lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Virginia Beach,
VA
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
hehe:
Subject: Account Disabled (from OvalQueen, a moderator there)
"If you would like to remain a member on this forum (again) I would suggest you stop calling the 2.5 engine names, like stupid, junk, poor design or paperweight.
You may offer your opinions, but you do not have permission to tell people to junk their 2.5 and get a different manufacturers engine, especially when you are a guest in the house of TRAXXAS.
Some of your posts have been edited and/or deleted."
roflmao. thats from the traxxas.com board. it probably isnt too smart doing that on a company's board and claling their own products crap, but i think its hilarious when they have to respond to you heh. and about the "again" thing, lol. i was kicked off before. but at least now i have an explanation...
its pretty bad when someone makes a horrible engine that magazines push at you because of advertising money when in reality it is weak and unreliable. its even worse when its not even a worthy paperweight... leaking gunk all over my papers. lol. hence the notoriously poorly sealed reputation it has lol...
anyone else have something funny/related to something like this? lol.
Subject: Account Disabled (from OvalQueen, a moderator there)
"If you would like to remain a member on this forum (again) I would suggest you stop calling the 2.5 engine names, like stupid, junk, poor design or paperweight.
You may offer your opinions, but you do not have permission to tell people to junk their 2.5 and get a different manufacturers engine, especially when you are a guest in the house of TRAXXAS.
Some of your posts have been edited and/or deleted."
roflmao. thats from the traxxas.com board. it probably isnt too smart doing that on a company's board and claling their own products crap, but i think its hilarious when they have to respond to you heh. and about the "again" thing, lol. i was kicked off before. but at least now i have an explanation...
its pretty bad when someone makes a horrible engine that magazines push at you because of advertising money when in reality it is weak and unreliable. its even worse when its not even a worthy paperweight... leaking gunk all over my papers. lol. hence the notoriously poorly sealed reputation it has lol...
anyone else have something funny/related to something like this? lol.
#2
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rockford, IL,
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
I dont like the maxx for its weaknesses and will bash that all day long. But calling the 2.5 a paperweight is just foolish. That motor is about the easiest to tune and has the best powerband of most of it competition! Most of the problems people have with that motor are mostly user error.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Virginia Beach,
VA
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
if it is user error then how come i have no problems at all with my fantom?
post a poll on this forum... tell me how many people prefer the trx 2.5 over EVERY OTHER SMALL BLOCK engine there is... yeah its like that. lol.
maybe you are very fortunate. but i hear mostly nothing but bad about this engine. except in magazines because they are paid to say good things about it
post a poll on this forum... tell me how many people prefer the trx 2.5 over EVERY OTHER SMALL BLOCK engine there is... yeah its like that. lol.
maybe you are very fortunate. but i hear mostly nothing but bad about this engine. except in magazines because they are paid to say good things about it
#4
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
ORIGINAL: Pkvillager
I dont like the maxx for its weaknesses and will bash that all day long. But calling the 2.5 a paperweight is just foolish. That motor is about the easiest to tune and has the best powerband of most of it competition! Most of the problems people have with that motor are mostly user error.
I dont like the maxx for its weaknesses and will bash that all day long. But calling the 2.5 a paperweight is just foolish. That motor is about the easiest to tune and has the best powerband of most of it competition! Most of the problems people have with that motor are mostly user error.
It seems the Traxxas mods have made a home here as well.
#5
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rockford, IL,
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
OMG Please I sold my POS Maxx 2 weeks ago! I believe traxxas out of stupidity or purpose designed the bulkheads to break when the wind blows in the wrong direction. I see savages take tumbles that would completely destroy the maxx and they drive away unscathed!!
But I dont think there is anything wrong with the 2.5 motor jeez even in national level races the 2.5 comes out in top finishes all the time.
But I dont think there is anything wrong with the 2.5 motor jeez even in national level races the 2.5 comes out in top finishes all the time.
#7
Senior Member
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
I've never had a problem with my 2.5 either. I bought my Tmaxx in September last year (import from Tower), followed the running in recommendation just as the manual said but used Blue Thunder 10% as you cant get Traxxas fuel in the UK. Have always used Traxxas recommended glow plug. The engine was easy to tune and will pull wheelies all too easily and flip the car over too easily. I fitted a Ritter pipe to it and it would wheelie even more!!
