"cost" on score sheets
05-03-2012, 01:37 PM
#5
Thread Starter
RE: RE:
ORIGINAL: Scott Smith
Total maneuver points - average deduction is what I used.
Edit: (10 - Avg score) * Kf would be more accurate!
Total maneuver points - average deduction is what I used.
Edit: (10 - Avg score) * Kf would be more accurate!
Jim
05-03-2012, 05:29 PM
#7
Junior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Benton City, WA
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE:
Jim,
Cost is an indication of the average cost in points for the maneuver. It is calculated from your average raw score subtracted from 10 times the K factor. The idea is to show you the maneuvers that are costing you the most points and help you focus your practice in the areas that will give you the most gain.
I hope this makes sense?
Gordon
Cost is an indication of the average cost in points for the maneuver. It is calculated from your average raw score subtracted from 10 times the K factor. The idea is to show you the maneuvers that are costing you the most points and help you focus your practice in the areas that will give you the most gain.
I hope this makes sense?
Gordon
05-04-2012, 05:43 AM
#8
Senior Member
RE: RE:
ORIGINAL: Gordon Anderson
Jim,
Cost is an indication of the average cost in points for the maneuver. It is calculated from your average raw score subtracted from 10 times the K factor. The idea is to show you the maneuvers that are costing you the most points and help you focus your practice in the areas that will give you the most gain.
I hope this makes sense?
Gordon
Jim,
Cost is an indication of the average cost in points for the maneuver. It is calculated from your average raw score subtracted from 10 times the K factor. The idea is to show you the maneuvers that are costing you the most points and help you focus your practice in the areas that will give you the most gain.
I hope this makes sense?
Gordon
So what you're saying is that if one scores a 6 on a K=1 maneuver and a 9 on a K=5 maneuver, he should work more on his K=5 maneuver?
05-04-2012, 06:16 AM
#9
Thread Starter
RE: RE:
ORIGINAL: MTK
Gordon,
So what you're saying is that if one scores a 6 on a K=1 maneuver and a 9 on a K=5 maneuver, he should work more on his K=5 maneuver?
ORIGINAL: Gordon Anderson
Jim,
Cost is an indication of the average cost in points for the maneuver. It is calculated from your average raw score subtracted from 10 times the K factor. The idea is to show you the maneuvers that are costing you the most points and help you focus your practice in the areas that will give you the most gain.
I hope this makes sense?
Gordon
Jim,
Cost is an indication of the average cost in points for the maneuver. It is calculated from your average raw score subtracted from 10 times the K factor. The idea is to show you the maneuvers that are costing you the most points and help you focus your practice in the areas that will give you the most gain.
I hope this makes sense?
Gordon
So what you're saying is that if one scores a 6 on a K=1 maneuver and a 9 on a K=5 maneuver, he should work more on his K=5 maneuver?
Unfortunately, if you get a zero on a K=3 during your best flight it is a throwaway flight even if you average 8 on that maneuver for the rest of the contest. Don't get zeros. They really COST.
05-07-2012, 08:25 AM
#11
Senior Member
RE: RE:
ORIGINAL: OhD
You should have used 5 on a K=1 and then it would have been a push.
Unfortunately, if you get a zero on a K=3 during your best flight it is a throwaway flight even if you average 8 on that maneuver for the rest of the contest. Don't get zeros. They really COST.
ORIGINAL: MTK
So what you're saying is that if one scores a 6 on a K=1 maneuver and a 9 on a K=5 maneuver, he should work more on his K=5 maneuver?
So what you're saying is that if one scores a 6 on a K=1 maneuver and a 9 on a K=5 maneuver, he should work more on his K=5 maneuver?
Unfortunately, if you get a zero on a K=3 during your best flight it is a throwaway flight even if you average 8 on that maneuver for the rest of the contest. Don't get zeros. They really COST.
Well one has to look at zeros phillosophically....you at least have a clue as to what to work on, no?
