Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

Skymaster F-18F

Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Skymaster F-18F

Old 05-18-2015, 10:26 AM
  #76  
dionysusbacchus
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (25)
 
dionysusbacchus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: McQueeney, TX
Posts: 2,490
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Great bri, you should be fine, that is the CG I am going with. How much flap are you using on takeoff and how long is your runway?
Old 05-18-2015, 11:00 AM
  #77  
bri6672
My Feedback: (6)
 
bri6672's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yeah I am feeling good about the CG and I can still move it forward so if I add the ordnance I can adjust it since that seem to add tail weight.

I am using 35mm for takeoff and 65 for landing. We have a 1000' paved runway close by so I will do the maiden there.
Old 05-18-2015, 11:48 AM
  #78  
spike5150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cool - good luck. Any chance of a video?
Old 05-18-2015, 12:01 PM
  #79  
bri6672
My Feedback: (6)
 
bri6672's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Should be able to, not that the maiden will be that exciting for anyone but me, hopefully it won't need a lot of changes and I can push it a bit in the second flight and see what it can really do....
Old 05-18-2015, 03:16 PM
  #80  
mackeyjones
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Moss Vale, NSW, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just be a little careful regarding the COG point, I would not go forward of what SM suggest, on my Classic Hornet I moved the COG way back after the initial flight as it was very nose heavy. I know...not quite the same plane, just be aware.
Old 05-19-2015, 02:18 AM
  #81  
Craig B.
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: PERTH, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mackeyjones
Just be a little careful regarding the COG point, I would not go forward of what SM suggest, on my Classic Hornet I moved the COG way back after the initial flight as it was very nose heavy. I know...not quite the same plane, just be aware.
The super and classic are not comparable. I agree C of g on the Classic is too far forwards as per specs. That is not the case with the super. I have and fly both and had to move the C of G on the super significantly further forwards from spec.

Brian, will send you a more detailed pm tonight.
Old 05-19-2015, 06:49 AM
  #82  
Craig B.
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: PERTH, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Hi Brian,

sent you a pm.
Old 05-19-2015, 07:24 AM
  #83  
spike5150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Got some pics sent from the factory - looking good!

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00097.JPG
Views:	486
Size:	677.3 KB
ID:	2097132   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00102.JPG
Views:	451
Size:	744.4 KB
ID:	2097133  
Old 05-20-2015, 05:48 AM
  #84  
bri6672
My Feedback: (6)
 
bri6672's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mackeyjones
Just be a little careful regarding the COG point, I would not go forward of what SM suggest, on my Classic Hornet I moved the COG way back after the initial flight as it was very nose heavy. I know...not quite the same plane, just be aware.

I had a smaller super hornet a few years back and was chasing a problem with it not tracking correctly, it ended up being flex inside the stabs but I had mistaken it for being tail heavy. I kept moving the CG forward trying to resolve it (not being aware of the true issue) I went really far forward and surprisingly it still flew ok! I feel a Superhornt just has the ability to fly really nose heavy compared to some other jets. Even thou the C model is its little brother they seem to be pretty different when CG is involved...
Old 05-20-2015, 05:48 AM
  #85  
bri6672
My Feedback: (6)
 
bri6672's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thanks again Craig!!! I really appreciate the feedback!
Old 05-20-2015, 05:50 AM
  #86  
bri6672
My Feedback: (6)
 
bri6672's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spike5150
Got some pics sent from the factory - looking good!


NICE!!!! My A-10 better be there in the background somewhere
Old 05-20-2015, 06:06 AM
  #87  
Craig B.
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: PERTH, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bri6672
Thanks again Craig!!! I really appreciate the feedback!
No probs Brian. Hope the info helps and all goes well. It sound like you are doing your homework well.
Old 05-20-2015, 08:05 AM
  #88  
yeahbaby
My Feedback: (21)
 
yeahbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: FT Worth, TX
Posts: 6,553
Received 58 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bri6672
Getting pretty close!! Balanced her today and it took some serious nose weight! I try to avoid lead at all cost so I put the ecu battery all the way up in the nose and then 2) 2s 5000 mah A123 just behind it. I'm going for 125mm for the maiden and will work things back from there but don't want any bucking Bronco landings!!



