RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Reply
Old 10-22-2010, 12:11 AM
  #101
Aussie Bart
Thread Starter
 
Aussie Bart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sale, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 397
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Alex48

Very interesting mod Bart, thanks for posting. I've just ordered a load of stuff from UMS to have a play with and your thread will be a great reference. I presume all the gear doors are still air?

Cheers, Alex
Alex

Yep the door cylinders remain as air and the gear and doors are still run off the same sequencer as before, just plug the hydraulic controller into the sequencer in place of the old gear air valve. You will need to Y lead the directional valve servo onto this and set the end points or servo throws to suit.
Aussie Bart is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 01:07 AM
  #102
ianober
 
ianober's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 4,453
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Here are some shots of my modified pistons for the hydraulic setup. They went pretty fast, a couple hours in the garage and I am set!! Now I am just waiting for the parts from UMS.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	vt57261.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	2.05 MB
ID:	1520883   Click image for larger version

Name:	id97239.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	1.80 MB
ID:	1520884  
ianober is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 06:50 AM
  #103
Edgar Perez
 
Edgar Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Gurabo, PUERTO RICO (USA)
Posts: 2,162
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

This may be obvious to you guys, but I was wondering why the pistons need to be modified. If the air does not leak, why we need to fiddle with the internals?
Edgar Perez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 08:24 AM
  #104
johnls
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PlaistowWest Sussex, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 411
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

The original pistons are hollow and have the offending shuttle mechanism in them. The shuttle is being discarded which leaves the vent holes open which would allow the hydraulic fluid to pass to the other side of the piston. The choice is to make a bung to plug up the holes or a new piston.



John
johnls is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 06:49 PM
  #105
Edgar Perez
 
Edgar Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Gurabo, PUERTO RICO (USA)
Posts: 2,162
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Thanks. How critical is to remove the shuttle? Will the wear out of it allow the oil to leak? Will having the oil inside avoid the shuttle to wear out?
It looks simple enough to remove the shuttle, but wanted to understand the options.
Edgar Perez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 07:09 PM
  #106
ianober
 
ianober's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 4,453
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Edgar, I think you should re-read this thread. The answers to all of your questions have been posted here already. Bart went through a lengthy description of how and why the units will fail. It is up to you to do the mod if you like, you dont have to, but personally I would like trouble free gear that will work every time I hit the switch.
ianober is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 08:29 PM
  #107
Aussie Bart
Thread Starter
 
Aussie Bart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sale, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 397
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Edgar Perez

Thanks. How critical is to remove the shuttle? Will the wear out of it allow the oil to leak? Will having the oil inside avoid the shuttle to wear out?
It looks simple enough to remove the shuttle, but wanted to understand the options.
Edgar

Ian is right, I can assure you that if you leave the shuttles in they will jamb up and eventually groove out the cylinder walls. As I mentioned earlier, the design of the shuttles is wonderfull, but will not hold up over time cause of the dynamics.
Aussie Bart is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 08:33 PM
  #108
Edgar Perez
 
Edgar Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Gurabo, PUERTO RICO (USA)
Posts: 2,162
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Got it. Thanks!
Edgar Perez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 08:59 PM
  #109
F15driver
 
F15driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Posts: 251
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Bart,

DHL delivered my Mig 29 today and I only had one minor piece of damage-the former that the nose door ram mounts to broke free from the fuse. This was either due to poor glue or failure to sand before gluing. Easily repaired. So, figured I would try to cycle the two main gear to see how the factory original worked. The long and short of it was, they didn't work. One gear stayed stuck down and the other finally came free and slammed into the fuse so hard I thought it would break something. It will definitely benefit from the hydraulic conversion.

Ianober, would you consider machining a set of pistons for a fee? Your work looks really good. As I don't have access to a lathe, the Hysol option with plug seems my choice unless you're willing to run another set. Let me know please.

My impression of the Mig 29 is that its not a home run ARF. The wood seems really light and the formers don't appear strong enough to withstand a hard landing. As easily as my one former separated from the fuse in shipment, I can't imagine the main gear formers withstanding a hard landing without reinforcement. I think I'll be adding fiberglass cloth on each side of the two main formers. The other odd feature of the Mig is the location of the twin fuel tanks. Their center looks to be at least 12" forward of the CG. This should make the Mig extremely nose heavy on takeoff. Bart, have you noticed this?

