Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

CARF Mephisto Build thread

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

CARF Mephisto Build thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2018, 09:26 PM
  #276  
Dave Wilshere
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,100
Received 735 Likes on 531 Posts
Default

Gains depend on servo type, but the Mercury should be set using the test flight assistant then you will get the optimum %
Do you have a GPS II fitted?
Vector gain can ( and should) be run 100% no problem at all, even flying around fast. In normal flying mode (1) gyros off. FM2 vector off and gains as Assistant, but I would guess 35-40% on aileron and 25-30% on elevator ( elevator is the dominant control so it’s going to be less ) rudder does not need to be high as the rudder is super powerful. FM3 same flight control gain with 100% on vector. Heading hold only on ailerons if you want to run some, soon as you move the stick it comes off anyway.

iIf you want to hover and have tailerons a separate iGyro 3e on. Vector set x4 will give you hands off hovering. Birdy has a Mercury in his, he will probably chip in with his figures based on JR servos
Old 10-25-2018, 09:46 AM
  #277  
ausfester
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Victoria, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks guys, will have a fiddle and report back soon.
David, no gps sensor, do you find it helps?
Old 10-25-2018, 10:48 AM
  #278  
Dave Wilshere
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,100
Received 735 Likes on 531 Posts
Default

Yes, only way to get the maximum out of the gyro is with a GPS II
Old 11-13-2018, 03:36 PM
  #279  
EladFish
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi Guys, Here are some picture of the Mephisto I got - Cayman Scheme Neon Green.
It's unbelievable how beautiful and HUGE this thing is... Simply amazing. I saw it in Best in The West, but it looked much smaller from far away

I tried to upload some photos, but I still don't have 10 posts on rcu.. so here it is in a google album: photos.app.goo.gl/PJo9VWsZJTNS4skW8
Old 11-27-2018, 08:21 PM
  #280  
TheFishLA
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 72
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Guys, quick question about the tank fittings:

I got 3 brass pipes for each tank and in the robber there are 3 holes (other than the one in the center), one of the three is blocked at the exist.

- I assume that I'm going to use only two and just ignore the 3rd one. Right? (Vent bented upwards and one for clunk all the way back)
- also, anyone filled that enterence of the 3rd hole all the way through, or is the existing blockage at the exist of the hole enough?
Old 11-27-2018, 10:01 PM
  #281  
Dave Wilshere
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,100
Received 735 Likes on 531 Posts
Default

The third pipe is for the clunk line to bridge the baffle, the fibre glass baffle plate would cut through the Tygon quickly.
The dubro bung blank hole is enough, there should be no pressure in the tank and even when people fill the tanks with a stopper left in, the tank fails way before that tiny blank hole would.
So straight pipe for the clunk line and curved pipe with a Tygon extension to the top of the tank for the vent.
Old 11-28-2018, 05:31 PM
  #282  
TheFishLA
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 72
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Thanks, Dave!

Like this?
Old 11-28-2018, 10:14 PM
  #283  
Dave Wilshere
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,100
Received 735 Likes on 531 Posts
Default

Yes, kinda! I shorten the pipes down where I can. What turbine size? You have large bore Tygon and the std 5/32 brass tube. I would use 5/32 bore Tygon with those tubes, that looks like 3/16? The open ends of the pipe asks for a leak, I’d lock wire near the end of the tube too. Also the way you have bent the vent, how are you going to get it through the small tank fitting?
Old 11-28-2018, 10:25 PM
  #284  
EladFish
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Wilshere
Yes, kinda! I shorten the pipes down where I can. What turbine size? You have large bore Tygon and the std 5/32 brass tube. I would use 5/32 bore Tygon with those tubes, that looks like 3/16? The open ends of the pipe asks for a leak, I’d lock wire near the end of the tube too. Also the way you have bent the vent, how are you going to get it through the small tank fitting?
I'm going to put a Kingtech 320. and yes you are right, that's a 3/16 tygon with the standard 5/32 brass tube that comes with the kit. I'll do as you suggest and replace that to a 5/32 tygon.
Getting the bended vent into the small fitting wasn't such a problem. I pulled the straight brass pipe towards the outside, twisted the vent towards it and the tygon bends at the same rate. when it's in, I just push the main line back and twist the vent back to its position.
Old 11-28-2018, 11:18 PM
  #285  
Dave Wilshere
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,100
Received 735 Likes on 531 Posts
Default

Ok, will you use a twin feed bubble trap? ( each tank feed has its own fitting on the bubble trap )

Assembly, that is fine, it’s important to make sure the pipes are smooth and ‘nick’ free, when you slide it
back and forth through the bung you can shave rubber off and you will get a leak around the tank tube. If you
pressure check the finished tank you will know where you are on that, I flex the pipes a little while doing the test
to ensure the seal is perfect- the mass of the pipes in flight will flex the tank pipes a little.

Dave
Old 11-28-2018, 11:44 PM
  #286  
TheFishLA
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 72
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Yes. I have the FCT UAT 350ml dual inlets:
​​​​​

i've pressurised the system a bit to make sure there are no leaks and before I placed the brass tubes I oiled the bore a bit and double checked that there are no sharp edges.
edges.

