Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

New Powerbox radio...

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

New Powerbox radio...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2017, 12:08 AM
  #1  
Nige321
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 121
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default New Powerbox radio...

Old 09-15-2017, 05:41 AM
  #2  
E.N.T.
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Juan, , PUERTO RICO (USA)
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Boy; That's an ugly radio........

hmarmaizmd717
Old 09-15-2017, 06:27 AM
  #3  
SECRET AGENT
My Feedback: (18)
 
SECRET AGENT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bush, LA
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yikes, I have to agree with that statement.
Old 09-15-2017, 06:30 AM
  #4  
ltc
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mendon, MA
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

The form factor looks very similar to the Jeti DS-16 handheld transmitter.
I actually like the looks, especially the display.
Old 09-15-2017, 06:37 AM
  #5  
Nige321
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 121
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

If looks sell, I'm not sure Jeti has anything to worry about... Looks like a FRsky cast off...

THe Jeti looks worth the money - this looks cheap...
Old 09-15-2017, 07:42 AM
  #6  
Zeeb
My Feedback: (41)
 
Zeeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St George, Utah UT
Posts: 5,685
Received 67 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

It's not only ugly as sin, I cannot see how the thing could possibly feel balanced in your hands or on a neckstrap with that display mounted where it is.

I like PB stuff and use it quite a bit, but I'll keep my current radios thank you very much.....
Old 09-15-2017, 07:59 AM
  #7  
fireblade5437
 
fireblade5437's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leicester, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 974
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well I have just had this new radio in my hands this morning at JetPower and I can say:
Its well lighter than the DS24
The sticks are very light and smooth
The Tx is totally balanced and feels very nice in the hands
The display is VERY quick to update
Lastly yes I will be buying one...

Alan
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1103.JPG
Views:	610
Size:	1.32 MB
ID:	2232027  

Last edited by fireblade5437; 09-15-2017 at 08:03 AM.
Old 09-15-2017, 08:47 AM
  #8  
Gordon W
 
Gordon W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The look doesn't bother me at all and the display is in a sensible position. What I'd like to know is if the top row of switches can be reached easily without having to stretch and look. My DX18 Tx has always been too tall in that respect, and I have quite long fingers. Also,the trim positions might need a bit of getting used to, though at least they should be easy to reach. Is the switch a push on-off type and if so is that safe? Presumably it requires a lo-o-ng press to activate it to avoid inadvertent operation.

Gordon
Old 09-15-2017, 10:05 AM
  #9  
HarryC
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: private, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gordon W
. Is the switch a push on-off type and if so is that safe? Presumably it requires a lo-o-ng press to activate it to avoid inadvertent operation.

Gordon
Perhaps it is like the Jeti which requires a second, different button to be pressed to confirm it.

Last edited by HarryC; 09-15-2017 at 12:31 PM.
Old 09-15-2017, 10:19 AM
  #10  
Dr Honda
My Feedback: (4)
 
Dr Honda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Latrobe, PA
Posts: 2,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looks like a Multiplex radio. Do we know a price?
Old 09-15-2017, 11:06 AM
  #11  
Erik van Dijen
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hilversum, NETHERLANDS
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default powerbox radio.

Yes, Euro 2490,00
Erik.
Old 09-15-2017, 01:15 PM
  #12  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,094
Received 733 Likes on 529 Posts
Default

There is so much about this radio, the picture does not show it well. The details are prototype-Always a risk showing an un finished product.
The features are amazing, balance as Alan said is perfect, I have plenty of pre orders and we are along way from release.
its comfortable in my hands, switches are well laid out, you can put your finger between the two top corner switches and they don't 'switch'
When I'm back from the show I'll list more of what is in there.
Old 09-15-2017, 01:43 PM
  #13  
David Searles
My Feedback: (49)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SANTA ANA, CA
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't understand the need for such a prominent visual display. If you're looking at that thing while in flight, you're just inviting trouble. Jmo

I like the current Weatronic size and location.

David S
Old 09-15-2017, 02:15 PM
  #14  
Ron S
My Feedback: (2)
 
Ron S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,233
Received 205 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

I like the placement of the screen. Should be easy for a spotter to see the display... I'd rather glance at the top of the transmitter for telemetry info, versus down at the bottom. Should be interesting.
Old 09-15-2017, 03:44 PM
  #15  
Zeeb
My Feedback: (41)
 
Zeeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St George, Utah UT
Posts: 5,685
Received 67 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Erik van Dijen
Yes, Euro 2490,00
Erik.
HOLY CH*T!!

There are LOTS of radio systems out there today and Weatronic was not successful, nor I suspect will PowerBox be with a price tag like that for an unproven system.
Old 09-15-2017, 05:42 PM
  #16  
Edgar Perez
My Feedback: (13)
 
Edgar Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Gurabo, PUERTO RICO (USA)
Posts: 2,404
Received 20 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zeeb
HOLY CH*T!!

There are LOTS of radio systems out there today and Weatronic was not successful, nor I suspect will PowerBox be with a price tag like that for an unproven system.
Weatronic was not commercially successful, but the technology and RF quality was way ahead of everyone. Understand this system uses the same RF technology, so looking forward to the finished product.
Old 09-15-2017, 06:02 PM
  #17  
Fish07
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Carolina, PUERTO RICO (USA)
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 09-15-2017, 06:51 PM
  #18  
paulhat
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: , AUSTRALIA
Posts: 405
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David Searles
I don't understand the need for such a prominent visual display. If you're looking at that thing while in flight, you're just inviting trouble. Jmo

I like the current Weatronic size and location.

