:	2088021   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0121.JPG
Views:	918
Size:	198.2 KB
ID:	2088022   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0123.JPG
Views:	938
Size:	246.5 KB
ID:	2088023   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0128.JPG
Views:	951
Size:	258.0 KB
ID:	2088024  

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0130.JPG
Views:	945
Size:	254.1 KB
ID:	2088025   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0132.JPG
Views:	912
Size:	249.1 KB
ID:	2088026   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0134.JPG
Views:	925
Size:	236.2 KB
ID:	2088027   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0139.JPG
Views:	982
Size:	276.8 KB
ID:	2088028  
Old 04-11-2015, 06:16 AM
  #31  
ticketec
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brisbane, QLD, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Looking good there mate!!

Are the tanks going to be removable?

Thanks

dave
Old 04-11-2015, 02:31 PM
  #32  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ticketec
Looking good there mate!!

Are the tanks going to be removable?

Thanks

dave
Hi Dave

Thank you dude.

Yes all the tanks are removable, but to remove the front tanks I'll have to remove the back once first.

It is a big plane but very limited in the internal area, because of the position of the CG.

Regards
Moatasem
Old 06-14-2015, 03:55 PM
  #33  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi All

A bit more progress.
We are progressing very slow but we will get there for sure.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Anhang 1.jpg
Views:	1040
Size:	276.9 KB
ID:	2102616   Click image for larger version

Name:	Anhang 2.jpg
Views:	1011
Size:	135.7 KB
ID:	2102617   Click image for larger version

Name:	Anhang 3.jpg
Views:	1003
Size:	225.6 KB
ID:	2102618   Click image for larger version

Name:	F117 build (1).JPG
Views:	933
Size:	253.6 KB
ID:	2102619   Click image for larger version

Name:	F117 build (2).JPG
Views:	961
Size:	232.8 KB
ID:	2102620   Click image for larger version

Name:	F117 build (3).JPG
Views:	941
Size:	280.8 KB
ID:	2102621   Click image for larger version

Name:	F117 build (4).JPG
Views:	994
Size:	155.4 KB
ID:	2102622   Click image for larger version

Name:	F117 build (5).JPG
Views:	910
Size:	189.9 KB
ID:	2102623  

Click image for larger version

Name:	F117 build (6).JPG
Views:	922
Size:	237.6 KB
ID:	2102624  
Old 06-14-2015, 04:44 PM
  #34  
erbroens
 
erbroens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Curitiba, Parana, BRAZIL
Posts: 4,289
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Looking great, the pipes also look fantastic.

If you want a feedback my only one would be asking about removable landing gear plates for manutention ease., cant be sure in the pics if the CF reinforcements are those already.
Old 06-14-2015, 06:18 PM
  #35  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by erbroens
Looking great, the pipes also look fantastic.

If you want a feedback my only one would be asking about removable landing gear plates for manutention ease., cant be sure in the pics if the CF reinforcements are those already.
Hi erbroens

Thank you for your feedback, but the CF plates are not removable. but the mounting area is going to be reinforced a lot more.

There is no much room to work in this area so I've to make it a strong as I possible..
Old 06-15-2015, 08:19 AM
  #36  
AndyAndrews
 
AndyAndrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 6,147
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

And who said folks don't build anymore? It's great to see this project. Very Cool!
Old 06-29-2015, 05:04 PM
  #37  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi All

Some more progress....

I'm thinking of buying to 2 new engines, my plan was to use the 2 Simjets 2300 that I already have but to have more confident and reliability and to save some weight (around 1.5kg) I think I'll go for 2 new Jet Munts M100XBL.
That plow a big hole in my budget but I think it worth it.... any thoughts?

some pics from the last work...


Regards
Moatasem

Last edited by Migf117; 06-29-2015 at 05:08 PM.
Old 06-29-2015, 05:05 PM
  #38  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi All

Some more progress....

I'm thinking of buying to 2 new engines, my plan was to use the 2 Simjets 2300 that I already have but to have more confident and reliability and to save some weight (around 1.5kg) I think I'll go for 2 new Jet Munts M100XBL.
That plow a big hole in my budget but I think it worth it.... any thoughts?

some pics from the last work...


