New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: goodlettsville,
TN
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
You're claiming collisions can't or don't happen?
#52
Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Flower Mound,
TX
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
After-post OK is given...
[img][/img][img][/img]
ORIGINAL: onewasp
bobzilla
True or false?
Originally Posted by hilgert
Actually, the AR7000 (and the AR6100 as well I believe) actually send back a very low-power signal to the DX7 to let it know it is a DSM2 RX, and the TX adjusts power usage accordingly (since the DSM2 transmission protocol must be more efficient in some manner, probably due to it's higher speed as it would need to be "on" less of the time). The AR6000 does not send anything back, so the DX7 stays in DSM (and not DSM2) mode.
If you guessed (I'm using the term advisedly) True then you are CORRECT!
The highest levels at Spektrum reviewed this----just as copied here and said "True".
I lost because I said no!!
Live and learn--------so now I have learned.
This is not intended as a "Gotcha" nor is it in any way intended to cast myself in any role other than 'Messenger'. Nor did I have Hilgert's OK to re-post his correction to a post I had made on another thread/site. I feel that Hilgert would go along with it if I had asked him-----at least I'm counting on it.
bobzilla
True or false?
Originally Posted by hilgert
Actually, the AR7000 (and the AR6100 as well I believe) actually send back a very low-power signal to the DX7 to let it know it is a DSM2 RX, and the TX adjusts power usage accordingly (since the DSM2 transmission protocol must be more efficient in some manner, probably due to it's higher speed as it would need to be "on" less of the time). The AR6000 does not send anything back, so the DX7 stays in DSM (and not DSM2) mode.
If you guessed (I'm using the term advisedly) True then you are CORRECT!
The highest levels at Spektrum reviewed this----just as copied here and said "True".
I lost because I said no!!
Live and learn--------so now I have learned.
This is not intended as a "Gotcha" nor is it in any way intended to cast myself in any role other than 'Messenger'. Nor did I have Hilgert's OK to re-post his correction to a post I had made on another thread/site. I feel that Hilgert would go along with it if I had asked him-----at least I'm counting on it.
#53
Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Flower Mound,
TX
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
NOT TRUE!!!
The AR7000 and AR6100 ARE 2-way. As part of the link-up process with the DX7 they let it know that they are DSM2-capable, and the DX7 converts to DSM2 mode. This occurs as a very low-power signal from the RX back to the TX. This can be proven a number of ways with the proper equipment, or with just a simple multimeter by monitoring the DX7 power usage. When talking to an AR6000 (which IS only 1-way) the DX7 will draw more current than when talking to an AR7000 or AR6100.
Or, you can just believe the designer of the Spektrum system, with whom I am confirmed this many, many months ago.
-hilgert
The AR7000 and AR6100 ARE 2-way. As part of the link-up process with the DX7 they let it know that they are DSM2-capable, and the DX7 converts to DSM2 mode. This occurs as a very low-power signal from the RX back to the TX. This can be proven a number of ways with the proper equipment, or with just a simple multimeter by monitoring the DX7 power usage. When talking to an AR6000 (which IS only 1-way) the DX7 will draw more current than when talking to an AR7000 or AR6100.
Or, you can just believe the designer of the Spektrum system, with whom I am confirmed this many, many months ago.
-hilgert
ORIGINAL: bobzilla
Spektum is NOT 2-way. The transmitter only transmits and the receiver only listens.
What is Model Match?
Model Match (patent pending) prevents the pilot from flying a model using the wrong memory. During binding (the process of teaching the receiver the specific code of the transmitter) the receiver actually learns and remembers the specific model memory that is selected during binding. Later if the system is turned on and a different model memory in the transmitter is selected, the system will not operate. This prevents the disastrous issue of trying to fly a model using the wrong model memory. Simply selecting the correct model in model memory will cause the system to connect.
What is DSM?
DSM or Digital Spektrum Modulation is Spektrum's proprietary method of implementing 2.4GHz spread spectrum technology for the R/C industry. DSM divides the 2.4Ghz band into 80 individual channels (frequencies) and incorporates direct sequence spread spectrum with an imbedded GUID (Globally Unique Identifier) code. DSM has been painstakingly optimized by our engineers for R/C surface and aircraft use, offering the most robust RF link in the industry.