More later as I play with it at greater length.

Rob
F15driver
F15driver is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 09:48 PM
  #110
Edgar Perez
 
Edgar Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Gurabo, PUERTO RICO (USA)
Posts: 2,162
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

I will also be interested in the machining from Bart if available
Edgar Perez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 02:39 AM
  #111
johnls
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PlaistowWest Sussex, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 411
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Rob, I had similar concerns regarding the location of the fuel tanks on the CG. As Shane(Aussie Bart) was the first that I knew to fly the Mig I emailed him prior to my first flight and he reassured me it is OK. Prior to me grounding my Mig due to the undercarriage issues, I had had 18 flights and the fuel tank location is not a problem. The leading edge extensions produce lift right up to the nose, in fact on the real sized aircraft 40% of the total lift is from the body. With the Mig's CG as per the plan the model rotates effortlessly and landings are superb, the nose can be held in a nose high attitude for a realistic touchdown. I haven't had any issues with my undercarriage formers and I have not strengthened anything. I fly from tarmac, but usually in some stiff crosswinds, Shane, I know fly's mainly from grass. I was starting to move my CG back and I ended up at 12mm behind the stated position. At this point inverted light was better and I could do point and very slow rolls satisfactory. Having said all this my Mig was ordered in January, so there is a possibility construction methods could have changed, but I doubt it.
Here is a link to a very poor video of the first flight (CG as per plan), you can get the idea of the takeoff and landing qualities. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpJpQUdAY0k


John
johnls is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 03:28 AM
  #112
ianober
 
ianober's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 4,453
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Rob, it should be no problem to machine up another set. I may have to have you send me one of your pistons or give me the measurements to compare to mine just to be sure. I am pretty sure that the Mig has the same size cylinders as the SU-27 but I am not certain as I do not have one. So if you want you can just send me your 3 pistons and I will swap it all out for you, just remove them via the pins and e-clips and send the whole things to me. That should be no problem.
ianober is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 04:26 AM
  #113
Aussie Bart
Thread Starter
 
Aussie Bart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sale, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 397
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Ok guys, I finally got a chance to finish it off and get some video of it as below. This was run with a 2 cell Lipo but you can set your speed slower by using a 2 cell life or even a single cell lipo (like I do on my T45) however you need to consider the sequencer timing. In the video I am using an Airpower sequencer that has the same time lag from gear up/door close to door open/gear down. I taxied her around for quite a while after the video (mainly to test my new "Big Bore" pipe) and she rode over really rough rocks and lumpy ground with no signs of collapsing. I am away with work again for a few weeks so hope to test fly when I get back.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMZTKeYmXsc

Aussie Bart is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 06:14 AM
  #114
JohnMac
 
JohnMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Leeds, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,386
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Well I must say Bart, you have me convinced. I think I will go with this system from the outset. Not only is the operation solid but scale too.
I may also fit the system to my F14 in due course.
Regards,

John
JohnMac is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 06:26 AM
  #115
F15driver
 
F15driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Posts: 251
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Bart,
Cool! Like the scale speed. Good job.
Rob
F15driver
F15driver is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 06:31 AM
  #116
F15driver
 
F15driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Posts: 251
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

iabober,

Much appreciated. I'll disassemble the gear over this weekend and remove the pistons. Would you email me your mailing address to the following: rpuetz@att.net. Thanks loads and good luck with your Mig.

Regards,
Rob
F15driver
F15driver is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 06:40 AM
  #117
F15driver
 
F15driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Posts: 251
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

John,
Very nice flight and landing. You satisfied my concern about the tank location and their effect on takeoff and landing. If all my landings were as smooth as yours in the video, I wouldn't need to strengthen the formers either! Good job.

Rob
F15driver
F15driver is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 08:31 AM
  #118
JohnMac
 
JohnMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Leeds, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,386
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

I have just one descision to make now. Which colour scheme?
What do you guys think?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Zx70140.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	72.9 KB
ID:	1521481   Click image for larger version

Name:	Xs59626.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	62.9 KB
ID:	1521482  
JohnMac is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 09:37 AM
  #119
johnls
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PlaistowWest Sussex, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 411
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Definitely the camo version on the left. For info John, the UMS hydraulic conversion kit was a little more expensive than I led you to believe. I've just had a bill from customs for £28.00 still its good value.