Regards
Moatasem
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0447.JPG
Views:	856
Size:	253.2 KB
ID:	2106450   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0448.JPG
Views:	873
Size:	249.9 KB
ID:	2106451   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0449.JPG
Views:	861
Size:	254.3 KB
ID:	2106452   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0450.JPG
Views:	901
Size:	233.8 KB
ID:	2106453  

Last edited by Migf117; 06-29-2015 at 05:08 PM.
Old 06-29-2015, 05:42 PM
  #39  
erbroens
 
erbroens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Curitiba, Parana, BRAZIL
Posts: 4,289
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Whatever brand you choose the most important reliability you can add to the project is making the thrust lines not paralel to the centerline, but pointing as much as you can to the center of pressure of the plane.. (somewhere near the cabin) . This will cancel out the yaw in case of one engine quitting and avoid a potential loose of control.
Old 06-29-2015, 06:38 PM
  #40  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by erbroens
Whatever brand you choose the most important reliability you can add to the project is making the thrust lines not paralel to the centerline, but pointing as much as you can to the center of pressure of the plane.. (somewhere near the cabin) . This will cancel out the yaw in case of one engine quitting and avoid a potential loose of control.
Hi erbrons

The engines and the exhaust pipes are at the closest location to the centerline. at the front I've the tanks between the engines and at the back I've the ruders.

Hopefully the current location of them will not cause much of yaw effect in case of a flame out.
Old 07-29-2015, 04:11 PM
  #41  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi Guys

A little bit more work done.
I didn't do much work on the plane itself as I was busy building a spot welder because I need to make my own pipes.
The pipes I got are great but there is a wrong angle on them which I can't fix.. errrrrrrrrrr.
So with the great help from Phil Celima from Jet Products Australia, I got the right material and got the spot welder working.

We bought 2 new JetMunt MX100 and Electron Retracts Evo40e from Jet Products Australia too.. Best service ever.

Now to some pics of the latest work and a video of the door mechanism testing.

https://youtu.be/iqeiaz4ttFc
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0467.JPG
Views:	845
Size:	183.4 KB
ID:	2111711   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0468.JPG
Views:	848
Size:	227.6 KB
ID:	2111712  
Old 08-11-2015, 10:37 PM
  #42  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi All

We started building the pipes. we almost finished one which came out well.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0471.JPG
Views:	865
Size:	219.7 KB
ID:	2114039   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0473.JPG
Views:	857
Size:	211.3 KB
ID:	2114040   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0474.JPG
Views:	883
Size:	213.3 KB
ID:	2114041   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0475.JPG
Views:	865
Size:	209.6 KB
ID:	2114042  
Old 08-12-2015, 12:29 AM
  #43  
ticketec
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brisbane, QLD, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Nice piece of fabrication there!!

Are those door collars 3D printed?

The Jetmunt engines are great! I have had 6 flights with my 140XBL and just love it.

It's a shame that you don't see more F-117's getting around, such a different shape in the sky.

Thanks

dave
Old 08-12-2015, 02:36 AM
  #44  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ticketec
Nice piece of fabrication there!!

Are those door collars 3D printed?

The Jetmunt engines are great! I have had 6 flights with my 140XBL and just love it.

It's a shame that you don't see more F-117's getting around, such a different shape in the sky.

Thanks

dave
Hi Dave

Thank you for your comment..
Yes, the door collars are 3D printed and some other pieces as well.
I'm looking forward for the 2 new engines, they should be great.

Regards
Moatasem
Old 08-17-2015, 06:52 PM
  #45  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi evey one

We've finished both pipes.
Each is around 650g with 90mm square intake, 210x40mm outlet and 830mm length.

We'll make a carbon fiber bell mouth, I've designed the plug and I'll 3D print it.

Not sure if we need the bell mouth, any ideas?

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0477.JPG
Views:	834
Size:	213.7 KB
ID:	2115018   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0479.JPG
Views:	810
Size:	190.7 KB
ID:	2115019   Click image for larger version

Name:	BM3D.JPG
Views:	790
Size:	19.9 KB
ID:	2115020  
Old 08-17-2015, 11:25 PM
  #46  
Jgwright
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Norfolk , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is a great project and well done so far. If I was making the pipes I would transition the squares into rounds gradually and insert a round collar and then a standard bell mouth like the ones from Grumania. They can be spun from soft aluminium. A lot of air gets drawn down the pipe around the back of the turbine and I would always fit an intake bell mouth. If pipes end in a straight end without a bell mouth they will usually have a bypass which is effectively a bell mouth. Not sure how this would work out in your installation though.

