DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
#126
My Feedback: (84)
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
ORIGINAL: cmoulder
I will fire up the SAP 180 when the snow clears from the fields and will continue flying the Focus II as I work on the electric Pentathlon Evo.
I will fire up the SAP 180 when the snow clears from the fields and will continue flying the Focus II as I work on the electric Pentathlon Evo.
I just purchased that exact ship & engine combo last Sunday and it is my first pattern ship. I intend to just sport/sunday fly it, but I would like to work on tightening up my moves a little. Any tips on control throws, CG & servo strength & servo arms would be appreciated. A few photos would be nice to compare if you have any to share. Thanks!
#127
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ossining,
NY
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
GS Gasser,
Start [link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_9237216/mpage_5/key_/tm.htm]Here[/link] with the original SAP thread with a lot of stuff about the Focus II I assembled with lots of help and advice from Matt and others.
Start [link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_9237216/mpage_5/key_/tm.htm]Here[/link] with the original SAP thread with a lot of stuff about the Focus II I assembled with lots of help and advice from Matt and others.
#128
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
Made some more progress on Delta. Installed the adjusters and lock downs on the wing. It's a big plane, 78 1/2" square,
#130
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ossining,
NY
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
ORIGINAL: vatechguy3
Going to use a dle35 and a pipe??
Tony
Going to use a dle35 and a pipe??
Tony
How about a [link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10906196]55!![/link]
#131
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
ORIGINAL: cmoulder
A 35??
How about a [link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10906196]55!![/link]
ORIGINAL: vatechguy3
Going to use a dle35 and a pipe??
Tony
Going to use a dle35 and a pipe??
Tony
How about a [link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10906196]55!![/link]
Bob, you've showed me a couple times how to do that link and I just don't use it enough to remember it. Thanks for doing it again.
I took more careful measurements of the wing recently. Final area is 1140 squares. My tip had been cut down to 6 5/8" which I forgot.... Root of course is still 22" for a ratio ofabout 3.4. **EDIT3.32 ratio, calculated. I estimated the 3.4 in my head** Anything over 3 should produce spirited performance so we will see. The large wing should slow me down a bit more and give me more time especiallywhen coupled with the DLE's outstanding mid range manners.
**EDIT Larger wing area, meaning drag and slow flying, is one huge advantage for a biplane over a monoplane. There are others too. The large electric props generate their thrust at lower rpm than gas or glow and can reall take advantage of a bipe's natural character. Makes me wish I had access to a machine shop to build a belt reduction drivesuch that a 23-24" prop could be turned**
#133
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
Vanquish most likely. Plenty of Pattern flying performance to get a good read on the engine. Most importantly it is finished already and making the enginemount changes is no biggie
#134
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MaranelloModena, ITALY
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
Hey Matt; great job you're doing with that ship...
I don't know if mentioned before but; did you considere Mintor 33 as a possible powerplant. There is also a 38 tto.
In any case, can you tell the incidences you're setting for the engine mount?
Thanks on advance...
G.
I don't know if mentioned before but; did you considere Mintor 33 as a possible powerplant. There is also a 38 tto.
In any case, can you tell the incidences you're setting for the engine mount?
Thanks on advance...
G.
#135
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
ORIGINAL: guille2006
Hey Matt; great job you're doing with that ship...
I don't know if mentioned before but; did you considere Mintor 33 as a possible powerplant. There is also a 38 tto.
In any case, can you tell the incidences you're setting for the engine mount?
Thanks on advance...
G.
Hey Matt; great job you're doing with that ship...
I don't know if mentioned before but; did you considere Mintor 33 as a possible powerplant. There is also a 38 tto.
In any case, can you tell the incidences you're setting for the engine mount?
Thanks on advance...
G.
I used the Mintor 38 last year on a Pattern project and found disappointing output from that powerplant. Disappointing in Pattern terms only, not sport. I've covered that in other threads
Otherwise, I found the engine to have excellent field manners, simple to start and maintain. It's a good sport engine. And extremely well built, probably better than any of the other 30cc offeringsthatare made withcast cases and cylinders
I have no experience with the Mintor 33.
Thrust angles in my Delta are zero degreesdown and 2 1/2 degrees right. Wing incidence is 0.3+ and stab is 0; those are the settings onthe bench anyway. Final settings to be determined. Vertical separation of wing and stab is 11.5 mm. That separation will give me zero roll couple for the wing dihedral I'm using (3 degrees)
#137
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
Looks like RCU is allowing photos again. A bunch of photos to download.
I am just about finished with the build. Wings and stabs have thebase coat of paint on.Completed the landing gearpant installationlast night along with the pipe NACA ducting and hot air exhaust.
I can see the finish line
I am just about finished with the build. Wings and stabs have thebase coat of paint on.Completed the landing gearpant installationlast night along with the pipe NACA ducting and hot air exhaust.
I can see the finish line
#138
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
Completed the chin cowl treatment. It now sports a header hood and hot air hoodedexits for better engine cooling
The pipe needs some extra cooling air hence the naca duct to make up some of the air lost out of the chin cowl.
The inside of the cowl was treated a little different by adding some composite reinforcement. The chin cowl will sit on its crutch at this area and in the past it tended to buckle cracking and flaking the paint. It won't happen this time
At the fuse rear additional air exits were installed to vent the pipe
The pipe needs some extra cooling air hence the naca duct to make up some of the air lost out of the chin cowl.