What happens if the band is full (80 users for surface or 40 users for aircraft) and I turn on my transmitter?
In the unlikely event that all channels are occupied, the next transmitter will scan the band indefinitely until open channels are available. The transmitter will then acquire the channel(s) and begin transmitting. Only then will the system connect.
What happens if two transmitters are on the same frequency?
To be FCC legal, all 2.4Ghz devices must incorporate a collision avoidance system that prevents the system from transmitting on an already occupied frequency. The chance of two transmitters occupying the same frequency is highly unlikely. If two transmitters should somehow end up on the same frequency, other safeguards, such as the GUID and proprietary time base coding, will prevent interference. Of course, with the aircraft system, the transmitter is transmitting on two frequencies simultaneously. The odds of two transmitters transmitting on the same two frequencies is even, more unlikely but again, should this happen, other safe guards will prevent interference.
and as far as two receivers..
The receiver has an extra part attached to it. What does this part do?
The AR7000 incorporates two receivers; an internal receiver is located on the main board and the extra part your referring to is actually an external receiver. Mounting the external receiver in a slightly different location with it's antenna oriented in a different direction greatly improves the RF link in difficult environments.
and for a quick DUAL LINK explaination
What is Dual Link?
Dual Link is a breakthrough, patented feature that was first incorporated in the DX6 aircraft system. Dual Link offers the security of two-path RF redundancy. The AR6000 is actually two receivers in one. The DX6 transmitter transmits on two frequencies simultaneously while the receiver receives and decodes both sets of information. Should one signal be blocked or corrupted or should one receiver malfunction in flight, the other frequency or receiver will take over. Dual Link offers the security of having two radios operating simultaneously on two separate frequencies.
Spektum is NOT 2-way. The transmitter only transmits and the receiver only listens.
What is Model Match?
Model Match (patent pending) prevents the pilot from flying a model using the wrong memory. During binding (the process of teaching the receiver the specific code of the transmitter) the receiver actually learns and remembers the specific model memory that is selected during binding. Later if the system is turned on and a different model memory in the transmitter is selected, the system will not operate. This prevents the disastrous issue of trying to fly a model using the wrong model memory. Simply selecting the correct model in model memory will cause the system to connect.
What is DSM?
DSM or Digital Spektrum Modulation is Spektrum's proprietary method of implementing 2.4GHz spread spectrum technology for the R/C industry. DSM divides the 2.4Ghz band into 80 individual channels (frequencies) and incorporates direct sequence spread spectrum with an imbedded GUID (Globally Unique Identifier) code. DSM has been painstakingly optimized by our engineers for R/C surface and aircraft use, offering the most robust RF link in the industry.
What happens if the band is full (80 users for surface or 40 users for aircraft) and I turn on my transmitter?
In the unlikely event that all channels are occupied, the next transmitter will scan the band indefinitely until open channels are available. The transmitter will then acquire the channel(s) and begin transmitting. Only then will the system connect.
What happens if two transmitters are on the same frequency?
To be FCC legal, all 2.4Ghz devices must incorporate a collision avoidance system that prevents the system from transmitting on an already occupied frequency. The chance of two transmitters occupying the same frequency is highly unlikely. If two transmitters should somehow end up on the same frequency, other safeguards, such as the GUID and proprietary time base coding, will prevent interference. Of course, with the aircraft system, the transmitter is transmitting on two frequencies simultaneously. The odds of two transmitters transmitting on the same two frequencies is even, more unlikely but again, should this happen, other safe guards will prevent interference.
and as far as two receivers..
The receiver has an extra part attached to it. What does this part do?
The AR7000 incorporates two receivers; an internal receiver is located on the main board and the extra part your referring to is actually an external receiver. Mounting the external receiver in a slightly different location with it's antenna oriented in a different direction greatly improves the RF link in difficult environments.
and for a quick DUAL LINK explaination
What is Dual Link?
