|
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: Marcelo Assis Have you already seen the Esay Jet XL from Joam Matos RC? www.joaomatosrc.com I know Barry from Kingtech USA is selling it in USA. I got mine and it is very impressive. You can make a very good combo with a K 100G. Regards Marcelo |
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: Sgt Shay Kingtech was pointed out to me and I'm going to go with it.. as far as airframe...for my first I want something with simplicity. Something to get the basics down...not interested in retracts and all the bells and whistles. So I'm thinking of getting a falcon 120 and keep the fixed gear on it. Then after some time flying that step up to something more sleek and spotty, maybe even a scale jet. |
RE: intro to turbines
Hey Sgt (I was a Capt) If you have access to a Ipad and want to get excited about turbines download the App for RC Jets international online magazine for 99 cents and then for your free introductory offer download this months turbine special. :)
|
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: Sgt Shay ORIGINAL: jetster81 ORIGINAL: Sgt Shay ORIGINAL: basimpsn Yes I'm new or actually will be new to turbines. P.S thanks for your service ;) Not new to rc, just to turbines. No thanks needed sir. It's our job. <br type="" /> <br type="_moz" /> |
RE: intro to turbines
Get a Kingtech 140 and a Boomerang XL or a Torus.
This is a perfect combo for your first jet. I have never flown the Torus but I have had a couple XL's and it is one of my favorite beginner jets. The Ultra Flash is a great jet. But I think it would make a better 2nd one. The Boomer is much more forgiving. Plus it's MUCH larger and easier to see. Here are a couple of my vids: Boomerang XL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA9mAL4pfZg (Watch it HD. In standard def its hard to see due to the clouds. The smoke pump had a bad battery) Ultra Flash (2nd flight): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_M9HQiky5F0 |
RE: intro to turbines
Jetster81, I would have said the same thing about your comment. [:-] From what you typed you either were saying it looks like you got the right idea or just being a ***** trying to start something. Someone that wasn't trying to be a ***** would have cleared things up if their comment was taken the wrong way.
|
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: FenderBean Jetster81, I would have said the same thing about your comment. [:-] From what you typed you either were saying it looks like you got the right idea or just being a ***** trying to start something. Someone that wasn't trying to be a ***** would have cleared things up if their comment was taken the wrong way. <br type="_moz" /> |
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: jetster81 ORIGINAL: FenderBean Jetster81, I would have said the same thing about your comment. [:-] From what you typed you either were saying it looks like you got the right idea or just being a ***** trying to start something. Someone that wasn't trying to be a ***** would have cleared things up if their comment was taken the wrong way. <br type=''_moz'' /> |
RE: intro to turbines
Hes a NCO in the military, he was just showing courtesy, people have lost perspective on the fact that the internet adds a very big (lost in translation) factor, plus some people are raised to say sir to a stranger in our country. The problem with reading everything is 10 people can read the same thing and end up with 10 different opinions, probably the biggest cause of forum fights today.
ORIGINAL: jetster81 ORIGINAL: FenderBean Jetster81, I would have said the same thing about your comment. [:-] From what you typed you either were saying it looks like you got the right idea or just being a ***** trying to start something. Someone that wasn't trying to be a ***** would have cleared things up if their comment was taken the wrong way. <br type=''_moz'' /> |
RE: intro to turbines
So I'm thinking of getting a falcon 120 and keep the fixed gear on it. Kingtech was pointed out to me and I'm going to go with it.. as far as airframe... http://www.rcuniverse.com/market/item.cfm?itemId=887303 John. |
RE: intro to turbines
Here is a good fix gear jet trainer call the JETCAP 242, Flys as good as the boomerang :) Only mod was to change the tail wheel to Aluminum [:@]:eek:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUuYsH_9MNI |
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: basimpsn Here is a good fix gear jet trainer call the JETCAP 242, Flys as good as the boomerang :) Only mod was to change the tail wheel to Aluminum [:@]:eek: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUuYsH_9MNI I've got to build one of those !!! :D |
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: Sgt Shay Kingtech was pointed out to me and I'm going to go with it.. as far as airframe...for my first I want something with simplicity. Something to get the basics down...not interested in retracts and all the bells and whistles. So I'm thinking of getting a falcon 120 and keep the fixed gear on it. Then after some time flying that step up to something more sleek and spotty, maybe even a scale jet. The Falcon 120 is a great jet, and they are dirt cheap. I know a lot of guys here will put them down as not being a real jet... but with a few simple mod's... and not trying to make them fly at 180 mph... you will have a model that will get you though the turbine learning curve. Besides... if you crunch one... it's only $150 for a new air frame. I was in the same boat as you 2 years ago. Wanted an inexpensive trainer, without the complications of retracts. So... My first attempt at flying my Falcon was to use the stock fixed gear. IT SUCKS !!!!!! It bent before we ever got off the ground. So... I made a nice spring loaded nose gear, and changed the main gear over to an aluminum set. By doing that... it supports the engine and wing mounts better, and it's MUCH easier to put together and transport since the fuse is on it's own gear. If you get one, an want more info... just give me a yell. ;) http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v9...ts/Landing.jpg |
RE: intro to turbines
Hey Sgt,
Are you a crew chief on Chinooks? Henry |
RE: intro to turbines
The falcon 120 require quite a bit of mods and the cheapest kingtech is K80 which I am not sure if you can get anymore, you may be stuck with a K100 (I was told K80 being discontinued not sure if that is still true).