John
johnls is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 10:16 AM
  #120
Countryboy
 
Countryboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lawrenceburg, KY
Posts: 2,652
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

The UMS hydraulic system looks to work great, but do they offer self sealing valves to close the system off if the UMS were implemented on a retract setup where the mains are in the removable wings.
Countryboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 11:43 AM
  #121
Jim Cattanach
 
Jim Cattanach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Larnaca, , CYPRUS
Posts: 2,085
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Anyone have trouble signing in to the UMS site? I just keep getting refreshed back to the login page when I try.
Jim Cattanach is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 12:15 PM
  #122
johnls
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PlaistowWest Sussex, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 411
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

No no problems: http://umstech.in/index.php



John
johnls is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 03:18 PM
  #123
Aussie Bart
Thread Starter
 
Aussie Bart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sale, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 397
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Countryboy

The UMS hydraulic system looks to work great, but do they offer self sealing valves to close the system off if the UMS were implemented on a retract setup where the mains are in the removable wings.
I use the same system on my JL T45 hawk which also has a removable wing. I use the same quick connect couplers as you would on an air system (different colours) on the lines that go through the fuse to the wing.

The up line is fitted with blue couplers and the down with red. The up line from the fuse is a female couple and the down line from the fuse is a male coupler.

After you retract your gear ready to strip the wings off, disconnect the retract pump battery and then cycle the gear at least once, this dumps any high pressure still trapped in the line but the gear stays locked up on its cam.

Once that is done, disconnect the couplers from each other and the connect the male/female on the fuse together and the male/female on the wing together. Oil won't come out the line unless you shake it (surface tension of oil is too high) and by conncting together the oil stays looped even if you accidently start the pump with the wing off.

You will still get a drip or two from between the couplers so keep a rag on hand and there is a small amount of thermal expansion of the oil trapped in the wing if its temperature is a fair bit higher when you assemble the wing onto the fuse.

Every now and then, check your reservoir level and top up if required.
Aussie Bart is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 03:37 PM
  #124
Aussie Bart
Thread Starter
 
Aussie Bart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sale, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 397
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Just one last thing for the guys who are converting the JL Mig over. Because the legs don't have any positive locks in them anymore (never worked anyway) you will find the legs sort of like spongy if you put a fair bit of pressure on them, either up or down. I am not sure bit looking at the Skymaster version of these legs, I think they only lock the air in the cylinders which if this is the case would be far more spongy.

This is simply the 3 mm airline expanding under the load and is about 1/2" on one leg or 1/4" if you push both, if it goes anymore than this you proberbly still have air in the cylinders or lines. Try sitting the plane inverted and cycling the gear a couple of times (reservoir has a clunk line so does not care which way is up).

I really don't think the spongy reaction will cause any grief, it is more likely to work like another shock absorber. However if you dump the landing the those tubes will be under alot of stress so you must ensure that the 3 mm line length is kept to a minimum, always put a lock wire on the tubes that go onto the barbs (have a close look at the pic with the leg in it and the blue tube, you can just make out the lock wire) and all ather fittings need to be Festo type "Push In" fittings as these hold harder as the pressure rises.

One last bit of advise, when first setting up the system, adjust the controller sensitivity down to the - end, the gear will cycle and once bottoms out will bring on the overload light and then time out. If the gear is not all trhe way home then wind the sensitivity towards the + until it is right, mine is set at about halfway. If this is set too high then the pump will keep running and potentially burn out.

If you have you retract pump powered up and turn on your reciever, don't be surprised if your pump runs for a "cycle", this is because the controller has seen a change of signal.

I use a 2 cell lipo on the Mig and 1000 Ma will give you about 30 cycles so no need to over power the system.
Aussie Bart is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 02:38 AM
  #125
JohnMac
 
JohnMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Leeds, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,386
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Jetlegend Mig 29 Fulcrum

Boy This thread gets even more interesting. I have a very old unfinished Sabre. Unfinished because I just cannot get the gear to lift successfully. The retract units are very small for the size and weight of the model but the location does not allow bigger ones to be fitted. Even at 150 PSI I cannot guarantee the legs will lift. I thought of Hydraulics, but dismissed the idea as I imagined oil spurting everywhere and having to bleed the system every time.
I thiink this might be worth a shot.
Thanks Bart. Very illuminating.
JohnMac is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:40 AM.