Dual Link is a breakthrough, patented feature that was first incorporated in the DX6 aircraft system. Dual Link offers the security of two-path RF redundancy. The AR6000 is actually two receivers in one. The DX6 transmitter transmits on two frequencies simultaneously while the receiver receives and decodes both sets of information. Should one signal be blocked or corrupted or should one receiver malfunction in flight, the other frequency or receiver will take over. Dual Link offers the security of having two radios operating simultaneously on two separate frequencies.
#54
My Feedback: (168)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lehigh Acres,
FL
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
Well now I am totally confused. Is it one way, is it 2 way...What is true...what is not true...who knows. After reading this, and reading it again...I sure dont know. Does anyone else know? I think there are just too many quotes, and denials, and confirmations and speculations to make any reasonable sense out of all this. It's just gotten very muddy.
Well thats just my take on all these recent posts.
Well thats just my take on all these recent posts.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: goodlettsville,
TN
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
Regardless of the boot process from an operational standpoint you have to consider the Spektrum a one way system. There is no communication back to the Tx during operation and there is no error correction. So to sum it up you could say it is a one way system that uses two way communication to determine RX type.
#56
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (63)
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
I have forwared an email directly to Spektrum on a clarification on this matter.
Everything I have read, including most of hilgerts and mjrc's post on previous post..on other forums...offer no concrete or verifiable evidence of sort.
We will probably hear back from Spectrum by Tuesday at the lastest.
Speculate if you must, but I prefer to hear from the horses' mouth.
bobz
Everything I have read, including most of hilgerts and mjrc's post on previous post..on other forums...offer no concrete or verifiable evidence of sort.
We will probably hear back from Spectrum by Tuesday at the lastest.
Speculate if you must, but I prefer to hear from the horses' mouth.
bobz
#57
Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Flower Mound,
TX
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
ORIGINAL: chrisF test pilot
Regardless of the boot process from an operational standpoint you have to consider the Spektrum a one way system. There is no communication back to the Tx during operation and there is no error correction. So to sum it up you could say it is a one way system that uses two way communication to determine RX type.
Regardless of the boot process from an operational standpoint you have to consider the Spektrum a one way system. There is no communication back to the Tx during operation and there is no error correction. So to sum it up you could say it is a one way system that uses two way communication to determine RX type.
Once the "boot" is done, the system then behaves in a one-way manner during use. So, technically, it is a two-way system. Operationally, however, it *operates* as a one-way (TX only) system. Today, at least.
I have spoken with Paul Beard on this a few times many months ago (he knows a little about the system since he DESIGNED it), and this IS the way it works. The reason it's not really advertised that way is that it does not matter how it works, just that it does work.
-Hilgert
#58
My Feedback: (2)
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
ORIGINAL: dirtybird
Its not a dedicated park flier but the functions it provides will likely confine it there. A flier used to a computer radio will not buy it.
Its not a dedicated park flier but the functions it provides will likely confine it there. A flier used to a computer radio will not buy it.
The 6 EX is a computer radio. It is the 2.4 GHz version of the Futaba 6 EXAS. It contains model memories, flapperons, free surface mixes, expo and other features common to computer radios, and not found on standard radios.
It is a full range radio, which in my book means at least 3000 feet and more likely a mile. I have not seen a specific range rating. So you can fly anything that is AMA legal.
There are thousands of people who fly planes of all sizes on standard 4 channel radios. I go down to the local glow field and a lot of the pilots use standard 4 channel radios. So, if they can do that on a 4 channel standard radio, why can't they do it on a 6 channel comptuer radio?
The only difference between giant scale planes and smaller planes is the size. People were flying giant scale planes on standard radios long before there were computer radios.
In relation to giant scale, my only concern here would be whether the receiver can handle the amperage needed to work those big servos. But many giant scale pilots have externally powered boxes to handle that drain rather than try to run it through the receiver. I am sure that would work well here as well.
This radio can fly any plane of any size that uses standard R/E/A/F/Retract features. In other words it has 6 channels so it can control six functions, just like any other 6 channel radio. And it can remember the settings for multiple models, just like any other computer radio.