Just waiting for my Savage SS to arrive from the USA, so I can compare the 2!!
Just waiting for my Savage SS to arrive from the USA, so I can compare the 2!!
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: indianapolis,
IN
Posts: 4,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
hahaha i got banned from traxxas boards also for not liking some design features in my old 4tec pro, and for complimenting the Terra Crusher lol
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Virginia Beach,
VA
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
lol it would be great if we all stormed the traxxas boards dissing the 2.5[&:]
heh...
it seems to me traxxas had better get their act together...
heh...
it seems to me traxxas had better get their act together...
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hoover, AL
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
I did'nt get banned but I did here the same from ovalqueen....I am another one of the guy's that got a bad 2.5, all I can say is that I know for a fact wether traxxas wants to admit that they had a VERY LONG bad run of 2.5's, But I have tinkered with 5 different 2.5's and 2 of the five were great engines....IMO the majority of it's problem's is the carb...BTW I liked the remark that they don't even make good paper weights because it is leaking all over the paper....
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: livonia,
MI,
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2.5=CRAP!
Thats hilarious...I got banned from the T-Maxx boards about 6 months ago for saying that the 2.5 engine wasn't a very good one. I didn't even get a warning, they just didn't allow me access anymore. Also, to anyone that sais that the 2.5 problems are based on "user error"... YOU ARE WRONG! I've heard this so many times on these boards by dedicated Traxxas owners and they are just wrong. I have owned 5 nitro vehicles over the past 5 years and haven't had a problem with one engine. That was until I made the mistake of buying a 2.5 t-maxx. It would't stay running for over 2-3 minutes. So, it's not "user error", it's "TRAXXAS ERROR". I can't believe what I was missing when I bought my savage ss...the parts are soooo much better and the thing doesn't break every 5 minutes. Traxxas=cheap.
#12
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Winnipeg, MB, CANADA
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
ive heard that tmaxxs are weak but i drove my electric rustler off my roof like tem times and its like an 11 foot drop. i have pics but my stupid scanner . ill try to post as soonb as possible
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Virginia Beach,
VA
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
thats completely different, you are comparing a**holes and oranges. er somethin...
i dont really mind that some of the stock stuff is weak, what i really hate is the fact that traxxas wont do **** to help you!
i dont really mind that some of the stock stuff is weak, what i really hate is the fact that traxxas wont do **** to help you!
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ballston Spa,
NY
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
I've never had problems with my 2.5. But Traxxas owns the board and they can do whatever they want to with it. Did you ever try to contact Traxxas to resolve the problem or did you just rant and rave on their board? Despite what people might think you just can't go on these boards and say whatever you want to, if you can't live by the rules then you should go somewhere else like you did
#15
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: , IL,
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
Off the subject alittle I busted on OVAL from traxxas when she said this:
"You shouldn't use anything that is a petroleum product, it can cause the O'rings to fail."
Then I simply posted this picture:
"You shouldn't use anything that is a petroleum product, it can cause the O'rings to fail."
Then I simply posted this picture:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: livonia,
MI,
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
Did you ever try to contact Traxxas to resolve the problem or did you just rant and rave on their board? Despite what people might think you just can't go on these boards and say whatever you want to, if you can't live by the rules then you should go somewhere else like you did
#17
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Long branch,
NJ
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
lol. i didnt know anyone disliked the tmaxx as much as me. i never owned one, but i just hate them because you cant find an r/c website or magazine without the tmaxx somewhere in it.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Virginia Beach,
VA
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
lol, yeah, im really wishing i bought a savage instead. i would trade my hopped up maxx for a savage 25 rtr when it comes out if i had the chance. i have well over $900 in hop ups. i wish i had a savage[>:]
#19
My Feedback: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Irvine,
CA
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
My background is marketing/graphic design.
So, let me get this straight...
You posted a NEGATIVE comment on a manufacturer's own board, and were then SURPRISED when they gave you the boot?
Lets be realistic. Company's host sites at their expense (and whim) to PROMOTE their products.
Its their OBLIGATION to ensure that their own boards promote their products.
ff
So, let me get this straight...