The inside of the cowl was treated a little different by adding some composite reinforcement. The chin cowl will sit on its crutch at this area and in the past it tended to buckle cracking and flaking the paint. It won't happen this time
At the fuse rear additional air exits were installed to vent the pipe
#139
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
Fully assembled fuse is very large but light....The canopy will also sport a dorsal fin as yet not built. Been preaching the benefits of dorsals /ventralsfor manyyears now. Nat Penton was the first I ever saw that sported these 30 years ago and they are finally being accepted as standard faire since schedules have caught up with the design concept
Wing to fuse fit and stab to fuse fit snaps. This is straight forward to get perfect. I add teflon tape to the fuse for release purposes and then fill the joint accordingly. Teflon tape is sticky on one side which makes this chore really elementary.
The fuse center section treatment is shown in one snap. The honeycomb laminate was made by me, controlling its weight. It's two layers of 1/16" with 3 layers of 1.2 oz glass cloth. Carbon is unnecessary; would have looked great but would have been heavier
Wing to fuse fit and stab to fuse fit snaps. This is straight forward to get perfect. I add teflon tape to the fuse for release purposes and then fill the joint accordingly. Teflon tape is sticky on one side which makes this chore really elementary.
The fuse center section treatment is shown in one snap. The honeycomb laminate was made by me, controlling its weight. It's two layers of 1/16" with 3 layers of 1.2 oz glass cloth. Carbon is unnecessary; would have looked great but would have been heavier
#140
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
The landing gear was fitted and faired into the fuse
The snap of the pant shows how my pants come out of the mold. The cloth is light 2.5 oz stock,but there is carbon in appropriate locations making these very strong. I've shown how the axle is installed before. It makes a very secure set-up which provides long service life. Carbon and axle hard points are all molded in and axles are aligned in the mold. It's the lighetst way to do pants. These weigh 12 to 14 grams a piece ready for finishing
A 16 oz tank operates the DLE55 for about 12 minutes depending on throttle management. Perfect for one schedule plus half dozen maneuvers. Should make Lochowski's day
The snap of the pant shows how my pants come out of the mold. The cloth is light 2.5 oz stock,but there is carbon in appropriate locations making these very strong. I've shown how the axle is installed before. It makes a very secure set-up which provides long service life. Carbon and axle hard points are all molded in and axles are aligned in the mold. It's the lighetst way to do pants. These weigh 12 to 14 grams a piece ready for finishing
A 16 oz tank operates the DLE55 for about 12 minutes depending on throttle management. Perfect for one schedule plus half dozen maneuvers. Should make Lochowski's day
#141
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Stewartsville, NJ
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
Awesome Matt! I hope I happen to be there on maiden day. Joe, nah, he is going to be mostly put out if you only fly the sched once around the onion patch. As any builder must know, the nail that sticks up... LOL! Will you be out there tomorrow with your current ride, hoping for a nice day? Cheers.
#142
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ossining,
NY
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
Looks great, Matt!
Can't believe you crammed a 55cc in there, lol! But I thought you would be using a bit smaller tank.
Any projection on the AUW?
Can't believe you crammed a 55cc in there, lol! But I thought you would be using a bit smaller tank.
Any projection on the AUW?
#143
My Feedback: (46)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bridgewater,
NJ
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
ORIGINAL: MTK
The landing gear was fitted and faired into the fuse
The snap of the pant shows how my pants come out of the mold. The cloth is light 2.5 oz stock, but there is carbon in appropriate locations making these very strong. I've shown how the axle is installed before. It makes a very secure set-up which provides long service life. Carbon and axle hard points are all molded in and axles are aligned in the mold. It's the lighetst way to do pants. These weigh 12 to 14 grams a piece ready for finishing
A 16 oz tank operates the DLE55 for about 12 minutes depending on throttle management. Perfect for one schedule plus half dozen maneuvers. Should make Lochowski's day
The landing gear was fitted and faired into the fuse
The snap of the pant shows how my pants come out of the mold. The cloth is light 2.5 oz stock, but there is carbon in appropriate locations making these very strong. I've shown how the axle is installed before. It makes a very secure set-up which provides long service life. Carbon and axle hard points are all molded in and axles are aligned in the mold. It's the lighetst way to do pants. These weigh 12 to 14 grams a piece ready for finishing
A 16 oz tank operates the DLE55 for about 12 minutes depending on throttle management. Perfect for one schedule plus half dozen maneuvers. Should make Lochowski's day
#144
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
ORIGINAL: cmoulder
Looks great, Matt!
Can't believe you crammed a 55cc in there, lol! But I thought you would be using a bit smaller tank.
Any projection on the AUW?
Looks great, Matt!
Can't believe you crammed a 55cc in there, lol! But I thought you would be using a bit smaller tank.
Any projection on the AUW?
The 33 uses a smaller tank certainly. The 55 is thirstier. But of course, puts out 6 horses give or take. It's gonna be exciting to power a Pattern weighted model with this much power. On the other hand, if I don't need anything more than 1/3 throttle, maybe an 11 oz tank will work here too. The 33 is going into the Shinden...with an 8 oz tank actually, again to make my flying buddy happy...
AUW, not sure still. It's gonna be very close to the limit. The paint job is gonna be simple as much for weight reduction as visibility. I can't see these crazy paint jobs so many current models have on them.....
I am so near the end I can hardly wait..... Hope to be flying it at Jackson next month...... Certainly by PokeURNose
#146
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
Looks like it will be 11 lbs3 ounces with spinner and prop. There's more primer to sand off the fuse but it won't amount to much; maybe 10 grams.....
#148
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: DERIVATIVE, New 2X2
ORIGINAL: MTK
Looks like it will be 11 lbs3 ounces with spinner and prop. There's more primer to sand off the fuse but it won't amount to much; maybe 10 grams.....
Looks like it will be 11 lbs3 ounces with spinner and prop. There's more primer to sand off the fuse but it won't amount to much; maybe 10 grams.....