It also has the ability to support aileron control on separate channels. It also has two free mixers that allow you to mix any two channels. Good for flap to elevator compensation I would bet. Or Rudder to Aileron mixing. It might even allow you to do separate channels for flaps if you don't have retracts. None of my 18 planes, ranging from 30 inch to 134 inch wing spans, have retracts.
Now, if you feel you like to have more features, that is fine, or if you NEED more features, that is fine too. That is why there are higher end radios. However, to say that you can only fly parkflyers on a 6 channel comptuer radio is absurd. In fact the Futaba 6EX on 2.5 GHz or 72 MHz is probably all the radio that most sport flyers will ever need.
I have a Futaba 9C which I use for my scale sailplanes, full house sailplanes, RES sailplanes, hand launch gliders, slope gliders and small electrics. But I use it for convenience and enhancement, not because I NEED it to fly these planes. I could fly them all on a standard 4 or 6 channel radio if I wish.
#59
My Feedback: (90)
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
So which scheme is better: Futaba's FHSS or Spektrum's DSSS?
Intuitively, hopping can lead to collision and hence to hopping more. The end result is that the response time on the receiver side can become slow when the frequency is crowded.
Am I right?
--qc
Intuitively, hopping can lead to collision and hence to hopping more. The end result is that the response time on the receiver side can become slow when the frequency is crowded.
Am I right?
--qc
ORIGINAL: bobzilla
Here is a statement about the difference that Futaba and Spektrum utilize:
FHSS VS. DSSS
There are two primary types of Spread Spectrum technology- Frequency Hopping (FHSS)[FUTABA] and Direct Sequencing (DSSS). FHSS systems transmit a narrow band signal and rapidly jump from one frequency to the next spending a few milliseconds on each frequency. DSSS systems transmit on a single selected frequency but on a very wide band. Only a small portion of that band is used for specially encoded information. Originally, Spektrum engineers started their development with FHSS-based systems because they were relatively easy and inexpensive to develop. However, it was soon discovered that FHSS had several limitations that would prevent it from being the optimal solution for RC.
While more difficult and costly to develop, Spektrum engineers began experimenting with Direct Sequencing Spread Spectrum and optimized the modulation scheme to overcome critical response and re-link issues. In addition, DSSS offered 18dB increase of processing gain for significant improvements in range. With years of development and testing the DSSS modulation scheme was optimized for RC car use and Spektrum's DSM 2.4GHz Spread Spectrum Technology was born.
Looks like the FUTABA engineers did not reach the same conclusion that SPEKTRUM reached concerning pro-con's of each.
I really could care less which to buy..only I want the system to WORK and be relatively in-expensive.
Bobz
Here is a statement about the difference that Futaba and Spektrum utilize:
FHSS VS. DSSS
There are two primary types of Spread Spectrum technology- Frequency Hopping (FHSS)[FUTABA] and Direct Sequencing (DSSS). FHSS systems transmit a narrow band signal and rapidly jump from one frequency to the next spending a few milliseconds on each frequency. DSSS systems transmit on a single selected frequency but on a very wide band. Only a small portion of that band is used for specially encoded information. Originally, Spektrum engineers started their development with FHSS-based systems because they were relatively easy and inexpensive to develop. However, it was soon discovered that FHSS had several limitations that would prevent it from being the optimal solution for RC.
While more difficult and costly to develop, Spektrum engineers began experimenting with Direct Sequencing Spread Spectrum and optimized the modulation scheme to overcome critical response and re-link issues. In addition, DSSS offered 18dB increase of processing gain for significant improvements in range. With years of development and testing the DSSS modulation scheme was optimized for RC car use and Spektrum's DSM 2.4GHz Spread Spectrum Technology was born.
Looks like the FUTABA engineers did not reach the same conclusion that SPEKTRUM reached concerning pro-con's of each.
I really could care less which to buy..only I want the system to WORK and be relatively in-expensive.
Bobz
#60
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
ORIGINAL: nonstoprc
So which scheme is better: Futaba's FHSS or Spektrum's DSSS?