You posted a NEGATIVE comment on a manufacturer's own board, and were then SURPRISED when they gave you the boot?
Lets be realistic. Company's host sites at their expense (and whim) to PROMOTE their products.
Its their OBLIGATION to ensure that their own boards promote their products.
ff
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: livonia,
MI,
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
My background is marketing/graphic design.
So, let me get this straight...
You posted a NEGATIVE comment on a manufacturer's own board, and were then SURPRISED when they gave you the boot?
Lets be realistic. Company's host sites at their expense (and whim) to PROMOTE their products.
Its their OBLIGATION to ensure that their own boards promote their products.
So, let me get this straight...
You posted a NEGATIVE comment on a manufacturer's own board, and were then SURPRISED when they gave you the boot?
Lets be realistic. Company's host sites at their expense (and whim) to PROMOTE their products.
Its their OBLIGATION to ensure that their own boards promote their products.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX,
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
I love my 2.5. It was my first nitro engine and I don't have any problems with it. The only problem I have is keeping the power in check. Granted the Sirio and fantom make more power than the 2.5, but they are also bigger engines and cost a good bit more.
I would consider removing you from the board a good marketing move. Losing you as a customer is allot better than losing all of the customers that your badmouthing could have caused. I don't think I have ever heard a complaint about Traxxas customer service until now. So i wouldn't say they are losing customers over it. Their customer service is actually one of their big selling points.
I think that the reason you would assume that most people who own a TRX 2.5 think it is junk is because people only really speak out when they are upset or disappointed in a product. That is especially true when it comes to web boards. Allot of people never even think to come on one until they have a problem. Compared to the amount of t-maxx's sold with the TRX 2.5 finding 200 people who hate it wouldn't make for even a small percentage of owners.
And no I am not a brand loyalist I just like my T-Maxx. When I look at my other options, I don't see changing trucks anywhere in my future.
I would consider removing you from the board a good marketing move. Losing you as a customer is allot better than losing all of the customers that your badmouthing could have caused. I don't think I have ever heard a complaint about Traxxas customer service until now. So i wouldn't say they are losing customers over it. Their customer service is actually one of their big selling points.
I think that the reason you would assume that most people who own a TRX 2.5 think it is junk is because people only really speak out when they are upset or disappointed in a product. That is especially true when it comes to web boards. Allot of people never even think to come on one until they have a problem. Compared to the amount of t-maxx's sold with the TRX 2.5 finding 200 people who hate it wouldn't make for even a small percentage of owners.
And no I am not a brand loyalist I just like my T-Maxx. When I look at my other options, I don't see changing trucks anywhere in my future.
#22
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ballston Spa,
NY
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
Theres 2 sides to every story, I'd love to hear Traxxas side! Just so I get this straight. You didn't send your engine back for repair like they asked you to. So you feel its OK to go on their boards and complain about the product without giving them a chance to fix it? Me thinks theres alot more to this story!!!!!!!!
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Virginia Beach,
VA
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
don't think I have ever heard a complaint about Traxxas customer service until now.
You didn't send your engine back for repair like they asked you to. So you feel its OK to go on their boards and complain about the product without giving them a chance to fix it?
i was not "surprised" that they gave me that warning. but really, the tmaxx is made in very large quantities. i believe the savage 21 is as well right? well... how many people do you hear *****ing about their hpi .21 engine? aside from its a bit weaker i know, but reliability and whatnot.
when it comes down to it, this is very true:
#24
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ballston Spa,
NY
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
The above post is a prime example why this board has gone down hill. I see no humor in making fun of the mentally handicapped and hope you get banned from this board as well, you have alot of growing up to do, your parents must be very proud of you!
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Virginia Beach,
VA
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: lol im in trouble for calling the trx 2.5 a 'paperweight'
sorry, i didnt mean to make fun of them, it was just an example that until you meet someone face to face, the argument wont be settled. the internet is nothing but false identities. and for your information i am pretty mature for my age. you could ask just about anyone that knows me in person. sorry if i offended anyone with that photo...
is this one okay?
sorry again for posting that other photo, i didnt mean to offend anyone.
is this one okay?
sorry again for posting that other photo, i didnt mean to offend anyone.