I am not a fan of the pilots from Skymaster so I decided to make my own. First thing I found was thier "1/8 scale" pilots just looked to small so did some measurements and found it is actually about 1-7.5 scale. So my buddy Chris Wolfe from Jet Hangar Hobbies and RcGeek.com makes some really nice 1/7-1/7.5 busts. I trimmed down the torsos and used some cut down 1/6 flight suits filled with 5/16 foam tubing and they came out awesome! The only weigh 1.7 oz each and Chris even molded me some hands for them!




So I am sitting at 35lbs dry and guessing about 43lbs wet so I should be better than1:1 at take off!!
dude, nice work with the cockpit. Good luck this weekend.
Old 05-23-2015, 04:24 PM
  #89  
bri6672
My Feedback: (6)
 
bri6672's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Well it was a no go today... Dark sky's and a pretty decent crosswind... Probably the like have been fine but I wasn't feeling it... I did get to run the turbine up a couple times and do some range check work. The 210 is a freaking monster, thought it was going to push me over!!! Her is a couple pics hope to get it in the air soon but of course the one weekend I'm ready it's storming in San Diego...........

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpg
Views:	121
Size:	399.1 KB
ID:	2098092   Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpg
Views:	454
Size:	385.1 KB
ID:	2098093  

Last edited by bri6672; 05-23-2015 at 04:44 PM.
Old 05-24-2015, 02:54 AM
  #90  
dionysusbacchus
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (25)
 
dionysusbacchus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: McQueeney, TX
Posts: 2,490
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Know the feeling, it has been raining everyday here in Texas, I don't think we will have a summer this year.

Looking good though man, you got a little closer! Is that the Camp Pendleton flying site? On your Kingtech are you running diesel and Kingtech oil?

Here is some inspiration! Looks like he used very little flap for takeoff.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISK0ICZCiJ8
Old 05-24-2015, 07:20 AM
  #91  
bri6672
My Feedback: (6)
 
bri6672's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yep it was at camp Pendelton, it's a great flying spot but only open on weekends and holidays. It is a live LZ so some weekends it is closed including next weekend. That is Steve's F-18 I have not seen it fly in person but I have spoken to him a little bit about it. I am running diesel and kingtech oil, I run it in my K140 and even in my older P120. I have had great success with it. On the bench my 140 put out 34 lbs of thrust! I have heard from a few others that they noticed a little bit more power running diesel as well. Don't know if that's true but what I have heard. Some complain about the smoke it produces during shut down but I like it! If you are every flying at a noisy event and you have a flame out you will know it! I was shocked at the power of the 210 and the sound in the 18 is ridiculous! My buddy was holding it at one point and I went around behind the jet to check if the afterburner rings were working at full throttle and I could feel the ground shaking a little! Can't wait to give her a go but probably not going to be for at least 2weeks unless Pendleton opens up last minute next weekend......
Old 05-27-2015, 04:15 PM
  #92  
dionysusbacchus
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (25)
 
dionysusbacchus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: McQueeney, TX
Posts: 2,490
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Bri, I'm going to be running diesel and Kingtech oil also, but I see they changed the mixing ratio to one quart to 5 gallons of diesel, same as kero. But diesel is still way cheaper and it has more power.

I have been tinkering with my F-18, not much flying weather this year, winter was bad and now it won't stop raining and the wind is 15 to 20 most of the time. It's almost June and I have not even been in my pool yet this year!

I wonder if Damo260 got his tailhook installed? Here is where I installed the servo, just a mini servo with a control rod from a micro flyer, works good. You can get at the servo from the wheel well.



I also finished my exhaust cones, you can see that I added an extra panel line to the first ring:



I'm almost done with the rest of the equipment install in the nose section, so won't be long!

