jcvt

My Feedback: (2)

According with Airtronics , When using the SD-10G with an FHSS-3 receiver, it simply may be too fast for some analog servos.
Any experience with futaba s3305 and h645?

Thanks

rlmcnii

My Feedback: (3)

Hitec 645s don't work with the FHSS-3 receivers. Speaking from personal experience, not vicarious internet knowledge.

jcvt

My Feedback: (2)

I appreciate it.

What about 3305 , I have 10 servos that I just can not Throw away.

DennisD

You don't have to throw them away. Analog servos work perfectly fine with FHSS-1 receivers. Buy some digitals for your FHSS-3 RX's and buy some FHSS-1 Rx's for your analog servos.

Regards,

Dennis

Pippin

They have just released the new ASC FHSS-3 receiver compatible with older (Hitec) analog servos.

http://sanwa-denshi.co.jp/rc/sky/rec...x-61h_asc.html

It's the analog version of the RX-61:

http://sanwa-denshi.com/rc/sky/recei...61h_92064.html

jcvt

My Feedback: (2)

This is What I found ;FHSS-3 uses the whole band, is faster and has some extra features like strong interference resistance, temperature resistance, low voltage (down to 1,2V) etc. , these futures are very desirable in large scale airplanes. So , if some one has already a giant scale aircraft with 10 or more regular analog servos , which are very popular among warplanes, may have to buy digital servos, or settle down for a less dependable fhss-1 receivers.
This is huge obstacle when you compare with others brands.[&o]

jester_s1

FHSS-1 is not less reliable at all. It is not more prone to intererence, not more temperature resistant or low voltage tolerant or have less range. It is simply a little slower. With analog servos, the speed of FHSS-3 is a waste so the standard FHSS-1 receivers are just fine. They designed the FHSS-3 to be optimized for the response times of digital servos, which is why they don't work with some analog servos. But they don't give you anything else aside from a better response time.