Ultra Lightning cooling holes
#2
I think the point is that the cooling air flows in and flows out between the inner and outer pipes of the thrust pipe - aiding cooling and also augmenting thrust. Cutting holes in the back would just stop the cold air from going where it was supposed to.
#5
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,469
Received 26 Likes
on
24 Posts
Yes, the UF and the UL are different - I have both. The UF is fitted with a 140 and the two narca cutout's, the UL is fitted with a 210 and no cutout's. Absolutely no heat issues with either of the two.
Cheers,
Jan
Cheers,
Jan
#7
My Feedback: (9)
I feel it would have made more sense to allow air intake between inner & outer thrust tubes for performance reasons
I see the benefits in the UF and thought they would have done the same with the UL
The original classic lightning had you cut some naca ducts in the bottom but there was no place for air to move out
The manual for the UL I believe still has this mod in it, but then at the same time the manual has not been changed from one jet too the next
I see the benefits in the UF and thought they would have done the same with the UL
The original classic lightning had you cut some naca ducts in the bottom but there was no place for air to move out
The manual for the UL I believe still has this mod in it, but then at the same time the manual has not been changed from one jet too the next