So which scheme is better: Futaba's FHSS or Spektrum's DSSS?
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: goodlettsville,
TN
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
Spektrum is a Hroizon trademark, the title should be spelled spectrum. And like Phaedrus said, saying that one is better than the other is a bit subjective. I think the Futaba system is actually a hybrid FHDSSS system. If you look at the FCC cert it indicates that the system is DS, but from their advertising material the description of hopping every two ms is a trait of a hybrid system. The Nomadio stuff is also hybrid.
#64
My Feedback: (90)
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
This is from
[link=http://www.arcelect.com/DSSS_FHSS-Spead_spectrum.htm]FHSS vs DSSS[/link]. Looks like degradation will happen when multiple 2.4ghz sources are present. Note that such sources do no limit to RC radios only.
" Spread-spectrum radio is good at dodging interference from conventional sources – (signals that stay in one narrow area of the frequency band and don’t move. it doesn’t always do as well when there are other spread ,spectrum systems operating nearby, though. The more frequency-hopping transmitters operating on a band, the more likely it is that one or more of them will hop to the same frequency at the same time, garbling data that must be retransmitted. DSSS is better at resisting noise up to a certain point. However, if the combined interference throughout the band rises above a certain level, throughput dramatically drops-nearly to zero. Unfortunately, it only takes a few nearby FHSS systems to cripple a DSSS system. On the other hand, because a DSSS system is always transmitting on every frequency in the band, a nearby FHSS system may be unable to find any clear channel to hop to. In the presence of interference, FHSS usually degrades more gracefully than DSSS, but neither works well when competing at close range. "
[link=http://www.arcelect.com/DSSS_FHSS-Spead_spectrum.htm]FHSS vs DSSS[/link]. Looks like degradation will happen when multiple 2.4ghz sources are present. Note that such sources do no limit to RC radios only.
" Spread-spectrum radio is good at dodging interference from conventional sources – (signals that stay in one narrow area of the frequency band and don’t move. it doesn’t always do as well when there are other spread ,spectrum systems operating nearby, though. The more frequency-hopping transmitters operating on a band, the more likely it is that one or more of them will hop to the same frequency at the same time, garbling data that must be retransmitted. DSSS is better at resisting noise up to a certain point. However, if the combined interference throughout the band rises above a certain level, throughput dramatically drops-nearly to zero. Unfortunately, it only takes a few nearby FHSS systems to cripple a DSSS system. On the other hand, because a DSSS system is always transmitting on every frequency in the band, a nearby FHSS system may be unable to find any clear channel to hop to. In the presence of interference, FHSS usually degrades more gracefully than DSSS, but neither works well when competing at close range. "
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: goodlettsville,
TN
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
That explanation is grossly over simplified. Just because a FHSS system hops to a frequency that another system is on doesnt mean the data is going to be lost. There is a list of several criteria that have to be met for communication to be completely lost with both systems. Not to mention the fact that they hop so fast there may be no impact at all. Many factors come into play when dealing with SS communication and you simply cannot simplify to the point that they have.
#66
My Feedback: (90)
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
The point is to figure out the condition under which it will happen. The reference and other sources raise the possibility. Is it the case that the new spectrum technology promises non-interfence?
Maybe somebody can tell us the exact condition, such as no more than N spectrum radios should operate at the same time.
Maybe somebody can tell us the exact condition, such as no more than N spectrum radios should operate at the same time.
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: goodlettsville,
TN
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
Due to the number of factors involved it would be hard to say exactly what circumstances would have to exist. The Spektrum system is limited to 40 users, not sure on the Futaba but is probably close. When trying to figure out what you are asking you have to consider not only the modulation technique, but also ERP, power output, range, path loss, Rx sensitivity, SN ratios, as well as data rate. That isnt even a complete list.
#68
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Tan Valley,
AZ
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
ORIGINAL: aeajr
I find this statement odd. What do you define as a computer radio?
The 6 EX is a computer radio. It is the 2.4 GHz version of the Futaba 6 EXAS. It contains model memories, flapperons, free surface mixes, expo and other features common to computer radios, and not found on standard radios.