David S
Better screen resolution, size, brightness etc surely has to be a good thing. After all its the only thing we have to interact with the controllers settings.
Old 09-15-2017, 09:31 PM
  #19  
olnico
 
olnico's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston, Texas.
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

The trim buttons are off center and difficult to reach. Shame because the sticks are nice and smooth and the screen a big step ahead of the competition.
Price point is an immediate no go when comparing this radio with the DS24 and its triple channel redundancy.
I hope that Powerbox will be able to drop the prices rapidly as soon as the system is going on production.
Old 09-15-2017, 10:42 PM
  #20  
HarryC
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: private, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

I wish them success and I expect it will be a very desirable radio (superficial looks don't bother me, useability does), I think their problem will be that they are so late joining the party that potential buyers will be well entrenched with their Futaba/JR/Jeti system and will see no reason to change. It's not just the cost of the Tx but all the Rx as well. Faced with a total bill beyond 4000 euros people will struggle to see any value in it. It may well have great range, but if I have not had any range problems with my Fut/JR/Jeti then more range is of no value to me.
iirc, Powerbox said it would not be compatible with the Weatronic gizmo Rx, which will be a big disappointment to the Wea users because the amazing gizmo Rx was really the whole point of Weatronic.
It will be interesting to see the full, final specification and what it can offer that is of enough real world value to tempt people to change brands.

Last edited by HarryC; 09-15-2017 at 10:46 PM.
Old 09-16-2017, 08:25 AM
  #21  
David Gladwin
 
David Gladwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: CookhamBerkshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 3,914
Received 141 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Zeeb;12368108]HOLY CH*T!!

There are LOTS of radio systems out there today and Weatronic was not successful, nor I suspect will PowerBox be with a price tag like that for an unproven system.[/QUOT

Wrong!
The Weatronics system was, and is, technically superbly successful. It failed commercially because of the premature and tragic death of one of its major investors and the removal of support by his subsequent estate managers who had no interest in rc.

I have been using it since day one, because of its huge capability and technical competence., 4 transmitters inc. a BAT 60 and 15 receivers.

The release of the Weatronics system was as big a breakthrough in RC technology as was the introduction of glass cockpits, INS and IRS and FMCS in airliner cockpits, now the standard.

With the technical quality, marketing expertise and customer support of Powerbox, this radio will be a success for those of us who want the most capable system.

My order is in, and I will do an in depth, and honest, objective, assessment in due course.

If you see me flying it ( as you currently do with 12 X and tx module) on my valuable models it will have my full endorsement.
DG.

Last edited by David Gladwin; 09-16-2017 at 08:27 AM.
Old 09-16-2017, 09:32 AM
  #22  
jetmaven
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fl.
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It is butt ugly , maybe they'll offer it with a nice camouflage case .
Old 09-16-2017, 09:46 AM
  #23  
Zeeb
My Feedback: (41)
 
Zeeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St George, Utah UT
Posts: 5,685
Received 67 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David Gladwin
My order is in, and I will do an in depth, and honest, objective, assessment in due course.
I'll be waiting with bated breath.....NOT
Old 09-16-2017, 10:18 AM
  #24  
David Gladwin
 
David Gladwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: CookhamBerkshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 3,914
Received 141 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zeeb
I'll be waiting with bated breath.....NOT
.......your choice, I have a more open, and inquisitive, mind. ( and a helluva a lot of experience than most on the Weatronics concept)

You are just like the guys who, at first, questioned my considerable enthusiasm for the, then, new Boeing FMC equipped airliners when I was one of the very first captains who converted to them back in 1986! They eventually realised the enormous and invaluable progress made !

DG.

DG.

Last edited by David Gladwin; 09-16-2017 at 10:34 AM.
Old 09-16-2017, 10:20 AM
  #25  
fireblade5437
 
fireblade5437's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leicester, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 974
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Some pics of the system, had another chance to play with Tx today and I instantly recognised the programming layout/wording. The display is superb and very much real time in operation.
As with my Bat60 we had same comments, I am glad not everyone likes it as it leaves me with a great system and a unique system at the field that makes a change from what everyone one else has got :-) Plus I get one quicker as the ones who don't like it won't be buying it!

Alan
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0279.JPG
Views:	470
Size:	569.2 KB
ID:	2232169   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0280.JPG
Views:	380
Size:	527.0 KB
ID:	2232170   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0281.JPG
Views:	353
Size:	493.9 KB
ID:	2232171   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0282.JPG
Views:	359
Size:	557.5 KB
ID:	2232172   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0283.JPG
Views:	349
Size:	544.6 KB
ID:	2232173   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0284.JPG
Views:	337
Size:	541.8 KB
ID:	2232174   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0285.JPG
Views:	427
Size:	528.7 KB
ID:	2232175   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0286.JPG
Views:	458
Size:	549.7 KB
ID:	2232176  


Last edited by fireblade5437; 09-16-2017 at 10:23 AM.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.