The K100 is way too much power for the falcon 120 without major modifications. If you got the $$$, the tornado is a falcon 120 done up right. YOu can put fixed gear on that too. I would hate to you see get frusterated and lose a new turbine to a questionable airframe. By the the time you do the mods to the falcon 120 cost wise you would be a tornado pretty close. I went with the F-86D great trainer but lots of mods again. I woudl of done tornado but transport is hell. YOu have to remove the booms and wings and this is a point for error, getting it hooked up right everytime. They take a lot of wear and tear being taken a apart like that. If you can keep it together in 1 piece you will be much better off. If I could my first turbine over again I would get a turbinator or a jet mach. They fly so good and are so easy to fly. No bad characteristics, othyer than FUGLY. |
RE: intro to turbines
I just purchased my first turbine, a used but very well maintained RAM 750. I was set on getting a Boomerang Elan, then I seen your post (picture of the Turbinator). What thrust are you using in this jet? Would it be a better start over the Elan? Just asking your opinion. Thanks.
|
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: Sgt Shay Thanks for the reply smitty....I'm actually in el paso, and I haven't seen a lot of people fly turbines out here in el paso. Yet alone flying at all. That's a great suggestion and I would have done that but, the jet guys just don't seem to be around here. |
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: Prop_Washer2 ORIGINAL: Sgt Shay Thanks for the reply smitty....I'm actually in el paso, and I haven't seen a lot of people fly turbines out here in el paso. Yet alone flying at all. That's a great suggestion and I would have done that but, the jet guys just don't seem to be around here. Thanks prop washer. |
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: essyou35 The falcon 120 require quite a bit of mods and the cheapest kingtech is K80 which I am not sure if you can get anymore, you may be stuck with a K100 (I was told K80 being discontinued not sure if that is still true). The K100 is way too much power for the falcon 120 without major modifications. If you got the $$$, the tornado is a falcon 120 done up right. YOu can put fixed gear on that too. I would hate to you see get frusterated and lose a new turbine to a questionable airframe. By the the time you do the mods to the falcon 120 cost wise you would be a tornado pretty close. I went with the F-86D great trainer but lots of mods again. I woudl of done tornado but transport is hell. YOu have to remove the booms and wings and this is a point for error, getting it hooked up right everytime. They take a lot of wear and tear being taken a apart like that. If you can keep it together in 1 piece you will be much better off. If I could my first turbine over again I would get a turbinator or a jet mach. They fly so good and are so easy to fly. No bad characteristics, othyer than FUGLY. |
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: 2_Subway Hey Sgt, Are you a crew chief on Chinooks? Henry |
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: Dr Honda ORIGINAL: Sgt Shay Kingtech was pointed out to me and I'm going to go with it.. as far as airframe...for my first I want something with simplicity. Something to get the basics down...not interested in retracts and all the bells and whistles. So I'm thinking of getting a falcon 120 and keep the fixed gear on it. Then after some time flying that step up to something more sleek and spotty, maybe even a scale jet. The Falcon 120 is a great jet, and they are dirt cheap. I know a lot of guys here will put them down as not being a real jet... but with a few simple mod's... and not trying to make them fly at 180 mph... you will have a model that will get you though the turbine learning curve. Besides... if you crunch one... it's only $150 for a new air frame. I was in the same boat as you 2 years ago. Wanted an inexpensive trainer, without the complications of retracts. So... My first attempt at flying my Falcon was to use the stock fixed gear. IT SUCKS !!!!!! It bent before we ever got off the ground. So... I made a nice spring loaded nose gear, and changed the main gear over to an aluminum set. By doing that... it supports the engine and wing mounts better, and it's MUCH easier to put together and transport since the fuse is on it's own gear. If you get one, an want more info... just give me a yell. ;) http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v9...ts/Landing.jpg |
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: basimpsn Here is a good fix gear jet trainer call the JETCAP 242, Flys as good as the boomerang :) Only mod was to change the tail wheel to Aluminum [:@]:eek: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUuYsH_9MNI Wooowww.... Ok, now thats different. And badass. I. Bet its cheaper then buying a turboprop. Nice mod dude. |
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: husafreak Hey Sgt (I was a Capt) If you have access to a Ipad and want to get excited about turbines download the App for RC Jets international online magazine for 99 cents and then for your free introductory offer download this months turbine special. :) Thanks sir for the info. |
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: FenderBean Hes a NCO in the military, he was just showing courtesy, people have lost perspective on the fact that the internet adds a very big (lost in translation) factor, plus some people are raised to say sir to a stranger in our country. The problem with reading everything is 10 people can read the same thing and end up with 10 different opinions, probably the biggest cause of forum fights today. ORIGINAL: jetster81 ORIGINAL: FenderBean Jetster81, I would have said the same thing about your comment. [:-] From what you typed you either were saying it looks like you got the right idea or just being a ***** trying to start something. Someone that wasn't trying to be a ***** would have cleared things up if their comment was taken the wrong way. <br type=''_moz'' /> Yeah that guy annoyed me , but I blocked him, but what sucks is if he posts here and someone quotes him I can see his post. Jester is just making excuses for being a bag, who gets offended by someone else calling someone else sir.?? Please go irritate someone else SIR. |
RE: intro to turbines
ORIGINAL: IFlyEm35 ORIGINAL: jetster81 ORIGINAL: FenderBean Jetster81, I would have said the same thing about your comment. [:-] From what you typed you either were saying it looks like you got the right idea or just being a ***** trying to start something. Someone that wasn't trying to be a ***** would have cleared things up if their comment was taken the wrong way. <br type=''_moz'' /> |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:09 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.