It is a full range radio, which in my book means at least 3000 feet and more likely a mile. I have not seen a specific range rating. So you can fly anything that is AMA legal.
There are thousands of people who fly planes of all sizes on standard 4 channel radios. I go down to the local glow field and a lot of the pilots use standard 4 channel radios. So, if they can do that on a 4 channel standard radio, why can't they do it on a 6 channel comptuer radio?
The only difference between giant scale planes and smaller planes is the size. People were flying giant scale planes on standard radios long before there were computer radios.
In relation to giant scale, my only concern here would be whether the receiver can handle the amperage needed to work those big servos. But many giant scale pilots have externally powered boxes to handle that drain rather than try to run it through the receiver. I am sure that would work well here as well.
This radio can fly any plane of any size that uses standard R/E/A/F/Retract features. In other words it has 6 channels so it can control six functions, just like any other 6 channel radio. And it can remember the settings for multiple models, just like any other computer radio.
It also has the ability to support aileron control on separate channels. It also has two free mixers that allow you to mix any two channels. Good for flap to elevator compensation I would bet. Or Rudder to Aileron mixing. It might even allow you to do separate channels for flaps if you don't have retracts. None of my 18 planes, ranging from 30 inch to 134 inch wing spans, have retracts.
Now, if you feel you like to have more features, that is fine, or if you NEED more features, that is fine too. That is why there are higher end radios. However, to say that you can only fly parkflyers on a 6 channel comptuer radio is absurd. In fact the Futaba 6EX on 2.5 GHz or 72 MHz is probably all the radio that most sport flyers will ever need.
I have a Futaba 9C which I use for my scale sailplanes, full house sailplanes, RES sailplanes, hand launch gliders, slope gliders and small electrics. But I use it for convenience and enhancement, not because I NEED it to fly these planes. I could fly them all on a standard 4 or 6 channel radio if I wish.
ORIGINAL: dirtybird
Its not a dedicated park flier but the functions it provides will likely confine it there. A flier used to a computer radio will not buy it.
Its not a dedicated park flier but the functions it provides will likely confine it there. A flier used to a computer radio will not buy it.
The 6 EX is a computer radio. It is the 2.4 GHz version of the Futaba 6 EXAS. It contains model memories, flapperons, free surface mixes, expo and other features common to computer radios, and not found on standard radios.
It is a full range radio, which in my book means at least 3000 feet and more likely a mile. I have not seen a specific range rating. So you can fly anything that is AMA legal.
There are thousands of people who fly planes of all sizes on standard 4 channel radios. I go down to the local glow field and a lot of the pilots use standard 4 channel radios. So, if they can do that on a 4 channel standard radio, why can't they do it on a 6 channel comptuer radio?
The only difference between giant scale planes and smaller planes is the size. People were flying giant scale planes on standard radios long before there were computer radios.
In relation to giant scale, my only concern here would be whether the receiver can handle the amperage needed to work those big servos. But many giant scale pilots have externally powered boxes to handle that drain rather than try to run it through the receiver. I am sure that would work well here as well.
This radio can fly any plane of any size that uses standard R/E/A/F/Retract features. In other words it has 6 channels so it can control six functions, just like any other 6 channel radio. And it can remember the settings for multiple models, just like any other computer radio.
It also has the ability to support aileron control on separate channels. It also has two free mixers that allow you to mix any two channels. Good for flap to elevator compensation I would bet. Or Rudder to Aileron mixing. It might even allow you to do separate channels for flaps if you don't have retracts. None of my 18 planes, ranging from 30 inch to 134 inch wing spans, have retracts.
Now, if you feel you like to have more features, that is fine, or if you NEED more features, that is fine too. That is why there are higher end radios. However, to say that you can only fly parkflyers on a 6 channel comptuer radio is absurd. In fact the Futaba 6EX on 2.5 GHz or 72 MHz is probably all the radio that most sport flyers will ever need.
I have a Futaba 9C which I use for my scale sailplanes, full house sailplanes, RES sailplanes, hand launch gliders, slope gliders and small electrics. But I use it for convenience and enhancement, not because I NEED it to fly these planes. I could fly them all on a standard 4 or 6 channel radio if I wish.