What do you reckon the finished weight will be? the pipes will take a bit of counterbalancing?

John
Old 08-21-2015, 11:25 PM
  #47  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi John

Thank you for your comments.
I would've been so hard to make the pipes square at the outlet and round at the inlet - at least for me - as we don't have experience in metal fabrication.
I think the square pipes will do the job with the carbon fibre bell mouth which I'll make, I've a carbon fibre bell mouth on one of jets and it is fine after over 100 flights.

This plane will be very tail heavy and will require a lot of nose weight anyway even with all the batteries and electronics as forward as possible and with the engines just in front of the CG, so some counter weight for the pipes will not be an issue.

Regards
Moatasem
Old 08-22-2015, 12:14 AM
  #48  
Jgwright
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Norfolk , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Migf117
Hi John

Thank you for your comments.
I would've been so hard to make the pipes square at the outlet and round at the inlet - at least for me - as we don't have experience in metal fabrication.
I think the square pipes will do the job with the carbon fibre bell mouth which I'll make, I've a carbon fibre bell mouth on one of jets and it is fine after over 100 flights.

This plane will be very tail heavy and will require a lot of nose weight anyway even with all the batteries and electronics as forward as possible and with the engines just in front of the CG, so some counter weight for the pipes will not be an issue.

Regards
Moatasem

Moatasem

I am sure your intake bell mount will work fine, it is so nice to see a scratch built plane it just enthuses me to build more!

Having built several turbine powered jet flying wings I well understand they usually need lead with the wing area being behind CG and a short nose. It is so annoying to add lead all modellers hate it.

John
Old 11-22-2015, 05:04 PM
  #49  
Migf117
Member
Thread Starter
 
Migf117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi Everyone

It have been a while since my last post but I have been very busy between work and life.

I've finished a long going project over couple of weeks. Finishing the Zero.
It is an ESM kit 90" powered by 80cc MVVS engine, sliding canopy, full detailed cockpit (not ready, we've built it from plastic parts) and all internal controls on all the surfaces (RDS).
It came out good I think.

Now back to the F117, we've done a lot of work on it as well, finishing the rudders, engine mounts and a lot more.
We did a test run of the engines to confirm that there is no leak on the pipes and the heat around them will not burn the wood.
All the area around the pipes and engines is painted with BVM Heat Shield, very good stuff and works very well.
While the engines are running I can put my hand on the outer piper, the heat doesn't' even travel 15mm from the inner pipe and that is without any air flow around pipes. Very happy with that.

The fuselage with wings and rudders is 8.2kg, I think we are on right direction to get to the target weight of 20-22kg dry.

Some pictures to show the progress and couple of pics for the Zero too.

Regards
Moatasem

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0015[1].jpg
Views:	867
Size:	382.9 KB
ID:	2131976   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0016[1].jpg
Views:	859
Size:	392.3 KB
ID:	2131977   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0019[1].jpg
Views:	815
Size:	308.3 KB
ID:	2131978   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0020[1].jpg
Views:	814
Size:	238.4 KB
ID:	2131979   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0033.JPG
Views:	887
Size:	1.72 MB
ID:	2131980   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0034.JPG
Views:	945
Size:	1.98 MB
ID:	2131981   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0035[1].jpg
Views:	831
Size:	236.6 KB
ID:	2131982   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0036.JPG
Views:	953
Size:	2.62 MB
ID:	2131983  

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0037.JPG
Views:	932
Size:	1.77 MB
ID:	2131984   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0039.JPG
Views:	892
Size:	1.87 MB
ID:	2131985   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0041.JPG
Views:	865
Size:	1.88 MB
ID:	2131986   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0045[1].jpg
Views:	833
Size:	417.5 KB
ID:	2131987   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0046[1].jpg
Views:	827
Size:	358.8 KB
ID:	2131988   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0047[1].jpg
Views:	870
Size:	269.1 KB
ID:	2131989   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0048[1].jpg
Views:	883
Size:	343.7 KB
ID:	2131990  
Old 11-23-2015, 08:43 AM
  #50  
Eaglepilot2
 
Eaglepilot2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Zebulon, NC
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Moatasem, I applaud your efforts. Looks like a nightmare of a build with all those angles! Starting to look like the Nighthawk though.

Keep us posted


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.