1/6th F-16 operational nozzle
#5
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pocatello,
ID
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 1/6th F-16 operational nozzle
ORIGINAL: DelGatoGrande
looks great!!!!
how the drive system looks like??
looks great!!!!
how the drive system looks like??
The drive system uses 2 high torque servos driving 15 CF pushrods in a set of concentric rings. The transfer system in the tailcone is pretty close to the way the real F-16's system works (minus the hydraulics of course)
You can see a picutre of the actual drive system on the website. Total weight of the system is 31 oz.
Dan
#6
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 1/6th F-16 operational nozzle
ORIGINAL: Details 4 Scale
The drive system uses 2 high torque servos driving 15 CF pushrods in a set of concentric rings. The transfer system in the tailcone is pretty close to the way the real F-16's system works (minus the hydraulics of course)
You can see a picutre of the actual drive system on the website. Total weight of the system is 31 oz.
Dan
ORIGINAL: DelGatoGrande
looks great!!!!
how the drive system looks like??
looks great!!!!
how the drive system looks like??
The drive system uses 2 high torque servos driving 15 CF pushrods in a set of concentric rings. The transfer system in the tailcone is pretty close to the way the real F-16's system works (minus the hydraulics of course)
You can see a picutre of the actual drive system on the website. Total weight of the system is 31 oz.
Dan
#9
RE: 1/6th F-16 operational nozzle
Hello:
Very pretty system, but why no use an only ring for hold the 15 pushrods near the nozzle and with the 2 servos you could move it. Not ? It more easy that use 15 pushrod too much long. Or it is only the prototype ???
I think.
Best regads from Spain.
Carlos.
________________________
http://cmjets.blogspot.com/
Very pretty system, but why no use an only ring for hold the 15 pushrods near the nozzle and with the 2 servos you could move it. Not ? It more easy that use 15 pushrod too much long. Or it is only the prototype ???
I think.
Best regads from Spain.
Carlos.
________________________
http://cmjets.blogspot.com/
#10
My Feedback: (15)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 1/6th F-16 operational nozzle
My guess would be for weight distribution and torque advantage... I like the idea of avoiding a tail heavy airplane, I'm in...
I guess one could reduce the rod size and position the transfer ring based on there CG requirement.
Either way the best Scale Nozzle ever to hit the Market ! Can't wait to see it with his new 1 amp afterburner light system...
Great Job as usual Dan...
I guess one could reduce the rod size and position the transfer ring based on there CG requirement.
Either way the best Scale Nozzle ever to hit the Market ! Can't wait to see it with his new 1 amp afterburner light system...
Great Job as usual Dan...
#12
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pocatello,
ID
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 1/6th F-16 operational nozzle
ORIGINAL: cmjets
Hello:
Very pretty system, but why no use an only ring for hold the 15 pushrods near the nozzle and with the 2 servos you could move it. Not ? It more easy that use 15 pushrod too much long. Or it is only the prototype ???
I think.
Best regads from Spain.
Carlos.
________________________
http://cmjets.blogspot.com/
Hello:
Very pretty system, but why no use an only ring for hold the 15 pushrods near the nozzle and with the 2 servos you could move it. Not ? It more easy that use 15 pushrod too much long. Or it is only the prototype ???
I think.
Best regads from Spain.
Carlos.
________________________
http://cmjets.blogspot.com/
Carlos,
Phil is exactly right about the weight distribution. The overall weight of the entire system is 31 ounces. To put the entire weight of the unit further back would mean more than doubling the system weight to the airframe by adding weight to the nose to balance the tailweight offset. The other advantage of the long pushrods is to balance the torque requirements of each individual turkey feather. In other words, the rod lengths become less critical as the nozzle moves since the rods can deflect slightly if one turkey feather needs slightly more torque than the others. The resulting deflections absorb the extra forces so that the entire unit moves as one piece without applying too much or too little force to each individual turkey feather. So, when first setting up the unit in the aircraft, the nozzle is in the fully closed position; this allows the nozzle to close properly when the pushrods are in tension. Believe me, in the year+ I have been working on the system, it has gone thru several transfomations to get tho this point. Like Edison, I could tell you MANY ways how NOT to make a scale nozzle system...LOL...
I'm glad you guys like the unit; my thanks to everyone for the past moral support! I nearly gave up on it a few times...
Dan
#14
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pocatello,
ID
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 1/6th F-16 operational nozzle
ORIGINAL: tulz161
Very impressive! Did the water vapor afterburner idea get thrown out?
Very impressive! Did the water vapor afterburner idea get thrown out?
Dan
#17
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pocatello,
ID
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 1/6th F-16 operational nozzle
ORIGINAL: invertmast
Dan, that thing is absolutely AMAZING!! How hard would it be to adapt Different tailcones to it? I think these should be an option for the F-14 i'm working on
Dan, that thing is absolutely AMAZING!! How hard would it be to adapt Different tailcones to it? I think these should be an option for the F-14 i'm working on
The F-14 tailcones are completely different than the F-16. The F-14's turkey feathers actually retract into the fuse when opening, so the F-16 units wouldn't be correct. I'm quite familiar with the F-14's actual system, so making the unit function wouldn't be a serious issue. In fact, the F-14 unit is much easier than the F-16 system. It would still be a lot of work, but no where near the hair pulling I went thru on the F-16 nozzle.[8D]
Dan
#19
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: BarranquillaAtlantico, COLOMBIA
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 1/6th F-16 operational nozzle
Hey Dan, nice job.
Why dont you start all those projects for the F-16 1/8 scale?
BTW, where is the thrust tube gone?
Should it be cut flush with the operational nozzle at the point where it is fixed to the fuse? I mean, is the operational nozzle capable of replacing the last portion of the thrust tube just to work as in real scale?
#21
My Feedback: (23)
RE: 1/6th F-16 operational nozzle
ORIGINAL: AndyAndrews
Thats very cool. But all those rods? Are they going to be shorter?
Thats very cool. But all those rods? Are they going to be shorter?
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_9650356/tm.htm
#22
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pocatello,
ID
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 1/6th F-16 operational nozzle
ORIGINAL: Guillermo Ibanez
Hey Dan, nice job.
Hey Dan, nice job.
Why dont you start all those projects for the F-16 1/8 scale?
BTW, where is the thrust tube gone?
Should it be cut flush with the operational nozzle at the point where it is fixed to the fuse? I mean, is the operational nozzle capable of replacing the last portion of the thrust tube just to work as in real scale?
Dan
#24
RE: 1/6th F-16 operational nozzle
Hello:
Many thanks for explain me it, Dan.
Regards from Spain.
Carlos.
____________________________
http://cmjets.blogspot.com/
Many thanks for explain me it, Dan.
Regards from Spain.
Carlos.
____________________________
http://cmjets.blogspot.com/