#69
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PARIS, FRANCE
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
Hi guys,
Does anybody knows if this new transmitter is available in Mode 1 ?
I havn't seen that mention in the Tower Hobby's advertissement.
Thierry
Does anybody knows if this new transmitter is available in Mode 1 ?
I havn't seen that mention in the Tower Hobby's advertissement.
Thierry
#70
My Feedback: (2)
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
Since both Spektrum and Futaba use an ID to link the transmitter with the receiver, the chance of one picking up signals from the other is extremely remote. A corrupttion of the signal would have to occur such that it caused the transmitter ID to change from one transmitter's ID to the others. The odds are ..... way to big to even consider.
In addition, if they both happen to be on the same frequency at the same time, which could easily happen, it won't matter because the unique ID will tell each receiver which signal to listen to and which commands to excecute. Since we have no such ID in the 72 MHz band, we have to give each transmitter receiver combo exclusive use. However some of the receiver makers have come up with a way of recognizing some unique characteristics of each transmitter. This can actually prevent a shoot down on 72 MHz. But on 2.4 GHz the ID is part of the design.
It is unlikely there is a specific number limit on the Futaba set. Since it is constantly changing AND the signal has an ID, Futaba does not see a frequency as being owned. All frequencies/channels can be used by anyone at any time with no interference.
This would be similar to millions of computers on the same internet. Each computer has a unique IP address so that all the packets can travel the internet and be delivered to the right computer. The others will ignore packets not addressed to them.
Spektrum, on the other hand, does create a hard link to a specific pair of frequnecies/channels, so they say they can have 40 radios up at once. That is 40 Spektrum radios. The Futabas will be ignored and the Futabas will ignore the Spektrums.
I really don't see an issue here. Of course time will tell, but from a logic point of view there should be no conflict.
And, while 40 might seem like a limit, you would have to have 40 Spektrums. Even at a large event you could have 40 spektrums, 60 72 Mz and 100 futabas and 6 on 72 MHz and 10 on 50 MHz have no conflicts. That is 216 planes in the air at once, or 216 pilots each with a transmitter in his hand.
So it is all a non-issue.
Can you imagine 100 planes in the air at once? Cool!
In addition, if they both happen to be on the same frequency at the same time, which could easily happen, it won't matter because the unique ID will tell each receiver which signal to listen to and which commands to excecute. Since we have no such ID in the 72 MHz band, we have to give each transmitter receiver combo exclusive use. However some of the receiver makers have come up with a way of recognizing some unique characteristics of each transmitter. This can actually prevent a shoot down on 72 MHz. But on 2.4 GHz the ID is part of the design.
It is unlikely there is a specific number limit on the Futaba set. Since it is constantly changing AND the signal has an ID, Futaba does not see a frequency as being owned. All frequencies/channels can be used by anyone at any time with no interference.
This would be similar to millions of computers on the same internet. Each computer has a unique IP address so that all the packets can travel the internet and be delivered to the right computer. The others will ignore packets not addressed to them.
Spektrum, on the other hand, does create a hard link to a specific pair of frequnecies/channels, so they say they can have 40 radios up at once. That is 40 Spektrum radios. The Futabas will be ignored and the Futabas will ignore the Spektrums.
I really don't see an issue here. Of course time will tell, but from a logic point of view there should be no conflict.
And, while 40 might seem like a limit, you would have to have 40 Spektrums. Even at a large event you could have 40 spektrums, 60 72 Mz and 100 futabas and 6 on 72 MHz and 10 on 50 MHz have no conflicts. That is 216 planes in the air at once, or 216 pilots each with a transmitter in his hand.
So it is all a non-issue.
Can you imagine 100 planes in the air at once? Cool!
#71
My Feedback: (10)
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
ORIGINAL: nonstoprc
So which scheme is better: Futaba's FHSS or Spektrum's DSSS?
Intuitively, hopping can lead to collision and hence to hopping more. The end result is that the response time on the receiver side can become slow when the frequency is crowded.