Did you use different fittings or the same ones from the kit?
Old 11-29-2018, 01:00 AM
  #287  
Dave Wilshere
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,100
Received 735 Likes on 531 Posts
Default

On my JetCat P-220 Rxi is used the stock fittings, I only changed to one of our high flow felt clunks.
Some of the guys we have done JetCat P-300 Pro installs for we increase the brass tube size (drill out the caps) I have used KS 4.5mm and 5mm tube.
The differences we see in the pump voltage are tiny, the fuel line runs on the Mephisto are all short, so the gain is not as much as we have seen on some
airframes I have done this on. I don't think you will see any problems with the pump voltages with your set up (5/32 Tygon and 6mm clear outside tank)

Dave
Old 11-29-2018, 12:45 PM
  #288  
skymaster68
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 441
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Get rid of that filter at the clunk, they are too restrictive for the fuel flow, spectially if you are running a large 320, i removed mine and my 260 has been running better since then much more fuel flow and the 260 and larger engines apreciate that.
just run the clunk.


Originally Posted by TheFishLA
Thanks, Dave!

Like this?
Old 11-29-2018, 12:57 PM
  #289  
JSF-TC
My Feedback: (2)
 
JSF-TC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
Received 134 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

You might consider replacing that brass tube in the clunk pick-up line where it passes through the baffle with a stainless steel tube.

I had the exact same set-up as you in my Ultra Flash and after a while I started to get air build-up in the air trap. Took a long time to troubleshoot, but I noticed that it would only start to collect air once that final tank started to run down. It turned out that the brass tube had developed a number of hair-line cracks running lengthwise, which would draw in air once the brass tube became uncovered as the tank ran down.

Paul
Old 11-29-2018, 06:25 PM
  #290  
TheFishLA
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 72
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

To felt, or not to felt? That is the question


@skymaster68, Just to double check: you had both your tanks connected to the UAT in parallel and still the felt was restricting the flow? Then, you took it out and the flow was much better?

I'm asking just cause the manual says:
Old 11-29-2018, 10:29 PM
  #291  
Dave Wilshere
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,100
Received 735 Likes on 531 Posts
Default

We use felt on everything up to 300N turbines, it’s never been a problem-but fuel choice does seem to make a difference, obviously they can get clogged by fine dirt or over a time with algae. We land with almost no air in the bubble trap, the long tanks and a normal weighted clunk tend to show more air, these big engines by nature of the high fuel flow can have an equally high air passage if the clunk is out of the fuel.
Old 11-30-2018, 03:03 AM
  #292  
skymaster68
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 441
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Yes, I removed both felts last weekend, I found out that they were restricting the fuel flow way too much and Yes I have the tanks in parallel to the High Flow Intairco UAT, a much happy engine now.


Originally Posted by TheFishLA

@skymaster68, Just to double check: you had both your tanks connected to the UAT in parallel and still the felt was restricting the flow? Then, you took it out and the flow was much better?

I'm asking just cause the manual says:
Old 11-30-2018, 03:41 AM
  #293  
GULDUKAT
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 267
Received 61 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skymaster68
Yes, I removed both felts last weekend, I found out that they were restricting the fuel flow way too much and Yes I have the tanks in parallel to the High Flow Intairco UAT, a much happy engine now.
I too have the felts and use the high flow inteirco UAT for my K260. The K260 feels sluggish but I have been told that the K260 is sluggish compared to the K210 or the other newer Kingtech's. The newer turbines spool up a lot faster as such it would make since to have as much flow as possible.

What was the major difference you saw in your engine's performance?
Old 11-30-2018, 03:56 AM
  #294  
skymaster68
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 441
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

It doesn't suck air any more!!! UAT is allways full now...

What was the major difference you saw in your engine's performance?[/QUOTE]
Old 11-30-2018, 04:00 AM
  #295  
GULDUKAT
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 267
Received 61 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skymaster68
It doesn't suck air any more!!! UAT is allways full now...

What was the major difference you saw in your engine's performance?
[/QUOTE]

Thx. I'll test it as well. Any performance difference - spool up time difference?
Old 11-30-2018, 04:09 AM
  #296  
skymaster68
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 441
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GULDUKAT
I too have the felts and use the high flow inteirco UAT for my K260. The K260 feels sluggish but I have been told that the K260 is sluggish compared to the K210 or the other newer Kingtech's. The newer turbines spool up a lot faster as such it would make since to have as much flow as possible.

What was the major difference you saw in your engine's performance?
Thx. I'll test it as well. Any performance difference - spool up time difference?[/QUOTE]

Well it felt better.. give it a try
Old 11-30-2018, 08:37 AM
  #297  
Andrew Bird
 
Andrew Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Henley on Thames, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 908
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I used high flow felt clunks on my 300 and all seems fine - pump voltages are good so far. When I used the CARF supplied ones in the past I drilled them out to get a higher flow rate.
Old 12-01-2018, 02:25 AM
  #298  
GULDUKAT
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 267
Received 61 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skymaster68
Thx. I'll test it as well. Any performance difference - spool up time difference?
Well it felt better.. give it a try[/QUOTE]

I tested it yesterday and the spool up times seemed to be a little faster. Down to ~ 5 seconds from original ~ 6 seconds.
Old 12-01-2018, 11:51 PM
  #299  
cmjets
 
cmjets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pontevedra, SPAIN
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Hi friends, you can find another option for the tanks here:

https://cmjets.com/c-arf/174-mephisto.html

Full personalize tanks, hight Flow fittings and felt filter for main and metal clunk for smoke.
Best regards from Spain.
Carlos
CMJETS.com

Old 12-02-2018, 07:19 AM
  #300  
skymaster68
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 441
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

I have a set on order!! Can’t wait to have them here soon!!


Originally Posted by cmjets
Hi friends, you can find another option for the tanks here:

https://cmjets.com/c-arf/174-mephisto.html

Full personalize tanks, hight Flow fittings and felt filter for main and metal clunk for smoke.
Best regards from Spain.
Carlos
CMJETS.com



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.