Hitec 5645 Jan 02 v1.03....?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (4)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Orleans,
LA
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hitec 5645 Jan 02 v1.03....?
I just purchased 6 new Hitec 5645 servos. 5 servos have Mar 02 and 1 servo has Jan 02 V1.03. Should I send the Jan 02 v1.03 servo back for a Mar 02?
Thanks.....Scott
Thanks.....Scott
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: SOUTH,
TX
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
5645
You should for one reason alone..... Why not, if they updated the servo, its for a reason, and ive heard bad things about the 5645 failures. Hope they turn out fine.
#5
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Hitec 5645 Jan 02 v1.03....?
Originally posted by beavertail
The 5645 is getting infamous for failures.
The 5645 is getting infamous for failures.
Vince
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: SOUTH,
TX
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hitec 5645 Jan 02 v1.03....?
I dont have any, or will, im just responding to what people are telling me and what i read, but its enough for me to stick to JR. I love my planes too much to chance it. But im no expert, just my 2 cents
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Hitec 5645 Jan 02 v1.03....?
All sevos, and all electronic devices have a certain amount of failure rate. I wager that Hitec's is on average with Futaba and JR. We are only made aware of Hitec's failure rate because there are vastly more Hitec servos in operation that either of the over priced Futaba or JR servos. I all probability there likely isn't that much differance in the factories in China that produce the amplifiers for all servos.
Vince
Vince
#9
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hitec 5645 Jan 02 v1.03....?
Originally posted by MikeMayberry
The 5645MG is one of our best selling servos. There are litterally hundreds of thousands in the marketplace at this time.
Mike.
The 5645MG is one of our best selling servos. There are litterally hundreds of thousands in the marketplace at this time.
Mike.
Vince
Now you should start worrying because they have spend some good time...
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: SOUTH,
TX
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hitec 5645 Jan 02 v1.03....?
Well, im done with this subject, Your going to have to make up your own mind, i just hope you dont learn a lesson the hard way.
all manufacturers have some good and bad products. This is true, but one lesson i learned early on in flying. YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR,
WINGS LEVEL-CLEARED HOT
all manufacturers have some good and bad products. This is true, but one lesson i learned early on in flying. YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR,
WINGS LEVEL-CLEARED HOT
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Jewett, NY,
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hitec 5645 Jan 02 v1.03....?
Mike is intiitled to his opinion just like us...
My only question is why are all the stories about the servo failures so similar in description...
They all describe a servo that locks in one extreme position. Is this indictive of digital servos.
The only servo I ever had fail (Airtronics) simply stopped responding it didn't move off center or anything?
I'm just curious?
Hoping and praying I never Have an inflight servo failure
My only question is why are all the stories about the servo failures so similar in description...
They all describe a servo that locks in one extreme position. Is this indictive of digital servos.
The only servo I ever had fail (Airtronics) simply stopped responding it didn't move off center or anything?
I'm just curious?
Hoping and praying I never Have an inflight servo failure
#15
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Poway, CA
Posts: 3,531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hitec 5645 Jan 02 v1.03....?
It is true that the 3-pole motors are not as durable as the coreless motors that are used in the Futaba, JR and high end Hitec digitals that is why they cost much more.
That has solved with the new V1.03 software starting that was implemented in Oct 2001.
Mike
That has solved with the new V1.03 software starting that was implemented in Oct 2001.
Mike