Luke
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	002.JPG
Views:	418
Size:	168.6 KB
ID:	2099092   Click image for larger version

Name:	001.JPG
Views:	389
Size:	165.8 KB
ID:	2099093  
Old 05-27-2015, 04:28 PM
  #93  
bri6672
My Feedback: (6)
 
bri6672's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Looks good Luke! I hear you on the weather, we are in this raining cold windy stage out here but San Diego never stays messy for long.. This weekend is supposed to be nice but Pendleton is closed, hopefully the following weekend we should be good to go!!

The diesel does giv a tiny bit more punch, I like the smoke on shutoff since it would indicate a flame out if you had one....
Old 05-27-2015, 05:38 PM
  #94  
erh7771
My Feedback: (30)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 476
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Anyone know of an SM F-18 F running on P120 power?

I want to do something else with my KT 140 and I've always viewed my SM F-18 SH as an easy flyer, no fuss ... don't need a ton of get gone to get er goin

Seeing I can get some more push on the KT 140 on diesel makes me want to use it in another jet even more
Old 05-27-2015, 06:20 PM
  #95  
bri6672
My Feedback: (6)
 
bri6672's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I have a 140 and I think it would marginally power the f-18...... My 140'powers my YA F-15 very well but the F-18 is considerable bigger.... A 120 would be a dog...
Old 05-28-2015, 03:55 PM
  #96  
dionysusbacchus
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (25)
 
dionysusbacchus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: McQueeney, TX
Posts: 2,490
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Got all the plumbing basically done for the gear, brakes and speed brake. I did a test install of all my components under the cockpit prior to painting and finishing the mounting boards. Fuel filter, shutoff valve and air fill valves with associated gauges will all be under the engine hatch.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	004.JPG
Views:	416
Size:	804.4 KB
ID:	2099283   Click image for larger version

Name:	002.JPG
Views:	400
Size:	785.7 KB
ID:	2099284  
Old 05-28-2015, 07:09 PM
  #97  
spike5150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bri6672
I have a 140 and I think it would marginally power the f-18...... My 140'powers my YA F-15 very well but the F-18 is considerable bigger.... A 120 would be a dog...
What are you going to run? I am thinking K180, but I also fly at +/- 6,000 ft.
Old 05-28-2015, 07:18 PM
  #98  
dionysusbacchus
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (25)
 
dionysusbacchus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: McQueeney, TX
Posts: 2,490
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Spike, Bri is running a Kingtech 210 in his, 46lbs of thrust, his plane weighs 34lbs. I'm going with the K-180 with 40lbs of thrust, but I'm flying at 522ft elevation!

Any word on your F-18 yet?
Old 05-28-2015, 07:46 PM
  #99  
bri6672
My Feedback: (6)
 
bri6672's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

My goal was to be better than 1:1 on take off. I cut my teeth in jets with big EDF where you strive for 1:1 if possible, I know it's not necessary with turbine because of the efflux but I want to be able to do low speed high power maneuvers and the thrust is the key. I am estimating to be about 43-44lbs AUW so that would give me what I'm after. I just ordered the Xicoy digital CG machine and it will give me an accurate weight as opposed to the digital fish scale and ropes I'm using......

i I would go no less than a 180, you want that low end power if you ever get in trouble, you can always throttle back I did add a few reinforcements for running the 210 and had Tam make a pipe with a bigger diameter, it barely fits but is shorter so once you get it in the jet it fits perfect!

I have an igyro 3e on its way and plan on putting it in the F-18, I'm going to try it in my Habu32 and then maybe my Flash before it finds its way in the rhino.
Old 05-29-2015, 03:30 AM
  #100  
basimpsn
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mia, FL
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bri6672
My goal was to be better than 1:1 on take off. I cut my teeth in jets with big EDF where you strive for 1:1 if possible, I know it's not necessary with turbine because of the efflux but I want to be able to do low speed high power maneuvers and the thrust is the key..
You are right with "better than 1:1 on take off" I love going vertical on takeoff with my K-180 SM F-18C....and in this flight the extra power save my butt when the wind switch direction during my landing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Kxr-rgbZ7k

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.