Am I right?
--qc
So which scheme is better: Futaba's FHSS or Spektrum's DSSS?
Intuitively, hopping can lead to collision and hence to hopping more. The end result is that the response time on the receiver side can become slow when the frequency is crowded.
Am I right?
--qc
Imagine a FHSS system like this- Your tx and rx would randomly use one of the 72MHz channels that are available for a short duration. Out of CH 11 through 60, they're moving around in sync very quickly and in a psuedo-random method. The more systems operating concurrently, the higher probability of collisions.
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: goodlettsville,
TN
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
It is unlikely there is a specific number limit on the Futaba set.
#73
My Feedback: (22)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sun City West, AZ
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
I remember the horrible results I had with the first 14MZ G-3 receivers that were available. Don’t count on me to run right out and buy a Futaba 2.4GHZ
#74
My Feedback: (90)
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
The co-existence of Spektrum and Futaba 2.4Ghz radios operating at same time probably is a difference story, depending on whether the two technologies share the bandwidth (83.5 mhz in total).
If sharing is true, then if there are 40 Specktrum radios operating, then all bandwidth are taken (the 2.4Ghz has a bandwidth of 83.5Mhz). A futaba specktrum receiver simply can not receive a signal dedicating to it, because which ever channel it hops to, the channel is "jammed" by the signal from one of the Spektrum radio. This is true regardless how Futaba FHSS divides the 2.4Ghz band.
Reversely, if the entire 2.4ghz band is taken by Futaba radios at the moment, then because each does the hopping, a SpeKtrum radio will not be able to get a clear channel.
So the bottom line is that FHSS and DSSS should not share the 2.4ghz bandwidth.
If sharing is true, then if there are 40 Specktrum radios operating, then all bandwidth are taken (the 2.4Ghz has a bandwidth of 83.5Mhz). A futaba specktrum receiver simply can not receive a signal dedicating to it, because which ever channel it hops to, the channel is "jammed" by the signal from one of the Spektrum radio. This is true regardless how Futaba FHSS divides the 2.4Ghz band.
Reversely, if the entire 2.4ghz band is taken by Futaba radios at the moment, then because each does the hopping, a SpeKtrum radio will not be able to get a clear channel.
So the bottom line is that FHSS and DSSS should not share the 2.4ghz bandwidth.
#75
My Feedback: (42)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Randolph,
NJ
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Futaba 2.4ghz 6ch spektrum
I'm not going to have an endless argument with you about this. However, a collision occurs when two or more transmitting sources attempt to send on the same channel at the same time. It can happen, it does happen, even if only briefly and on very infrequent occasions. The GUID enters into the picture when information is clearly received or at least when it's received with enough intact for error correction schemes to work. A receiver can't event see a GUID being transmitted if it just happens to be interfered with. I invite you to take your own advice and find out just exactly how it does work, then maybe this will make more sense to you. Tossing insults just because you aren't aware of how some scenarios can occur isn't all that productive.
Anyway, the real point is this. As I already said, collisions should be rare and uneventful in ordinary use. That doesn't sound too alarming, does it? I am suggesting that the manufacturers get together and test for worst case uses, where a large number of transmitters may be in simultaneous use. The reason for this seems straightforward. If it can be proven that there is no limit (other than the max available channels) to the number or mix ratio of one brand to another, then that's great. However, if it turns out that when there are X Spektrums and Y FASST systems on and there is an observable slowdown in response or possibly a loss of control here and there, then event directors who run large events would benefit from having that information. Are you opposed to that?
Anyway, the real point is this. As I already said, collisions should be rare and uneventful in ordinary use. That doesn't sound too alarming, does it? I am suggesting that the manufacturers get together and test for worst case uses, where a large number of transmitters may be in simultaneous use. The reason for this seems straightforward. If it can be proven that there is no limit (other than the max available channels) to the number or mix ratio of one brand to another, then that's great. However, if it turns out that when there are X Spektrums and Y FASST systems on and there is an observable slowdown in response or possibly a loss of control here and there, then event directors who run large events would benefit from having that information. Are you opposed to that?