Do models fly like real planes ?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: , RUSSIA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do models fly like real planes ?
I have this question: do jet models fly like the real planes ? Suppose one builds a model of a F-16 very accurately and gives it a turbine such that the thrust/weight ratio is identical to the real plane.
Will it fly the same as the real plane or there are other factors involved ?
In practice I believe people do not care about matching the thrust/wight ratio. Do models fly at leat remotely like real planes ?
Will it fly the same as the real plane or there are other factors involved ?
In practice I believe people do not care about matching the thrust/wight ratio. Do models fly at leat remotely like real planes ?
#3
My Feedback: (10)
RE: Do models fly like real planes ?
It depends upon who is piloting the Model. Most pilots probably fly a bit more "sporty" than the real thing, but I just saw an F15 fly at a jet meet that you would swear was the full size at an airshow, if you didnt know it was a model.
Whether a jet or not, a scale model can indeed be flown in a scale manner if the pilot is so inclined and has the skills to do it, IMO.
AJC
Whether a jet or not, a scale model can indeed be flown in a scale manner if the pilot is so inclined and has the skills to do it, IMO.
AJC
#5
My Feedback: (6)
RE: Do models fly like real planes ?
The short answer is no. Due to Reynolds number effects, the aerodynamics are not scalable. That is not to say that it can not be close. Also, the strength of structures also are not directly scalable. In other words a model may be able to pull way more Gs than the full scale (or way less), therefore the min turn radius may be totally different.
#7
Senior Member
RE: Do models fly like real planes ?
ORIGINAL: elenabuz
I have this question: do jet models fly like the real planes ? Suppose one builds a model of a F-16 very accurately and gives it a turbine such that the thrust/weight ratio is identical to the real plane.
Will it fly the same as the real plane or there are other factors involved ?
In practice I believe people do not care about matching the thrust/wight ratio. Do models fly at leat remotely like real planes ?
I have this question: do jet models fly like the real planes ? Suppose one builds a model of a F-16 very accurately and gives it a turbine such that the thrust/weight ratio is identical to the real plane.
Will it fly the same as the real plane or there are other factors involved ?
In practice I believe people do not care about matching the thrust/wight ratio. Do models fly at leat remotely like real planes ?
Steven
#8
Junior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Do models fly like real planes ?
An F-16 when loaded for an attack mission with all or most of the hard points stored up actually becomes a little nose heavy and a very stable platform to deliver a weapon. After it drops everything, that's when it becomes a tail heavy mean dogfighter. I think an F-16 is a hard aircraft to convert to a model because of the small wing area and high wing loading. What I find interesting is that in a high G maneuver and/or high AOA, a full scale fighter will have “cottage” or visible vortices from the low pressure on top of the strake and wing. I believe that models are missing the dynamic to squeeze moisture out of the air like that. A model might be able to do it, but I’ve never witnessed it. Does anyone know how well leading edge slats work with the models?
Gary
Gary
#9
My Feedback: (34)
RE: Do models fly like real planes ?
ORIGINAL: S_Ellzey
In the case of an F-16, nope. The full scale F-16 is unstable by design, it takes a computer to keep it in the air, this is part of what makes the F-16 so maneuverable. This also what makes an R/C F-16 use up extra runway on take off. We have to move the CG forward to make it stable, so if the main gear are in the right place it is harder to get the nose up. You run it to the same problem with many other modern fighters that have "relaxed static stability".
Steven
In the case of an F-16, nope. The full scale F-16 is unstable by design, it takes a computer to keep it in the air, this is part of what makes the F-16 so maneuverable. This also what makes an R/C F-16 use up extra runway on take off. We have to move the CG forward to make it stable, so if the main gear are in the right place it is harder to get the nose up. You run it to the same problem with many other modern fighters that have "relaxed static stability".
Steven
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kent , , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Do models fly like real planes ?
Alot more on the full size!
Paul,
Having a discussion with my darling sister, over where to go on holiday. She wants to go away in July. I wonna go to Florida Jets. She reckons we are aload of train spotters but the model areoplane type.
Laura
Paul,
Having a discussion with my darling sister, over where to go on holiday. She wants to go away in July. I wonna go to Florida Jets. She reckons we are aload of train spotters but the model areoplane type.
Laura
#12
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Warsaw, POLAND
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Do models fly like real planes ?
If I may add my two cents…
It depends on what you mean by FLY LIKE A REAL PLANES. If you want to predict the speed characteristics of a real plane at the low angle of attack, derived from flight test of scaled model, errors could be unacceptable, but if you consider dynamic characteristics (dynamic stability, maneuverability, spin characteristics), generally HIGH ANGLE OF ATTACK, correlation between scaled down model and real airplane will be very good. The situation is even better if you consider aircraft with strakes, because in this case at the high angle of attack lift is generated by strakes vortex which are Reynolds number undependable. But…. Scaled down model does not mean only scaled geometry, but also scaled mass and mass distribution. Its called dynamically scaling and IT’S A MUST if you want to have similarities between model and real airplane. The mass scale factor is equal to the third power of linear scale factor. This mean if you have 20% dynamically scaled down model of F-16 (1/5 scale), length of the model will be about 10 ft but a weight (model) will be 0.2(linear scale)^3*35000lbs( weight of real F-16)=280lbs!!!! You will say impossible, but such models fly and are used for research purposes. The F-15, F-18 or Su-27 and... had their little brothers (pictures below)
That’s it.
Marcin
It depends on what you mean by FLY LIKE A REAL PLANES. If you want to predict the speed characteristics of a real plane at the low angle of attack, derived from flight test of scaled model, errors could be unacceptable, but if you consider dynamic characteristics (dynamic stability, maneuverability, spin characteristics), generally HIGH ANGLE OF ATTACK, correlation between scaled down model and real airplane will be very good. The situation is even better if you consider aircraft with strakes, because in this case at the high angle of attack lift is generated by strakes vortex which are Reynolds number undependable. But…. Scaled down model does not mean only scaled geometry, but also scaled mass and mass distribution. Its called dynamically scaling and IT’S A MUST if you want to have similarities between model and real airplane. The mass scale factor is equal to the third power of linear scale factor. This mean if you have 20% dynamically scaled down model of F-16 (1/5 scale), length of the model will be about 10 ft but a weight (model) will be 0.2(linear scale)^3*35000lbs( weight of real F-16)=280lbs!!!! You will say impossible, but such models fly and are used for research purposes. The F-15, F-18 or Su-27 and... had their little brothers (pictures below)
That’s it.
Marcin
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kent , , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Do models fly like real planes ?
Recovered properly when i woke up yesterday morning.
I will never eat another duck as long as I live!
Back to me 2 weeks
L
I will never eat another duck as long as I live!
Back to me 2 weeks
L